نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه ارومیه

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه شاهرود

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی ارتباط بین سبک تفکر و دام‌های زمان مدیران هیأت‌های ورزشی استان قم می‌باشد. این پژوهش به‌لحاظ هدف، کاربردی بوده و روش انجام آن، توصیفی و از نوع هم‌بستگی است. جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش را کلیۀ رئیسان، نایب رئیسان و دبیران هیأت‌های ورزشی استان قم به تعداد 120 نفر تشکیل دادند. همچنین، حجم نمونه در این پژوهش به‌صورت کل‌شمار، تمامی هیأت‌های ورزشی فعال استان قم (40 هیأت) در نظر گرفته شد که درنهایت، 85 نفر در این پژوهش شرکت نمودند. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان میدهد که ارتباط معناداری بین سبک‌های تفکر و هریک از پنج مؤلفۀ آن با دام‌های زمان وجود دارد که این ارتباط در سبک قضایی قوی‌تر می‌باشد. همچنین، مشخص شد که سبک اجرایی، سبک غالب مدیران می‌باشد و مدیران هیأت‌های ورزشی، بیشتر در دام‌هایی گرفتار می‌شوند که دیگران عامل آن هستند؛ بنابراین، توصیه میشود مدیران با فراهم‌نمودن شرایط، عوامل اتلاف وقت را در سازمان کاهش دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship between Thinking Styles and Time Traps in Managers of Qom Sports Board

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ebrahim Deldar 1
  • Azita Shahpar Towfigh 2
  • Mojtaba Zarifi 3

