نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه خوارزمی

2 دانشگاه کردستان

چکیده

هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی ارتباط بین سبک‌های رهبری مربیان، انسجام تیمی و انگیزه موفقیت طلبی در فوتبالیست‌های لیگ برتر ایران بود. روش پژوهش حاضر پیمایشی و از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را بازیکنان حاضر در تیم‌های فوتبال لیگ برتر ایران در سال 92-91 تشکیل می‌دهند، که تعداد آنها بر اساس اعلام سازمان لیگ 414 نفر بوده است. بر اساس روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی و با استفاده از جدول مورگان 201 نفر از بازیکنان به عنوان نمونه تحقیق انتخاب گردیدند. ابزار اندازه‌گیری در این پژوهش شامل 4 پرسشنامه اطلاعات فردی، پرسشنامه مقیاس رهبری در ورزش چالادوری (1978)، پرسشنامه انسجام گروهی چن (2007) و پرسشنامه انگیزه موفقیت طلبی چن (2007) بود. پایایی به دست آمده از طریق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای هر یک از پرسشنامه‌ها به ترتیب: مقیاس رهبری 91/0، انسجام گروهی 93/0 و انگیزه موفقیت طلبی 88/0 محاسبه گردید. داده‌های گردآوری شده با استفاده از تکنیک‌های آمار توصیفی و همچنین آمار استنباطی (آزمون کلموگروف اسمیرنوف، ضریب همبستگی پیرسون، آزمون تعقیبی شفه و خط رگرسیون) توسط نرم افزار SPSSنسخه 18 مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که بین سبک رهبری، انسجام تیمی و انگیزه موفقیت طلبی ورزشکاران رابطه معنادار وجود دارد و سبک رهبری و انگیزه موفقیت طلبی می‌توانند انسجام تیمی را پیش بینی نمایند. با توجه به نتایج تحقیق در خصوص سبک رهبری، انسجام تیمی و انگیزه موفقیت‌طلبی به نظر می‌رسد که استفاده مربیان از سبک‌های مختلف مربیگری و الگوهای رفتاری متفاوت، سطوح انسجام تیمی و انگیزه موفقیت طلبی را دستخوش تغییر خواهد کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The relationship between the leadership styles of coaches, team solidarity and seeking success motivation in Iran premier league teams

نویسنده [English]

  • saeed hatami 1

1

2

چکیده [English]

