نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی‌ارشد کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران

2 کارشناسی‌ارشد کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، طراحی مدل عوامل مؤثر در عملکرد صادرات شرکت‌های تولیدکنندة تجهیزات ورزشی بود. این پژوهش ازحیث نوع پژوهش، کاربردی و ازنظر گردآوری داده‌ها، ازنوع توصیفی- پیمایشی بود. جامعة آماری پژوهش حاضر همة مدیران شرکت‌های تولیدکنندة تجهیزات ورزشی بودند که محصولات خود را به سایر کشورها صادر می‌کردند. طبق برآوردهای انجام‌شده، تعداد مدیران بالغ بر 72 نفر بود. در این پژوهش، برای نمونه‌گیری از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده استفاده شد و تعداد 60 نفر از اعضای جامعه بررسی شدند. برای گردآوری داده‌ها از دو روش کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی (پرسش‌نامة پژوهشگرساخته متشکل از 39 سؤال) استفاده شد. برای بررسی رابطة بین متغیرها و تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها نیز از روش حداقل مربعات جزئی و نرم‌افزار اسمارت پی.ال.اس. استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که بازارگرایی بر قابلیت‌های بازاریابی تأثیر دارد و قابلیت‌های بازاریابی بر مزیت رقابتی، قابلیت نوآوری و عملکرد صادرات تأثیر دارند. نتایج تأثیر مزیت رقابتی و قابلیت نوآوری را بر عملکرد صادرات نشان داد. همچنین، نتایج نشان‌دهندة نقش میانجی قابلیت‌های بازاریابی در رابطة بین بازارگرایی و عملکرد صادرات و نیز نقش میانجی مزیت رقابتی و قابلیت نوآوری در رابطة بین قابلیت‌های بازاریابی و عملکرد صادرات است. صادرکنندگان تجهیزات ورزشی می‌توانند با بهره‌گیری از نتایج این پژوهش و شناخت عوامل مؤثر در عملکرد صادرات و تقویت آن‌ها، عملکرد صادراتی خود را بهبود بخشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing the Model of Effective Factors on Export Performance of Sport Equipment Manufacturing

نویسندگان [English]

  • Negar Nowrozi 1
  • Mohammad Masum 2

1 M.Sc. Student in Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran

2 M.Sc. in Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study is to design the model of effective factors on export performance of sport equipment manufacturing companies. This is an applied study in terms of type of research and descriptive survey in terms of data collection method. The statistical population of the study includes all manages of companies producing sport equipment that export their products to other countries. According to the estimations, there are 72 companies with such characteristics. For sampling purposes, simple random sampling has been used and 60 subjects from the population have been investigated. In this research, two methods of library and field studies (a researcher made questionnaire consisting of 39 items) have been used for data collection. In order to investigate the relationship between variables and data analysis, partial least squares and Smart PALS software have been used. The results of the study showed that market orientation has an impact on marketing capabilities and marketing capabilities have an impact on competitive advantage, innovation capability and export performance. Moreover, the results also confirmed the impact of competitive advantage and innovation capability on export performance. Other results confirm the mediating role of marketing capabilities in relation between market orientation and export performance, as well as the mediating role of competitive advantage and innovation capability in the relation between marketing capabilities and export performance. The exporters of sports equipment can improve their export performance by utilizing the results of this research and recognizing the effective factors on export performance and strengthening them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Marketing
  • Export Performance
  • Innovation Capability
  • Marketing Capabilities
  • Competitive Advantage
  1. Amirazodi, A., Mohammadi, H., & Ghasemi, M. (2013). Iran’s non-Oil export forecasting using adaptive-neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Agricultural Economics and Development, 21(82),153-69. (Persian).
  2. Azar, G., & Ciabuschi, F. (2016). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness. International Business Review, 26(2), 324-36.
  3. Barrales-Molina, V., Martinez-Lopez, F. J., & Gazquez-Abad, J. C. (2014). Dynamic marketing capabilities: Toward an integrative framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 397–416.
  4. Beverland, M. B., & Lindgreen, A. (2007). Implementing market orientation in industrial firms: A multiple case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 430-42.
  5. Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891–902
  6. Chen, S., Quester, P. G. (2009). A value-based perspective of market orientation and customer service. Journal of Business Research, 16(3), 197-206.
  7. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Benitez-Amado, J., & Kou, G. (2015). IT capabilities and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity. Information & Management, 52(6), 643–57
  8. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336
  9. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Confeeicient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
  10. Esmaeili Shahmirzadi, H. (2013). The effect of cost leadership strategy to increase exports of petrochemical products (case study: National petrochemical company of Iran). Accounting Knowledge & Management Audit, 2(8), 83-92. (Persian).
  11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  12. Haghighi Kaffash, M., Hajipoor, B., Mazloomi, N., & & Momeni, M. (2016). Modeling of organizational innovation ability. Public Organizations Management, 3(4), 26-40. (Persian).
  13. Hajipour, B., Rahimi, F., & Jafaryzadeh, F. (2013). Effect of marketing factors on export performance. Journal of Management Research, 5(1), 21-40.
  14. Hejazi, S. Y., Saki, S., & & Savari, M. (2016). Investigate relationship of organizational culture in the innovation of faculty members in Khuzestan University. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 47(1), 1-12. (Persian).
  15. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277 – 319.
  16. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
  17. Khalid, S., & Bhatti, K. (2015). Entrepreneurial competence in managing partnerships and partnership knowledge exchange: Impact on performance differences in export expansion stages. Journal of World Business, 10(2), 45-56.
  18. Kohansal, M., & Dadras Moghadam, A. (2015). Factors affecting the growth of various sectors of the economy with emphasis on exports and investment. Agricultural Economics and Development, 23(91), 1-25. (Persian).
  19. Kordnaeej, A., Anvari Rostami, A. A., & Dehyadgary, S. (2005). Investigating the relationship between dimensions of competitive advantage and export performance of decorative stones exporter companies. Trade Studies, 10(37), 133-52. (Persian).
  20. Kumlu, Ö. (2014). The effect of intangible resources and competitive strategies on the export performance of small and medium sized enterprises. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 24 –34.
  21. Leonidou, L. C., Fotiadis, T. A., Christodoulides, P., Spyropoulou, S., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2015). Environmentally friendly export business strategy: Its determinants and effects on competitive advantage and performance. International Business Review, 24(5), 798–811.
  22. Lawshe, CH. (1975). A qualitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-75.
  23. Magner, N., Welker, R. B., & Campbell, T. L. (1996). Testing a model of cognitive budgetary participation -processes in a latent variable structural equations framework. Accounting and Business Research, 27(1), 41-50.
  24. Massao Oura, M., Novaes Zilber, S., & Luiz Lopes, E. (2015). Innovation capacity, international experience and export performance of SMEs in Brazil. International Business Review, 25(4), 921–32.
  25. Mohamad Kazemi, R., Rasekh, N., & Esmaeili, F. (2017). Assessment of entrepreneurial attitude among club’s women managers in Tehran province. Sport Management Studies, 9(41), 111-26. (Persian).
  26. Mohammadian, M., Allahverdi, M., & Salimi, A. (2014). The impact of export market orientation and competitive advantage on export performance (case study: The study of exemplary exporters of Iran selected in 2012). Journal of Business Management, 5(4), 61-78. (Persian).
  27. Mohr, J., & Sarin, S. (2009). Insights on market orientation and innovation: Implications for emerging areas in high technology marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(1), 85-96.
  28. Mohsenzadeh, M., & Ahmadian, S. (2016). The mediating role of competitive strategies in the effect of firm competencies and export performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 456-66.
  29. Mojaverian, S. M., Ahmadi Koliji, S., & Amin Ravan, M. (2016). Determination of medical plant export target markets in Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 46(4), 729-37. (Persian).
  30. Morgan, N.A., Vorhies, D.W., & Mason, C. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909-20.
  31. Moshabaki, A., & Khademi, A. A. (2012). The role of export development programs on promoting export performance. Management Improvement, 6(3), 98-135. (Persian).
  32. Murray, J. Y., Yong Gao, G., & Kotabe, M. (2011). Market orientation and performance of export ventures: The process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages, 39(2), 252–69.
  33. Nath, P., Nachiappan, S., & Ramanathan, R. (2010). The impact of marketing capability, operations capability and diversification strategy on performance: Aresource-based view. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2), 317–29.
  34. Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  35. Rajabali Baglo, R. (2012). Competitive advantage and its role in economy of libraries and information Research centers. Library and Information Research Journal, 15(1), 237-62. (Persian).
  36. Sohail, M. S., & Alashban, A. A. (2009). An analysis of product-market strategy and export performance: Evidence from SME’S in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 49-65.
  37. Song, M., Benedetto, A. D., & Nason, R. W. (2007). Capabilities and financial performance: The moderating effect of strategic type. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 18-34.
  38. Takata, H. (2016). Effects of industry forces, market orientation, and marketing capabilities on business performance: An empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturers from 2009 to 2011. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5611–19.
  39. Tan, Q., & Sousa, C. M. P. (2015). Leveraging marketing capabilities into competitive advantage and export performance. International Marketing Review, 32(1), 78–102.
  40. Veisi, K., Kuzechian, H., Ehsani, M., & Kashtidar, M. (2016). Modeling the effects of organizational agility on organizational performance in sports manufacturing corporations. Sport Management Studies, 8(39), 17-36. (Persian).
  41. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchial construct models: Guidelines and impirical illustration, MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-95.
  42. Yi, J., Wang, C., & Kafouros, M. (2013). The effects of innovative capabilities on exporting: Do institutional forces matter? International Business Review, 22(2),    392–406.
  43. Zawislak, P. A., Gamarra, J. T., Alves, A. C., Barbieux, D., & Reichert, F. M. (2014). The different innovation capabilities of the firm: Further remarks upon the Brazilian experience. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 13, 129-50.
  44. Zehir, C., Köle, M., & Yıldız, H. (2015). The mediating role of innovation capability on market orientation and export performance: An implementation on SMEs in Turkey. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 700-8.