نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه لرستان
2 دانشجوی دکتری منابع انسانی، دانشگاه لرستان
3 دانشجوی دکتری منابع انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
پژوهشحاضرازنوعپژوهشهایکیفی بودکهبااستفادهازرویکردکیو الگوهای ذهنی مدیران درراستای چابکسازی سرمایة انسانی در سازمانهای ورزشی شناسایی و تبیین شده است. دراینپژوهش،ازمصاحبةعمیقبهعنوانابزاراصلیجمعآوریدادههااستفادهشده است که روایی آن با استفاده از رویکرد نسبت روایی محتوا و پایایی آن با استفاده از روش کاپای کوهن تأیید شده است. بهعلاوه برایانتخابنمونه، ازنمونهگیریهدفمنداستفاده شده است کهازروشهاینمونهبرداری غیراحتمالیاست. در پژوهش حاضر، با استفاده از 23 مصاحبه فضای گفتمان حاصل شد و با استفاده از نظرهای آنها نمونه و گزینههای کیو و در ادامة آن، مجموعة کیو بهدست آمد. نتایج پژوهش مشتمل بر شناسایی عوامل تشکیلدهندة ذهنیت مدیران درراستای چابکسازی سرمایههای انسانی و همچنین، تبیین ذهنیتهای مدیران دراینرابطه است. نتایج نشان داد که حامی شایستگی، پشتیبان یادگیری و هوشمندی، مروج ظرفیتسازی و انعطافپذیری، توانمندساز و مشوق، اشاعهدهندة انگیزه و جو مثبت و آیندهنگر و توسعهدهنده، شش الگوی ذهنی مدیران درراستای چابکسازی سرمایههای انسانی هستند. پیشنهادهای پژوهش نیز در دو حیطة کاربردی و پژوهشی برای اقدامی عملیتر و کارآمدتر در عرصة چابکسازی سرمایههای انسانی ارائه شدهاند.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identifying the Manager’s Mental Pattern in Order to Human Capital Agility in Sports Organizations Using the Q Approach
نویسندگان [English]
- Amir Hooshang Nazar Poori 1
- aliA Shariat Nejad 2
- Abdollah Saedi 2
- Azita Haji Zadeh 3
1 Associate Professor of Public Management, University of Lorestan
2 Ph.D. Student of Human Resources, University of Lorestan
3 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده [English]
The present study is a qualitative research. In this paper, using the Q approach, the managers' mental pattern in direction of Human capital agility is identified. A deep interview is the main tool for collecting data which its validity is confirmed using the CVR relative validity approach and its reliability using the Kapa Kohn method is confirmed. In addition, for sample selection, purposive sampling was used. In the present study with 23 interviews, discourse space was obtained. The results of the research include identifying the factors that make up the mentality of managers the results indicate that Supporter competence, Learning and intelligence support, promotes capacity building and flexibility, Promoters and positive and prospective promoters and developers, six subjective patterns of managers are aimed at Human capital agility. Research suggestions as well in two areas of applied and research for a more practical and effective action in the realm Human capital agility are provided.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Human Capital Agility
- Flexibility
- Intelligence
- Sports Organizations
- Abbaspour, A., Mirkamali, S. M., Hesam Amiri, R., & Moradi, K. (2014). Explanation of the role of human capital agility in the development of strategic agility (Case Study: Bank Ansar). Quarterly Development of Monetary and Banking Management, 2(4), 1-24. (Persian).
- Alavi, S., & Dzuraidah, A. W. (2013). A review on workforce agility. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(16), 4195-9.
- Alhadid, N. (2016). The effect of organization agility on organization performance. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(1), 273-9.
- Amin, Z. (2000). Q methodology: A journey into the subjectivity of human mind. Singapore Med Journal, 41(8), 410-4.
- Azuara, V. (2015). A human resource perspective on the development of workforce agility, Thesis PHD, School of Business and Management, Pepperdine University.
- Breu, K., Hemingway, C. J., Strathern, M., & Bridger, D. (2002). Workforce agility: The new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. Journal of Information Technology, 77(1), 21-31.
- Bunton, T. (2017). Agility within higher education it organizations: A loosely coupled systems perspective. Teses PHD, Philosophy in Communication, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
- Chonko, L. B., & Jones, C. (2005). The need for speed: Agility selling. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, J. Person. Sell. Sales Manag, 25(4): 371-82.
- Dyer, L., & Shafer, R. A. (2003). Dynamic organizations: Achieving marketplace and organizational agility with people. Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. Available at: http://catalog.library.cornell.edu, [Accessed, 14 may 2017].
- Glinska, M., Carr, S. D., & Halliday, A. (2012). Workforce agility: An executive briefing. Batten briefing innovatorsí roundtable series. Available at: https://www.darden.virginia.edu, [Accessed: 13 may 2017].
- Hamad, Z, M. M., & Yozgat, U. (2017). Does organizational agility affect organizational learning capability? Evidence from commercial banking. Management Science Letters, 7, 407–22.
- Homan, H. (2009). A practical guide to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities at Universities. (Persian).
- Jalali Farhani, M., Saberi, A., Hidari, M., & Javid, M. (2015). Specify the relationship organizational forgetting and organizational learning with organizational agility in staff of office of youth and sports in Hamadan province. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 2(8), 35-43. (Persian).
- Javanmardi, M., Khabushani, A., & Abdi, A. (2012). Analysis information technology infrastructures toward supply chain agility in home appliance industry. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(3), 416-29.
- Lajevardi, S., Rahimnia, F., Mortazavi, S., & Gharnajaj, A. (2016). Application of Q Method in Understanding Patterns: Assessing the factors of human resource productivity from the point of view of faculty members, Public Administration Research, 9(31), 5-28.
- Maskell, B. (2001). The age of agile manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(1), 5-11.
- Muduli, A. (2013). Workforce agility: A review of literature. The IUP Journal of Management Research, 12(3), 55-65.
- Nafei, W. (2016). Organizational agility: The key to organizational success. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(5), 296-309.
- Nkuda, M. (2017). Strategic agility and competitive advantage: Exploration of the ontological, epistemological and theoretical underpinnings. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 16(1), 1-13.
- Rodina, E., Zeimpekis, V., & Fouskas, K. (2003). Remote workforce business processes integration through real-time mobile communications. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Mobile Businesses, Vienna. McGraw-Hill.
- Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (1999). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organizations, an introduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 12(1), 7-22.
- Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37, 445-60.
- Sohrabi, R., Jafari, D., & Miandar basmanji, F. (2017). Provide a talent management framework with a human resource agility approach, Human Resource Management Research, 2(9), 1-23. (Persian).
- Suofi, H., Hosnavi, M., & Mirsepasi, N. (2014). A study on relationship between workforce agility and knowledge sharing.Management Science Letters, 4(5), 1015-20.
- Swisher, V. V. Eichinger, R. W. & Lombard. M. M. (2012). Leadership Development: Exploring, Clarifying, and Expanding Our Understanding of Learning Agility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice,5(9), 280-6.
- Tielen, M., Van Staa, A., Jedeloo, S., Exel, V., & Weimar, W. (2008). Q methodology to identify young adult renal transplant recipients at risk for nonadherence. Transplantation, 85(5),689-715.
- Trong Lin, C., Chiu, H., & Tseng, Y. H. (2005). Agility evaluation using Fuzzy Logic. International Journal of Production Economics, 7(12), 1-16.
- Zahedi, Sh., Khosravi, A., Yarahmadizehi, M., & Ahmadi, R. (2013). Investigate dimensions and indicators of agility capacity of human resources. Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies, 1(4),1-24. (Persian).
- Yusuf, Y.Y., Sarhadi, M., Gunasekaran, A., (1999). Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of Production Economics 62(5), 33–43.