نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، پژوهشگاه علوم ورزشی

2 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه جهرم، گروه علوم ورزشی

3 دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دبیر تربیت بدنی وزارت آموزش و پرورش

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل کیفی توسعة پایدار از طریق ورزش و شناسایی موانع و راهبردهای آن انجام شده است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از لحاظ نوع راهبرد، کیفی بود که از رویکرد گراندد تئوری (نظریة برخاسته از داده‌ها) برای ارائة نتایج بهره گرفته شد. مشارکت‌کنندگان در پژوهش 21 نفر از نخبگان (شامل اعضای هیئت‌علمی، مدیران ارشد در وزارت ورزش و جوانان و فدراسیون‌های ورزشی، کارشناسان خبره، مربیان ورزشی و بازیکنان گذشتة تیم ملی) بودند. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق مصاحبة اکتشافی گردآوری شدند. ملاک اتمام گردآوری داده‌ها رسیدن به اشباع نظری بوده است. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از رهیافت ظاهرشوندة مربوط به اثر گلیزر (1992) بهره گرفته شد که از طریق اجرای سه فرایند کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام شد. در بررسی موانع توسعة پایدار از طریق ورزش، 47 کد مستقل و 11 مفهوم که شکل‌دهندة سه مقولة کلی (موانع شناختی-دانشی، ساختاری و قانونی-مدیریتی) بودند، شناسایی و طبقه-بندی شدند. همچنین، در بخش راهبردها 35 کد و 10 مفهوم استخراج شدند و در سه مقولة کلی (راهبردهای ادراکی-ارتباطی، اقتصادی-ساختاری و عملکردی) دسته‌بندی شدند. نتـایج این پژوهش می-تواند در برنامه‌ریزی‌های کلان توسعة کشور و همچنین برنامه‌های توسعة بخش ورزش موردتوجه قرار گیرد و با تأکید بر رفع موانع و اتخاذ راهبردهای مستخرج از این پژوهش، می‌توان مسیر دستیابی به اهداف توسعة پایدار کشور را هموار کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Sustainable Development Through Sport: Barriers and Strategies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Hossein Ghorbani 1
  • Hamid Reza Safari Jafarloo 2
  • Mohammad Reza Esmaeili 3

1 Assisstant Professor of Sport Management, Sport Sciences Research Institute

2 Assisstant Professor of Sport Management, Jahrom University, Sport Sciences Department

3 Ph.D. of Sport Management, Physical Education Teacher of the Ministry of Education

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to qualitatively analyze sustainable development through sport and identify its barriers and strategies. The method of the present study was qualitative research in terms of purpose and type of strategy which used the grounded theory approach to present the results. The research participants included 21 elites (including faculty members, senior managers in the Ministry of Sport and Youth and Sports Federations, experts, sports coaches and former national team players). The data were collected through exploratory interviews. The criterion for completing the data collection was theoretical saturation. In order to data analysis, Glaser's (1992) Emergent approach was used and this process was performed through three open, axial and selective coding processes. In examining the barriers to sustainable development through sport, 47 independent codes and 11 concepts that formed three general categories (cognitive-knowledge, structural and legal-managerial barriers) were identified and classified. Also, in the Strategies 35 codes and 10 concepts were extracted and categorized into three general categories (Perceptual-Communication, Economic-Structural, and Functional Strategies). The results of this study can be taken into consideration in the macro planning of the country as well as the development plans of the sports sector. Also, by focusing on removing the barriers and adopting strategies derived from this research, we can pave the way for achieving the country's sustainable development goals.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Development Barriers
  • Development Strategies
  • Sustainable Development
  • Sport
  1. Absalyamov, T. (2015). The influence of cultural and sport mega-events on sustainable development of the city. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 188, 197-201.
  2. Akindes, G., & Kirwan, M. (2009) Sport as international aid: Assisting development or promoting under-development in Sub-Saharan Africa? In R. Levermore, & A. Beacom (Eds), Sport and international development (215-45). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  3. Alamdar, S, J. (2016). The role of municipal specialists in municipal sustainable management and development in the sustainable urban development management and accounting. Paper presented at the Second Gathering of Key Issues in Management and Accounting Sciences, Golestan Province, Gorgan. (Persian).
  4. Aliakbar, M. (2003). Privatization from the first development plan up to now. Tehran: Iran Privatization Organization. (Persian)
  5. Babaeifard, A. (2010). Cultural Development and Social Development in Iran. RefahJ. 10 (37):7-56, URL: http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-306-fa.html
  6. Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility in professional sport: Internal and external factors. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 717.
  7. Black, D. R. (2010). The ambiguities of development: Implications for ‘development through sport’. Sport in Society, 13(1), 121-9.
  8. Burnett, C. (2015). Assessing the sociology of sport: On sport for development and peace. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(4–5), 385–90.
  9. Chang, Y. C., & Wei, Z. G. (2007). Research on main reason and countermeasure for imbalanced development of mass sports in China [J]. Journal of Xi'an Physical Education University, 5(1): 83-92.
  10. Coalter, F. (2010). The politics of sport-for-development: Limited focus programmes and broad-gauge problems? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45(3), 295–314.
  11. Czyżewski, A., & Smędzik-Ambroży, K. (2015). Specialization and diversification of agricultural production in the light of sustainable development. Journal of International Studies, 8(2), 63-73.
  12. Danaeifard, H., & Mozaffari, Z. (2008). Promoting validity and reliability in quality management research: Reflection on research audit strategies. Public Management Research, 1(1), 131-62. (Persian).
  13. Dimeo, P., & Kay, J. (2004). Major sports events, image projection and the problems of ‘semi periphery’: A case study of the 1996 South Asia Cricket World Cup. The World Quarterly, 25(7), 1263–76.
  14. Girginov, V., & Hills, L. (2008). A sustainable sports legacy: Creating a link between the London Olympics and sports participation. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25(14), 2091-116.
  15. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basic of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forces. Mill Valley, CA: Sinology Press.  
  16. Hartmann, D., & Kwauk, C. (2011). Sport and development: An overview, critique, and reconstruction. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 35(3), 284-305.
  17. Javani, V. (2018). Explaining the implementation of resistive economy in sport industry. Journal of Sport Management, 10(3), 567-80. (Persian).
  18. Khazaei, A., Honari, H., & Shahlaee Bagheri, J. (2018). Identify the Challenges of Implementing the Resilient Economy in The Country's Sport Industry. Sport Management Studies, 10(49), 59-78. doi:10.22089/smrj.2017.4610.1886
  19. Kiani, M. S., Nazari, L., & Shahbazpour, L. (2019). Sport tourism and sustainable local development for host cities for sporting events. American Journal of Sports Science, 7(1), 7-10. (Persian).
  20. Langhelle, O. (2000). Sustainable development and social justice: Expanding the Rawlsian framework of global justice. Environmental Values, 9(3), 295-323.
  21. Lemke, W. (2016). The role of sport in achieving the sustainable development goals. UN Chronicle, 53(2), 6-9.
  22. Leopkey, B., & Parent, M. M. (2012). Olympic Games legacy: From general benefits to sustainable long-term legacy. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 29(6), 924-43.
  23. Lindsey, I., & Darby, P. (2019). Sport and the Sustainable Development Goals: Where is the policy coherence?. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 54(7), 793-812.
  24. Loland, S. (2006). Olympic sport and the ideal of sustainable development. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 33(2), 144-56
  25. Lyras, A., & Welty Peachey, J. (2011). Integrating sport-for-development theory and praxis. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 311–26.
  26. Maes, J., & Jacobs, S. (2017). Nature‐based solutions for Europe's sustainable development. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 121-4.
  27. McGoldrick, D. (1996). Sustainable development and human rights: An integrated conception. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 45(4), 796-818.
  28. Milani, J. (2015). Resistance economy and national self-confidence, opportunities and challenges. 15 (7), 5-22.
  29. Mohammadi Moghani, H., & Gharehkhani, H. (2018). The designing and explaining the model for the government's economic role in the process of Iran sports privatization. Journal of Sport Management, 10(2), 385-67. (Persian).
  30. Nazari, R. and Ghasemi, H (2012). The role of mass media as an opportunity for sustainable development in sport, Journal of Communication Management in Sports Media, 1 (1), 40-4.
  31. Peiry, K. (2006). Promoting sustainable development and poverty reduction-what makes them successful? Environmental Policy and Law, 36(5), 219.
  32. Rabbani Khorasgan, R., Purafkari, N., Ketabi, M., & Raoufi, M. (2009). Investigating cultural-social barriers to development with emphasis on specialism (Case study of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas). Applied Sociology, 20(3), 135-56. (Persian).
  33. Radicchi, E. (2013). Tourism and sport: Strategic synergies to enhance the sustainable development of a local context. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 57(1), 44-57.
  34. Richards, J., Kaufman, Z., Schulenkorf, N., Wolff, E., Gannett, K., Siefken, K., & Rodriguez, G. (2013). Advancing the evidence base of sport for development: A new open-access, peer-reviewed journal. Journal of Sport for Development, 1(1), 1–3.
  35. Romão, J., & Neuts, B. (2017). Territorial capital, smart tourism specialization and sustainable regional development: Experiences from Europe. Habitat International, 68, 64-74.
  36. Schulenkorf, N. (2012). Sustainable community development through sport and events: A conceptual framework for sport-for-development projects. Sport Management Review, 15(1), 1-12.
  37. Schulenkorf, N. (2017). Managing sport-for-development: Reflections and outlook. Sport Management Review, 20(3), 243-51.
  38. Schulenkorf, N., Thomson, A., & Schlenker, K. (2011). Inter-community sport events: Vehicles and catalysts for social capital in divided societies. Event Management, 15(2), 105–19.
  39. Šipilova, V., Ostrovska, I., Jermolajeva, E., Aleksejeva, L., & Oļehnovičs, D. (2017). Evaluation of sustainable development in rural territories in Latgale region (Latvia) by using the conception of smart specialization. Journal of teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 82-105.
  40. Smith, A. and Westerbeek, H. (2007), “Sport as a vehicle for deploying corporate social responsibility”, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25(1), 43-54.
  41. Sobry, C. (2016). Sport Tourism and Local Sustainable Development: Prospective of globalization effects-Actors strategy and responsibility. Editions L'Harmattan
  42. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2015). transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available at: www.preventionweb.net (Accessed).
  43. Zahedi, Sh. A. (2011). Globalization and sustainable development. Strategic Studies in Globalization, 2(3): 1-18. (Persian).
  44. Zahedi, Sh. A. (2016). Comprehensive sustainable development with emphasis on green entrepreneurship management and entrepreneurship. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University Press. (Persian).
  45. Zou, Y. H., & Yu, W. Q. (2007). Imbalanced development of athletic sports in China. Journal Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 41(5), 13-25.
  46. Zhang, B., & Peng, P., (2017). Research on the Development of Education Resources for the Internet Plus Universities in the National Health Field. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5085–93. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00984a
  47. Zheng, G. H. (2015). The Role of Endurance Contests in the Construction of Authority and Social Order in Rural China: Cases in the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32(8), 1057-70. doi:10.1080/09523367.2015.1022719