مدل تبیین موانع و پیشران­های توسعۀ اجتماعی در برنامه­های سازمان­های ورزش برای توسعه و صلح (SDP)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استاد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدل تبیین موانع و پیشران­های توسعه اجتماعی در برنامه­های سازمان­های ورزش برای توسعه و صلح (SDP) بود. این تحقیق با روش تحقیق کیفی و با ماهیت اکتشافی-بنیادی انجام شد. از طریق روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمندِ معیارمحور و براساس مصاحبه‌های عمیق، داده‌های تحقیق جمع‌آوری شد. مشارکت­کنندگان (جامعه) در پژوهش، جمعی از خبرگان شامل اساتید دانشگاه در حوزه علوم ورزشی، علوم اجتماعی و رفتاری، اقتصاد و توسعه و کارشناسان خبره کمیسیون ملی یونسکو ایران و کارشناسان خبره کمیته ملی المپیک و مدیران ارشد معاونت تربیت‌بدنی و سلامت وزارت آموزش و پرورش و وزارت علوم و مدیران ارشد و کارشناسان خبره وزارت ورزش و جوانانی که آشنایی کامل با مباحث توسعه و به‌ویژه توسعه اجتماعی از طریق ورزش داشتند، بودند (تعداد نمونه درمجموع 19 نفر). داده­ها براساس نظریه داده‌بنیاد و با رویکرد کلاسیک داده‌ها (رویکرد گلیزری) و استفاده از نرم‌افزار مکس‌کیودا، کدگذاری و تجزیه‌وتحلیل شدند. مطابق نتایج پژوهش، مدل توسعه اجتماعی مبتنی بر سه مقوله اصلی تعریف شد. مقوله محوری توسعه اجتماعی از طریق ورزش شامل مقوله­های فرعی مسئولیت جمعی اجتماعی، صلح پایدار، بهبود کیفیت ارتباطات اجتماعی، تغییرات اجتماعی-ورزشی برنامه­ریزی­شده، برابری و عدالت، یکپارچگی و انسجام اجتماعی، و بهزیستی فردی و جمعی بود. همچنین تحلیل داده­ها نشان داد، موانع یا محدودیت­های توسعه اجتماعی از طریق ورزش از ترکیب محدودیت منابع، بدبینی به ورزش، تعارض بین سازمانی، خلأ دانش، اشتباهات برنامه‌‌ریزی، مسائل مدیریتی، مسائل قانونی، مسائل اجرایی، تبعیض جنسیتی، مسائل سیاسی، مسائل فرهنگی-اجتماعی و مشکلات اقتصادی ایجاد شده است. درمقابل، پیشران­ها تلفیقی از شایسته‌گزینی، شبکه­سازی، برنامه­ راهبردی، رهبری اشتراکی، جریان­سازی، آگاهی ­بخشی و آموزش، فرهنگ‌سازی، مهندسی مجدد و حمایت بود. با توجه به نتایج تحقیق پیشنهاد می­شود، شبکه­ای منسجم از سازمان­ها و نهادهای مرتبط با توسعه، به‌ویژه توسعه اجتماعی از طریق ورزش با رویکرد رهبری اشتراکی تشکیل شود تا بتوان مداخلات برنامه‌ریزی‌شده ورزشی-اجتماعی را با سیاستی منسجم پیش برد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The Model for Explaining Obstacles and Drivers of Social Development in the Programs of Sports Organizations for Development and Peace (SDP)

نویسندگان English

  • Saeed Jafari 1
  • Seyed Nasrollah Sajadi 2
  • Ebrahim Alidoust Ghahfarokhi 3
1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Sports Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Background and Purpose
One of the core principles of Olympism and the objectives enshrined in the Olympic Charter is to place sport at the service of balanced human development, aiming to foster a peaceful society grounded in the preservation of human dignity. Sport functions as a powerful educational tool that not only promotes cognitive development but also strengthens social cohesion by teaching and reinforcing positive social behaviors. This dual role of sport—as both an educational medium and a social integrator—is widely recognized in international frameworks such as the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) initiatives on Development through Sport. Beyond its educational and social functions, sport has the capacity to address emerging global social and economic demands, offering a strategic platform for investment that can ensure sustainable social and economic progress over the long term (Di Palma, Tafuri, Ascione, & Raiola, 2018).
Purposeful and intelligent utilization of sport can drive positive changes in public health and socialization across all age groups. This is particularly relevant through the social inclusion of marginalized populations, economic and social empowerment of disadvantaged communities, and the expansion of intercultural relations and conflict resolution. Collectively, these outcomes define sustainable development through sport (Ghorbani, Safari Jafarloo, & Esmaeili, 2020). These themes, along with other social variables that act as connective tissue within local communities, underpin the broader concept of social development. Sport for Development and Peace (SDP) organizations and policy frameworks exemplify how sport can be leveraged to achieve sustainable development goals (Hylton & Bramham, 2008).
Despite this recognition, the mechanisms through which social development is realized via sport, as well as the barriers and facilitators encountered by sports organizations dedicated to development and peace, remain underexplored, particularly in local contexts. This study aimed to elucidate the obstacles and drivers influencing the dimensions of social development through sport. Specifically, it sought to answer how social development is realized via sport and to identify the barriers and facilitators within the programs of sports organizations dedicated to development and peace.
 