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was the relationship between thinking styles and time traps in managers of Qom sports boards. This study according to the objective is applied research and the method of this research was descriptive (correlation method). All of the managers of sports boards were choose as research society (N=120). The research sample was all of sports boards (40 boards). From this boards 31 secretary, 29 vice president and 25 president of boards, cooperated with this research (n=85). The results show that there is relationship between thinking styles (and all of 5 components) and time traps, that is correlation was stronger in Judical thinking style. Also the result show that Executive thinking style was rulling in the managers of sports board and also they most fall into the trap that others are runnig. So we suggest that managers with providing conditions can reduce the waste of the time.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Executive Thinking Style
  • Judical Thinking Style
  • Legislative Thinking Styles
  • Internal Thinking Styles
  • External Thinking Styles
  1. Abolghasemi, M., Nazari, F., Kamali, H., & Hosseini, T. (2010). The relationship between the function of thinking styles and educational development among the students of technical and engineering faculties of Tehran University. The Seasonal Published Educational Engineering Journal of Iran, 12­(47), 49-61. (­Persian).
  2. Ahanchiyan, M. R., & Hassaniyan, Z. M. (2013). The relationship between the thinking style and the style of problem solving among the nursing students. Education of Nursing, 2­(3), 38-48. (­Persian).
  3. Asgari, M. H., & Shahri, M. (2012). The relationship between variety of thinking styles and the organizational creativity of managers. Monthly Published Journal of Management Engineering, 5­(46), 27-32. (­Persian).
  4. Claessens, B. J. C., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G.,­ & Roe, R. A­. (2007). A review of the time management literature. PERS REV, 36­(2), 255-76.
  5. Doroodi, A. (2005). A window to time management. Tehran: Tadbir Publications, First publish, 25-34. (­Persian).
  6. Fan, W., & Zhang, L. F. (2009). Are achievement motivation and thinking styles related? A visit among Chinese university students. Learn Individ Differ, 19­(2), 299–303.
  7. Farhoosh, M., & Ahmadi, F. (2013). The relationship between the thinking styles and the strategies of learning using development motivation. Psychology of Development: Psychology of Iran, 9­(35), 297-306. (­Persian).
  8. Gyeong, J. A., & Myung, S. Y. (2008). Critical thinking and learning styles of nursing students at the Baccalaureate nursing program in Korea. Contemp Nurse, 29­(1): 100-9.
  9. Hashemi, A., Sadeghifard, A., & Hemmati, A. (2011). An account of the relationship between the variety of thinking styles and creativity and innovation among the principals of Lamard schools. Research in Educational Planning, 8­(30), 63-72. (­Persian).
  10. Hatefi, M. A. (2002). Intellectual development in management. Tehran: Tadbir Publication, First publish, 24-31. (­Persian).
  11. Hill, M., & McClain, j. (­2002).­ Managing your management time. New York, First publish: 1:2-1.
  12. Hosseinzadeh, D., & Eskandarzadeh, S. (2008). The relationship between the thinking style and the level of performance. The Journal of Management, 19­(131-132), 51-4. (­­Persian).
  13. Javaherizadeh, N. (2005). ­An account of features of time management in secondary schools in Tehran city. Daneshvar­–­e-­Raftar, 12­(12), 14-21. (­Persian).
  14. Karami Moghaddam, F. (1997). An account of the relationship between individual skill of time management and its organizational skill among principals of Shiraz city (Master proposal). The University of Shiraz­. (­Persian).
  15. Khaki, Gh. (2001). Time management. Tehran: Kouhsar Publications. First publish: 23. (In Persian).
  16. Mackenzie, A. (2006). Time trap. (Gh. Khaki, Trans). (1st ed). Tehran: The Publication of the National Organization of Efficiency. 43-56. (­Persian).
  17. Mahboodi, M. H. (2006). An account of the relationship between the organizational skill of time management and organizational effectiveness of the high schools in district 2 of Shiraz city (Master proposal). The University of Tehran­. (­Persian)
  18. Martin, j. (­2004). Organization and time management. NewYork: McGraw Press. First publish, 331.
  19. Mehrdad, H., & Beyranvand, P. (2012). An account of the relationship between the thinking style and approval of changing the principals of Khorram Abad secondary schools in the academic year of 1389-90. The Seasonal Published Journal of Management of Development, 8(1): 23-33. (­Persian).
  20. Mohammadi, A., & PoorGhaaz, A. (2013). The relationship between the thinking style and the power sources among the principals of schools. The Seasonal Scientific Research Journal of a New Approach in Educational Management, 4­(3), 117-­38. (­Persian).
  21. Nonis, A., Teng, J. K., & Ford, C. W. (2005). Across-cultural investigation of time management practices and job outcomes. IJIR, 29(1): 409-­28.
  22. O'Brien, M. T., Tang, S., & Hall, K. (2011). Changing our thinking: Empirical research on law student wellbeing, thinking styles and the law curriculum (online). Legal Education Review, 24­(1&2), 182-­49. Retrieved, Oct 14 (2014),­ from: <http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=867993628050214;res=IELHSS> ISSN: 1033-2839.
  23. Pourkiyani, M., & Shahiloo, F. (2010). The relationship between the thinking style and time traps (case study). Tadbir Magazine, 216(1), 60-4. (­Persian).
  24. Rabsoon, G. (­2002)­. Time management and management school. OBHDP, 201(1): 374-­88.
  25. Runco, M. A. (­2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research development, and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. First publish, 230.
  26. Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Thinking styles. (­­A. Etemady, & A. A. Khosravi, Trans)­­. (1st ed). Tehran: The Publications and the Research Institute of Dadar. 35-6. (­Persian).
  27. Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (2005). Styles of thinking as a basis of differentiated instruction. Theor Pract, 44­(3), 245–­53.
  28. Torabi, F., & Seyf, D. (2012). The role of thinking styles in predicting the dimensions of creativity among brilliant talented students. The Magazine of Behavioral Sciences, 6­(4), 369-­76. (­Persian).
  29. Vinitzky, G., & Mazursky, D. (2011). The effects of cognitive thinking styles and ambient scent on online consumer approach behaviour, experience approach behaviour, and search motivation. Psychol Market, 28­(5), 496-519.
  30. Zarb Estejabi, M., Barmas, H., & Bahrami, H. (2013). The relationship between thinking styles and marital satisfaction and psychological welfare among married students. Psychological Studies of the Ethics and Psychological Sciences Faculty of Al-Zahra University, 9­(2), 103-­30. (­Persian).
  31. Zare' ei, H. A., Mir Hashemi, M., & Pasha Sharifi, H. (2012). The relationship between the thinking styles and educational adjustment among nursing students. Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences, 12­(3), 160-6. (­Persian).
  32. Zhang, L. F. (2001). Do styles of thinking matter among Hong Kong secondary school students? Pers Indiv Differ, 31­(3), 289-301.
  33. Zhang, L. F. (2006). Preferred teaching styles and modes of thinking among university students in mainland China. TSAC, 1­(2)­, 95-107.
  34. Zhang, L. F. (­2008­a). Teachers’ styles of thinking: An exploratory study. J Psychol, 142­(1), 37–55.
  35. Zhang, L. F. (2008­­b­). Thinking styles and emotions. J Psychol, 142­(5), 497–515.
  36. Zhang, L. F. (2008­c­). Thinking styles and identity development among Chinese university students. AM J Psychiat,21(1), 88.