ارائه مدل توسعه یافتگی ورزش دانش آموزی ایران با استفاده از دیمتل فازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدل توسعه‌یافتگی ورزش دانش‌آموزی ایران با استفاده از دیمتل فازی بود. این پژوهش از نظر هدف تحقیق جزو تحقیقات کاربردی بود و از لحاظ ماهیت، توصیفی و از حیث متغیرها، پژوهشی آمیخته بود که در دو مرحله انجام شد. ابتدا شاخصه‌های توسعه ورزش دانش‌آموزی در ایران توسط مصاحبه و نظریه داده‌بنیاد رویکرد گلیزر شناسایی شد و در مرحله دوم عوامل اثرگذار و اثرپذیر طبق رویکرد دیمتل فازی شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی شدند. با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند، پانزده مصاحبه به صورت حضوری و مجازی انجام شد و هشت نفر به پرسشنامه دیمتل فازی پاسخ دادند. یافته‌ها نشان داد، 59 گویه در قالب 11 مفهوم به‌عنوان شاخصه‌های توسعه‌یافتگی ورزش دانش‌آموزی ایران وجود دارد که طبق یافته‌ها به ترتیب اولویت شش مؤلفه منابع مالی، زیرساخت ورزشی، کیفیت و کمیت منابع انسانی، آموزش درس تربیت‌بدنی، فرهنگ‌سازی ورزشی و مدیریت کارآمد به‌عنوان شاخصه‌های اثرگذار و پنج مؤلفه حرفه‌ای‌سازی ورزش دانش‌آموزی، مسابقات دانش‌آموزی، تجهیزات نرم‌افزاری و فناورانه، انجمن‌های ورزشی و هنرستان‌های تربیت‌بدنی و استعدادیابی به‌عنوان شاخصه اثرپذیر شناسایی شدند. در نتیجه‌گیری کلی باید بیان کرد که عوامل اثرگذار باید در درجه اول اهمیت قرار بگیرند. همچنین ازآنجاکه مؤلفه‌های اثرپذیر وابسته به عوامل اثرگذارند یا حتی در صورت وجود نمی‌توانند به‌تنهایی موجب توسعه ورزش دانش‌آموزی شوند، باید به ترتیب اولویت شناسایی شوند و برای توسعه هرچه‌بیشتر ورزش دانش‌آموزی اقدام کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Development Model of Iran's Student Sports Using Fuzzy Dematel

نویسندگان English

Morteza Ghenaat
Mahdi Talebpour
Zahrasadat Mirzazadeh
Mohammad kashtidar
. Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Purpose
Development is a multidimensional concept encompassing broad economic, social, and cultural contexts. When referring to a developed or underdeveloped society, we imply a community that fulfills various economic, social, human, and cultural development indicators. The advancement of national sports represents a critical component within national socio-economic development. The widespread participation in public sports enhances social vitality and productivity, while the promotion of elite championship sports garners national and international recognition.
Thus, the achievements and broader impacts of national sports development extend beyond athletics, contributing to both economic prosperity and social well-being. The development of physical education and sports, which underpin the preparation and training of healthy and physically fit human resources, is considered integral to national development strategies. Consequently, sports form a socio-cultural subsystem within the nation’s overarching system and require comprehensive development plans aligned with macro-level goals.
In particular, sports education within schools and its advancement are prioritized in national policy frameworks. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to propose a development model for Iranian student sports utilizing a fuzzy DEMATEL approach.
Materials and Methods
This study was applied research in terms of purpose, descriptive in nature, and mixed in variable scope. It was conducted in two phases. The initial phase involved identifying the indicators of student sports development in Iran through interviews analyzed via Glaser’s grounded theory methodology.
The statistical population comprised experts in student sports, including education directors and deputy directors, physical education managers at various levels nationwide, sports management professors with expertise in student sports, and practitioners such as experienced physical education teachers and school principals. Purposive sampling was employed, conducting thirteen interviews until theoretical saturation was attained.
In the second phase, influential and affected factors regarding the development indicators were identified and prioritized through fuzzy DEMATEL analysis. This method allowed assessment of the direct and indirect influences among identified factors.
Results
Initial coding yielded 59 open codes, organized into 11 core concepts pertaining to the development of Iranian student sports. Utilizing fuzzy DEMATEL, these concepts were classified based on their relative influence and dependency, producing a conceptual model distinguishing influencing and affected indicators.
The analysis (presented in Table 1 and Figure 1) shows that points above the horizontal axis represent influential factors, whereas points below denote affected factors. The model thus visualizes interrelationships among developmental factors.
 
Conclusion
Participants acknowledged that the development and enhancement of school physical education—in terms of available facilities and program quality and quantity—directly influences student sports development. In summary, school sports advancement depends on multiple contributing indicators. The fuzzy DEMATEL results highlight that influential factors require initial prioritization, emphasizing that influential components depend on these drivers and, in isolation, cannot independently cultivate student sports development.
Thus, interventions should proceed according to the identified priorities to maximize the growth of student sports.
Article Message
The article’s core message is the necessity to address two categories of factors to achieve sustainable student sports development. Influential factors—such as financial resources, sports infrastructure, physical education instruction, and human resource quality and quantity—play a foundational and vital role. Improvement in these drivers directly impacts dependent factors—including technological capabilities, professionalization, student competitions, and talent identification. Investing in and strategically enhancing influential components is the prerequisite and accelerator for activating and advancing dependent elements, ultimately promoting student sports development.
Ethical Considerations
This manuscript derives from a doctoral dissertation where ethical considerations were rigorously observed. Participants were fully informed about the study objectives and processes, provided written informed consent, and confidentiality was maintained. Transparency in results dissemination and impartiality in reporting were ensured, upholding honesty and trustworthiness throughout analysis and citation.
Funding
This research received no financial support from external funding agencies.

Authors’ Contributions
All authors actively contributed from the research planning phase through data collection, analysis, manuscript drafting, and final review.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors express gratitude to all participants and individuals who provided assistance during this study. Special thanks are extended to academic colleagues who supported evaluation and editing of this article.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Development Indicators
Student Sports
Fuzzy DEMATEL
Physical Education Teachers
 
1.       Bailey, R., Armour, K., & Kirk, D. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701809817
2.       Camiré, M. (2014). Youth development in North American high school sport: Review and recommendations. Quest, 66(4), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2014.952448
3.       Coakley, J. (2011). Youth sports: What counts as “positive development?” Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 35, 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2014.952448
4.       Esteban-Cornejo, I., Tejero-Gonzalez, C. M., Sallis, J. F., & Veiga, O. L. (2015). Physical activity and cognition in adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 18(5), 534–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2014.07.007
5.       Fraser-Thomas, J. L., Côté, J., & Deakin, J. (2005). Youth sport programs: An avenue to foster positive youth development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898042000334890
6.       Ghanbari Firouzabadi, A., Amani, A., Reihani, M., & Sardroodian, M. (2020). Designing a strategic model for student sport development. Research on Educational Sport, 8(20), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2020.7838.1732
7.       Ghanbari, H., Shetabbushehri, N., Shafiniya, P., & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2018). Pathology of physical education and school sports by applying three-dimensional model. Research on Educational Sport, 6(15), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2017.4786.1359
8.       Ghasemi Rooshnavand, J., Bahrololoum, H., Andam, R., & Bagheri, H. (2021). Identifying the ways of development of trans-sectional cooperation in student sports. Research on Educational Sport, 8(21), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2019.7718.1715
9.       Ghasemi, H., & Asgar Shamsi, M. (2019). Content analysis of physical education and student sport researches in Iran. Research on Educational Sport, 7(16), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2018.5917.1467
10.    Goudas, M., & Giannoudis, G. (2008). A team-sports-based life-skills program in a physical education context. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 528–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.11.002
11.    Gould, D., & Carson, S. (2008). Life skills development through sport: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840701834573
12.    Heydari, A. (2020). The problem of governance and policy making in education in post-revolutionary Iran. Quarterly Journal of Education, 35(4), 65–86. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.10174133.1398.35.4.4.7
13.    Hills, A., Dengel, D., & Lubans, D. (2015). Supporting public health priorities: Recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 57(4), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.010
14.    Hogan, A., & Stylianou, M. (2018). School-based sports development and the role of NSOs as ‘boundary spanners’: Benefits, disbenefits and unintended consequences of the Sporting Schools policy initiative. Sport, Education and Society, 23(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1184638
15.    Knaus, M. C., Lechner, M., & Reimers, A. K. (2020). For better or worse? – The effects of physical education on child development. Labour Economics, 67, 101904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101904
16.    Lubans, D., Richards, J., Hillman, C., Faulkner, G., Beauchamp, M., Nilsson, M., Kelly, P., Smith, J., Raine, L., & Biddle, S. (2016). Physical activity for cognitive and mental health in youth: A systematic review of mechanisms. Pediatrics, 138(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1642
17.    Lubis, J., & Sujiono, B. (2022). Program evaluation of Southeast Sulawesi student sports center for development and training. Gladi: Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 13(2), 146–160.
18.    Metelski, A. (2019). Physical activity in Poland and the European Union. Quality in Sport, 5(3), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2019.013
19.    Nasiri Khozani, M., Arufzad, S., & Nadi, M. A. (2020). Developing the sustainable development model of student sport participation in Iran. Sport Sciences Quarterly, 12(38), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2019.6508.1557
20.    Ness, A. R., Leary, S. D., Mattocks, C., Blair, S. N., Reilly, J. J., Wells, J., Ingle, S., Tilling, K., Smith, G. D., & Riddoch, C. (2007). Objectively measured physical activity and fat mass in a large cohort of children. PLOS Medicine, 4(3), e97. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040097
21.    Opstoel, K., Chapelle, L., Prins, F. J., De Meester, A., Haerens, L., van Tartwijk, J., & De Martelaer, K. (2020). Personal and social development in physical education and sports: A review study. European Physical Education Review, 26(4), 797–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19882054
22.    Rahmati, M. M., Alikhah, F., Shadmanfaat, S. M., & Kabiri, S. (2018). Sociological study of sport participation process based on symbolic interaction approach. Research on Educational Sport, 6(15), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.22089/res.2017.4245.1307
23.    Shahvali Kohshouri, J., Askari, A., Nazari, R., & Naghsh, A. (2020). A constructive model of participation in student sports. Teaching and Learning Research, 17(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.22070/TLR.2021.10390.0
24.    Smith, J. J., Eather, N., Weaver, R. G., Riley, N., Beets, M. W., & Lubans, D. R. (2019). Behavioral correlates of muscular fitness in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 49(6), 887–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01089-7
25.    Soltani, P., Chapri, L., & Sajadian, M. (2024). Designing a model of the antecedents of social capital in student sports. Social Capital Management, 11(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.22059/JSCM.2023.360055.2421
26.    Sutherland, R., Campbell, E., Nathan, N., Wolfenden, L., Lubans, D. R., Morgan, P. J., ..., & Wiggers, J. (2019). A cluster randomised trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of physical activity practices in secondary schools: Study protocol for scaling up the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) program. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6965-0
27.    Tashpulatov, F. A. (2022). Student sports as a factor in the preparation of highly qualified athletes. European Journal of Business Startups and Open Society, 2(2), 18–23.
28.    Theodoulides, A., & Armour, K. M. (2001). Personal, social and moral development through team games: Some critical questions. European Physical Education Review, 7(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X010071004
29.    Tsangaridou, N. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ views about teaching physical education: Challenges and recommendations. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2016.80
30.    Vahdani, M., Hamidi, M., Khabiri, M., & Alidoust Ghahfarrokhi, E. (2017). Codification a Strategy Map of Physical Education and Sports Activities in Ministry of Education of Iran. Research on Educational Sport, 5(12), 17-36.
31.    Wright, P. M., & Craig, M. W. (2011). Tool for assessing responsibility-based education (TARE): Instrument development, content validity, and inter-rater reliability. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 15(3), 204–219. doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2011.590084
32.    Zalech, M. (2021). Student perception of PE teachers and its effect on their participation in PE classes and sports: A new perspective on teacher competencies. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21, 1106-1111. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s2139
دوره 17، شماره 91
مرداد و شهریور 1404
صفحه 133-151

  • تاریخ دریافت 23 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 08 شهریور 1404