مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی

پاسخ مصرف کنندگان محصولات ورزشی سودمند و لذت بخش به فروش سخت و نرم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار مدیریت بازاریابی ورزشی، گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه کردستان، کردستان، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازاریابی ورزشی، گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه کردستان، کردستان، ایران

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت ورزشی، گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده
هدف از تحقیق حاضر بررسی تاثیر جاذبه‌های فروش نرم و سخت بر نگرش نسبت به آگهی تبلیغاتی و قصدخرید محصولات ورزشی بود. جامعه‌ی آماری تحقیق، کلیه دانشجویان پسر کارشناسی و کارشناسی ارشد تربیت‌بدنی دانشگاه کردستان که از محصولات ورزشی استفاده می‌کردند، بودند که نمونه‌ی آماری در مجموع 180 نفر از دانشجویان انتخاب شد و از روش نمونه-گیری تصادفی ساده برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها استفاده شد. روش پژوهش، نیمه تجربی و از نوع طرح فاکتوریل 2*2 بود. به منظور اندازه‌گیری متغیرهای نگرش نسبت به آگهی تبلیغاتی و قصد‌خرید محصولات ورزشی از پرسشنامه، و برای تحلیل داده‌ها از روشهای آمار توصیفی (فراوانی، درصد، میانگین) و استنباطی (آنووا سه راهه) استفاده شد. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان داد هر دوی آگهی‌های تبلیغاتی فروش سخت و نرم بر نگرش نسبت به آگهی تبلیغاتی و قصد‌خرید محصولات تاثیرگذار است ولی تاثیر تبلیغات فروش نرم بیشتر است. همچنین نتایج نشان داد نوع محصول در این رابطه به عنوان تعدیل‌گر عمل می-کند. بگونه‌ای که شرکت‌کنندگان آگهی تبلیغاتی فروش سخت را برای محصول سودمند، و آگهی تبلیغاتی فروش نرم را برای محصول لذت‌بخش و تفریحی مناسب‌تر دانستند. بر این اساس، پیشنهاد می‌شود مدیران بازاریابی شرکت‌ها با توجه به نوع محصولی که ارائه می‌دهند، جاذبه تبلیغاتی خاص آن محصول را انتخاب کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The consumer's response of the utilitarian and hedonic sports products to sell-hard and soft-hard

نویسندگان English

  • sardar mohammadi 1
  • mojtaba Ghasemi 2
  • Abbas jahan Tab Nejad 3
1 Associate Professor of Sports Marketing Management, Department of Physical Education, Kurdistan University, Kurdistan, Iran
2 PhD Student in Sports Marketing Management, Department of Physical Education, Kurdistan University, Kurdistan, Iran
3 Master student of sports management, Department of Physical Education, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده English

The purpose of this study was to investigated the effect of soft and hard-sell appeals on the attitude toward advertising and the purchase intention of sports products. The statistical population of the study consisted of all undergraduate and postgraduate students of Physical Education in University of Kurdistan who used sports goods. A sample of 180 students was selected and a simple random sampling method was used for collecting data. The research method was semi experimental and 2 * 2 factorial design. In order to measure the variables of attitude toward advertising and purchase intention of sports products, a questionnaire was used, and descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean) and inferential statistics (Multiple ANOVA) were used for data analysis. The research findings showed that both advertising ads of hard-sell and soft-sell are influence on the attitude toward advertising and the purchase intention of products, but the effect of soft-sell advertising ad is greater. The results also showed that the product type acts as a moderator in this relationship. So that the participants known More suitable hard-sell ad for utilitarian product, and soft-sell ad for hedonic and recreational product. Based on this, it is suggested that the marketing managers of the companies choose the particular advertising appeals of the product, depending on the product type they offer.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Soft-sell
  • hard-sell
  • sports products
  • utilitarian product
  • hedonic product
  1. Akbari, M. (2015). Different impacts of advertising appeals on advertising attitude for high and low involvement products. Global Business Review, 16, 478-493.
  2. Botti, S., & McGill, A. L. (2010). The locus of choice: Personal causality and satisfaction with hedonic and utilitarian decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 1065-1078.
  3. Burton, R. (2017). The US Sport Industry. Zhang, J.J., Huang, R.H. and Nauright, J. (Ed.), Sport Business in Leading Economies (pp. 383-426). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. 383-426.
  4. Byun, J., & Jang, S. S. (2015). Effective destination advertising: Matching effect between advertising language and destination type. Tourism Management, 50, 31-40.
  5. De Veirman, M., Hudders, L., & Cauberghe, V. (2015). Facts versus feelings? The effectiveness of hard versus soft sell appeals in online advertising. In EMAC 2015.
  6. Drolet, A., & Aaker, J. (2002). Off‐target? Changing cognitive‐based attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(1), 59-68.
  7. Drolet, A., Williams, P., & Lau-Gesk, L. (2007). Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products. Marketing Letters, 18(4), 211-221.
  8. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Available at: https://philarchive.org/archive/FISBAI
  9. He, Q., & Qu, H. (2018). The impact of advertising appeals on purchase intention in social media environment: Analysis of intermediary effect based on brand attitude. Journal of Business Administration Research, 7(2), 17-32
  10. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132-140.
  11. Huertas, M. K. Z., & Campomar, M. C. (2009). Rational and emotional appeals in advertising of prescription medicines: Study of a slimming drug in Brazil. Innovative Marketing, 5(4), 80-88.
  12. Jang, W., Ko, Y. J., & Stepchenkova, S. (2014). The effects of message appeal on consumer attitude toward sporting events. International Journal of Sport Communication, 7(3), 337-356.
  13. Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 23-33.
  14. Keshari, P., & Jain, S. (2016). Effect of age and gender on consumer response to advertising appeals. Paradigm, 20(1), 69-82.
  15. Kronrod, A., & Danziger, S. (2013). “Wii will rock you!” The use and effect of figurative language in consumer reviews of hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 726-739.
  16. Lim, C., Lee, W. Y., & Pedersen, P. M. (2013). Investigating the moderating role of sport service type and personality on audiences' emotional responses to hedonic vs. cognitive advertisements. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 23(1), 55-71.
  17. Lin, L. Y. (2011). The impact of advertising appeals and advertising spokespersons on advertising attitudes and purchase intentions. African Journal of Business Management, 5(21), 8446-8457.
  18. Lin, Y. C., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, N. T. (2014). The Effect of Advertising using Advertising Appeals, Pictures and Product Categories. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 17(1), 71-96.
  19. Ling, K. C., Chai, L. T., & Piew, T. H. (2010). The effects of shopping orientations, online trust and prior online purchase experience toward customers’ online purchase intention. International Business Research, 3(3), 63-76.
  20. Lwin, M., Phau, I., Huang, Y. A., & Lim, A. (2014). Examining the moderating role of rational-versus emotional-focused websites: The case of boutique hotels. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 20(2), 95-109.
  21. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 48-65.
  22. MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 130-143.
  23. Mayer, N. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2010). “Think” versus “feel” framing effects in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 443-454.
  24. Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318-332.
  25. Naylor, G., Kleiser, S. B., Baker, J., & Yorkston, E. (2008). Using transformational appeals to enhance the retail experience. Journal of Retailing, 84(1), 49-57.
  26. Nikoumaram, H., & Sarabadani, M. (2012). The effect of soft-sell and hard-sell on consumers purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 12-26 (In Persian).
  27. Okazaki, S., Mueller, B., & Diehl, S. (2013). A multi-country examination of hard-sell and soft-sell advertising: comparing global consumer positioning in holistic-and analytic-thinking cultures. Journal of Advertising Research, 53(3), 258-272.
  28. Okazaki, S., Mueller, B., & Taylor, C. R. (2010). Measuring soft-sell versus hard-sell advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 5-20.
  29. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
  30. Puto, C. P., & Wells, W. D. (1984). Informational and transformational advertising: The differential effects of time. ACR North American Advances. Available at: https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/6323/volumes/v11/NA-11/
  31. Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2007). Reference groups and family influences in consumer behaviour. London: Prentice Hall.
  32. Sekaran, O. (2012). Research methods in management. Institute for management and planning of educational and research. Tehran. Available at: [https://www.adinehbook.com/gp/product/9643380440]. 22 Sep, 2013. (In Persian).
  33. Teichert, T., Hardeck, D., Liu, Y., & Trivedi, R. (2018). How to implement informational and emotional appeals in print advertisements: A framework for choosing ad appeals based on advertisers' objectives and targeted demographics. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(3), 363-379.
  34. Terlutter, R., Diehl, S., & Mueller, B. (2006). The GLOBE study: Applicability of a new typology of cultural dimensions for cross-cultural marketing and advertising research. In: Diehl S., Terlutter R. (eds), International advertising and communication. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5702-2_22. (pp. 419-438).
  35. Venkatraman, M. P., Marlino, D., Kardes, F. R., & Sklar, K. B. (1990). The interactive effects of message appeal and individual differences on information processing and persuasion. Psychology & Marketing, 7(2), 85-96.
  36. Wei, Y., Rickard, M., & Brown, C. (2015). Effects of consumer weight level and advertising appeals on consumer attitude toward food and advertisements. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 21(4), 426-441.
  37. Xu, A., Zheng, Q., Wu, J., Su, X., Zheng, M., & Zheng, Q. (2019). An Experiment Research on the Correlation between Advertising Appeal and Purchase Intention in Eco-Tourism Industry Based on Attitude toward Advertisement. Ekoloji, 28(107), 915-920.
  38. Young, C., Gillespie, B., & Otto, C. (2019). The Impact of Rational, Emotional, And Physiological Advertising Images On Purchase Intention: How TV Ads Influence Brand Memory. Journal of Advertising Research, 59(3), 329-341.
  39. Yang, K. C. (2004). Effects of consumer motives on search behavior using internet advertising. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 430-442.
  40. Zhang, H., Sun, J., Liu, F., & G. Knight, J. (2014). Be rational or be emotional: advertising appeals, service types and consumer responses. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2105-2126.
مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 13، شماره 65
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1400
صفحه 251-277

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 بهمن 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری 09 خرداد 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش 18 خرداد 1398

صفحه اصلی

اصول اخلاقی

ارسال مقاله

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما