نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، پژوهشگاه علوم ورزشی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکدة علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

3 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکدة علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه مازندران، مازندران، ایران

چکیده

افزایش رقابت و انگیزة بقا، بسیاری از سازمان‌ها را بر آن داشته است که فعالیت‌های خود را بر ارائة خدمات اساسی و توانمند‌ی‌های محوری متمرکز کنند که این امر مستلزم سرمایه‌گذاری در پژوهش‌ها و ایجاد نوآوری‌ها است؛ ازاین‌رو، پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل عوامل مؤثر در توانمندی‌های تحقیق و توسعه در پژوهشگاه علوم ورزشی تدوین شده است. روش پژوهش آمیخته بود و به‌صورت میدانی انجام شد. نمونه­های این پژوهش رئیس‌ها، معاون‌ها، اعضای هیئت‌علمی و کارشناسان پژوهشگاه علوم ورزشی بودند. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از پرسش‌‌نامه­های پژوهشگرساخته استفاده شد که روایی و پایایی آن به تأیید رسید. تحلیل داده‌ها در نرم‌افزار اس.پی.اس.اس. نسخة 24 و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی در نرم‌افزار آموس انجام شدند. نتایج نشان داد که از دید نمونه‌های پژوهش متغیرهای عوامل انسانی، فناورانه، مدیریتی، تجاری کردن، راهبردی و مالی دارای درجة اهمیت بودند و اولویت در هر بخش براین‌اساس بود: مدیریت دانش در عوامل راهبردی، روحیة خلاقیت و نوآوری در عوامل انسانی، توانایی انتقال و انتشار فناوری در عوامل فناورانه و افزایش انگیزش افراد فنی در عوامل مدیریتی. در دو عامل مالی و تجاری‌کردن، اختلاف معناداری بین مؤلفه‌ها وجود نداشت. برمبنای نتایج به‌دست‌آمده و لزوم اهمیت تأسیس این واحد در این نهاد علمی، بدیهی است که درراستای تحقق اهداف کلان پژوهشگاه، تأسیس این واحد ضروری به‌نظر می‌رسد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis and Application of Effective Factors on Research and Development (R & D) Capabilities at Sport Sciences Research Institute of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mostafa Afshari 1
  • Hamid Reza Mirsafian 2
  • Mohsen Esmaeili 1
  • Ali Vafaei Moghadam 3

1 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Sport Management Research Center, Sport Sciences Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Sport Science Faculty, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Sport Science Faculty, Mazandaran University, Mazandaran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Increasement of competition and motivation for survival has led many organizations to focus their activities on basic services and core competencies and this issue requires investment in research and innovation. Therefore, the present study aims to analyze the factors affecting R & D capabilities at Sport Sciences Research Institute. It was a field research using mixed method. The research samples were directors, deputies, faculty members and expert personnel of Sport Sciences Research Institute. To collect data, a researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect information and its validity and reliability were confirmed. For data analysis SPSS software and for confirmatory factor analysis Lisrel software were used. The results showed that all the mentioned variables are important for research samples and the priority in each part is in this base: knowledge management in effective strategic factors, creativity and innovation in effective human factors, the ability to transfer and release technology in effective technological factors, and increase the motivation of technical people in effective management factors. There were no significant differences between components in financial factors and factors of commercialization. Based on the obtained results and the necessity of establishing this department in this scientific organization, and in order to reach the objectives of Sport Sciences Research Institute, the establishment of this department seems essential.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sterategic Factors
  • Technological Factors
  • Factors of Commercialization
  • human Factors of
  • financial Factors
  1. Abbasi Esfajani, H. (2006). R & D strategic management, productivity and quality management. Paper presented at the 4th Conference of Industries and Mines R & D Centers, Tehran, Industry and Mines Research and Development Centers Association. (Persian).
  2. Allen, J., James, A. D., & Gamlen, P. (2007). Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R & D: A case study using social network analysis. R & D Management, 37(3), 179-96.
  3. Asakawa, K., Nakamura, H., & Sawada, N. (2010). Firms' open innovation policies, laboratories' external collaborations, and laboratories' R&D performance. R & D Management, 40, 109-23.
  4. Baccarini, D and Collins, A. (2003). Critical success factors for projects, in Brown, A. (ed), Surfing the Waves: Management Challenges; Management Solutions, Proceedings of the 17th ANZAM Conference, 2-5 December. Fremantle, Western Australia.
  5. Ghanbari Nejad Esfaghansari, M., & Mohammadi Almani, A. (2012). The study of the effect of technology management and R & D (Comprehensive Innovation Management) on organization performance in terms of innovation and quality. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 2(2), 1-18. (Persian).
  6. Haji Hosseini, M. (2001). Effectiveness and efficiency of industrial research projects. Paper presented at the 3rd Conference of Industries and Mines R & D Centers, Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade, Tehran. (Persian).
  7. Limanlı, O. (2015). Determinants of R & D investment decision in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 759-67.
  8. Mohammadian, A. J. (2000). Analysis of effective factors on effectiveness of planning in general economic affairs offices of economic affairs and finance of Ilam and Lorestan Province and the comparison between them (Unpublished masterˊs thesis). Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran. (Persian).
  9. Pouyaie, I., & Naderi Bani, N. (2016). Reviewing and prioritizing key factors for the success of R & D projects of air products (Case study: Iran Aircraft Industries Company). Quarterly Journal of Standard and Quality Management, 6(3), 24-6. (Persian).
  10. Rabie, M. (2008). The role of R & D in economic development of countries. Technology Development Quarterly, 4(15), 35-40. (Persian).
  11. Raquel, O.A., Potters, L, & Vivarelli, M. (2011). R & D and productivity: Testing sectoral peculiarities using micro data. Empirical Economics, 41(3), 817–39.
  12. Rasa, L., & Zieduna, L.M. (2015). R&D Planning System Approach at Organizational Level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 213,812-6.
  13. Rust, F. C. (2015). Requirements for a systems-based research and development management process in transport infrastructure engineering. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(1), 87-101.
  14. Samadi Moghadam, Y., Hashem Zadeh Khorasgani, Gh, Radfar, R., & Manteghi, M. (2017). The study of the importance of the capabilities of R & D centers on the methods of technology transfer in investment (Case study: Iranian automotive industry). Investment Knowledge Quarterly, 6(22), 101-12. (Persian).
  15. Sandro, M. (2009). Brave old world: Accounting for 'high-tech' knowledge in 'low-tech' industries". Research Policy, 38(3), 470–82.