نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه باهنر کرمان

2 دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی موانع استفاده از دوچرخه به عنوان وسیله ای برای حمل و نقل شهری دربین کودکان از دیدگاه مادران خود بود. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع کاربردی بوده که به شکل میدانی انجام گرفته است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل تمام مادران خانواده های ایرانی بود که متاسفانه اطلاعاتی در مورد تعداد آنان وجود نداشت. با توجه به نبود ابزار استاندارد در این زمینه، ابزار پژوهش پرسش­نامه محقق ساخته­ای با 14 سوال اصلی بود که پس از تأیید روایی صوری و سازه و پایایی (86/0=α) به صورت انتخاب خوشه­ای چند مرحله­ای توزیع گردید. داده­های 5863 پرسش­نامه برگشتی توسط نرم افزار اس. پی. اس. اس و با از آزمون فریدمن مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که از دیدگاه مادران "عدم مهارت کافی برای دوچرخه­سواری" با میانگین رتبه­ای (79/9) و " نبود مسیر های مخصوص دوچرخه­سواری" با میانگین رتبه­ای (11/9) به­ترتیب مهم­ترین مانع و "کاهش شأن اجتماعی در اثر دوچرخه­سواری" کم اهمیت­ترین مانع از دید­گاه مادران بود. بنابراین لزوم برنامه­ریزی مناسب جهت برچیدن موانع اساسی دوچرخه سواری کودکان لازم و ضروری می­باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of Barriers for Using Bicycle among Iranian Children

نویسنده [English]

  • mehdi emadi 1

1

2

چکیده [English]

The aim of this research was survey related concern about do cycling between children from mother's viewpoint. The method of present research was applied that it is performed by field shape. Statistical population was all mothers from Iranian families that unfortunately there is no information about the number of them. According to lack of standard tools in this area, the survey Instrument was a researcher made questionnaire with 14 Main question, that after Confirmation Its validity and reliability (α=0.86) Were distributed by the multistage cluster selection. 5863 data from questionnaires returned, were analyzed with the Friedman test by SPSS 20 software. Results showed that Lack of skills in cycling with rank mean (9.79( and lack of Special bike paths with rank mean )9.11( is most important barrier and reduction social status because of do cycling was least important barrier from perspective of mothers. So, proper planning it is Require and necessary for dismantle the barriers of children's cycling.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Barrier
  • Cycling
  • Children
1. Ahlport, K. N., Linnan, L., Vaughn, A., Evenson, K., Ward, D. (2008). Barriers to and Facilitators of Walking and Bicycling to School: Formative Results from the Non-Motorized Travel Study. Health Education & Behavior 35(2): 221-44.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007). Health of Children in Australia: A Snapshot, 2004-05. Retrieved 16th January, 2012, Available online: http://www.abs.gov.au/ AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/4829.0.55.001/.
3. Andersen, L. B., Lawlor, D., Cooper, A., Froberg, K., Anderssen, S. (2009). Physical Fitness in Relation to Transport to School in Adolescents: The Danish Youth and Sports Study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 19(3): 406-11.
4. Bauman A, Rissel Ch, Garrard J, Ker I, Speidel R, Fishman E. (2008). Cycling: getting Australia moving – barriers, facilitators and interventions to get more Australians physically active through cycling, 31st Australasian transport research forum
5. Brown Trent D, O’Connor Justen P, Barkatsas Anastasios N. (2009). Instrumentation and motivations for organized cycling: the development of the Cyclist Motivation Instrument (CMI), Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8, 211-8
6. Brown B., Mackett, R., Gong, Y., Kitazawa, K., Paskins, J. (2008). Gender Differences in Children's Pathways to Independent Mobility. Children's Geographies. 6(4): 385-401.
7. Buis, J. (2000). The Economic Significance of Cycling A survey to illustrate the costs and benefits of cycling policy world-wide, Available online: http://www. velomondial.net/velomondiall2000/PDF/BUIS.PDF
8. Chang, H.-W. & H.-L. Chang (2008). Students' Perceptions of Difficulties in Cycling to School in Urban and Suburban Taiwan. Transportation Research Record (2060): 123-30.
9. Christie, N., Kimberlee, R., Towner, E., Rodgers, S., Ward, H. & Sleney, J. (2011). Children aged 9–14 living in disadvantaged areas in England: Opportunities and barriers for cycling. Journal of transport geography, 19(4), 943-9.‏
10. D'Haese, S., Meester, D., Bourdeaudhuij, D., Deforche, B. & Cardon, G. (2011). Criterion Distances and Environmental Correlates of Active Commuting to School in Children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activitym, (8): 1-10
11. Daley M, Rissel Ch. (2011). Perspectives and images of cycling as a barrier or facilitator of cycling, Transport Policy. (18): 211–6
12. De Vries, S. (2010). Built Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling in Dutch Urban Children: Results from the Space Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7(5): 2309-24.
13. Department for Transport (2011). Trips to School by Main Mode- Trip Length and Age: Great Britain. London, Department for Transport.
14. Engbers, L. H., & Hendriksen, I. J. (2010). Characteristics of a population of commuter cyclists in the Netherlands: perceived barriers and facilitators in the personal, social and physical environment. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 7(1), 11-9.
15. Fyhri A, Hjorthol R. (2009). Children’s Independent Mobility to School, Friends and Leisure Activities. Journal of Transport Geography. 17(5): 377-84.
16. Gatersleben B, Appleton K. M. (2007). Contemplating Cycling to Work: Attitudes and Perceptions in Different Stages of Change. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 41(4): 302-12.
17. Maibach E, Steg L, Anable J. (2009). Promoting physical activity and reducing climate change: Opportunities to replace short car trips with active transportation. Preventive Medicine. (49): 326–7.
18. Moudon, A. V. (2005). Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10(3): 245-61.
19. Panter, J. R., Jones, A. P., Van Sluijs, E. M., & Griffin, S. J. (2010). Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 64(01), 41-48.‏
20. Parkina John, Meyers Ciaran, (2010), The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic. Accident Analysis and Prevention. (42): 159–65
21. Sabagh, S; Rahimi, Sameti, M; (2011), Positioning exercise among families living in the city, Journal of Sport Sciences. 10; 105-18. (Persian).
22. Shabani, A; Ghafori, F; Honari, H; (2011), study of Challenges of sport for all in Iran, Journal of Sports Sciences. 10; 13-26. (Persian).
23. Steinbach Rebecca, Green Judith, Datta Jessica, Edwards Phil, (2011), Cycling and the city: A case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Social Science & Medicine. (72); 1123-30.
24. Timperio A.,  Ball, K.,  Salmon, J.,  Roberts, R.,  Geoit, M. & Giles, C. (2006), Personal, Family, Social, and Environmental Correlates of Active Commuting to School; American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(1): 14-21.
25. Walsh, P. (2006). Creating Child Friendly Play spaces: A Practitioner's Perspective. Creating Child Friendly Cities: Reinstating Kids in the City. B. Gleeson and N. Sipe. Oxon, Routledge.