مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی

شناسایی و ارزیابی عوامل موثر بر فساد رقابتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده علوم ورزشی دانشگاه رازی

2 دانشیار گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی

3 استادیارگروه علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی

چکیده
هدف از این تحقیق شناسایی و ارزیابی عوامل (درون و برون‌بخشی) موثر بر اکوسیستم فساد در ورزش است، لذا با شناسایی این شاخض‌ها به تحلیل فساد رقابتی پرداخته می‌شود. جامعه تحقیق، 23 نفر از اساتید دانشگاهی می-باشد که در زمینه فساد سابقه پژوهش و مطالعه داشته‌اند. بر اساس مرور ادبیات و پیشینهء پژوهش، 11 شاخص در 4 بُعد شناسایی و استخراج شد: الف) ماهیت ورزش معاصر ب) شاخص‌های اصلی حکمرانی ج) سطوح فرابخشی د) پیامد. برای تجزیه تحلیل داده‌ها از روش ترکیبی تئوری تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی شامل: ANP بر اساس DEMATEL استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که شاخص پیامد و سطوح فرابخشی، به ترتیب اثرگزارترین و همچنین شاخص‌های ماهیت ورزش معاصر و حکمرانی نیز به عنوان اثرپذیرترین عوامل در بروز فساد رقابتی هستند. نتایج اولویت‌بندی عوامل از دیدگاه مشارکت‌کنندگان نشان داد که شاخص های اصلی حکمرانی، بالاترین وزن نهایی را به خود اختصاص داده‌اند. هرچند پیامد در چرخهء وقوع فساد، آخرین مرحلهء این پدیده محسوب میشود، اما در چرخهء اثرگزاری، به عنوان نخستین و اثرگزارترین شاخص، سایر معیارها را تحت تاثیر قرار م‌دهد، زیرا به عنوان محرکهای اولیه، امکان ادراک ریسک‌های مربوط به مشارکت و همچنین شرایط سود و زیان فعالیت‌های مفسدانه را تبیین می‌کند. با متناسب‌سازی نظام جرم و مجازات، افزایش جرایم مالی و محرومیت‌های انضباطی سختِ مفسدان، محدودیت شدید در عفو مقامات فاسد و جلوگیری از ورود مجدد آنها، و برقرارسازی سیستم‌های پایش می‌تواند نقش تأثیرگذاری در کاهش فساد ورزشی ایفا کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying and Evaluating the Factors Affecting Competitive Corruption

نویسندگان English

  • ali naseri 1
  • Bahram yousefi 2
  • zohreh hasani 3
  • Aliashraf khazaei 3
1 Faculty of Sports Sciences Razi University
2 Associate Professor, Department of Sports Science, Razi University
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Sports Science, Razi University of
چکیده English

