مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

داوران

هزینه های دریافتی

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

راهنمای نگارش مقاله

شاخص‌های ارزیابی عملکرد سرمربیان حرفه‌ای لیگ برتر والیبال ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه گیلان

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین شاخص‌های ارزیابی عملکرد سرمربیان لیگ برتر والیبال ایران از دیدگاه مربیان و ورزشکاران بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه سرمربیان و مربیان (24نفر) و ورزشکاران (144نفر) شاغل در لیگ برتر والیبال ایران سال (1391) بودند. نمونه آماری برابر با جامعه آماری در نظر گرفته شد که در نهایت، 138 نفر (82 درصد) در پژوهش حاضر شرکت کردند. ابزار تحقیق ، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته ای حاوی 42 شاخص ارزیابی عملکرد سرمربیان والیبال بود که در یک مصاحبه نیمه هدایت شده با مقیاس پنج ارزشی لیکرتی تنظیم گردید. ضمناً 18 نفر از اساتید صاحب‌نظر و مربیان و کارشناسان با سابقه والیبال، روایی صوری و محتوایی آن را تأیید کردند و پایایی آن با استفاده از روش آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شد (93/0 =α). از روش تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی با چرخش متمایل (چرخش ابلیمین مستقیم) برای تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شد. بر اساس نتایج تحلیل عاملی، یازده شاخص حذف شدند و 31شاخص باقیمانده در شش عامل مدیریت تیم، روابط حرفه‌ای، مهارت‌های اجتماعی-ارتباطی، مهارت‌های روان‌شناختی، عامل سابقه و تجربه و مهارت‌های فنی، با ارزش ویژه بزرگ‌تر از 1 طبقه‌بندی گردید. از دیدگاه پاسخ‌دهندگان به ترتیب عامل‌های مهارت‌های اجتماعی - ارتباطی، مدیریت تیم، مهارت‌های روان‌شناختی، مهارت‌های فنی، روابط حرفه‌ای و سابقه و تجربه ورزشی مهم‌ترین ابعاد ارزیابی عملکرد مربیان شناخته شد و همچنین شاخص‌ ایجاد نظم و انضباط تیمی در تمرین و مسابقه در اولویت اول و شاخص ارتباط با اصحاب رسانه در آخرین اولویت قرار داشتند. بنابراین، با توجه به اولویت بالای عامل مهارت‌های اجتماعی - ارتباطی و عامل مدیریت تیم، ارزیابی این مهارت‌ها برای سرمربیان بسیار ضروری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Performance Evaluation’s Indicators of Volleyball Head Coaches In Iran Premier League

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rahim Ramezaninezhad 1
  • mohamad sahebkaran 2

1

2

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was performance evaluation’s indicators of the head coaches in professional volleyball premier League of Iran from the coaches and athletes point of views. The statistical population of this study included all the head coaches and coaches (24 persons), and (144 persons) employed in volleyball premier league of iran (2012-2013). The statistical sample contained number to statistical population and finally 138 individuals (82 percent) paticipated in the present study. A researcher made questionnaire was used which included 42 performance evaluation indicators of the volleyball head- coaches gathered by a semi-directed interview and was used in a five valued likert measure. The apparent and content validity of this questionnaire was also confirmed by 18 experienced expert and coaches of volleyball. The reliability was also computed through alpha kronbakh method (α= 0.93). In order to analyze the data, the discovery factor analysis metod with the inclined rotation (direct oblimined rotation) was used. According to the factor analysis results, eleven indicators were eliminated; and 31 remain in indicators, were categorized with the special value of bigger than one in to the following factors; team management, professional relationship, social-relationship skill, psychological skill, experience and athletic background factor and technical skills. From the responders point of views, the following factors in order were considered as the most important dimension in coaches performance evaluation indicators; social-relationship skill, team management, psychological skill, professional relationship and experience and athletic background. The indicator of team discipline during practices and games was in the first priority and the indicator of relationship with media was in the last priority. In general the club managers and specialists could use basis and important indicators and factors in order to evaluation the head coaches. However, considering the high priority of the social-relationship skill and team management factors, evaluation these skills is very necessary for the head-coaches that gained the technical qualifications.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Performance Evaluation
  • volleyball head-coaches
  • social-relationship skills
  • Team Management
  • Psychological-technical skills
مراجع
1. Adler, E.S., Berry, M.J., & Doherty, D. (2013). Pushing “Reset”: The Conditional Effects of Coaching Replacements on College Football Performance, Social Science Quarterly, 94(1), 1-28.
2. Barber, H., Eckrich, J. (1998). Methods and criteria employed in the evaluation of intercollegiate coaches. Journal of Sport Management, 12: 301-22.
3. Barron, M. (2009). First Aid and Injury Prevention Knowledge of Youth Basketball, Football, and Soccer Coaches. International Journal of Coaching Science, 3 (1): 55-67.
4. Bazargan, A. (2002). Educational Evaluation. First Edition. The Press. 34. (Persian).
5. Center for Studies and Research and Educational Evaluation. (2007). Macro to evaluate the performance of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology from 1383 to 1380 on the basis of specific criteria. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (Persian).
6. Coaches’ Association of British Columbia. (2007). Available on: www.coachesbc.com.
7. Couch Stephan. (2000). Coach Selection. from http:/www.Cc/.org. programs,
8. Esmaeili, M., Talebpour, M. (2008). Prioritizing and evaluating aspects of coaching sports teams in universities. Research in sports science. 16: 106-92. (Persian).
9. Gerver, D. (1992). Coaching: Winning Strategies for Individuals and Teams. Textbook.
10. Ghahfarokhi Dehghan, A. (2011). Evaluating the performance of national team coaches’ volleyball using 360-degree feedback. Thesis Master of Physical Education and Sport Sciences. University of Tehran. (Persian).
11. Gondi. (1998). Coach Assessment Form, available at: http//www.vemp learning.org.
12. Graham, G. (1983). A system matching game requirement with participant ability. Deigiachi sport, roam. 97.
13. Gunaratne A. K., & Plessis J. A. (2007). Performing management system: A powerful tool to achieve organizational goals. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 3 (1): 17-28.
14. Hamidi, M., Memari, ZH. (2015). Exploration model national coaches explain the selection criteria. Sports Management Studies, 6: 58-31. (Persian).
15. Hematinezhad, M.A., Rmzanynzhad, R. (2009). Monitoring and evaluation in physical education and sports. First Edition. Sustainable Nshrshmal. (Persian).
16. Kelly K O, Angela Ang S Y, Chong W L & Hu W S. (2008). Teacher appraisal and its outcomes in Singapore primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration. 46 (1): 39-54.
17. Kohandel, M., Amyrtash, A., & Muzaffar, S. A. A. (2003). Determine and prioritize the selection criteria for national teams in several sports team coaches. Olympic Journal, Issue 1 and 2 (2), Spring and Summer: 29-17. (Persian).
18. Maclean, J.C., Chelladurai, P. (1995). Dimensions of Coaching Performance Development of a Scale. Journal of sport management. 9: 194-207.
19. Martens, R. (2004). Successful coaching. Human kinetics. Third edition.
20. Mirsepassi, N. (2008). Analytical study on evaluation of public employees and managers of public administration training centers. Journal of Public Administration, 6: 23-10. (Persian).
21. Monazami, A.H., Sokhtezari, S., Hadadi, F.h, Rostami Nejad, M, & Goudarzi, M. (2014). Ashraf Hafiz Asghar. Develop criteria for selection of the country's National Volleyball coaches. Applied preceding studies in Sports Management, 2, 119-111. (Persian).
22. Myers, N.D., Feltz, D.L., Maier, K.S., Wolf, E.W, & Reackase, M.D. (2006). Athletes’ Evaluation of Their Head Coaches Coaching Competency. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77(1): 111-21.
23. Myers, N.D., Jin, Y. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling and coaching competency. In P. Potrac, W. Gilbert, & J. Dennison (Eds.). Routledge handbook of sports coaching, 81- 95. London: Routledge.
24. Nasiri, Kh., Khabiri, M., sajadi, N., & Kazemnejad, A. (2010). Analysis and modeling of Iran's national handball team coaches’ evaluation. The Journal of Sport Management, 1: 119-140. (Persian).
25. Novshadi, B. (2010). Success in professional coaching. First Edition. Powered by Publishing. (Persian).
26. Peng, Y., Mingming, L. (2011). Evaluation Index System on Performance Management of Universities High-Level Wushu. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovation & management, 814-818.
27. Peyghambari, E., Talebpour, M., & JabbbariNooghabi, M. (2015). Determining the factors affecting on performance evaluation of the national teams coaches of Wushu Federation of Republic Islamic of Iran, International Journal of Research in Management, 1: 80-87. (Persian).
28. Ramezannezjad, R., RezaieSufi, M., Khosravi, A., & Mollaie, M. (2014). Compare performance indicators from the Viewpoint coaches, athletes and coaches city of Rasht, (2) 5, 214-191. (Persian).
29. Rohani, M., Talebpour, M., Ramezaninejad, R., & Banar N. (2014). Factor Analysis of Performance Indicators soccer coaches Iran, applied research in sport management, 2: 48-35. (Persian).
30. Santos, S., Mesquita, I., Garca, A., & Rosado, A. (2010). Coaches’ perceptions of competence and acknowledgement of training needs related to professional competences. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine; 9: 62-70.
31. Shafie, M., Goudarzi, M. (2008). Define and design criteria for the selection of national team coaches swimming, diving and water polo coaches of view. Harakat Journal, 32: 36-19. (Persian).
32. Stenan. (2006). The evaluation of Canadian skating coaches.
33. Tabrizi, R. (2003). Prioritize some features of teacher trainers and wrestlers national level. Harakat Journal, 11: 131-119. (Persian).
34. Talebpour, M. (2006). Develop a system of monitoring and evaluation of programs and activities in physical education in universities. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Institute of Physical Education and Sport Sciences. (Persian).
35. Vahdat, B. (2008). Developing Indicators to assess the country's track and field coach. Sport Management master's thesis, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Tehran University. (Persian).
36. www.volleyball.ir
مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 7، شماره 33 - شماره پیاپی 33
آذر و دی 1394
صفحه 15-32
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 05 آبان 1392
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 02 تیر 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 12 خرداد 1393
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار