نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد بروجرد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بروجرد، ایران

2 گروه تربیت بدنی، واحد بروجرد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بروجرد، ایران؛ گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و رتبه بندی عوامل مؤثر بر مالکیت فکری در ورزش ایران طراحی و اجرا گردید. پژوهش حاضر از لحاظ هدف کاربردی، از نظر شیوه گردآوری داده‌ها توصیفی- پیمایشی بود چون هیچ گونه دستکاری بر روی متغیرها و عوامل صورت نگرفته و بر اساس رویکرد پژوهش، آمیخته بود. جامعة آماری بخش کیفی این پژوهش را نخبگان و صاحب‌نظران حوزة مدیریت ورزشی کشور و حوزةمالکیت فکری تشکیل دادند و در بخش کمی؛ نیز برخی پژوهشگران و مخترعین حوزة ورزش نیز به جامعة آماری اضافه شدند. ابزار پژوهش حاضر شامل پرسشنامه و مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختارمند بود. به منظور رتبه‌بندی عوامل از روش الکتره استفاده گردید. کلیة روند تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از نرم افزار الکتره اسلور انجام گردید. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که تعداد 20 عامل به عنوان عوامل مؤثر بر بهبود مالکیت فکری در حوزه ورزش شناسایی گردید. با توجه به نتایج روش الکتره مشخص گردیده که تأسیس دفاتر تخصصی در سراسر کشور جهت بهبود مالکیت فکری در ورزش با چیرگی 19 مهم‌ترین عامل مؤثر بر بهبود مالکیت فکری در ورزش می-باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and ranking factors affecting the improvement of intellectual property in sport

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Mahdi Soltani 1
  • Hosein Ali Mohamma 2
  • Hamid Foroghipour 1

1 Department of Physical Education, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran

2 Department of Physical Education, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran; Department of Physical Education, Qom University, Qom, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to identify and rank the factors affecting intellectual property in sport. The purpose of this study was to use a descriptive-survey method in terms of collecting data because of no manipulation of variables and factors and based on the research approach. The statistical community of the qualitative section of this research was elite and experts in the field of sport management in the country and the domain of intellectual property. In the quantitative part, some researchers and inventors of the field of sport were added to the statistical society. The tool of this research was questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Electricity method was used to rank the factors. All data analysis process was performed using the Sulur Electric Software. The results of this study showed that 20 factors were identified as factors affecting the improvement of intellectual property in the field of sport. With regard to the results of the method of electrification, it has been determined that the establishment of specialized offices throughout the country to improve intellectual property in sport with a domination of 19 is the most important factor affecting the improvement of intellectual domination in sport.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Intellectual sovereignty
  • sport
  • invention
  • property
  1. Abbas Zadeh, A., Ataei Nejad, M., & Ismael Zadeh, M. (2014). Role of intellectual property in resistance economics and operational opportunity. Paper presented at the First National Conference on Management, Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Resistance Economics, Mashhad, Khorasan Branch of Iranian Management. (in Persian).
  2. Abedinzadeh, M., & Khamisi, M. (2014). Intellectual property rights in iran and its comparison in international legal system. Paper presented at the National Conference of Iran and International Legal Challenges, Maragheh, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh Branch. (in Persian).
  3. Amadi, U. J. (2017). Intellectual property rights in sports: A trick or two Nigeria can learn from the global game. African Sports Law and Business Bulletin, 14(1), 152-171.
  4. Bettig, V. (2018). Copyrighting culture: The political economy of intellectual property. London: Routledge.
  5. Dratler Jr, J., & McJohn, S. M. (2018). Intellectual property law: Commercial, creative and industrial property. Law Journal Press,18(7), 45-53.
  6. Fredendall, L. D., Letmathe, P., & Uebe-Emden, N. (2016). Supply chain management practices and intellectual property protection in China: Perceptions of Mittelstand managers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(2), 135-163.
  7. Gans, J. S., Murray, F. E., & Stern, S. (2017). Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge: Intellectual property and academic publication. Research Policy, 46(4), 820-835.
  8. Hagedoorn, J., & Zobel, A. K. (2015). The role of contracts and intellectual property rights in open innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9), 1050-1067.
  9. Hekmat Nia, M., & Khoshnevis, A. (2009). Examples of intellectual property rights in the sports industry. Islamic law, 6 (23), 127-159. (in Persian).
  10. Hylton, J. G. (2011). The over-protection of intellectual property rights in sport in the United States and Elsewhere. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 21(1), 43-73.
  11. Khani, R., & Nasrallahi, Z. (2012). Investigating economic factors affecting intellectual property rights: Comparing selected developing and developed countries. Economics and Modeling, 3(11), 172-145. (in Persian).
  12. Kukkonen, C. A. (1998). Be a good sport and refrain from using my patented putt: Intellectual property protection for sports related movements. J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y, 80, 808.
  13. Liu, Q., & Hu, F. (2006). Protection of the intellectual property of sport tournament and the television right [J]. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education (Social Science), 2(16), 21-36.
  14. Liu, C., Jing, J. P., & Yu, J. (2009). Analysis on the definition and composition factor of patent quality in intellectual property rights. Information Science, 11, 2609-2618.
  15. Manteghi, M., Taghavi Bafghi, M., & Shahshahi, M. (2013). How to protect intellectual property in collaborative technology transfer projects. Paper presented th the National Conference on Accounting and Management, Center for the Conferences of the Research Institute of Power, Tehran. (in Persian).
  16. Mobini, A., & Keshtkar, M. (2014). Analyzing the effects of three-dimensional model on social innovation: A case study of a company in iran's automotive industry. Innovation Management Quarterly, 3(4), 57-75.
  17. Nikitenko, S. M., Mesyats, M. A., & Protsenko, A. P. (2018). Intellectual property as an active resource for sustainable development of the regional economy. In  IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,206, 109-120. IOP Publishing.
  18. Pan, L. (2018). Research on macro influencing factors of energy intellectual property in China: Analysis based on dynamic panel data model. Available at: (Accessed 12 August 2019).
  19. Shakouri, S., Pishvaee, M., & Ghaffari, A. (2015). Comparison of intellectual property system of Iran with the top countries of innovation America, Germany, England, France. Paper presented at the International Conference on Modern Research in Management, Economics and Consultation, Iliya Capital Ideas Managers Institute, Istanbul. (in Persian).
  20. Shouri, M., & Najafi, A. (2017). Investigating the impact of developing the intellectual property system and registered knowledge on motivation for innovating industry. Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 7(3), 250-217. (in Persian).
  21. Wang, M. K., & Hwang, K. P. (2011). Key factors for the successful evaluation and screening of managers of the intellectual property rights speciality. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 10794-10802.‏
  22. Wiwchar, M., Walker, D., & Marsh, R. (2020). Protecting your digital health intellectual property: Fundamentals of intellectual property and how it applies to software, hardware and business processes. In Digital Health Entrepreneurship (pp. 103-118). Cham: ‏