چارچوب مفهومی تحول اجتماعی صلح­محور در ورزش زنان: رویکرد داده‌بنیاد چندگانه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد بین المللی کیش، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کیش، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت و سیاست‌گذاری در ورزش، پژوهشگاه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران

3 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد بوشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بوشهر، ایران

4 گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، واحد یاسوج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، یاسوج، ایران

چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف ارائه چارچوب مفهومی تحول اجتماعی صلح‌محور در ورزش زنان کشور انجام شد. روش تحقیق از نوع کیفی با رویکرد داده‌بنیاد چندگانه (ترکیب مصاحبه و متن) بود. مطابق روش تحقیق، استخراج مفاهیم از دو بخش نمونه صاحب‌نظران علمی و اجرایی (16 نفر) و نمونه متون علمی (27 مقاله) انجام شد. نمونه­گیری براساس رسیدن به اشباع نظری و به روش قضاوتی انجام شد. ابزار پژوهش، مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته با صاحب‌نظران و چارچوب استخراج مفاهیم از متون بود. روایی پژوهش براساس مثلث‌سازی داده‌ها و بازبینی توسط مشارکت‌کنندگان و پایایی آن براساس میزان توافق مصححان کدگذاری (ضریب کاپا=71/0) تأیید شد. تحلیل یافته‌ها با استفاده از روش کدگذاری مطابق با روش داده‌بنیاد چندگانه انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که براساس چارچوب کدگذاری، کدهای مفهومی اولیه مستخرج از کدگذاری اول (209) در شش مقوله کلی، 12 کد انتخابی و 56 کد محوری چارچوب­بندی شدند. براساس نتایج، شش مقوله کلی و کدهای انتخابی زیرمجموعه آن­ها شامل پیشران‌ها (علیت‌ها)، چالش‌ها (مداخله‌گرها)، بسترها (زمینه‌ها)، جریان تحول (پدیده)، ظرفیت‌سازی (راهبردها) و کارکردها (پیامدها) در تحول اجتماعی صلح‌محور ورزش زنان بود. مدل مفهومی با تلفیق عوامل اصلی و فرعی، الگویی جامع برای تبیین تحول اجتماعی صلح‌محور در حوزه ورزش زنان ارائه داد که روابط نظام‌مند بین مؤلفه‌های مختلف این پدیده را تبین می­کند. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که تحول اجتماعی صلح‌محور در ورزش زنان نیازمند به‌کارگیری رویکردی نظام‌مند و چندسطحی است که پیشران‌ها، چالش‌ها و بسترهای شناسایی‌شده را به‌ صورت یکپارچه مدنظر قرار دهد. مدل مفهومی ارائه‌شده می‌تواند به‌عنوان چارچوبی راهبردی برای سیاست‌گذاری، برنامه‌ریزی و اجرای برنامه‌های تحولی در حوزه ورزش زنان استفاده شود و گامی مؤثر در راستای تحقق عدالت جنسیتی و توسعه اجتماعی پایدار باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Conceptual Framework of Peace-Oriented Social Transformation in Women's Sports: A Multi-Grounded Theory Approach

نویسندگان English

Farzaneh Heidari Joni 1
Nazanin Rasekh 2
Rouhallah Ershadi 3
BI BI Fakhrosadat Hashemi 3
Seyed Ehsan Amirhosseini 4
1 Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Ki.C., Islamic Azad University, Kish, Iran
2 Department of Management and Policy-Making in Sport, Sport Sciences Research Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Physical Education and sport science, Bu.C., Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
4 Department of Physical Education and sport sciences, Yas.C., Islamic Azad University, Yasuj, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Purpose
In recent years, women's sports in Iran have been situated within a complex landscape of social, cultural, and political transformations that have generated both emerging opportunities and structural challenges. While the international successes of female athletes have projected an empowered and nationally cohesive image, gender inequalities, institutional limitations, and cultural barriers persist. Research has shown that women's sports can serve as an effective tool for reducing social tensions and achieving peace, especially in Islamic contexts where sports act as a medium for cultural dialogue and social cohesion. Despite the expansion of social media and the potential of modern technologies to increase women's participation, recent socio-political upheavals have negatively affected this process. At the theoretical level, the integration of perspectives such as communicative action theory, the capabilities approach, and Bourdieu's field theory can offer a comprehensive framework for analyzing the social dynamics of women's sports. This study aims to design a localized and multi-level model using a grounded theory approach to systematically explain the interaction between social transformation, peace, and development in the context of women's sports in Iran.
Methods
This study employed a qualitative approach using the Multi-Grounded Theory method, combining semi-structured interviews and systematic analysis of scholarly texts. Data were collected and analyzed interactively and simultaneously, using systematic coding strategies to extract core concepts. Data sources included 16 academic and executive experts in women's sports and 27 peer-reviewed domestic and international articles, selected through purposive sampling. Data collection tools consisted of semi-guided interviews and content analysis of relevant literature. Validity was ensured through data triangulation, participant feedback, and tailored interview orientation based on the expertise of respondents. Reliability was confirmed by calculating inter-coder agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.71) and maintaining a detailed audit trail of the coding process. Data analysis followed three stages: open coding (identifying initial concepts), axial coding (establishing relationships between categories), and selective coding (formulating the final theory). Throughout these stages, data were continuously compared with existing sources and expert insights to gradually build the final theoretical framework grounded in the data. The Guba and Lincoln criteria were applied to enhance the qualitative credibility of findings. Ultimately, the resulting conceptual model systematically explains the interaction between key categories within a coherent and localized theoretical structure.
Results
This research was conducted using data obtained from 16 interviews with academic, executive, and media experts in the field of women's sports, along with an analysis of 27 domestic and international articles. The interview samples included 7 faculty members and 9 managers and sports activists who provided diverse perspectives. The reviewed studies consisted of 11 domestic and 16 international research articles. The data analysis was presented in two main sections: the conceptual coding framework and the research conceptual model. A sample of the coding process illustrated how initial codes were extracted from the interview texts and categorized based on scientific principles. Based on the data coding, 209 initial codes were classified into 6 general categories, 12 selective codes, and 56 axial codes. According to the results, the six general categories and their associated selective codes included: drivers (causal conditions), challenges (intervening conditions), contexts (background conditions), transformation flow (phenomenon), capacity building (strategies), and functions (outcomes) in the peace-oriented social transformation of women's sports. In the analysis of the findings, the following selective codes were extracted as key concepts: "Global paradigm of women's sports for peace and social justice," "National requirements for social support of women in sports," "Limitations and gender gaps in sports," "Behavioral and cultural changes in the women's sports community," "Impact of virtual space and social media on women's sports," "The position of women's sports in the national transformation and development system," "Gender dynamics and participation of the women's community in sports," "Content and approach transformation in the development of the women's sports community," "Culturalization of social changes in women's sports environments and communities," "Empowerment of sports organizations in social transformation towards women," "Sustainable social development of women's sports in the country," and finally, "The potential of sports for peace and transformation in the women's community." These codes reflect the multilayered social, cultural, gender-based, and structural dimensions related to women's sports and its role in advancing social justice and sustainable peace on national and global levels.
The drivers of social transformation in women's sports include the global paradigm of women's sports and national requirements for social support. The challenges of this transformation involve gender-based limitations and cultural changes within the women's sports community. The transformation contexts consist of the influence of virtual space and media, as well as the role of women's sports in the national development system. The transformation flow encompasses gender dynamics and content changes in the women's sports domain. The strategies for capacity building include culturalization processes and institutional and organizational empowerment. Finally, the functions of transformation encompass the achievements of sustainable development and the peace-building capacities of women's sports. This comprehensive analytical framework covers all key aspects of social transformation in the field of women's sports.
Conclusion
This research, aimed at analyzing peace-oriented social transformation in Iranian women's sports, presents a comprehensive and localized model that integrates micro (individual empowerment), meso (strengthening social institutions), and macro (reforming policy structures) dimensions. The findings indicate that this transformation results from a complex interplay of cultural, structural, media-related, and international factors. Obstacles such as gender discrimination, media stereotypes, and weak policymaking—alongside drivers like the rise of global gender justice discourse and the athletic successes of women—shape this process. The proposed model, by integrating global theories (Habermas, Giddens, Connell) with contextual evidence from Iran, offers practical strategies for enhancing participation, equitable resource distribution, and strengthening media and institutional capacities.
Based on the conceptual framework presented in this study, it is recommended that the peace-oriented social transformation model for women's sports be implemented as a five-year action plan in collaboration with the Ministry of Sports, sports federations, and non-governmental organizations. Given the sampling limitations, future studies are advised to involve a broader population across various provinces. Based on the identified core codes, it is recommended to establish monitoring mechanisms to ensure equitable resource allocation for women's sports. Drawing on qualitative findings, future research should conduct comparative analyses between this model and international frameworks. Considering methodological limitations, it is also recommended that longitudinal studies be designed and conducted to assess the effectiveness of the model.
Article Message
The innovation of this research is in providing an integrated framework that shows the relationships between the various components of social transformation of women's sports in the form of a comprehensive and systematic model. The presented model allows for the prediction of the effectiveness of transformational policies and programs and shows that the realization of positive social and cultural functions requires an integrated and multi-level view of the effective factors. In addition, by combining internal and external sources, the research has simultaneously considered theoretical compatibility and practical application in the design of programs and policies. The application of this model goes beyond scientific analysis and can be a guide for the design of educational programs, empowerment, participatory policymaking, and practical interventions at the level of organizations and the Ministry of Sports. This framework allows managers and planners to identify effective intervention points to promote women's participation and achieve gender justice. Finally, the research findings show that peace-based social transformation of women's sport requires a coherent, evidence-based, and integrated approach that covers both scientific theorizing and practical application, paving the way for achieving sustainable social development and gender justice.
Ethical Considerations
This research complied with ethical standards, securing participant consent and safeguarding confidentiality. Participant feedback was integrated into the research process, and efforts were made to eliminate bias during data collection and analysis.
Authors' Contributions
All authors equally participated in the design, implementation, and manuscript preparation phases of this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest pertaining to this publication.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to all the experts, specialists, athletes, and stakeholders who contributed to the advancement of this research by providing their views, participating in interviews, and providing valuable information.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Social change
societal transformation
social development
women's sports
sports for peace
1.       Aboofazeli, M., Sharififar, F., Nikbakhsh, R., & Honari, H. (2022). Identifying factors affecting peace development through sport using fuzzy Delphi method. Physiology and Sport Management Researches, 14(4), 37–52. [In Persian].
2.       Afrouzeh, A., Phipps, C., Pourkiani, M., Oftadeh-Moghadam, S., & Sajjadi, N. (2025). “Iranians on one side, immigrants on the other!”: socio-cultural constraints to sport participation amongst Afghan women migrants and refugees. Leisure Studies, 44(1), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2023.2280024
3.       Ajurlou, F., Ghadimi, B., Mohammadi-Kazemi, R., & Azadfada, Sh. (2021). Designing a model of the role of women's sport in improving development indices in Iran. Strategic Studies on Sport and Youth, 20(53), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.22034/ssys.2021.461 [In Persian].  
4.       Alipour Darvishi, Z., Veisi, M., Ghadimi, B., Khabiri, K., & Hojjat, Sh. (2018). Identifying and developing the components of cultural transformations in sports education based on grounded theory approach. Contemporary Research in Sport Management, 8(16), 55–66. [In Persian].
5.       Altiami-Nia, R., & Mohammadi Azizzabadi, M. (2015). The implicit and accelerating role of sport in providing conditions for peace among states. Political and International Research, 7(22), 149–179. [In Persian].
6.       Antunovic, D., & Cooky, C. (2025). Feminist theories and sport communication: understanding media representations of women's sport. In Routledge Handbook of Sport Communication (pp. 281-294). London: Routledge.
7.       Balazs, E., & Koch, J. (2024). Sparring with Femininity: An urban ethnography of a youth MMA sport-for-development program. Journal of Emerging Sport Studies, 10. https://doi.org/10.26522/jess.v10i.4547
8.       Bose, A., & Mishra, S. (2025). Setting narrative: A study how OTT content has influenced the women and sports in India. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 54(2), 448-464. https://doi.org/10.48047/CU
9.       Charway, D., & Strandbu, Å. (2024). Participation of girls and women in community sport in Ghana: Cultural and structural barriers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 59(4), 559-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902231214955
10.    Darnell, S. C., & Dao, M. (2020). Considering sport for development and peace through the capabilities approach. In Innovations in'Sport for Development and Peace'Research (pp. 23-36). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2017.1314772
11.    Farkhshahi-Nia, R. (2025). Women's sport and sustainable development: Explaining the role and status of gender equality as a key driver in the future of Iranian sport. Sustainable Development Management in Sport, 13(13), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.22054/qrsm.2024.82764.160 [In Persian].  
12.    Farzadefar, M., Ganji, F., & Bahrami, Sh. (2021). Identifying the social and cultural consequences of the success of Muslim female athletes in international sporting events. Sport Management Journal, 13(3), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2019.269497.2177 [In Persian].  
13.    Fasangari, E., & Saadatifard, E. (2025). Presenting a model of the influence of social media on the development of women's sport. Olympic Studies, 3(1), 67–93. [In Persian].
14.    Gerdin, G., & Pringle, R. (2022). Towards more equal power relations in physical education: power, resistance and social transformation. Sport in Society, 25(6), 1193-1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2022.2064108
15.    Gerstein, L. H., Blom, L. C., Banerjee, A., Farello, A., & Crabb, L. (2021). Sport for social change: An action-oriented peace education curriculum. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 27(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000518
16.    Gillion, L., & Keim, M. (2020). Sport, peace, and social transformation. Peace Review, 32(4), 441-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2020.1921398
17.    Goudarzi, M., Eyvazi-Kalash, G., Alidoust Ghahfarokhi, E., & Dehghan Ghahfarokhi, A. (2025). Presenting a model of structural barriers to the growth and development of women's status in Iranian sport. Strategic Studies on Sport and Youth, 23(63), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.22034/ssys.2022.2283.2639 [In Persian].  
18.    Graeff, B., Šafaříková, S., & Sambili-Gicheha, L. C. (Eds.). (2024). Routledge handbook of the global south in sport for development and peace. Taylor & Francis.
19.    Hall, G., & Wise, N. (2019). Introduction: Sport and social transformation in Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 38(3), 265-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12920
20.    Hassani, Z. (2025). A social review of women's sport in the Olympic Games: A bibliometric study. Olympic Studies, 2(3), 111–129. [In Persian].
21.    Hayhurst, L. M., McSweeney, M. J., Zakariya, R., & Darnell, S. C. (2023). Social transformation-Critically interrogating girls and women as transformational subjects in sport for development and peace. In Handbook of Sport and International Development (pp. 304-319). Edward Elgar Publishing.
22.    Hussain, U., & Cunningham, G. B. (2024). The Muslim community and sport scholarship: A scoping review to advance sport management research. European Sport Management Quarterly, 24(2), 536-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X241298
23.    Jafari, S., Sajadi, S. N., & Alidoust Ghahfarokhi, E. (2025). A model for explaining barriers and drivers of social development in Sport for Development and Peace (SDP) programs. Sport Management Studies, 16(88), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2023.13682.3789 [In Persian].  
24.    Kashani, H. (2021). The role of sport in achieving peace and reducing international conflicts with emphasis on the UN Millennium Declaration. Legal Researches, 21(10), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.48300/jlr.2021.140175 [In Persian].  
25.    McSweeney, M., Lu, L., & Jones, G. (2024). The use of bricolage in a resource-constrained sport for development and peace organization. Journal of Sport Management, 38(5), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2023-0198
26.    Misener, L., Rich, K., & Pearson, E. (2022). Tensions and opportunities in researching social change in sport management. Sport Management Review, 25(2), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1902123
27.    Moradi, H., Morsel Tayebi-Thani, S. M., & Fahimi-Nejad. (2022). The evolution of social justice in the allocation of resources to elite sports in Iran. Socio-Cultural Changes, 19(72), 223–241. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30495/jscc.2022.1936831.1895
28.    Nodehi, M., Behlke, T., Fallah, Z. A., & Nodehi, M. A. (2023). An analysis of the interactive relationships of factors influencing coalition-building in social movements through sport. Sport Management Studies, 15(78), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2023.13072.3702 [In Persian].  
29.    Nouri, Z., Keshkar, S., Kargar, G., & Shahlaei, J. (2022). Determining the components of elite women's sports culture. New Approaches in Sport Management, 10(37), 165–183. [In Persian].
30.    Oxford, S., & Spaaij, R. (2020). Critical pedagogy and power relations in sport for development and peace: Lessons from Colombia. In Innovations in'Sport for Development and Peace'Research (pp. 102-116). London: Routledge.
31.    Pape, M. (2020). Gender segregation and trajectories of organizational change: The underrepresentation of women in sports leadership. Gender & Society, 34(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219867914
32.    Parra-Camacho, D., González-García, R. J., & Alonso-Dos-Santos, M. (2021). Social impact of a participative small-scale sporting event. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 11(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251340540
33.    Pashaei, S. (2025). The impact of cultural and social changes on physical education in Iran: From ancient times to the modern era. Iranian Cultural History, 21(2), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.22034/ihc.2025.66270.1044 [In Persian].  
34.    Rensmann, L. (2014). Sports, global politics, and social value change: A research agenda. Altre modernità/Otras modernidades/Autres modernités/Other Modernities, 14, 114-133. https://doi.org/10.13130/2035-7680/6535 
35.    Rodríguez, S., León-Prieto, C., Rodríguez-Jaime, M. F., & Lugo, L. S. (2024). Playing for peace: scoping review of sports programs as agents of peace. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-024-00967-1
36.    Sapkota, J. B., & Neupane, P. (2021). Sport for development and peace (SDP) organisations and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) of Nepal. Global Social Welfare, 8(1), 47-58.
37.    Sari, D. M., Fitryona, N., Purnomo, E., Ma'mun, A., Kusmaedi, N., Hendrayana, Y., ..., & Amirudin, A. (2024). Integration of social values through sport. Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación, (52), 144-153.
38.    Shajie, R., Shajie, K., & Khorsandifard, M. (2025). Identifying the impact of political and social chaos on Iranian women's sports using Lorenz's chaos theory approach. Women's Sport Research, 2(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.22089/rws.2025.17790.1058 [In Persian].
39.    Sharififar, F., Aboofazeli, M., Nikbakhsh, R., & Honary, H. (2023). Modeling sport for development and peace (SDP). Contemporary Research in Sport Management, 13(25), 65–75. [In Persian].
40.    Sherry, E., Bowell, P., Symons, K., & Pankowiak, A. (2024). Researching women in sport development: an intersectional approach. Sport in Society, 27(5), 820-842. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2023.2278614
41.    Svensson, P. G., & Loat, R. (2019). Bridge-building for social transformation in sport for development and peace. Journal of Sport Management, 33(5), 426-439. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2018-0258
42.    Talebpour, A., Nazariazad, M., & Kashani, M. (2013). A sociological analysis of gender inequality in sport: From the perspective of national female elite athletes. Women and Society Quarterly, 10(40), 289–316. [In Persian].
43.    Thorpe, H., Jeffrey, A., Fullagar, S., & Pavlidis, A. (2023). Reconceptualizing women's wellbeing during the pandemic: Sport, fitness and more-than-human connection. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 47(1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/01937235221109438
44.    Tjønndal, A., Turtiainen, R., Frandsen, K., & Rogstad, E. T. (Eds.). (2025). Women in a digitized sports culture: Nordic perspectives. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003527565
45.    Toffoletti, K., Ahmad, N., & Thorpe, H. (2022). Critical encounters with social media in women's sport and physical culture. In Sport, social media, and digital technology (Vol. 15, pp. 29-47). Emerald Publishing Limited.
46.    Zhang, J. (2016). Research of social transformation and urban community sports. In International Conference on Education, Sports, Arts and Management Engineering (pp. 846-849). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8948248
 
دوره 18، شماره 98 - شماره پیاپی 98
مهر و آبان 1405
صفحه 40-71

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 17 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 30 اردیبهشت 1405