The purpose of this study is to identify and evaluate the factors (internal and external) affecting the ecosystem of corruption in sports, so by identifying these factors, competitive corruption is analyzed. The research population is 23 university professors who have a history of research and study in the field of corruption. Based on the literature review and research background, 11 indicators were identified and extracted in 4 main dimensions: a) Contemporary Sports Characteristics. b) Governance. c) Extrapartial Levels. d) Consequence. To analyze the data, the combined method of fuzzy multi-criteria decision theory including ANP based on DEMATEL was used. The results showed that the “Consequence” index and “Extrapartial Levels” were the most effective factors, as well as the indicators of the “Contemporary Sports Characteristics” and “Governance”, were recognized as the most Impressive factors. The results of factor prioritization showed that the main indicators of Governance have the highest final weight. Although the Consequence in the corruption cycle is the last stage of this phenomenon, but in the effectiveness cycle, as the first and most effective indicator, it affects other criteria, because as the primary stimuli, the possibility of perceiving the risks associated with participation. It also explains the profit and loss conditions of corrupt activities. By adapting the system of crime and punishment, increasing financial crimes and severe disciplinary sanctions of corrupt people, severe restrictions on pardoning corrupt officials and preventing their re-entry, and establishment of monitoring systems can play an effective role in reducing sports corruption.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • "Governance"
  • "corruption"
  • "sport"
  • "Commercialization""Medicalization"
  1. Andreff, W. (2017). Complexity triggered by economic globalisation—The issue of on-line betting-related match fixing. Systems, 5(1), 2-18.
  2. Ariel, D. (2015). Behind the hypocrisy; How we lie to everyone, especially to ourselves. Available at: http://akhlagh.morsalat.ir/article_67534.html?lang=fa.
  3. Bell, P., Ten Have, C., & Lauchs, M. (2016). A case study analysis of a sophisticated sports doping network: Lance Armstrong and the USPS Team. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 46, 57–68.
  4. Brannagan, P. M., & Giulianotti, R. (2015). Soft power and soft disempowerment: Qatar, global sport and football’s 2022 World Cup finals. Leisure studies, 34(6), 703-719.‏
  5. Brannagan, P. M., & Giulianotti, R. (2014). Qatar, global sport and the 2022 FIFA world cup. In Leveraging legacies from sports mega-events: Concepts and cases (pp. 154-165). Palgrave: Basingstoke.
  6. Brooks, G., & Lavorgna, A. (2017). Lost Eden: The corruption of sport. In Corruption in Sport, 1, 79-90.
  7. Caneppele, S., Langlois, F., & Verschuuren, P. (2020). Those who counter match-fixing fraudsters: voices from a multistakeholder ecosystem. Crime, Law and Social Change, 74(1), 13-26.‏
  8. Carmichael, F., Rossi, G., & Thomas, D. (2017). Production, efficiency, and corruption in Italian Serie A football. Journal of Sports Economics, 18(1), 34-57.‏
  9. Chappelet, J.L (2012). From daily management to high politics: the governance of the International Olympic Committee. In L. Robinson, P. Chelladurai, G. Bodet, & P. Downward (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport management (pp. 7-25). New York: Routledge.
  10. Chadwick, S., Roberts, S., & Cowley, R. (2017). The impact of sports corruption on organisational stakeholders. In Corruption in sport (pp. 110-125). New York: Routledge.
  11. Cooper, P., & Upton, G. (1990). An ecosystemic approach to emotional and behavioural difficulties in schools. Educational Psychology, 10(4), 301–321.
  12. Costa, J. (2018). The globalised network of a dirty game: Match-fixing, illegal betting and transnational organised crime in Italian football. Global Crime, 19(2), 125-145.
  13. Danley, B., & Widmark, C. (2016). Evaluating conceptual definitions of ecosystem services and their implications. Ecological Economics, 126, 132–138.
  14. Davies, C. (2013). Doping in sport: from Lance Armstrong to the AFL and NRL. In Papers from the Legal Studies Students' Conference. Legal Studies Students' Conference, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
  15. Dimant, E., & Schulte, T. (2016). The nature of corruption: An interdisciplinary perspective. German Law Journal, 17(1), 53-72.‏
  16. Dietl, H., & Weingärtner, C. (2014). Betting scandals and attenuated property rights: how betting-related match-fixing can be prevented in future. The International Sports Law Journal, 14(1), 128-137.‏
  17. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1995). NGO performance and accountability in the post-cold war world. Journal of International Development, 7, 849–856
  18. Ehrlich, I. (1996). Crime, punishment and the market for offenses. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 43–67.
  19. Ewers, C. (2021). Sport, life, this sporting life, and the hypertopia. Textual Practice, 1 , 1-20.‏
  20. Fattah, Z., & Tuttle, R. (2014). Qatar cuts number of world cup soccer stadiums as costs rise. Bloomberg News April 21. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/ news/2014-04-20/qatar-cuts-number-of-world-cup-soccer-stadiums-amid-risingcosts. html #disqus_thread (Accessed November 4, 2014).
  21. Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (2003). Sport and gambling. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 598–611.
  22. Forrest, D. (2012). The threat to football from betting-related corruption. International Journal of Sport Finance, 7(2), 99-116.
  23. Forster, J., & Pope, N. (2004). The political economy of global sporting organisations. Routledge: London.
  24. Gardiner, S. (2017). Conceptualising corruption in sport. In Corruption in sport (pp. 10-29). London: Routledge.‏
  25. Gardiner, S. (2014). Evaluation of the creation of a global sports anti-corruption body. In presentation held at Sport & EU Conference, Cologne.
  26. Geeraert, A. (2013). The governance agenda and its relevance for sport: introducing the four dimensions of the AGGIS sports governance observer. In J. Alm (Ed.), Action for good governance in international sports organisations (pp. 9–21).
  27. Geeraert, A., & Drieskens, E. (2015). The EU controls FIFA and UEFA: A principal–agent perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1448–1466.
  28. Geeraert, A. (2016). The governance of international sport organisations. In B. Houlihan, & D. Malcolm (Eds.), Sport in society: A student introduction (pp. 37–413). London: Sage.
  29. Gorse, S., & Chadwick, S. (2010). Conceptualising corruption in sport: Implications for sponsorship programmes. European Business Review, 1, 5–40.
  30. Hargreaves, J. (1989). The promise and problems of women’s Leisure and sport. In Leisure for leisure (pp. 130-149). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Henne, K. (2015). Reforming global sport: Hybridity and the challenges of pursuing transparency. Law & Policy, 37(4), 324-349.‏
  32. Henning, A. D. (2013). (Self-) surveilliance, anti-doping, and health in non-elite road running. Surveillance & Society, 11, 494–507.
  33. Hill, D. (2010). A critical mass of corruption: why some football leagues have more match-fixing than others. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 11(3), 38-52.
  34. Hums, M. A., & MacLean, J. C. (2004). Governance and policy in sport organizations. Scottsdale, AZ: Halcomb Hathaway Publishers.
  35. Hu, K. H., Chen, F. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Lee, J. D. (2015). Improving corporate governance effects on an enterprise crisis based on a new hybrid DEMATEL with the MADM model. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 43(6), 1395-1412.‏
  36. Kihl, L. A. (2018). Corruption in sport: Causes, consequences, and reform. New York: Routledge Research in Sport and Corruption.
  37. Laxman, H. S. V. (2021). A Study on immoral behavior of athletes in the sports world and its impact. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(6), 11274-11282.‏
  38. McGillivray, D., Koenigstorfer, J., Bocarro, J. N., & Edwards, M. B. (2021). The role of advocacy organisations for ethical mega sport events. Sport Management Review, 1, 1-20.‏
  39. Moriconi, M., & De Cima, C. (2021). Why some football referees engage in match-fixing? A sociological explanation of the influence of social structures. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(4), 545-563.‏
  40. Milanović, L., Ranđelović, N., Živković, D., & Savić, Z. (2021). Ethics and sports, ethics in sports, sports ethics: Aspects of consideration of different authors. Fizičko Vaspitanje i Sport Kroz Vekove, 8(2), 16-32.‏
  41. Monteverde, V. H. (2021). The cost of corruption and undue private benefit: two hidden faces of the same mirror. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(12), 653-664.
  42. Morrow, S. (2013). Football club financial reporting: Time for a new model? Sports Business Management, 3, 297–311.
  43. Mravec, L. (2021). Match-fixing as a threat to Sport: Ethical and legal perspectives. Studia sportiva, 15(2), 37-48.‏
  44. Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence: A review of the evidence by a criminologist for economists. Annual Review of Economics, 5(1), 83-105.
  45. Osifo, Ch. (2018). A network perspective and hidden corruption. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8(1), 115-136.
  46. Philippou, C. (2019). Towards a unified framework for anti-bribery in sport governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 16(2), 83-99.‏
  47. Philippou, C. (2021). Anti-bribery and corruption in sport mega-events: stakeholder perspectives, Sport in Society, 25(4), 819-836.
  48. Roberts, S., Chadwick, S., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2018). Sponsorship programmes and corruption in sport: management responses to a growing threat. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(1), 19-36.‏
  49. Sánchez, F., & Broudehoux, A. M. (2013). Mega-events and urban regeneration in Rio de Janeiro: planning in a state of emergency. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 5(2), 132-153.‏
  50. Serby, T. (2015). The council of europe convention on manipulation of sports competitions: the best bet for the global fight against match-fixing? International Sports Law Journal, 15, 83–100.
  51. Shafiee, S., & Afrouzeh, H. (2018). Identifying and determining the factors affecting the incidence of corruption in Iran`S Football. Sport Management Studies, 10(47), 39-66. (in Persian).
  52. Soebbing, B. P., & Walker, K. B. (2017). Impact on organisations: Economic and reputation. Corruption in Sport, 1, 126-143.
  53. Surowiecki, J. (2014). The Sochi effect. New Yorker February 13. Available at: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/02/10/the-sochi-effect (Accessed July 18, 2014).
  54. Thomsen, S. R., & Anderson, H. (2015). Using the rhetoric of atonement to analyze Lance Armstrong's failed attempt at redeeming his public image. Journal of Sports Media, 10(1), 79-99.‏
  55. Testa, A., & Sergi, A. (2018). Corruption, mafia power and Italian soccer. London: Routledge.
  56. Theberg, N., & Birrel, S. (1994). Structural constrains facing women and sport. In D. Margaret Costa, & S. R. Guthrie (Eds.), women and sport: interdisciplinary perspectives, champaign (1-336). Illinois: Human Kinetics.
  57. Urdaneta, R., Guevara-Pérez, J. C., Llena-Macarulla, F., & Moneva, J. M. (2021). Transparency and accountability in sports: Measuring the Social and financial performance of Spanish professional football. Sustainability, 13(15), 1-16.‏
  58. Walsh, D. (2013). seven deadly sins: My pursuit of Lance Armstrong. UK, London: Simon & Schuster.
  59. Williams, M. S., & Warren, M. E. (2014). A democratic case for comparative political theory. Political Theory, 42(1), 26-57.‏
  60. Yaffa, J. (2014). The waste and corruption of Vladimir Putin’s 2014 Winter Olympics. Bloomberg Businessweek, ‏1, 1-15.
  61. Yilmaz, S., Manoli, A. E., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2019). An anatomy of Turkish football match-fixing. Trends in Organized Crime, 22(4), 375-393.
  62. Yousefi, B., & Naseri, A. (2022). Identification of the problems of entering the wealthy owners in Iranian football using interpretive-structural modeling technique. Sport Management Studies, 13(65), 79-108. (in Persian).
  63. Zafirovski, M. (2003). Human rational behavior and economic rationality. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7(2), 1-34.‏
مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 15، شماره 80
مهر و آبان 1402
صفحه 181-210

  • تاریخ دریافت 14 فروردین 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 06 تیر 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 11 تیر 1401

صفحه اصلی

اصول اخلاقی

ارسال مقاله

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما