نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه جهرم

2 استاد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی

3 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی

4 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس تهران

چکیده

مسئولیت‌ اجتماعی مفهوم جدیدی در بازاریابی و مباحث جامعه‌شناسی است که باشگاه‌های فوتبال دارای پتانسیل استفاده از آن می‌باشند؛ ازاین‌رو، هدف اصلی از پژوهش حاضر تدوین راهبردهای مسئولیت اجتماعی باشگاه‌های لیگ برتر فوتبال ایران بود. نمونۀ آماری پژوهش را 19 نفر از نخبگان، مدیران، مربیان و اعضای هیأت علمی تشکیل دادند که به روش مصاحبه و با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری نظری انتخاب شدند. انتخاب خبرگان نیز با حداکثر نوسان انجام گرفت. شایان‌ذکر است که یافته‌ها از طریق روش کد‌گذاری در سه مرحلۀ باز، محوری و انتخابی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. براساس نتایج، 42 نشان در کدگذاری شناسایی گردید که در 14 مقوله شامل: آموزش رسانه‌ها، ‌آموزش اخلاقی و اجتماعی مدیران، ورزشکاران و ذی‌نفعان، آموزش شهروندی، جامعه‌سنجی، برند‌سازی اجتماعی، مدیر‌سازی، توسعۀ مالی، ترویج، توسعۀ زیربنایی، توسعۀ داوطلبی، فوتبال‌سازی نسل چهارم، عقد قرارداد، شبکه‌سازی برخط، دیپلماسی و مذاکره و شش مؤلفۀ آموزش، مهندسی اجتماعی، استقلال‌گرایی، ساختار‌سازی، تفکر‌سازی و ارتباطات طبقه‌بندی شدند. برمبنای نتایج می‌توان گفت که هر راهبرد می‌تواند بنا‌بر موقعیت جامعۀ محلی و باشگاه فوتبال در اولویت قرار گیرد تا باشگاه و جامعه هر دو منتفع گردند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Codification of Social Responsibility Strategies for Football Clubs of Iran's Primer League

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Sadegh Afroozeh 1
  • Amir Ahmad Mozafari 2
  • Najaf Aghaee 3
  • Marjan Safari 4

1 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Jahrom University

2 Professor of Sport Management, Kharazmi University

3 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Kharazmi University

4 Assistant Professor of Tarbiat Modares University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

Social responsibility is new concept in marketing and sociology field that football clubs have potential to use it. The main objective of this study was codification of Strategies for Football Clubs of Iran's Primer League. The sample consisted of 19 people's experts, administrators, coach and faculty who were selected through theoretical sampling and Maximal Variation. Data analyzed through three stages coding include open, axial and selective. In coding, 42 cods, 14 fields in six categories include of media education, ethical-social education for managers, athletics and stakeholders, education citizenship, sociometry, Social branding, director maker, financial development infrastructure development, volunteer development, development of fourth generation in football, contracts, online networking, negotiation and diplomacy and 6 components of education, social engineering, independence, structuring, thinking and communications were classified. Each strategy according to local community and the football club's position can be prioritized to benefit both the club and the community.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social Responsibility
  • Strategy
  • Education
  • Society
  • Primer League
1. Abassi, M. H. (2015). Foundation charity football players. Spectators News Magazine, 183. (Persian)
2. Afifah, N., & Asnan, A. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility, service experience and intercultural competence on customer company identification, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty (case study: PDAM tirta khatulistiwa Pontianak West Kalimantan). 2nd Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences on “Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Management and Society”. 17-18 September, Bali, Indonesia, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 211. 277-84.
3. Alkholi, A. (2002). Sport and social. SAMT Published. First Edition. 45. (Persian)
4. Anagnostopoulos, Ch., Byers, T., & Shilbury, T. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in professional team sport organisations: Towards a theory of decision-making. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(3), 259-81.
5. Bradish, C., & Cronin, J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in sport. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 691-7.
6. Brown, T., & Dacin, P. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
7. Blumrodt, J., Desbordes, M., & Bodin, D. (2013). Professional football clubs and corporate social responsibility. Sport, Business and Management , 3(3), 205-25.
8. Coakly, J. (2009). Sport in society: Issues and Controversies. (10th ed). New York: Mc-Graw-Hill. 98.
9. Dowlinga, M., Robinsonb, L., & Washington, M. (2013). Taking advantage of the London (2012) Olympic games: Corporate social responsibility through sport partnerships. European Sport Management Quarterly, 13(3), 269-92.
10. Duff, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting in professional accounting firms. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 74–86.
11. Elahi, A. R., Sajjadi, N., Khabiri, M., & Abrishami, H. (2007). Barriers to attracting revenue from sponsorship in the football industry. Journal of Sport Management, 1(1), 189-202. (Persian)
12. Esposito, M. Ecimovic, T. Mulej, M. Haw, R. (2010). The Sustainable Future of Mankind III, SEM Institute for Climate Change; III edition. 192.
13. Ghare khani, H., Ehsani, M., Kozeh chean, H., Khabiri, M., Fuladi, M., & Nobakht, F. (2013). Examine the economic barriers privatization of football clubs. Sport Science Research, 3(9), 125-38. (Persian)
14. Ghasemi, V., Zolaktaf, V., & Alivand, A. (2009). Sociological theories and Sports. Published by Sociologists. Tehran. First Edition. 160. (Persian)
15. Huang, F. H., Jin Ye, Y., & Kao, Ch. (2015). Developing a novel intuitionistic fuzzy importance–performance analysis for evaluating corporate social responsibility in sport tourism event. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 19, 6530–8.
16. Jankalova, M. (2016). Approaches to the evaluation of corporate social responsibility. 3rd Global Conference on Business, Economics, Management and Tourism, Procedia Economics and Finance. 580–7.
17. Kolyperas, D., & Sparks, L. (2011). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) communications in the G-25 football clubs'. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 10(1), 83-103.
18. Lin, C. H., Yong, H. L., & Lion, D. Y. (2009). The impact corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology of Society, 31(1), 56-63.
19. Luetkenhorst, W. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the development agenda. Intereconomics, 39(3), 157–68.
20. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). A conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wanger & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), CSR across Europe (pp. 339-360). Berline: Springer.
21. Mehr Ayen, M. R. (2015). Sociological theories and sports. Published by Sociologists.Tehran. First Edition. 67. (Persian)
22. Moharram Zadeh, M., & Afruzeh, M. S. (2008). Survey of motivational factors in college sports. Research in Sports Science, 6(19): 143-56. (Persian)
23. Paramio-Salcines, J.L (2013). Accessibility and disability CSR polices in Football: The case of Manchester United FC. A Seminar as Part of the Sport Business Centre Seminar Series, Lankaster Lecture Theatre (University College London – UCL). England. Available at:
http://www.sportbusinesscentre.com/events/accessibility-and-disability-csr-policies-in-football-the-case-of-manchester-united-fc/
24. Rezaeean, A. (2015). Principles of organization and management. SAMT Published. Tehran. Five edition. 230. (Persian)
25. Rosca, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in English football: History and present. Management & Marketing, 6(2), 327-46.
26. Waddock, S., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. (2003). Responsibility: The new business imperative. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132-47.
27. Walker, M., Kent, A., & Vincent, J. (2010). Communicating socially responsible initiatives: An analysis of U.S professional teams. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19(3): 125-31.
28. Web of IOC (2010) Reterieved 2015, Aug 16, from
https://stillmed.olympic.org/Documents/Games_Vancouver_2010/VANOC_Sustainability_Report-EN.pdf.