Materials and Methods
This research employed an exploratory, interpretive paradigm with an inductive approach to advance understanding of social development through sport. The methodology was grounded in the classical grounded theory approach (Glaserian), which prioritizes the description and explanation of phenomena without imposing preconceived theoretical frameworks. Data collection and analysis occurred simultaneously through in-depth interviews, detailed note-taking, annotation, open and selective coding, and iterative theory development.
Participants included a purposive, criteria-based sample of nineteen experts drawn from diverse but relevant fields. These included university professors specializing in sports sciences, social and behavioral sciences, economics, and development studies. Additionally, specialists from the UNESCO National Commission of Iran, experts from the National Olympic Committee, and senior managers from the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Science, and Ministry of Sports and Youth were included. All participants possessed substantial expertise in development issues, particularly social development through sport, ensuring rich and authoritative data.
The data collection process involved semi-structured interviews that allowed participants to share their experiences, perceptions, and insights regarding the role of sport in social development, the challenges faced, and the enabling factors. The iterative coding process enabled the emergence of a grounded theory that captures the complex interplay of factors shaping social development through sport.
 
Findings
The resulting grounded theory posits that the strategies employed by sports organizations for development and peace yield social development when these organizations implement planned socio-sportive changes. However, such changes encounter significant obstacles that must be addressed to optimize impact.
Social development through sport manifests across seven interconnected domains. These are collective social responsibility, sustainable peace, planned social-sport interventions, improved quality of social communication, equality and justice, social integration and cohesion, and individual and collective well-being. Each domain reflects a vital aspect of how sport contributes to the social fabric and the holistic development of communities.
The study identified twelve key obstacles that impede the realization of social development through sport. These include resource limitations, skepticism toward sport as a development tool, inter-organizational conflict, knowledge gaps, planning errors, management challenges, legal and executive issues, gender discrimination, political and socio-cultural barriers, and economic problems at both national and regional levels. These barriers operate at multiple levels and interact dynamically, often compounding each other and limiting the effectiveness of SDP programs.
Conversely, the main drivers facilitating social development through sport were identified as merit-based selection, networking, strategic planning, shared leadership, process streamlining, awareness and training, culture-building, reengineering, and institutional support. These drivers enhance the capacity of sports organizations to design and implement impactful programs, foster collaboration, and sustain positive social change.
The interaction between these obstacles and drivers is complex and dynamic. Barriers tend to diminish both the quantity and quality of organizational initiatives, while drivers enhance program outcomes and facilitate the realization of social development through sport. The balance between these forces determines the overall effectiveness of SDP efforts.
 
Conclusion
Sports events and programs should actively contribute to social and civic development. Social capital not only supports the growth of sport but is also reinforced by widespread societal engagement in sport, strengthening facets of social capital such as harmony, solidarity, resilience, civic participation, and trust. These factors collectively reflect the social and psychological health of a society.
Herasimovich and Alzua-Sorzabal (2021) describe sport for development and peace as a domain where sport—including non-competitive physical activities—serves broader social and peacebuilding goals. This study underscores the importance of strategic planning and ecosystem-wide cooperation in advancing social development through sport.
Regular, functionally oriented organizational approaches and comprehensive stakeholder collaboration are essential for progress. This requires commitment from governmental bodies, sports organizations, educational institutions, civil society, and international partners to create enabling environments for sport to fulfill its social development potential.
 Acknowledgments
We extend our sincere gratitude to the National Olympic Committee of the Islamic Republic of Iran for their material and moral support of this research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Social Development
  • Sport for Development and Peace
  • Sustainable Development
  • Social Inclusion
  • Sports Organizations
  • Grounded Theory
  1. Amartya Kumar, S. (1999). Development as freedem (N. Naeeni, & M. Saeed, Trans). Tehran: Nashreney.
  2. Amiri, M., & Norouzi Seyed Hossini, R. (2013). An introduction on qualitative research method in sport. Tehran: Publication of University of Tehran. (Persian)
  3. Anderson-Butcher, D. (2019). Youth sport as a vehicle for social development. Kinesiology Review, 8, 180-187.
  4. Badri Azarin, Y., Sedghi, S., Khodadadi, M. R., & Shajie, R. (2021). Factors affecting the environmentally sustainable development of sport events in Iran: A thematic analysis. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 20(53), 175-192. (Persian)
  5. Di Palma, D., Tafuri, D., Ascione, D., & Raiola, G. (2018). Social, tourism and educational development through Sport. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(1), 473 – 478.
  6. Elyasi, H., Rezaei-Soufi, M., farahani, A., & Ghasemi, H. (2022). Presenting the model of social capital development through volunteering in student sports. Research on Educational Sport, doi: 10.22089/res.2022.11848.2197. (Persian)
  7. Ghadimi, B., Khabiri, K., & Pouria, M. R. (2021). Relationship between social cohesion and sustainable development in badminton sport from the elite perspective. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 19(50), 95-116. (Persian)
  8. Ghorbani, M. H., Safari Jafarloo, H. R., & Esmaeili, M. R. (2020). Sustainable development through sport: Barriers and strategies. Sport Management Studies, 12(60), 83-102. (Persian)
  9. Giulianotti, R., Coalter, F., Collison, H., & Darnell, S.C. (2019). Rethinking sportland: A new research agenda for the sport for development and peace sector. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 43(6), 411–437.
  10. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  11. Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  12. Herasimovich, V., & Alzua-Sorzabal, A. (2021). Communication network analysis to advance mapping ‘Sport for Development and Peace’ complexity: Cohesion and leadership. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 56(2), 170–193.
  13. Hojabri, K., Ramzaninejad, R., & Abedinzadeh, R. (2019). Sustainable development through sport: An analysis of the 2030 agenda. Paper presented at the First National Congress on Strategic Management in Sport, Gilan University. (Persian)
  14. https://www.olympic.org/development-through-sport
  15. Hylton, K., & Bramham, P. (2008). Sports development: Policy, process and practice (2nd). USA and Canada: Routledge.  
  16. Ian, J., Lorraine, B., & Immy, H. (2012). Qualitative research in sport and physical activity (R. Norouzi Seyed Hosseini, Trans). Tehran: Hatmi Publication. (Persian)
  17. Jamieson, K.M., & Smith, M. (2020). Fundamentals of sociology of sport and physical activity (R. Norouzi Seyed Hosseini, Trans). Tehran: Hatmi Publication. (Persian)
  18. Kang, S., & Svensson, P.G (2019). Shared leadership in sport for development and peace: A conceptual framework of antecedents and outcomes. Sport Management Review, 22, 464-476.
  19. Kang, S., & Svensson, P.G (2019). Shared leadership in sport for development and peace: A conceptual framework of antecedents and outcomes. Sport Management Review, 22, 464-476.
  20. Keshkar, S., & Ghasemi, H. (2020). Consistency of national policy and legislation with the sport organizations and mass media performance in women's sports development in Iran. Sport Management Studies, 12(62), 111-134. (Persian)
  21. Khosravian Champiri, Y., Jalali Farahani, M., Alidoost Ghahfarokhi, E., & Jafari, S. (2021). The Identification and Prioritization of the Sustainable Development Indicators of Championship and Model Presentation. Sport Management Studies, 13(69), 33-64. (Persian)
  22. Lindsey, L., Chapman, T., & Dudfield, O. (2020) Configuring relationships between state and non-state actors: a new conceptual approach for sport and development. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 12(1), 127-146.
  23. Midgley, J. (2019). Social development: Theory & practice (S. A. Firoozabadi, & H. Dabaghi, Trans). Tehran: Elmi- Farhangi Publishing Co.
  24. Mohammadamini, S., Ahmadi, S., & Solymani, M. (2021). Designing a model for sustainable development in women's sport of Iran. Research on Educational Sport, 9(24), 213-240. (Persian)
  25. Nasiri Khozani, M, Arufzad, Sh, & Nadi, MA. (2020). Developing the sustainable development model of student sport participation in Iran. Sport Sciences Quarterly, 12(38), 82-105. (Persian)
  26. Nedrveen Pieterse, J. (2016). Development theory (A. Mohammadi, Trans). Tehran: Golazinpub.
  27. Rosso, E. G. F.M., McGrath, R., Immink, M. A., & May, E. (2016). Sport for development (S4D) as ‘core university business’? Modelling university participation in sport-based social development, Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 7(1(, 77-90.
  28. Saeidi, K. K., Ghadimi, B., Khabiri, K., & Aslan Khani, M. A. (2021). Role of modern Olympic sports approaches in the development of international peace and friendship. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 20(51), 217-238. (Persian)
  29. Schiink, R. J., & Hanraman, E. (2011). Sport for development, peace, and social justice (S. M. Aaghapour, M. Sharifi Moghaddam, & Z. Aaghaee, Trans). Tehran: Elmi.
  30. Schulenkorf, N. (2017). Managing sport-for-development: Reflections and Sport Management Review, 20(3), 243-251.
  31. Sherry, E., Osborne, A., & Nicholson, M. (2016). Images of sports women: A review. Sex Roles, 74(7-8), 299-309.
  32. Tavakol, M., Fahim, H., Peymanizad, H., & Esmaeilzadeh Ghandehari, M. R. (2022). Analysis and psychometrics of tools for measuring the development ofsocial capital through sport. Sport Sciences Quarterly, 14(45), 81-118. (Persian)
  33. Tekin, Y. (2019). Social development through sports. Paper presented at the 17th International Sport Sciences Congress, Ankara.
  34. Welty Peachey, J., Cohen, A., Shin, N., & Fusaro B. (2018). Challenges and strategies of building and sustaining inter-organizational partnerships in sport for development and peace. Sport Management Review, 21, 160–175.
دوره 16، شماره 88
بهمن و اسفند 1403
صفحه 17-42

  • تاریخ دریافت 15 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 23 مرداد 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 05 شهریور 1402