مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی

طراحی مدل سرمایۀ فکری در وزارت ورزش و جوانان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی

2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده
سرمایۀ فکری­ یکی از قابلیت‌های مهم سازمانی است که می‌تواند به سازمان‌ها درخلق و تسهیم دانش، بسیار کمک کند و ­­­در­مقایسه با سازمان‌های دیگر، مزیت سازمانی پایداری را برای آن­ها ایجاد نماید؛ لذا، هدف­ از ­پژوهش حاضر، ارائۀ مدلی برای سرمایۀ فکری در وزارت ورزش و جوانان می­باشد. شایان­ذکر است که این پژوهش از نوع مطالعات توصیفی ـ هم­بستگی است. جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش را کلیۀ کارکنان وزارت ورزش و جوانان (745 نفر) تشکیل دادند. حجم نمونه نیز بر­اساس جدول مورگان، 254 نفر تعیین گردید. یافته­ ها نشان می­دهد که سرمایۀ انسانی­، سرمایۀ ساختاری و سرمایۀ رابطه­ ای تأثیر معناداری بر سرمایۀ فکری دارند.. ­

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Design a Model of Intellectual Capital in Ministry of Sports and Youth

نویسندگان English

  • Hossein Abdolmaleki 1
  • Asma Ghane Sangatash 2
  • Hamed Karimi 3
1
2
3
چکیده English

One of the most important organizational capabilities that can help organizations to create and share knowledge and to compare them with other organizations, creates “the advantages of sustainable organization” can be of intellectual capital. The purpose of this paper was to Design and Implementation a model for intellectual capital in Ministry of Sports and Youth based on pattern of Skandia. This research was Descriptive- Analysis of the correlation matrix. The population of this study was employees of Ministry of Sports and Youth (750 people) and the study sample based on Morgan, was 254 employees. The data collection instrument was a Researcher made questionnaire that its content validity was approved by 12 members of the faculty of sport management. The reliability of the questionnaire was Cronbach's alpha that for this survey value of 0.856 was obtained. For data analysis in level of inferential statistics were used, exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. In this study were identified that human capital (β=0.51, P<0/05), relational capital (β=0.38, P<0.05) and structural capital (β=0.31, P<0.05) have a significant effect on intellectual capital.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Intellectual Capital
  • Human Capital
  • Relational Capital
  • Structural Capital
  • Ministry of Sports and Youth
  1. Abdolmaleki, H., Derakhshanfar, T., Salmanimoghadam, S., & Goodarzi, S. (2014). The role of social capital in the creation of intellectual capital in IR Iranian sports federations’ staffs. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 4(3): 387-91.
  2. Abdolmaleki, H., Ghane Sang Atash, A., & Karimi, H. (2014). The Relationship between Social Capital and Job Satisfaction of Physical Education Teachers: The Case Study of Hamedan Province. Shomal Journal of Management and Physiology in Sport. 1(2): 41-52.
  3. Abdolmaleki, H., Mirzazadeh, Z., & Heidari, F. (2015). The future of human resources in sport organizations with scenario making, the Case study: Developing country of Iran. International Journal of Research in Management. 6(5): 41-52.
  4. Abdolmaleki, H., Mirzazadeh, Z., Allahyari, M., & Ramezani, M. (2015). Identify and Analysis of Performance Evaluation Indicators of Iranian Goalball Coaches. Annals of Applied Sport Science. 3(3): 43-56.
  5. Bahrami, S. (2009). Intellectual capital in higher education. Isfahan: Association of Higher Education­. 1: 1-16. (Persian).
  6. Bahrami, S. (2011). Comparison of common models measuring knowledge assets in organizations. The 1st national congress on health information systems and knowledge economy. Isfahan, Iran. Applied management. 2(1): 2-21. (Persian).
  7. Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5-8): 433-­62.
  8. Bontis, N. (2004). National intellectual capital index. A United Nations initiative for the Arab region. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1): 13-39.
  9. Bontis, N., Crossan. M., & Hulland, J. (2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4): 437-­66.
  10. Borins, S. (1995). Summary: Government in transition – A new paradigm in public administration in Commonwealth Secretariat. Proceedings of Government in Transition for Public Administration and Management. Toronto. Edit1: 3-23.
  11. Borins, S. (2002). New public management, north-American style. The new public management. London: Rutledge­. Edit 1: 1-86
  12. Bozbura, F. T. (2004). Measurement and applications of intellectual capital. The Learning Oorganization, An International Journal, 11(4/5): 357-­67.
  13. Brennan, N., & Connell, B. (2000). Intellectual capital: Current issues and policy implications. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(3): 206-­40.
  14. Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual capital: Core asset for third millennium enterprise. London: International Thomson Business Press. Edit 1: 1-55.
  15. Can˜ibano, L., & Sa´nchez, P. (2004). Measurement, management and reporting on intangibles: State of the art. Accounting and Business Review, 4 (1): 56-68.
  16. Can˜ibano. L., Garcı´a-Ayuso, M., & Sa´nchez, M. P. (2000). Accounting for intangibles: A literature review. The Journal of Accounting Literature, 19 (1): 102-30.
  17. Castro, G. M., Pedro, L. S., & Jose, W. N. L. (2004). The role of corporate reputation in developing relational capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4): 575-­85.
  18. Chang, S. Lee, M. (2008). The linkage between knowledge accumulation capability and organizational innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1): 3-20.
  19. Chen, J., Zhu, Z.,­ & Xie, H. Y. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: A new model and empirical Study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5­(1): 195-212.
  20. Edvinson, L. (2000). Some perspectives on intangibles and intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1): 12–­6.
  21. Edvinson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Developing a model of managing in intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 4(3): 356-­64.
  22. Engstrom Truls, E. J., Petter, W., & Siren, F. W. (2003). Evaluating intellectual capital in hotel industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(3): 287-303.
  23. Lev, B. (2000). Intangibles: Management, measurement and reporting. London: International Thomson Business Press. Edit 2: 3-91.
  24. Marr, B. Schiuma, G.  Neely, A. (2004). Intellectual capital- defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets. Business Process Management Journal, 10(5): 551-­69.
  25. Marr, B. Starovic, D. (2003). Understanding corporate value. Managing and reporting intellectual capital. Available from: www.cimaglobal.com/cps/rde/xbcr/sidoaaac5644e569109/live/mgrptintcap_tecrpt_pdf.
  26. Marr, B.,­ & Roos, G. (2005).A strategy perspective on intellectual capital in marr. Perspectives on intellectual capital, multidisciplinary insights into management, measurement and reporting. Boston MA: Elsevier­. Edit1: 28-41.
  27. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. ­New York: Oxford University Press. Edit1: 1-88.
  28. Pablos, P. (2003). Intellectual capital reporting in Spain: A comparative view. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1): 61-81.
  29. Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review: Measurement reporting & management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2): 155-­76.
  30. Pomeda, J. R., Moreno, C. M., Rivera, C. M., & Martil L, V. (2002). Towards an intellectual capital report of Madrid: New insights and developments. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2): 381-11.
  31. Rembe, A. (1999). The governmental invest in Sweden Agency – ISA: Report. Halls Offset AB. Stockholm. Edit 1:1-95.
  32. Roos,G., & Roos,J. (1997). Measuring your company's intellectual performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3): 413-­26.
  33. Rudez, H N. Mihalic, T. (2007). Intellectual capital in the hotel industry: A case study from Slovenia. Hospitality Management, 26 (1): 188–­99.
  34. Seetharaman, A., Kevin, L. T. L., & Saravanan, A. S. (2004). Comparative justification on intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4): 522-­39.
  35. Spring Project. (2002). Retrieve from: http://cordis.europa.eu/data/PROJ_FP5/ACTIONeqDndSESSIO Neq21722200595ndDOCeq104ndTBLeqEN_PROJ.htm.
  36. Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: The wealth of organizations. Currency Doubleday, New York, Thompson, Paul and McHugh, David Work organizations, A critical introduction. (3th ed). New York: Palgrave­:1-85.
  37. Sveiby, K. E. (2000). A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2­ (4): 344-­58.
  38. Torres, M. R. (2006). A procedure to design a structural and measurement model of intellectual capital: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 43 (1): 617–­26.
  39. Weziak, D. (2007). Measurement of national intellectual capital application to EU countries. International Networks for Studies in Technology, Environment, Alternatives and Development. 2 (1): 29-43.
مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 8، شماره 37
مرداد و شهریور 95
مرداد و شهریور 1395
صفحه 89-108

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 مرداد 1393
  • تاریخ بازنگری 23 اردیبهشت 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش 24 خرداد 1394

صفحه اصلی

اصول اخلاقی

ارسال مقاله

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما