نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه اصفهان

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه اصفهان

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، شناخت و ارزیابی موانع خصوصی‌سازی صنعت ورزش فوتبال در ایران با رویکرد منسجم آنالیز چندمعیاره و کپ‌لند براساس نظر خبرگان و آگاه‌نمودن سیاست‌گذاران ورزشی از نقاط قوت و ضعف موانع خصوصی‌سازی در صنعت ورزش فوتبال در ایران بود. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی بوده و به شیوۀ پیمایشی اجرا گردیده است. تجزیه‌و‌تحلیل داده‌ها نیز در دو سطح توصیفی و استنباطی انجام گرفت. در این پژوهش، در وهلۀ اول موانع خصوصی‌سازی صنعت ورزش فوتبال در ایران شناسایی شد و در ادامه، با استفاده از مدل‌های مختلف تصمیم‌گیری چند‌شاخصه رتبه‌بندی گردید. با توجه به این‌که نتایج حاصل از اجرای مدل‌های فوق در مواردی با یکدیگر همخوانی نداشت، برای رسیدن به یک اجماع کلی از رتبه‌بندی موانع پیش روی خصوصی‌سازی باشگاه‌های صنعت ورزش فوتبال در ایران، از تکنیک ادغامی با عنوان روش کپ‌لند استفاده گردید. نتایج رتبه‌بندی حاصل از تکنیک کپ‌لند نشان می‌دهد که سه مانع اصلی خصوصی‌سازی صنعت ورزش فوتبال در ایران به‌ترتیب عبارت هستند از: عدم برنامه‌ریزی مناسب جهت خصوصی‌سازی، عدم برخورداری صنعت ورزش فوتبال در ایران از حق پخش تلویزیونی و عدم ایجاد زیرساخت‌های مناسب جهت خصوصی‌سازی صنعت ورزش فوتبال در ایران؛ بنابراین، توجه به موانع موجود می‌تواند برای تحقق امر خصوصی‌سازی در صنعت ورزش فوتبال ایران بسیار مفید باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Prioritizing Barriers to the Privatization of Soccer Industry in Iran Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Copeland's Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohamad Soltanhoseini 1
  • Seyed Mohamad Javad Razavi 2
  • Mahdi Salimi 3

1 Associate Professor of Sport Management, University of Isfahan

2 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

3 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, University of Isfahan

چکیده [English]

This study aims to recognize and ultimately prioritize barriers to the privatization of soccer industry in Iran using the integrated approach of multi-criteria analysis and Copeland's method. This investigation is also based on the opinions of experts and seeks to inform sport policymakers about strengths and weaknesses of the privatization of soccer industry in Iran as well as the barriers to do so. This research is a survey-based study and follows a practical application. Both descriptive and inferential data analyses were conducted. In this study, barriers to the privatization of soccer industry in Iran were initially identified and then ranked using various models of multi-attribute decision making (MADM). As the results obtained from the above-mentioned models did not conform to each other in some cases, an integrated model called Copeland’s method was used to reach a general consensus in ranking obstacles to the privatization of soccer clubs in Iran. Ranking results obtained from Copeland’s method revealed that the three main barriers to the privatization of soccer industry in Iran were lack of proper planning for privatization, lack of television broadcasting right for soccer industry in Iran, and lack of appropriate infrastructure for privatization of soccer industry in this country. Therefore, paying attention to the existing obstacles can be very useful in the realization of the soccer industry privatization in Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Iran
  • Copeland’s Method
  • Privatization Barriers
  • Soccer
  1. Amiri, M., Nayyeri, Sh., Saffari, M., & Delbari Ragheb, F. (2014). Explanation and prioritization of barriers to privatization and private sector participation in sport development. Journal of Sport Management, 5(4), 83-106. (Persian).
  2. Amirtash, A. R., & Mozafari, A. A. (2014). Conditions and necessity of entering premier league’s professional football clubs into the stock market. Journal of Sport Management, 6(4), 399-419. (Persian).
  3. Asgharpor, M. J. (2014). Multiple attribute decision making. Tehran: Tehran University Publications. Edit14: 1-400. (Persian).
  4. Aslkoti, M. B. (2011). Identification barriers to the development of football in the Khozestan province from view sport society. (Unpublished master dissertation). Shahid Ghamran Ahvaz University, Physical Education College. (Persian).
  5. Azar, A., & Rajabzade, A. (2012). Applied decision making MADM approach. Tehran: Danesh Negah Publications, Edit6: 1-230. (Persian).
  6. Babaeian, A., Moradi, Gh. R., & Hosseini, A. (2015). The identification and prioritization of the exiting challenges of privatization of Iranian football clubs using PEST1 model. Journal of Sport Management, 6(4), 575-93. (Persian).
  7. Bansberdi, A., Khabiri, M., Jalali Farahani, M., & Godarzi, M. (2015). Factors affecting the development of the brand league football club In Iran. Journal of Sport and Youth Studies, 27(1), 147-58. (Persian).
  8. Elahi, A., Sajadi, N., Khabiri, M., & Abrishami, H. (2010). Identification to the development of football industry professional clubs. Research in Sports Science, 7(28), 53-68. (Persian).
  9. Farzali Pour, S. (2012). The role of mass media in women's sport. Scholars Research Library, 1(1), 6-13. (Persian).
  10. Gharekhani, H., Kozechian, H., Khabiri, M., Heidarlo, S., & Nobakht. F. (2011). Study of the most important economic barriers privatization of football clubs. Research in Sports Science, 3(9), 125-38. (Persian).
  11. Hamil, S., & Helt, M. (2003). The state of game, the corporate governance of football clubs. Football Governance Research Center, University of London, 79-92.
  12. Kashkar, S., & soleymani. (2012). The role of privatization on recreational sport development in expert’s opinion. Applied Research of Sport Management of Biology, 1(2), 99-104. (Persian).
  13. Khosravizadeh, E., Bahrami, A., & haghdadi. (2014). Investment and involvement barriers of private sector in Markazi province sport. Journal of Sport Management Studies, 6(24), 207-22. (Persian).
  14. Momeni, M., & Sharifi, A. R. (2011). Model and softwares multiple attribute decision making. Tehran: Forozesh Publications. Edit4: 1-218. (Persian).
  15. Salimi, M., Soltan Hosseini, M., & Esfahani, N. (2014). The ranking of the private firms’ sponsorship improving obstacles from champion sport according to assemble the result of MADM methods using POSET combinational technique. Journal of Sport Management Studies, 5(21), 149-72. (Persian).
  16. Satchian, V., Alizadeh, A., Dehghan, A., & Elahi, A. R. (2011). Prioritize and identification effective factors on the fans case study: Tehran Derby. Research in Sports Science, 8(10), 131-46. (Persian).
  17. Theiri, S., Medabesh, A., & Ati, A. (2012). The effect of changing status of sport clubs: From association to the company. Journal of Finance and Investment, International Scientific Press, 1(1), 127-49.
  18. Torlak, G., Sevkli, M., Sanal, M., & Zaim, S. (2011). Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airlinei. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3396–406.
  19. Tsameny, M., Onumah, J., & Tetteh-kumah, E. (2010). Post-privatization performance and organization changes: Case study from Ghana. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(5), 428-42.
  20. Wicker, P., Hallmannb, K., Breuerb, C. (2013). Analyzing the impact of sport infrastructure on sport participation using geo-coded data: Evidence from multi-levels models. Sport Management Review, 16(1), 54-67.
  21. Yoon, K. P., & Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction. London: Sage Publications. Edit1: 1-86.