مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

داوران

هزینه های دریافتی

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

راهنمای نگارش مقاله

اثر ذهنیت باز بر نوآوری رادیکال از طریق شبکه‌های اجتماعی و یادگیری سازمانی در باشگاه‌های خصوصی لیگ برتر فوتبال ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ایران

2 استاد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ایران

3 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ایران

4 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تبریز، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی اثر ذهنیت باز بر نوآوری رادیکال در باشگاه­ های خصوصی لیگ برتر فوتبال کشور با نقش میانجی شبکه­ های اجتماعی و یادگیری سازمانی انجام شد. جامعة آماری این پژوهش همة عوامل اجرایی باشگاه ­های خصوصی لیگ برتر فوتبال ایران در فصل 98-1397 بودند. تعداد نمونه­ های این پژوهش با استفاده از روش نمونه­ گیری هدفمند تمام نمونه‌ها 242 نفر تعیین شد. برای گردآوری داده ­ها از پرسشنامة نوآوری رادیکال ترویلو و همکاران (2014)، پرسشنامة ذهنیت باز مگلن و همکاران (2010)، پرسشنامة شبکه‌های اجتماعی بکر و همکاران (2016) و پرسشنامة یادگیری سازمانی میس و سلس (2013) استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که ذهنیت باز در باشگاه های فوتبال به طور مستقیم می­تواند باعث ارتقای نوآوری رادیکال شود. علاوه‌براین، یادگیری سازمانی و شبکه ­های اجتماعی بر نوآوری رادیکال تأثیر مستقیم دارند. همچنین یادگیری سازمانی و شبکه­ های اجتماعی بر رابطة بین ذهنیت باز و نوآوری رادیکال اثر میانجی دارند؛ درنتیجه، باشگاه ­های فوتبال کشور باید به ایجاد فضای ذهنی باز در باشگاه توجه ویژه داشته باشند تا یادگیری سازمانی و شبکه ­های اجتماعی بهبود یابند و به‌دنبال آن نوآوری رادیکال در باشگاه توسعه یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Open Mindedness on Radical Innovation Through Social Networks and Organizational Learning in Iranian Private Clubs of Football Premier League

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehran Azarian Soosahab 1
  • Seyyed Mohammad Kashef 2
  • Mohsen Behnam 3
  • Yaghob Badri Azarin 4

1 Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Science, Urmia University

2 Professor of Sport Management. Faculty of Sport Science, Urmia University

3 Assistant Professor of Sport Management. Faculty of Sport Science, Urmia University

4 Associate Professor of Sport Management. Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, Tabriz University

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to examining the effect of open mindednesson radical innovation through social networksand organizational learning in Iranian private clubs of football premier league. The statistical population of this study included all the executive staff of the Iranian private clubs of football Premier League in the 2018-19 season. The number of samples in this study was determined using purposeful sampling consist of all samples (n=242). To collect the data used from scales of Troilo’s et al. (2014) radical innovation, Mogollon’s et al. (2010) open mindedness, Baker’s et al. (2016) social networks and Maes & Sels’s (2013) organizational learning. The results showed that open mindedness in football clubs could directly promote radical innovation. Moreover, social networks and organisation learning had a direct impact on radical innovation. In addition, social networks and organizational learning had a mediator effect on the relationship between open mindednessand radical innovation. As a result, football clubs should pay special attention to creating an open-minded atmosphere in the club to improve organizational learning and social networks, and then develop radical innovation in the club.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Framework
  • Organizational Communication
  • Application of Organizational Knowledge
  • Fundamental Change
  • Football Clubs
مراجع
  1. Abbasi Esfanjani. H. (2017). Designing the model for commercialization of university research using structural equation modeling-Partial least squares method (SEM-PLS). Journal of Commerce, 82, 33-65. (in Persian).
  2. Abbasi, T., Hashemi, M., Armineh, A. R., & Bakhtiari, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between intellectual capital and labor productivity: With an emphasis on organizational learning. Journal of Public Administration, 6(4), 791-817. (in Persian).
  3. Ahmadi, J., Bahmei, J., Ranjbar, M., Rahimi, H., & Shahbazi, H. (2015). Study of relationship between organizational climate and faculty members' participation in academic decision makings. Payavard, 9(2), 118-30. (in Persian).
  4. Baker, W. E., Grinstein, A., & Harmancioglu, N. (2016). Whose innovation performance benefits more from external networks: Entrepreneurial or conservative firms? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 104-20.
  5. Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. Management Reviews, 3(1), 41–60.
  6. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–121.
  7. Dehgan Najm, M. (2009). Knowledge management and its role in organizational innovation. Automotive Engineering and Related Industries, 10(1), 47- 52. (in Persian).
  8. Eidi, H., & Yosefi, B. (2014). Investigating the sources of income for football in the world and comparing it with soccer club in Iran. Iran Marketing Journal, 5, 1- 17. (in Persian).
  9. Fatemi Nasab, E., & Mahmoodzadeh, E. (2017). The effect of organizational communication on knowledge sharing in iran railway company. National Defense Strategic Studies, 1(1), 72- 109. (in Persian).
  10. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  11. Imani, J. (2011). A study of the relationship between the participative management and organizational climate with managers’ effectiveness in guidance schools in Bandar Abbas city. Instruction and Evaluation, 4(14), 45-74. (in Persian).
  12. Kang, S.-C., Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 236–56.
  13. Kazem M. (2002). Football in Bourse and Bourse in football (1st e.d.). Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance Publications. (in Persian).
  14. Khorakian, A., Kadkhoda, N., & Yazdani B. M. (2017). Investigating the effect of intellectual capital on innovative behavior through the role of knowledge sharing as a mediator (Case of Sun-Air Research Institute). Innovation Management, 6(1), 101- 34. (in Persian).
  15. Lord, M. (2015). Group learning capacity: The roles of open-mindedness and shared vision. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-11.
  16. Maes, J., & Sels, S. (2013). SMEs’ radical product innovation: The role of internally and externally oriented knowledge capabilities. Journal of Small Business Management,  52(1), 141-63.
  17. Malaii, Z. (2012). The moderating role of cultural barriers on the relationship between organizational innovation thinking (Case study: Thirteen areas of Mashhad municipality) (Unpublished Master´s thesis). Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. (in Persian).
  18. Mesbahi Jahromi, N., & Adibzade, M. (2015). Impact of knowledge management system on organizational innovation (moderating role of organizational learning). Knowledge Studies, 2(5), 25- 43. (in Persian).
  19. Mirkamali, M., & Aghajani Afroozi, A. A. (2013). Providing a cognitive model of the position of entrepreneurship and radical innovation in cohen's theory of scientific revolution. Paper presented at the National Conference on Business Management with a Focus: Entrepreneurial Businesses and Knowledge Based Economy, Payam Noor University of Mazandaran, Ramsar. (in Persian).
  20. Mogollon, R. H., Carrio´n, G. C., Navarro, J. G. C., & Milla´n, A. L. (2010). The role of cultural barriers in the relationship between open-mindedness and organizational innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(4), 360-76
  21. Mohammad Kazemi, R., & Omidi, Y. (2011). Exercise entrepreneurship: An emerging approach to entrepreneurship and sport management. Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior, 2(18), 69- 87. (in Persian).
  22. Mohammadi Hoseini, A., Amine Bedokhti, A., & Jamshidi, L. (2014). The role of organizational learning in enhancement the innovation performance. Journal of Innovation and Value Creation, 2(4), 84-95. (in Persian).
  23. Nguyen, T. D., & Barrett, N. J. (2006). The adoption of the internet by export firms in transitional markets. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 18(1), 29-42.
  24. Pérez-Luño, A., Cabello-Medina, C., Carmona-Lavado, A., & Cuevas-Rodríguez, G. (2011). How social capital and knowledge affect innovation. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1369-76.
  25. Perin, M. G., Sampaio, C., H., Jiménez, D., J., & Cegarra-Navarro, J., G. (2016). Network effects on radical innovation and financial performance: An Open-mindedness approach. Brazilian Administrative Review, 13(4), 1-24.
  26. Ramazani, R. (2008). Economics and investment in sport: A case study of football. physical education organization. Research Project, 212-37. (in Persian).
  27. Rampersad, G., Quester, P., & Troshani, I. (2009). Managing innovation networks: Exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networks. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 793-805.
  28. Rezaei, Sh. D., Ehsani, M., Koozechian, H., & Amiri, M. (2015). Designing effective commercialization mechanisms for football clubs in Iran. Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior. 5(9), 119-30. (in Persian).
  29. Ritala, P., Husted, K., Olander, H., & Michailova, S. (2018). External knowledge sharing and radical innovation: The downsides of uncontrolled openness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), https://doi.org/10.1108/ JKM-05-2017-0172.  
  30. Sanchez-Casado, N., Cegarra Navarro, J. G., Wensley, A., & Tomaseti-Solano, E. (2016). Social networking sites as a learning tool. The Learning Organization, 23(1), 23-42.
  31. Sanjaghi, M. E., Daliri, A., Farahi, A., & Amirahmadi, F. S. (2017). The effect of strategic leadership on innovation emphasizing on network communication approach. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 9(4), 181-205. (in Persian).
  32. Schindehutte, M., Morris, M. H., & Kocak, A. (2008). Understanding market-driving behavior: The role of entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 4-26.
  33. Talebi, K. (2006). Incremental innovation versus radical innovation. Culture of Management, 4(13), 113- 30. (in Persian).
  34. Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modeling. Proceedings of the XLII SISScientific Meeting (739–42). Padova: CLEUP.
  35. Troilo, G., De Luca, L. M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2014). More innovation with less? A strategic contingency view of slack resources, information search, and radical innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(2), 259–77.
  36. Van de Ven A H, Polley D E, Garud R., & Venkataraman S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
  37. Wang, M.-C., & Fang, S.-C. (2012). The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between network structures and the innovative performance of a new venture. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(4), 311-23.
  38. Xu, J., Houssin, R., Caillaud, E., & Gardoni, M. (2010). Macro process of knowledge management for continuous innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 573-91.
مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 12، شماره 63
آذر و دی 1399
صفحه 113-138
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 24 آذر 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 02 اردیبهشت 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 اردیبهشت 1399
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار