نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه
2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطۀ رفتار مربیگری با انسجام تیمی و کارایی مشارکتی بازیکنان زن لیگ برتر هاکی ایران به‌شکل توصیفی ـ پیمایشی انجام شده است. جامعۀآماری پژوهش راکلیةبازیکنان زن ششمین دورۀ لیگ برتر هاکی ایران تشکیل دادند (130 نفر) که ازاینتعداد، 90نفر به‌صورت داوطلبانه در پژوهش شرکت کردند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که رابطۀ مثبت و معناداری بین رفتارهای مربیگری تقویت، آموزش فنی اقتضایی، آموزش فنی عمومی و سازماندهی با انسجام تیمی وجود دارد؛ اما، بین آموزش فنی تنبیهی و تنبیه با انسجام تیمی، رابطۀ منفی و معناداری مشاهده می‌شود. علاوه‌براین، بین رفتارهای آموزش فنی اقتضایی اشتباه، تشویق عمومی، آموزش فنی عمومی، تقویت، روابط عمومی و حفظ کنترل با کارایی مشارکتی، رابطۀ مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد؛ در‌حالی‌که رابطۀ میان رفتارهای تشویق اقتضایی مشروط به اشتباهو سازماندهی با کارایی مشارکتی، منفی و معنادار می‌باشد. بین کارایی مشارکتی با انسجام تیمی نیز ارتباط معناداری مشاهده می‌شود. به‌طورکلی، می‌توان گفت مربیان هاکی بانوان جهت ارتقای انسجام و کارایی بازیکنان می‌توانند رفتارهای مربیگری ذکر‌شده را در تیم‌های خود به‌کار گیرند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Association of Coaching Behavior with Group Cohesion and Collective Efficacy of Female Players in Iranian Hockey Proffesional League
نویسندگان [English]
- Shirin Zardoshtian 1
- Shahrzad Khazaee 2
1 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Razi University
2 M. Sc, of Sport Management, Razi University
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of coaching behavior with group cohesion and collective efficacy of female players in Iranian hockey professional league. The research method is descriptive–survey. The statistical population included female hockey players of the sixth Premier League (n = 130), 90 of whom voluntarily participated in the study and finally 70 questionnaires were correctly analyzed. We used CBQ (Martin and Barnes, 1999), GEQ (Caron et al. 1985) and CEQ (Fletz and Lirch, 1998). Questionnaires validity was approved by sport management specialists (10 people), and Cronbach's alpha coefficients for their reliability were calculated as 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, respectively. Descriptive statistics (mean standard deviation) and inferential statistics (k-s, multiple regressions) were used. There was a significant positive relationship between coaching behaviors (reinforcement, contingency technical training, general technical training, organizing) and group cohesion, while a significant negative relationship was observed between coaching behaviors (punitive technical education, punishment) and group cohesion. There also was a significant positive relationship between coaching behaviors (mistake contingency technical education, general encouragement, general technical training, reinforcement, public relations, keeping control) and collective efficacy, whereas the relationship between coaching behaviors (mistake contingency encouragement and organizing) and collective efficacy was significantly negative. Finally, there was a significant positive relationship between collective efficacies and group cohesion. Then, it's concluded that female hockey coaches could benefit from these coaching behaviors to improve their teams’ cohesion and collective efficacy.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Coaching Behavior
- Group Cohesion
- Collective Efficacy
- Female Hockey Players
- Aubke, F., & Wober, K. (2014). Knowledge sharing in revenue management teams: Antecedents and consequences of group cohesion. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 149-57.
- Ballesteros, R. F., Nicolas, J., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2002). Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1, 107-25.
- Basmi, M., Torkfar, A., & Azadfada, Sh. (2015). The relationship between servant leadership style with cohesion country of women's sitting volleyball championship team in Iran. Journal of Sport Management and Action Behavior, 21, 139-48. (Persian).
- Carron, A., Bravely, L., & Widmeyer, W. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport group. In J. L. Duma (Ed.), Advancements in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Morgantown.
- Carron, A., Hausenblas, H., & Eys, M. (1998). Group dynamics in sport Morgantown, WV, fitness information technologic.
- Casey, M., & Martens, M. L. (2009). Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion–performance literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 223-46.
- Chung, M., Embi, M. Z., & Fauzee, O. (2011). The influence of coach leadership style towards cohesiveness among high school team sports athletes. Education and Development Conference. Bangkok, Thailand.
- Farneti, M. (2008). The perceptions of leadership style of division III head basketball coaches and effect on the perceived cohesion of the team.
- Fransen, K., Vanbeselaere, N., Exadaktylos, V., Vande Broek, G., De Cuyper, B., Berckmans, D., Ceux, T., De Backer, M., & Boen, F. (2012). Yes, we can!: Perceptions of collective efficacy sources in volleyball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 7, 641-9
- Hamidi, M., Memari, Z., & Jafarabadi, M. A. (2012). The dimensions and criteria for the selection of Iranian national coaches. Sport Management and Development, 1(1), 55-74. (Persian).
- Heuze, J. P., Raimbault, N., & Fontayne, P. (2006). Relationship between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects. Journal of Sports Science, 24, 59-68.
- Julie, S., Todd, L., & Gordon, A. (2008). A season-long team building intervention: Examining the effect of team goal setting on cohesion. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2.
- Murray, N. P. (2006). The differential effect of team cohesion and leadership behavior in high school sports. Individual Differences Research, 4, 216-25.
- Nazarian Madovani, A., & Mpkhtari Dinani, M. (2014). Preferences coaching behavior Iranian volleyball players. Sport Management Studies, 25, 39-52. (Persian).
- Nazarian Madovani, A., Tondnevis, F., & Mozafari, A. A. (2011). The effect of coaching behaviors on coaching efficacy and team dynamic of volleyball Pro-League Players in Iran (2009). Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 2, 11-29. (Persian).
- Philippe, R., Sagar, S., Huguet, S., Paquet, Y., & Jowett, S. (2011). From teacher to friend: The evolving nature of the coach-athlete relationship. Int. J. Sport Psychol, 42, 1-23.
- Ramezan Nejad, R., & Misagh Hoseini, K. (2010). The relationship between leadership Styles with team cohesion of Football Professional League Club in Iran. Olympic Journal, 1. (Persian).
- Rhind, D. J. A., Jowett, S., & Tang, S. X. (2012). A comparison of athlete's perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship in team and individual sports. Publication: Journal of Sport Behavior.
- Shamsai, N., Khani, N., & Yousefi, B. (2009). The relationship between leadership behavior of coaches with group cohesion and performance of junior football teams in the Premier League (1385). Research on Sport Science, 22, 131-51. (Persian).
- Spink, K. S. (1990). Group cohesion and collective efficacy in volleyball teams. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 301-11.
- Staples, S., & Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and verticalness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information Systems Journal, 18, 617-40.
- Stephen, J., Zaccaro, A. L., & Rittman, M. A. (2001). Leadership in sport. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451–83.
- Vahdani, M., Moharramzadeh, M., Aghaei, A., & Hoseinpoor, E. (2012). The relationship between coaches’ leadership styles and group cohesion in selected student teams in urmia city. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 49-64. (Persian).
- Vincer, D., & Loughead, T. M. (2010). The relationship among athlete leadership behaviors and cohesion in team sports. Sport Psychologist, 24(4), 448-67.
- Widmeyer, W., Brawely, L., & Carron, A. (2002). Group dynamics in sport. In. T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology. 285-308.
- Yaghobi, A., & Forghani Ozrudi, M. B. (2015). The relationship between leadership and responsibility in the executive office of physical education in Tehran city. Sport Management Studies, 28, 151-66. (Persian).
- Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. In J. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment. 305-28.
)