مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی

بررسی رابطۀ یادگیری سازمانی با خودکارآمدی عمومی و اشتیاق کاری در ادارات ورزش و جوانان استان مرکزی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران

3 استاد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران

چکیده
هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی رابطۀ یادگیری سازمانی با خودکارآمدی عمومی و اشتیاق کاری کارکنان در ادارات ورزش و جوانان استان مرکزی است. روش این پژوهش توصیفی بوده و از نوع مطالعات هم‌بستگی می‌باشد. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش را کلیۀ کارکنان ادارات ورزش و جوانان استان مرکزی تشکیل دادند (289 نفر) که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده، 159 نفر از میان آن‌ها انتخاب شدند. بر‌اساس یافته‌ها مشخص ‌شد که رابطۀ‌ معنا‌داری بین یادگیری سازمانی و خودکارآمدی عمومی و نیز یادگیری سازمانی و اشتیاق کاری کارکنان وجود دارد. همچنین نتایج بیانگر این است که از بین مؤلفه‌های یادگیری سازمانی، "انتقال و یکپارچه‌سازی دانش" قوی‌ترین متغیر در پیش‌بینی خودکارآمدی عمومی و اشتیاق کاری کارکنان می‌باشد. شایان‌ذکر است که هر چهار مؤلفۀ یادگیری سازمانی، بخشی از واریانس متغیر خودکارآمدی عمومی را تبیین کردند. بخشی از واریانس متغیر اشتیاق نیز توسط سه مؤلفۀ (انتقال و یکپارچه‌سازی، تعهد مدیریت و فضای باز و آزمایشگری) متغیر یادگیری سازمانی تبیین گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Relationship Between Organizational Learning with Self Efficacy and Work Engagement in Sports and Youth Offices of Markazi Province

نویسندگان English

  • Mohammad Sanjari 1
  • Mohammad Reza Esmaeili 2
  • Farshad Tojari 3
1 M.Sc. of Sport Management, University of Tehran
2 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch
3 Professor of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch
چکیده English

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of organizational learning with general self-efficacy and work engagement in employees of Sport and Youth offices of Markazi province. Study method was descriptive and correlative. The statistical population of this study consisted of all employees of Sport and Youth offices of Markazi province (N=289) in 2013. 159 subjects were selected as the sample using simple random sampling method. Data were collected using Gomez Organizational Learning Questionnaire (2005), Bandura General Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (2001) and Scaufeli Work Engagement Questionnaire. In this study, Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationships and stepwise regression was applied to predict. The results showed a significant relationship between organizational learning (r=0.62) and general self-efficacy and also between organizational learning (r=0.57) and work engagement. Stepwise regression results showed that among the components of organizational learning, knowledge transfer and integration was the strongest variable to predict general self-efficacy and work engagement. All four components of organizational learning were able to explain 45% of the variance in general self-efficacy and three variables (transfer and integration, management commitment, openness) of organizational learning were able to explain 34% of the variance in work engagement.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Organizational Learning
  • General Self-Efficacy
  • Work Engagement
  1. Abvy Ardekani, M. (2000). Theory of learning organizations. Tehran: Iran's Center for Information and Documentation.1-147. (‌Persian).
  2. Abdullahi, B. (2011). The role of self-empowerment. Tadbir Monthly, (3), 17. (Persian).
  3. Alvani, S. M. (1999). Successful organizations today: Learning organizations and knowledge creation. Tehran: Public AdministrationL.1-121. (Persian).
  4. Analil, L. (2004). Organizational learning in theory and practical. Journal of Nursing Administration, 30(5), 232-5.
  5. Asadi, H‌., Ghanbarpour, ‌N, Gorbani, M.H. & Dossti, M. (2009). The relationship between learning and organizational performance of Physical Education Organization of Islamic Republic. Journal of Sport Management, (1), 237-47. (‌Persian).
  6. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human relations, 58(5), 661-89.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise in changing societies. New York Combridge University.
  8. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
  9. Berthoin, A. A., Lenhard, U., & Rosenberg, R. (2002). Barries to organizational learning, hand book of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford University Press.
  10. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1998). Manual for the occupational self-efficacy scale. Ohio State University & Arizona State University.
  11. Bhatnagar, G. (2006). Measuring organizational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm performance linkage. The Learning Organization, 13(5), 416-633.
  12. Chaudhary, R., Rangnekar, S., & Kumar, M. (2012). Relationships between occupational self-efficacy, human resource development climate, and work engagement. Team Performance Management, 18(17/8), 370-‌83.
  13. Elahi, A. R., & Vesali, M. (2007). Identify obstacles sports infrastructure in the institutions of Islamic learning organization. Move Publication, (34), 21-33. (Persian).
  14. Farhang, A. (2010). Examine the relationship between organizational learning and organizational performance by developing staff at public universities in the South East of the country. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Isfahan. (Persian).
  15. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of management review, 10(4), 803-13.
  16. Heslin, P. A., & Klehe, U. C. (2006). Self-efficacy In SG Rogelberg (Ed.) Encyclopedia of industrial/organizational Psychology, 2,705-8.
  17. Hijazi, Y., & Vaisi, H. (2007). Explanation of organizational learning at institutions of higher education in agriculture. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 13(4), 3-13. (Persian).
  18. Hoveyda, R. (2007). The relationship between the application components of the learning organization and improve the quality of education in universities of Isfahan University of learner. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Isfahan. (Persian).
  19. Jaffari, I. (2006). The study of organizational learning at the individual, group and organizational martyr Hasheminejad Tehran hospital. (Unpublished masterdissertation). Tehran University. (Persian).
  20. Jerez-Gomez, P., Cespedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of business research, 58(6), 715-25.
  21. Keshavarze, L., & Sarkhosh, S. (2013). Its career self-management and organizational commitment to customer satisfaction, the general directorate of youth and sports Kerman province. Journal of Applied Research in Sport Management, 2(4), 11-9. (Persian).
  22. Myrhydry, A. (2012). Examine the relationship between organizational learning, general self-efficacy and career path with a passion for working managers in Isfahan Steel Company. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Isfahan. (Persian).
  23. Phipps, S. T., Prieto, L. C., & Ndinguri, E. N. (2013). Teaching an old dog new tricks: Investigating how age, ability, and self-efficacy influence intentions to learn and learning among participants in adult education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(1), 13.
  24. Pourabbas, A. (2008). The effectiveness of self-professional workshops on career aspirations of university staff. (Unpublished master dissertation). University of Isfahan. (Persian).
  25. Rahmani Manesh, M. (2012). The relationship between organizational trust and organizational learning among faculty members of Islamic Azad University. MSc Thesis of Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan branch. (‌Persian).
  26. Salanova, M., Liorens, S., Peiro, J. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). How positive emotions predict self-efficacy: The mediating role of job engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 600-19.
  27. Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, stress, and coping, 20(2), 177-96.
  28. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-16.
  29. Stata, R. (1980). Organizational learning: The key to management innovation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  30. Taheri, L. M., Kayatmoghadam, S., Enayati, G. R., & Zavari, M. I. (2012). Examine the relationship between organizational trust and organizational learning and entrepreneurship in small business. National Entrepreneurship Conference Bhhmkary Economic Jihad. P. 1-17. Retrieved from: http://www.civilica.com. (Persian).
  31. Taslimi, S., & Noderi, A. R. (2002). Organizational learning capability, a new approach for balanced development organizations. Journal of Management Studies, (39), 21-47. (Persian).
  32. Templeton, G. F., Lewis, B. R., & Snyder, C. A. (2002). Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct. Journal of the Management Information System, 19(2), 175-218.
  33. Zali, M. R., Madhoushi, M., & Mokhber, M. (2009). Learning entrepreneurial, innovative approach to organizational learning. Magazine and Community Work, (106-1067), 16-25. (‌Persian).
مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 12، شماره 59
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1399
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1399
صفحه 251-268

  • تاریخ دریافت 01 مهر 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری 27 آبان 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش 28 آبان 1394

صفحه اصلی

اصول اخلاقی

ارسال مقاله

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما