نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه آزاد، بروجرد، ایران

2 استادیار دانشگاه رازی ، کرمانشاه، گروه مدیریت ورزشی

3 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی ، دانشگاه شهید باهنر، کرمان، ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری عوامل مؤثر بر تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی بازیکنان فوتبال بود. روش این پژوهش آمیخته و طرح آن اکتشافی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را بازیکنان لیگ‌برتر فوتبال مردان و زنان تشکیل می‌دادند که به‌صورت هدفمند و بر مبنای اشباع نظری 15 نفر از آنها انتخاب شدند. جهت گردآوری داده‌ها در مطالعه کیفی از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته و برای گردآوری اطلاعات در مطالعه کمی از پرسشنامه استفاده شد. جهت بررسی ممیزی پژوهش از شاخص‌های اعتبار، انتقال، قابلیت اعتماد و تأییدپذیری و جهت تحلیل داده‌های مطالعه کیفی از کدگذاری و مطالعه کمی از روش تحلیل ساختاری تفسیری (ISM) و نرم‌افزار ISM software استفاده شد. در نتیجۀ تحلیل داده‌های کیفی 74 مفهوم نهایی، 14 مقولۀ فرعی و پنج مقوله اصلی مؤثر بر تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی تشخیص داده شد. در نتیجۀ تحلیل داده‌های کمی مشخص شد عوامل مؤثر بر تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی در سطح مقولات فرعی از چهار لایه تشکیل شده است و در این بین محیط سازمان، محیط حرفه، محیط زندگی، محیط قانونی و ارزش‌های بنیادین جزء بنیادین‌ترین لایه‌ بودند. این نتیجه نشان می‌دهد برای حرکت در مسیر پیچیدۀ تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی بازیکنان فوتبال در ابتدای مسیر بایستی ظرفیت سازمانی، حرفه، زندگی، قانونی و ارزش‌های بنیادی مورد نیاز این پدیده ایجاد شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Interpretive structural modeling of factors affecting ethical decision-making of soccer players

نویسندگان [English]

  • ayoub sangsefide 1
  • keivan shabani moghaddam 2
  • esmaeil sharifian 3

1 PhD student in Sports Management, Faculty of Physical Education, Azad University, Borujerd, Iran

2 Assistant Professor Razi University, Kermanshah, Department of Sport Management

3 Associate Professor of Sports Management, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim of this research was to provide interpretive structural modeling of factors affecting the moral decision making of soccer players. The method of this research was mixed and its design was exploratory. The statistical population of this study consisted of men's and women's top league football players, 15 of whom were selected purposefully and based on theoretical saturation. A semi-structured interview was used to collect data in a qualitative study, and a questionnaire was used to collect information in a quantitative study. In order to check the audit of the research, the indicators of credibility, transferability, reliability and verifiability were used, and to analyze the data of the qualitative study, coding was used, and the interpretive structural analysis method (ISM) and ISM software were used for the quantitative study. As a result of qualitative data analysis, 74 final concepts, 14 sub-categories and five main categories affecting ethical decision-making were identified. As a result of the quantitative data analysis, it was found that the factors affecting ethical decision-making at the level of sub-categories consist of four layers, and among these, the organization environment, the professional environment, the living environment, the legal environment, and the fundamental values are among the most fundamental. They were layered. This result shows that in order to move in the complex path of ethical decision-making of football players, at the beginning of the path, the organizational, professional, life, legal and fundamental values needed by this phenomenon must be created

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • ethical decision-making
  • unethical behaviors
  • football sport
  • interpretive structural modeling
  1. Anderson, J. E. (2019). Decreasing unethical behaviors in financial institutions(Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
  2. Arrami, N., & QingXiang, Y. (2022). Impact of Ethical Training on Auditors’ Ethical Decision Making in Morocco. Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldiș Arad, Seria Științe Economic, 32(2), 41-64.
  3. Berne, E. (2016). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. Pickle Partners Publishing.
  4. Eyo, N. A., & Hasan, N. A. M. (2021). The Influence of Self-Efficacy in Ethical Consideration and Decision-Making Processes. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 23(3), 25-45.
  5. Gentile, A., Milovanovic, I., Pišot, S., Bianco, A., & Lavanco, G. (2022). Moral Disengagement in Youth Athletes: A Narrative Review. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology7(2), 1-13.
  6. Ghanbari, Vahid., Latifi, Maitham., Islambolchi, Alireza., and Asghari Sarem, Ali. (1400). Explaining the native pattern of ethical decision-making in people's organizations. Ethics in Science and Technology, Volume 16, Number 3, pp. 75-67.(in Persian)
  7. Good, M. C., & Schwepker Jr, C. H. (2022). Stop making excuses: reducing unethical behavior and improving performance and relationship quality. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 1-20.
  8. Gorane, S. J., & Kant, R. (2013). Modelling the SCM enablers: an integrated ISM‐fuzzy MICMAC approach.Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 25(2); 263-286.
  9. Guo, H., Liu, B., & Yang, Z. (2022). Machine Learning-Based Emotion Factor Analysis of Sport Fan Community. Security and Communication Networks, 2022.
  10. Guvendi, B., & Isim, A. T. (2019). Moral Disengagement Level of Team Athletes Depending on Unethical Behaviors They Perceived from Their Coaches. Journal of Education and Learning8(4), 83-92.
  11. Hosseinpour, Saeed, Khordiar, Sina, Khozin, Ali, and Mohammadi Nodeh, Fazel. (1400). Investigating the effect of mental health and perfectionism on the ethical decision making of accountants with the role of procrastination as a mediator. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, Year 6, Number 11, pp: 93-121.(in Persian)
  12. Hossein-zadeh, Amir., Abdi, Rasul., Pak-Maram, Asgar., and Rezaei, Nader. (1401). Ethical accounting decision making model. Ethics in Science and Technology, Volume 17, pp: 152-182.(in Persian)
  13. Karataş, E. Ö., & Karataş, Ö. (2022). Investigation of the Level of Susceptibility to Ethical Values of Sports High School Students. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 16(02), 390-390.
  14. Kavussanu, M., Yukhymenko-Lescroart, M. A., Elbe, A. M., & Hatzigeorgiadis, A. (2020). Integrating moral and achievement variables to predict doping likelihood in football: A cross-cultural investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 47, 101518.
  15. Kamli, F., Manochehri Nezhad, M., & Hakakzadeh, M. (2020). Designing an Ethical Decision-Making Model for Professional Football Referees in Iran. Sport Psychology Studies, 9(34), 235-258.
  16. Leong, L. W., Ho, T. C., Teo, P. C., & Choo, L. S. (2020, November). Factors Influencing Ethical Decision Making: A View Through Engineering Consultancy Firm in Malaysia. In 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA) (pp. 893-897). IEEE.
  17. Mandalizadeh, Zainab. (2019). Designing a model for the institutionalization of ethics in sports. Ethics in Science and Technology, Volume 15, Number 4, pp. 154-147.(in Persian)
  18. Manouchehri, J. (2021). The Consequences of Endorser’s Doping Scandal in Sport Marketing. Sport Management Studies, 13(66), 17-54. (In Persian).
  19. McManus, J. (2018). Hubris and unethical decision making: The tragedy of the uncommon. Journal of Business Ethics149(1), 169-185.
  20. Nguyen, L. A., Dellaportas, S., Vesty, G. M., Jandug, L., & Tsahuridu, E. (2021). The influence of organizational culture on corporate accountants' ethical judgment and ethical intention in Vietnam. Accounting, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(2); 325-354.
  21. Oboh, C. S., & Omolehinwa, E. O. (2022). Socio demographic variables and ethical decision-making: a survey of professional accountants in Nigeria. RAUSP Management Journal, 57, 131-148.
  22. Rainone, N. A., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., McIntosh, T. J., & Medeiros, K. E. (2021). The impact of happy and sad affective states on biases in ethical decision making. Ethics & Behavior, 31(4), 284-300.
  23. A., Sajjadi. S. N., & Rajabi. H., & Rayat. M. (2020). Ethical issues Iran sport media: Perceptions of professional football players. Sport Management Studies, 12(59), 37-52. (Persian).
  24. Safari Dolo, Mitra, Fahim Devin, Hassan, Peymanizad, Hossein, and Keshtidar, Mohammad. (1400). Identifying and explaining factors affecting the development of ethics in university sports. Research in educational sports, volume 9, number 23, pp: 234-209.(in Persian)
  25. Sturm, R. E. (2017). Decreasing unethical decisions: The role of morality-based individual differences. Journal of Business Ethics142(1), 37-57.
  26. Ünal, E., & Çeviker, A. (2022). The Ethical and Unethical Behaviors That Women Volleyball Players Observed on Their Coaches. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 16(02), 653-653.
  27. Watts, L. L., Medeiros, K. E., McIntosh, T. J., & Mulhearn, T. J. (2021). Ethics training for managers: Best practices and techniques. Routledge: New York.
  28. Wu, Y., Hu, J., & Li, W. (2022). The link between online gaming behaviour and unethical decision-making in emerging adults: the mediating roles of game cheating and moral disengagement. Behaviors & Information Technology, 1-14.