مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی

مدل‌سازی نقش تعاملی ساختار پارک‌ها، محل زندگی و فعالیت ‌بدنی (مطالعة موردی: ساکنان شهر اهواز)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

2 استاد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

3 دانشیار رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی اثر تعاملی ساختار پارک‌ها و وضعیت محل زندگی بر فعالیت ‌بدنی شهروندان اهوازی بود. روش پژوهش ازنوع پیمایشی و به‌لحاظ هدف، کاربردی بود. 370 نفر از افراد مراجعه‌کننده به پارک‌های سطح شهر اهواز برای انجام فعالیت ‌بدنی نمونة آماری پژوهش را تشکیل دادند که به روش تصادفی انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، پرسش‌نامة پژوهشگرساخته بود که در دو بخش وضعیت محل زندگی (14 سؤال) و ساختار پارک‌ها (17 سؤال) تنظیم شد. این پرسش‌نامه پس از تأیید روایی محتوا و سازة آن ازطریق تحلیلعاملی، دراختیار جامعةآماریقرارگرفت. داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از مدل معادلات ساختاری در محیط نرم‌افزار پی.ال.اس. تجزیه‌وتحلیل شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که وضعیت محل زندگی و ساختار پارک‌ها بر فعالیت ‌بدنی شهروندان اهوازی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری داشتند و نیز ساختار پارک‌ها، اثری تعدیل‌کننده بر فعالیت ‌بدنی افراد ­گذاشتند. براساس یافته‌های پژوهش، در شرایطی که امکان تغییر محل زندگی افراد و شاخص‌های مرتبط با آن مانند هم‌جواری وجود نداشته باشد، با تجهیز و افزایش کیفیت امکانات ورزشی و رفاهی پارک‌ها می‌توان اثرهای منفی و مشکلات ناشی از محل زندگی افراد را که موانعی در استفاده از پارک‌ها به‌شمار می‌روند، مرتفع کرد و زمینة گرایش هرچه‌بیشتر شهروندان به انجام فعالیت‌های بدنی را فراهم آورد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Modeling Interactively Role of Parks Structure, Living Environment and Physical Activity (Case Study: Residents of Ahvaz City)

نویسندگان English

  • Akbar Ghodrat Nama 1
  • Sedigheh Heydari Nejad 2
  • Seyedeh Nahid Shetab Bushehri 3
1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
2 Professor of Sport Management, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
3 Associate Professor of Motor Behavior, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
چکیده English

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of parks structure and status of living environment on physical activity among citizenship of Ahvaz. The research method is a survey and its target is applicable. The sample consisted of 370 persons referred to in Ahvaz parks for physical activity by random sampling. Data was collected by a researcher-made questionnaire in two parts, status of living environment (14 question) and parks structure (17 question) was adjusted, that face and content validity was measured by comments the number of university sport experts and to determine the structure validity, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). After determining of reliability, the questionnaire was distributed. Research data by using structural equation modeling with Smart PLS software analyzed. The research results showed that parks structure and status of living environment have direct and significant effect on citizens of physical activity, and also parks structure has a moderating effect on physical activity. Based on the findings in the case of the possibility of changing the living environment and their related indicators such as proximity does not exist, by equipment and enhance the quality of sports facilities and recreational parks, can be largely reduced barriers to the use of the park and tends to encourage people to doing physical activity.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Parks Structure
  • Status of Living Environment
  • Physical Activity
  1. Annear, M. J., Cushman, G., & Gidlow, B. (2009). Leisure time physical activity differences among older adults from diverse socioeconomic neighborhoods. Health & Place, 15(2), 482-90.
  2. Babey, S. H., Hastert, T., Yu, H., & Brown, E. (2008). Physical activity among adolescents: When do parks matter? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(4), 345-8.
  3. Babey, S. H., Tan, D., Wolstein, J., & Diamant, A. L. (2015). Neighborhood, family and individual characteristics related to adolescent park-based physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 76, 31-6.
  4. Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 159-68.
  5. Carlson, J. A., Bracy, N. L., Sallis, J. F., Millstein, R. A., Saelens, B. E., Kerr, J., ... & King, A. C. (2014). Sociodemographic moderators of relations of neighborhood safety to physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 46(8), 1554-63.
  6. Chow, B. C., McKenzie, T. L., & Sit, C. H. (2016). Public parks in Hong Kong: Characteristics of physical activity areas and their users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(7), 639-54.
  7. Cohen, D. A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Derose, K. P., Martinez, H., Setodji, C., & McKenzie, T. L. (2010). Parks and physical activity: Why are some parks used more than others? Preventive Medicine, 50, 9-12.
  8. Davari, A., Rezazadeh, A. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with Software PLS. Publishing Jahad Daneshgahi Organization, 67-100. (In Persian).
  9. Ebrahimzadeh, J., Maleki, S., & Hatami, D. (2014). Assessment of safety status in Parks city (Case study: Izeh Town). Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 5(2), 57-72. (Persian).
  10. Edwards, N., Hooper, P., Knuiman, M., Foster, S., & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Associations between park features and adolescent park use for physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 21-30.
  11. Eyre, E., Duncan, M. J., Birch, S. L., & Cox, V. (2014). Low socio-economic environmental determinants of children's physical activity in Coventry, UK: A qualitative study in parents. Preventive Medicine Reports, 1, 32-42.
  12. Franzini, L., Taylor, W., Elliott, M. N., Cuccaro, P., Tortolero, S. R., Gilliland, M. J., & Schuster, M. A. (2010). Neighborhood characteristics favorable to outdoor physical activity: Disparities by socioeconomic and racial/ethnic composition. Health & Place, 16(2), 267-74.
  13. Hallal, P. C., Andersen, L. B., Bull, F. C., Guthold, R., Haskell, W., & Ekelund, U. (2012). Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet, 380(9838), 247–57.
  14. Hillsdon, M., Panter, J., Foster, C., & Jones, A. (2006). The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health, 120(12), 1127-32.
  15. Humpel, N., Owen, N., & Leslie, E. (2002). Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(3), 188-99.
  16. Kaczynski, A. T., Besenyi, G. M., Stanis, S. A. W., Koohsari, M. J., Oestman, K. B., Bergstrom, R., & Reis, R. S. (2014). Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(146), 146-59.
  17. Kaczynski, A. T., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Environmental correlates of physical activity: A review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sciences, 29(4), 315-54.
  18. Kaczynski, A. T., Potwarka, L. R., & Saelens, B. E. (2008). Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1451-6.
  19. Koohsari, M. J., Kaczynski, A. T., Giles-Corti, B., & Karakiewicz, J. A. (2013). Effects of access to public open spaces on walking: Is proximity enough? Landscape and Urban Planning, 117, 92-9.
  20. McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place, 16(4), 712-26.
  21. Ou, J. Y., Levy, J. I., Peters, J. L., Bongiovanni, R., Garcia-Soto, J., Medina, R., & Scammell, M. K. (2016). A walk in the park: The influence of urban parks and community violence on physical activity in Chelsea, MA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(1), 97-108.
  22. Saelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Auffrey, C., Whitaker, R. C., Burdette, H. L., & Colabianchi, N. (2006). Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds: EAPRS instrument development and inter-rater reliability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(1), 190-207.
  23. Schipperijn, J., Bentsen, P., Troelsen, J., Toftager, M., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1), 109-16.
  24. Shores, K. A., & West, S. T. (2008). The relationship between built park environments and physical activity in four park locations. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(3), 9-16.
  25. Taghavitakyar, O. (2006). A study socio-economic status and motives of participants in sport for all. (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Guilan, Guilan. (Persian).
  26. Timperio, A., Veitch, J., & Carver, A. (2015). Safety in numbers: Does perceived safety mediate associations between the neighborhood social environment and physical activity among women living in disadvantaged neighborhoods? Preventive Medicine, 74, 49-54.
  27. Tucker, P., Irwin, J. D., Gilliland, J., He, M., Larsen, K., & Hess, P. (2009). Environmental influences on physical activity levels in youth. Health & Place, 15(1), 357-63.
  28. Van Cauwenberg, J., Cerin, E., Timperio, A., Salmon, J., Deforche, B., & Veitch, J. (2017). Is the association between park proximity and recreational physical activity among mid-older aged adults moderated by park quality and neighborhood conditions? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(2), 192-202.
  29. Wang, D., Brown, G., & Liu, Y. (2015). The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133,        53-66.
  30. Witten, K., Hiscock, R., Pearce, J., & Blakely, T. (2008). Neighbourhood access to open spaces and the physical activity of residents. Preventive Medicine, 47(3),        299-303.
مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 11، شماره 53
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1398
صفحه 199-218

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 اردیبهشت 1396
  • تاریخ بازنگری 22 تیر 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 مرداد 1396

صفحه اصلی

اصول اخلاقی

ارسال مقاله

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما