نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
2 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی ، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
3 استاد گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
4 استادیار مدیریت بازرگانی،دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری،پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
5 دانشیار مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی مدل پیشآیندها و پسآیندهای چابکی استراتژیک در کسبوکارهای کوچک و متوسط ورزشی انجام شد. پژوهش به‌صورت آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) بود که بخش کمی آن از نظر شیوة گردآوری دادهها توصیفی-پیمایشی بود. در بخش اول (کیفی) برای اجرای مصاحبۀ میدانی، جامعة آماری پژوهش، اساتید برجسته در حوزة مدیریتورزشی و متخصص در کسبوکارهای ورزشی و صاحبان برجستۀ کسبوکارهای ورزشی بودند که این افراد در دو فاز اولیه و ثانویه به‌ترتیب به‌صورت هدفمند و گلولهبرفی برای مصاحبه‌های کیفی در موضوع پژوهش انتخاب شدند (14 مصاحبه و تا حد اشباع نظری ادامه یافت). در بخش دوم یعنی بخش کمی، بعد از گردآوری اطلاعات حاصل از پژوهش کیفی، پرسشنامهای با 51 گویه و در قالب سه مؤلفۀ پیشآیندهای چابکی استراتژیک، چابکی استراتژیک و پسآیندهای چابکی استراتژیک ساخته شد و در بین صاحبان کسبوکارهای کوچک و متوسط ورزشی شهر تهران توزیع شد (269 نفر). از شاخصهای کشیدگی و چولگی به‌منظور بررسی توزیع دادهها (طبیعی یا غیرطبیعی‌بودن) استفاده شد و برای بررسی و پاسخ به سؤال‌های پژوهش و رسم و تدوین مدل اندازهگیری و مدل ساختاری از نرمافزارهای اسپیاساس نسخة 24، پیالاس نسخة 2.0 و نرم‌افزار مکسکیودیای نسخة پرو استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که فرهنگ سازمانی، ساختار سازمانی و چابکی سازمانی از مقولههای اصلی پیشآیندهای چابکی استراتژیک، همچنین وضوح چشمانداز، قابلیتهای اصلی، اهداف استراتژیک منتخب، مسئولیت مشترک و اقدام از مقولههای اصلی چابکی استراتژیک و درنهایت عملکرد مالی، عملکرد غیرمالی و کسب مزیت رقابتی از مقولههای اصلی پسآیندهای چابکی استراتژیک بودند. نتایج معادلات ساختاری روابط موجود در مدل پژوهش را تأیید کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing and Developing a Strategic Agility Model for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses
نویسندگان [English]
- Hamzeh Esazadeh 1
- Ghodratoalahe Bagheri Ragheb 2
- Asadoalahe Kordenayeg 3
- Asef karimi 4
- Morteza Soltani 5
1 PhD Student in Sport Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
4
5 Associate Professor of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of the present study is to design and develop a model of strategic agility in small and medium-sized sports businesses (pre-future and Then future). The present study in terms of purpose is applied and in terms of data collection was descriptive-survey. In the first (qualitative) part of the field interview, the statistical population of the study were prominent sports management professors specializing in sports businesses and prominent owners of sports businesses. The target and snowball subjects were selected for qualitative interviews in the first and second phases, respectively. (15 interviews with 14 individuals continued to theoretical saturation). And in the second (quantitative) part after collecting data from qualitative research, he made a questionnaire and this questionnaire (51 items in terms of three general components of strategic agility, strategic agility and strategic agility consequences) in Distributed among the owners of small and medium-sized sports businesses in Tehran (269 people). Use elasticity and skewness indices to evaluate the distribution of data (natural or abnormal) and to answer and answer research questions and to draw up a measurement model and structural model using SPSS version 24, Smart PLS version 2.0 and Max QDA Pro version software were used. The results showed that organizational culture, organizational structure and organizational agility are the main categories of strategic agility precursors; vision clarity, core capabilities, selected strategic goals, shared responsibility and action, the key categories of strategic agility and ultimately financial performance, Nonfinancial performance and competitive advantage are the main categories of strategic agility outcomes.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Financial Performance
- Organizational Agility
- Organizational Culture
- Organizational Structure
- Competitive Advantage
- Abasi, H., & Fatahian, N. (2018). The effect of strategic learning on organizational performance with the mediating role of strategic agility (Case Study: Hamadan and Kermanshah Youth and Sport Offices). Contemporary Research in Sport Management. 8(15), 29-43. (in Persian).
- Abu-Radi, S., & Al-Hawajreh, K. M. (2013). Strategic agility and its impact on the operations competitive capabilities in Jordanian private hospitals. Jordan: Middle East University.
- Al-Azzam, Z. F., IRTAIMEH, H. J. A., & Khaddam, A. A. H. (2017). Examining the Mediating Effect of Strategic Agility in the Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Introduction Organizational Excellence in Jordan Service Sector. Journal of Business, 6(1), 7-15.
- Bader, S., Barth, T., Krohn, P., Ruchser, R., Storch, L., Wagner, L, & Palm, D. (2019). Agile Shopfloor organization design for industry 4.0 manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 756–764.
- Baei, S., Kordnaeg, A., & Dellhai, G. (2016). The title of strategic agility in the Iranian banking industry and its impact on performance. Business Strategies, 13(8), 44-58. (in Persian).
- Bandarian, R. (2016). Presenting a conceptual model of strategic agility in research and technology organizations. Technology Growth, 46, 9-14. (in Persian).
- Batra, D. D. (2020). Job-work fit as a determinant of the Acceptance of Large-Scale Agile Methodology. Journal of Systems and Software, 168: 1-37.
- Bavaghar, F. (2018). The Impact of strategic agility and innovative behavior on competitiveness (Unpublished master´s thesis). Zanjan University, Zanjan. (in Persian).
- Brueller, N. N., Carmeli, A., & Drori, I. (2014). How do different types of mergers and acquisitions facilitate strategic agility? California Management Review, 56(3), 39–57.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (p. 676). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Di Minin, A., Frattini, F., Bianchi, M., Bortoluzzi, G., & Piccaluga, A. (2014). Udinese Calcio soccer club as a talent’s factory: Strategic agility, diverging objectives, and resource constraints. European Management Journal. 32(2), 319-336.
- Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 370–382.
- Gupta, M., George, J. F., & Xia, W. (2019). Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 13–24.
- Kale, E., Aknar, A., & Başar, Ö. (2019). Absorptive capacity and firm performance: The mediating role of strategic agility. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 78, 276-283.
- Kozechian, H., Ehsani, M., Azimzadeh, S. M., & Kordenaeg, A. (2014). A model for starting small and medium-sized sports businesses. Sport management and development, 3(1), 51-68. (in Persian).
- Kumkale, I. (2016). Organization’s tool for creating competitive advantage: Strategic agility. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 2(03), 118-124.
- Kutej, D., & Vorraber, W. (2019). Fostering additive manufacturing of special parts with augmented-reality on-site visualization. Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 13–21.
- Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 58–77.
- Monavarian, A., Manian, A., Movahidi, M., & Akbari, M. (2014). Investigating factors influencing e-commerce development (Case study: Small and medium enterprises of Iran). Journal of Information Technology Management, 1, 145-160. (in Persian).
- Morgan, R. E., & Page, K. L., (2008). Managing business transformation to deliver strategic agility. Strategic Change, 17(92), 155-168.
- Ojha, D. (2008). Impact of strategic agility on competitive capabilities and financial performance (Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University).
- Penttilä, S., Lund, H., Ratava, J., Lohtander, M., Kah, P., & Varis, J. (2019). Virtual reality enabled manufacturing of challenging workpieces. Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 22–31.
- Roth, A. (1996). Achieving strategic agility through Economies of Knowledge. Planning Review, 24(2), 30-36.
- Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V., (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms, MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263.
- Setia, P., Sambamurthy, V., & Closs, D. J. (2008). Realizing business value of agile IT applications: antecedents in the supply chain networks. Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 5-19.
- Seyed Javadin, S. R., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., & Zarei, N. (2017). Analysing the effective factors on workforce agility upon a novel hybrid approach by factor analysis and VIKOR Method (A case study of MAPNA corporation). Journal of Modern Management Studies, 1(1), 19-45.
- Shin, H., Lee, J. E., Kimm D. S., & Rhim, H. (2015). Strategic agility of Korean small and medium enterprises and its influence on operational and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics. 168, 181-196.
- Teoh, A. P., Lee, K. Y., & Muthuveloo, R. (2017). The impact of enterprise risk management, strategic agility, and quality of internal audit function on firm performance. International Review of Management and Marketing. (1), 222-229.
)