نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

چکیده

شهرت باشگاه‌های ورزشی ازنظر تماشاگران آن‌ها می‌تواند تأثیرات مثبت مستقیم و غیرمستقیم بر رفتار ذی‌نفعان آن‌ها داشته باشد؛ بنابراین، پژوهشگران برای ارزیابی این نوع شهرت به‌دنبال ابزاری معتبر و پایا هستند. در مطالعة حاضر به تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی پرسش‌نامة فارسی «شهرت تماشاگرمحور تیم‌های ورزشی» (جانگ و همکاران، 2015) پرداخته شد. این پرسش‌نامه شامل مؤلفه‌های عملکرد تیمی، تاریخچة تیم، مسئولیت اجتماعی تیم، تماشاگرمحوری، کیفیت مدیریت و سلامت مالی تیم بود. پس از دریافت مجوز از سازندگان پرسش‌نامه، روایی محتوایی و صوری آن با استفاده از گروه صاحب‌نظران تأیید شد. پرسش‌نامه به شیوه سه‌مرحله‌ای ترجمه شد. برای تعیین پایایی ابزار، مطالعه‌ای مقدماتی روی 45 نفر از دانشجویان هوادار تیم استقلال و پرسپولیس اجرا شد. همچنین، برای سنجش روایی سازة ابزار نمونه‌ای متشکل از 219 نفر از دانشجویانی انتخاب شدند که سابقة تماشای بازی‌های دو تیم استقلال و پرسپولیس را از نزدیک داشتند. از تکنیک تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و نرم‌افزار لیزرل برای تعیین روایی سازه استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که معرف‌های انتخاب‌شده برای سنجش مؤلفه‌های شهرت تیم‌های ورزشی از روایی لازم برخوردارند و به‌خوبی می‌توانند سازة مدنظر را بسنجند.با توجه به نتایج می‌توان گفت که مقیاس انطباق‌یافتة شهرت تماشاگرمحور تیم‌های ورزشی می‌تواند به‌عنوان مقیاسی پایا و معتبر درمورد تیم‌های ورزشی ایران به‌کار رود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Determining the Validity and Reliability of Spectator-Based Sports Team Reputation Scale in Persian

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Reza Elahi 1
  • Maryam Taheri Kia 2
  • Reza Khorshidi 2

1 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Kharazmi University

2 Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, Kharazmi University

چکیده [English]

Spectator-based sports team reputation can have positive direct and indirect impacts on stakeholders’ behavior. In this regard, researchers are also seeking for a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate this kind of reputation. Therefore, the validity and the reliability of the Spectator-Based Sports Team Reputation Scale (Jang et al., 2015) in Persian were determined in this study. The given scale consists of team performance, team tradition, team social responsibility, spectator orientation, management quality and financial soundness of teams. After obtaining permission from the developer of the scale, content validity and face validity were confirmed by a group of experts. The questionnaire was also translated based on a three-step approach. To determine the reliability of the given scale, a pilot study was carried out on 45 participants in the present study (university students). To assess the construct validity of the given scale, a sample of 219 students with experiences of watching the games of Esteghlal and Persepolis closely were selected. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis technique and the LISREL Software were employed to assess the construct validity of the scale. The findings showed that the agents selected to measure the components of sports team reputation were endowed with the required reliability and they could measure the construct very well (RMSEA≤0.05). Considering these results, it was argued that the adapted Spectator-Based Sports Team Reputation Scale could be applied as a reliable and valid questionnaire for Iranian sport teams.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Psychometrics
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis
  • Sports Team Reputation
  • Sports Fans
  1. Burlingame, J., & Blaschko, T. M. (2010). Assessment tools for recreational therapy and related fields. Idyll Arbor.
  2. Caruana, A., Ramasashan, B. & Krentler, K. A. (2004). Corporate reputation, customer satisfaction & customer loyalty: What is the relationship? In H. E. Spotts (Ed.), Proceedings: Developments in marketing science (27) 301. Coral Gables, FL: Academy of Marketing Science.
  3. Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Review,7(2), 91-109.
  4. Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Structural equations modeling with PLS software. Tehran: Jahad University Press (Persian).
  5. Davies, G., Chun, R., Da Silva, R. V., & Roper, S. (2002). Corporate reputation and competitiveness. London: Routledge.
  6. De Knop, P., Van Hoecke, J., & De Bosscher, V. (2004). Quality management in sports clubs. Sport Management Review, 7, 57-77.
  7. Dowling, G. (2001). Creating corporate reputations: Identity, image and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Fillis, I. (2003). Image, reputation and identity issues in the arts and crafts organization. Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 239-51.
  9. Filo, K., Funk, D. C., & Alexandris, K. (2008). Exploring the role of brand trust in the relationship between brand associations and brand loyalty in sport and fitness. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 3(1), 39-57.
  10. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  11. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. W. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–55.
  12. Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name: Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–58.
  13. Gotsi, M., & Wilson, A. M. (2001). Corporate reputation management: Living the brand. Management Decision, 39(2), 99–104.
  14. Groenland, E. A. G. (2002). Qualitative research to validate the RQdimensions. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(4), 309–15.
  15. Hong, S. Y., & Yang, S. (2009). Effects of reputation, relational satisfaction, and customer-company identification on positive word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 381-403.
  16. Jang, W., Jae Ko, Y., & Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2015). Spectator-based sports team reputation: scale development and validation. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 16(3), 52-72.
  17. Keh, H. T., & Xie, Y. (2009). Corporate reputation and customer behavioral intentions: The roles of trust, identification and commitment. Industrial Marketing Management, 18, 732-42.
  1. Kim, K. T., Kwak, D. H., & Kim, Y. K. (2010). The impact of cause-related marketing (CRM) in spectator sport. Journal of management & organization, 16(04), 515-27.
  2. Stall-Meadows, C., & Davey, A. (2013). Green marketing of apparel: Consumers' price sensitivity to environmental marketing claims. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 4(1), 33-43.
  1. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
  2. Page, G., & Fearn, H. (2005). Corporate reputation: What do consumer really care about? Journal of Advertising Research, 45,305-13.
  3. Parent, M. M., & Foreman, P. O. (2007). Organizational image and identity management in large-scale sporting event. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 15-41.
  4. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–93.
  5. Rose, C., & Thomsen, S. (2004). The impact of corporate reputation on performance: Some Danish evidence. European Management Journal, 22(2), 201-10.
  6. Sartore-Baldwin, M. L., & Walker, M. (2011). The process of organizational identity: What are the roles of social responsiveness, organizational image, and identification? Journal of Sport Management, 7, 489-505.
  7. Shruti, M. (2015). Relationship of customer based corporate reputation and customer perceived value-A case of automobile sector. International Journal of Computing and Corporate Research, 5(1), 1-11
  1. Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement, and theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12, 357-78.
  2. Walker, M., & Kent. A. (2009). Do fans care? Assessing the influence of corporate social responsibility on consumer attitudes in the sport industry. Journal of Sport Management, 43, 743–69.
  3. Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. (2007). Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: Scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy and Marketing Science, 35, 127-43.
  4. Walsh, G., Beatty, S. E., & Shiu, E. M. (2009). The customer-based corporate reputation scale: Replication and short form. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 924-30.
  5. Walsh, G., Mitchell, V. W., Jackson, P. R., & Beatty, S. E. (2009). Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 187-203.
  6. Wang, Y., Lo, H. P., & Hui, Y. V. (2003). The antecedents of service quality and product quality and their influence on bank reputation: Evidence from the banking industry in China. Managing Service Quality, 13(1), 72–83.