The Purpose of this study is investigation of the relationship between coaching leadership styles and team cohesion and achievement motivation in selected athletes in Iran's premier league teams. The study method is descriptive and is of correlative type. Survey community consists of 414 athletes participating in premier league teams in the season of 2012-2013. For collecting information, questionnaires were used. For getting the reliable test of the questionnaires Cronbach Alpha was used that showed coaching leadership method (α=0/91), team cohesion (α=0/93) and achievement motivation (α=0/88). For checking leadership the method used was Cheladurai questionnaire (1978), for checking team cohesion Chen questionnaire (2007) was used and for achievement motivation Chen questionnaire (2007) was used. For analyzing the data, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Pearson’s correlation test, Scheffe Posthoc analysis and linear regression analysis were used by application of SPSS version 18. Survey tests (P≤%5) were checked. Study results showed that there is meaningful relationship between coaching leadership style, team cohesion, coaching leadership style and achievement motivation. So considering the findings of the study, it’s found that the use of different styles of coaching and different behavior styles will change team cohesion and achievement motivation that could affect coaching task and athlete and this case clarifies the importance of the relationship between the coach and the athlete.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Coach leadership style
  • team cohesion
  • Achievement motivation
1. Allen, J.B., & How, B.L. (2010). Player Ability, Coach Feedback, and Female Adolescent Athletes` Perceived Competence and Satisfaction, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. Dec; 20 (2):14-3.
2. Bennett, G., & Maneual, M. (2000). Leadership Style of Dixie Youth Baseball Coaches. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Dec; 71 (1):218-202.
3. Black, S.J., & Weiss, M.R. (2011). The Relationship Among Perceived Coaching Behaviors, Perceptions of Ability, and Motivation in Competitive Age - Group Swimmer, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. Dec; 14 (3):94-77.
4. Boyle, I. T. (2010). The Impact of Adventure-Based Training on Team Cohesion and Psychological Skills Development in Elite Sporting Teams, MA thesis, University of Wollongong, Australia.
5. Cakioglu, A. (2008). Leadership and Satisfaction in Soccer: Examination of Congruence and Players` Position, Senior Theses: 2008. Http: / /www. google.com. Advanced search/ leadership and team cohesion. 2010.
6. Carron, A.V., Bry, S.R., & Eys, M.A. (2002), Team cohesion & Team Success in Sport, Journal of Sport Science. 2002 Dec; 20 (2):101-88.
7. Carron, A.V., Colman, M.M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. (2006). Cohesion and Performance in Sport: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Dec; 29 (2):32-18.
8. Chelladvrai, P. (1999). Human Resource in Sport management & Recreation, USA, Human Kinetics: 55-61.
9. Chen, M. (2007). Exploring The Relationship between Effective Coaching Leadership, Group cohesion, and Achievement motivation in college Basketball Team in Taiwan. MA thesis, Ohio state university.
10. Corrigan, P.W., Diwan, S., Campion, J., & Rashid, F, (2009). Transformational Leadership and the Mental Health Team, Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 2009 Dec; 30 (2):23-11.
11. Eichas, T.M., & Krane, V. (2009). Relationship Among Perceived Leadership Styles, Member Satisfaction, and Team Cohesion in High School Basketball Players, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.Dec; 64 (4):165-151.
12. Grieve, G. (2011). An Experimental Examination of the Cohesion-Performance Relationship in an Interactive Team Sport, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. Dec; 12 (1):25-14.
13. Jabbari G.R. (2001). “The investigation of leadership style, abilities and performance of football trainers in azadegan football cup in Iran”;(10)6: 19-27. (Persian).
14. Kazemi, A. (2001). “The relationship between trainers leadership styles of women's basketball teams in Tehran with the extent of improvement motivation in players”. MA thesis. Published: Tarbiat Moalem University of Tehran. (Persian).
15. Keshtan, M.H. (2008). “The relationship between trainers’ leadership styles and team unity in football teams in the Premier League in Iran”. MA thesis, University of Gilaan. (Persian).
16. Moradi, M.R. (2005). ”The investigation of the relationship between trainers’ leadership styles with players’ team unity in basketball premier league teams in Iran”. MA thesis, tarbiat modares university. (Persian).
17. Nolan, O. (2010). The Relationship between Perceived Coaching Behaviors and Team Cohesion among School Age Cricketers in Australian.2010. Setting,
 http://www.google.com.10/2/2013.
18. Patterson, P., Aufsesser, P., & Caves, RW. (2001). “The Relationship Between Group Cohesion, Leadership Style & Win/Loss Record in Collegiate Soccer Players”. Journal of Psychology. Dec; 20 (3):71-55.
19. Rang, C.O. (2006). The Relationship between Group Cohesion & Leadership Style & Win / Loss Record in Collegiate Soccer Player, Unpublished Thesis, MA thesis and San Diego State University, USA.
20. Range,A. V.B, & Eys, M.A. (2002). ”Team Cohesion & Team Success in Sport”. Journal of Sport Scince. Dec; 20 (2):126-119.
21. Riemer, H.A., & Toon, K. (2001). Leadership and Satisfaction in Tennis: Examination of Congruence, Gender and Ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Dec; 72 (3):256-243.
22. Shamsaee N., khani N., & Yosefi B. (2010). “The relationship between dimensions of trainers’ leadership behavior who encourage group unity whit the performance of football teams in teenage Premier League in Iran”. Research in the Behavioral Sciences. (22)4: 131-151. (Persian).
23. Sidgreavs. D., Johnson, C.A., Colman, M., & Bostrom, A. (1998). The Psychological Effects Of Victory & Defeat on Team Cohesion, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. Dec; 25 (1):59-45.
24. Wester, K.R, & Weiss, M.R. (1991). ”The Relationship Between Perceived Coaching Behaviors and Group Cohesion in High School Football Team”. The Sport Psychologist, Journal of Sport Psychology. Dec; 10 (4):15-3.
25. Wester, K.R., & Weiss, M.R. (2009). The Relationship between Perceived Coaching Behaviors and Group Cohesion in High School Football Teams, The Sport Psychologist. Dec; 5 (2):117-100.