نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازاریابی و رسانه در ورزش، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

3 استادیار، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نیمه­تجربی تأثیر بازاریابی خیرخواهانه و تبلیغ بر تصمیم به خرید محصولات ورزشی انجام شد. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی بود و به­صورت نیمه­تجربی انجام گرفت. جامعۀ آماری دانشجویان رشتۀ تربیت­بدنی در محدودۀ سنی 25 تا 35 سال بودند که  40 نفر داوطلب از آن­ها (20 زن و 20 مرد) به­عنوان نمونۀ پژوهش انتخاب شدند. به­منظور تهیۀ ابزار پژوهش تصاویر متناسب با دو استراتژی خیرخواهانه و تبلیغ تهیه و روایی تصاویر به تأیید 10 نفر از متخصصان بازاریابی ورزشی رسید. از دستگاه الکتروآنسفالوگرافی Enobio، 20 کاناله برای ثبت امواج، پرسشنامه برای سنجش تصمیم به خرید و شکل­های خودارزیابی برای سنجش انگیختگی و لذت استفاده شد. با نگرش به نقش لوب فرونتال در توجه، موج آلفا و بتا در این ناحیه از مغز توسط کانال‌های F3، F4 و FZ بررسی شد. به­منظور استخراج امواج از داده‌های الکتروانسفالوگرافی کمّی از نرم‌افزار متلب b 2013 و  برای تجزیه ‌و تحلیل دادها با روش­های آمار توصیفی و آمار استنباطی شامل آزمون فریدمن و رگرسیون لجستیک دووجهی، از نرم‌افزاراس­پی­اس­اس نسخۀ 22 استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد میزان تغییرات امواج آلفا و بتا در راهبرد خیرخواهانه بیشتر از راهبرد تبلیغ بود و این راهبرد درگیری بیشتری در ناحیۀ فرونتال ایجاد کرد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد پاسخ­های عصبی-روان­شناختی درصد درخور توجهی از تصمیم به خرید مصرف­کننده را تبیین کردند؛ بنابراین بازاریابان و پژوهشگران می­توانند با رعایت این نتایج در راهبردهای ترویجی خود زمینۀ اثربخشی هرچه­بیشتر فعالیت­های ترویجی­شان را فراهم آورند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of charity and Advertising on Purchase Sports Products: Semi-experimental approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • ali ghaedi 1
  • behzad izadi 2
  • Mohammadreza Ghasemian 3

1 PhD Student in Sport Marketing and Media, University Of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Sport Management Group, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

3 Assistant professor, Faculty of physical education and sport sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of charity and advertising to purchase of sports products. The research in terms of purpose was an applied and In terms of the methodology was a Semi-experimental research. The statistical population of the study was physical education student 25-35 years old and the sample was 40 volunteers (20 men and 20 women). In order to provide research tool, images were adapted by two research strategies (charity and advertising). Validity of images was confirmed by 10 sports marketing experts. Enobio electroencephalography device, 20 channels, was used to record the waves. A questionnaire was used to measure purchase decision and self-assessment manikin were used to measure arousal. By considering the role of the frontal lobe in attention, the alpha and beta waves in this area of the brain were examined by F3, F4 and FZ channels. Data were analyzed by using of SPSS 22, Matlab 2013 b and descriptive statistics and inferential statistics including Friedman test and Binary logistic regression. The results showed that the changes of alpha and beta waves in the charity strategy were higher than the advertising fit. This strategy involves the brain in frontal lobe greater than the advertising strategy. Also Neurological psychological responses explain a significant percentage of consumer buying decisions. Therefore, marketers and researchers can use this finding in their promotion strategies to make their promotional activities more effectiveness.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Charity Marketing
  • Advertising
  • Neuromarketing
  • Pleasure
  • Arousal
  1. Adkins, S. (1999). Cause related marketing: Who cares wins. London: Routledge.
  2. Arabi, M., & Varzeshkar, M. (2003). Investigating effective communities to maintain and enhance loyalty, customers. Journal of Management Studies, 2(46), 32- 59. (in Persian).
  3. Babu, M. M., & Mohiuddin, M. (2008). Cause related marketing and its impact on the purchasing behavior of the customers of Bangladesh: An empirical study. American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), (5), 126-134.
  4. Bargh, J. A., Schwader, K. L., Hailey, S. E., Dyer, R. L., & Boothby, E. J. (2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 593-605.
  5. Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.
  6. Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 336-372.
  7. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental psychology (5th). Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
  8. Bigné, E., Currás-Pérez, R., & Aldás-Manzano, J. (2012). Dual nature of cause-brand fit: Influence on corporate social responsibility consumer perception. European Journal of Marketing, 46(3/4), 575-594.‏
  9. Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., & Sánchez-García, I. (2009). Brand credibility in cause-related marketing: the moderating role of consumer values. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(6), 437-447.
  10. Boksem, M. A. S., & Smidts, A. (2015). Brain responses to movie trailers predict individual preferences for movies and their population-wide commercial success. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 482–492.
  11. Braeutigam, S., Rose, S. P., Swithenby, S. J., & Ambler, T. (2004). The distributed neuronal systems supporting choice-making in real-life situations: differences between men and women when choosing groceries detected using magnetoencephalography. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20(1), 293-302.
  12. Bruce, A. S., Bruce, J. M., Black, W. R., Lepping, R. J., Henry, J. M., Cherry, J. B. C., ..., & Savage, C. R. (2012). Branding and a child’s brain: An fMRI study of neural responses to logos. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 118-122.
  13. Chark, R. (2018). Neuromarketing. Innovative Research Methodologies in Management, 179-198.‏
  14. Cook, E. W., Melamed, B. G., Cuthbert, B. N., McNeil, D. W., & Lang, P. J. (1988). Emotional imagery and the differential diagnosis of anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 734.‏
  15. Demetriou, M., Papasolomou, I., & Vrontis, D. (2010). Cause-related marketing: Building the corporate image while supporting worthwhile causes. Journal of Brand Management, 17(4), 266-278.
  16. Demos, J. N. (2005). Getting started with Neurofeedback. Available at: WW Norton & Company (Accessed: 20 July 2016). ‏
  17. Dergi, P. (2013). Neuromarketing, theory and practice. Tehran: Marketing Publications. (in Persian).
  18. Donovan, R. J., Rossiter, J. R., Marcoolyn, G., & Nesdale, A. (1994). Store atmosphere and purchasing behavior. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 283-294.‏
  19. Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: An environmental psychologyapproach. Journal of Retailing, 58(1), 34-57.
  20. Eser, Z., Isin, F. B., & Tolon, M. (2011). Perceptions of marketing academics, neurologists, and marketing professionals about neuromarketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(7-8), 854-868.
  21. Falk, E. B., O’Donnell, M. B., Tompson, S., Gonzalez, R., Cin, S. D., Strecher, V., …, & An, L. (2016). Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 204–214.
  22. Folse, J. A. G., Niedrich, R. W., & Grau, S. L. (2010). Cause-relating marketing: The effects of purchase quantity and firm donation amount on consumer inferences and participation intentions. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 295-309.‏
  23. Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (2013). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. London: Academic Press.
  24. Gordon, R. (2012). Re-thinking and re-tooling the social marketing mix. Australasian Marketing Journal, 20(2), 122-126.
  25. Guerreiro, J., Rita, P., & Trigueiros, D. (2015). Attention, emotions and cause-related marketing effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 49(11/12), 1728-1750.‏
  26. Ha, Y., & Lennon, S. J. (2010). Online visual merchandising (VMD) cues and consumer pleasure and arousal: Purchasing versus browsing situation. Psychology & Marketing, 27(2), 141-165.‏
  27. Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Ahadi, F., & Ghaderi Varkani, F. (2012). Internet advertising adoption: A structural equation model for Iranian SMEs. Internet Research, 22(4), 499-526.
  28. Hou, J., Du, L., & Li, J. (2008). Cause’s attributes influencing consumer’s purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 363–380.
  29. Koschate-Fischer, N., Huber, I. V., & Hoyer, W. D. (2016). When will price increases associated with company donations to charity be perceived as fair? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 608–626.
  30. Kuo, A., & Rice, D. H. (2015). The impact of perceptual congruence on the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 78-88.‏
  31. Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Hult, G. T. M. (2004). The impact of the alliance on the partners: A look at cause–brand alliances. Psychology & Marketing, 21(7), 509-531.‏
  32. Lam, Y. (2001). The effects of store environment on shopping behaviors: A critical review. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 190-197.
  33. Lin, L.-Y. (2011). the impact of advertising appeals and advertising spokespersons on advertising attitudes and purchase intentions. African Journal of Business Management, 5(21), 8446–8457.
  34. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  35. Melero, I., & Montaner, T. (2016). Cause-related marketing: An experimental study about how the product type and the perceived fit may influence the consumer response. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(3), 161-167.
  36. Morin, C. (2011). Neuromarketing: The new science of consumer behavior. Society, 48(2), 131-135.‏
  37. Movahedi, Y. (2018). Comparing the effect of brand advertising on the brainwave pattern of interested and non-interested consumers to brand. Neuroscience Journal, 3(4), 131- 142. (in Persian).
  38. Ohme, R., Reykowska, D., Wiener, D., & Choromanska, A. (2010). Application of frontal EEG asymmetry to advertising research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(5), 785-793.
  39. Puto, C. P., & Hoyer, R. W. (1990). Transformational advertising: Current state of the art. Emotion in advertising: Theoretical and practical explorations, 69-80.‏
  40. Ruff, C. C., & Huettel, S. A. (2014). Experimental methods in cognitive neuroscience. In Neuroeconomics (pp. 77-108). Academic Press.‏
  41. Shokouhian, F., & Tarekh, M. (2016). Investigating the brain's response to marketing motivations using electrical brain therapy. Pajouhesh Journal, 5, 252-262. (in Persian).
  42. Siuly, S., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2016). EEG signal analysis and classification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabilit Eng, 11, 141-4.‏
  43. Stark, C., & Berggren, J. (2010). Cause-related marketing, win-win-win? A qualitative study of the pink ribbon in Swedish partner companies´ CRM Campaign (Master´s thesis). Umea School of Business, Economics & Statistics, Handelshögskolan vid Umeå Universitet
  44. Suomala, J. (2018). Benefits of neuromarketing in the product/service innovation process and creative marketing campaign. In Innovative research methodologies in management (pp. 159-177). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  45. ‏Taghavian, A. (2012). Neuromarketing roundtable with neurologists: Clinical psychology and marketing specialists. Engineering Development Quarterly, 28, 46- 59. (in Persian).
  46. Taute, H. A., McQuitty, S., & Sautter, E. P. (2011). Emotional information management and responses to emotional appeals. Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 31-44.
  47. Telpaz, A., Webb, R., & Levy, D. J. (2015). Using EEG to predict consumers' future choices. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 511-529.‏
  48. Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., Reast, J., & van Popering, N. (2012). To do well by doing good: Improving corporate image through cause –related marketing. Journal of business ethics, 109(3), 259-274.
  49. Vecchiato, G., Babiloni, F., Astolfi, L., Toppi, J., Cherubino, P., Dai, J., …, & Wei, D. (2011). Enhance of theta EEG spectral activity related to the memorization of commercial advertisings in Chinese and Italian subjects. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), (Vol. 3, pp. 1491-1494). IEEE.‏
  50. Winterich, K. P., & Barone, M. J. (2011). Warm glow or cold, hard cash? Social identity effects on consumer choice for donation versus discount promotions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 855-868.‏
  51. Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think. Boston: Harvard Business School‏ ISBN 1- 57851-826-1.