نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت راهبردی در سازمان های ورزشی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد مدیریت و برنامهریزی در تربیت بدنی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت ورزشی دانشکده تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی واحد تهران جنوب دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 مدیریت و برنامه ریزی در تربیت بدنی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
غالباً، سازمان‌ها، مدیران و کارکنان فقط در مواردی که دچار مشکل می‌شوند تمایل به پاسخگویی دارند، این امر بر مشکلات سازمان به ویژه سازمان‌های ورزشی بیش از پیش افزوده است، بنابراین هدف از این پژوهش درک پیامدهای پاسخگویی مدیران در سازمان-های ورزشی با استفاده از نظریه داده بنیاد است. روش این پژوهش کیفی از نوع نظریه داده بنیاد است و رهیافت موردنظر رویکرد نظام‌مند اشتراوس و کوربین بود. مشارکت‌کنندگان در تحقیق را صاحب‌نظران علمی و اجرایی ورزش کشور تشکیل می‌دادند که از طریق روش نمونه‌گیری گلوله برفی و مبتنی بر اشباع نظری با 12 نفر از آن‌ها مصاحبه عمیق انجام شد. جهت تحلیل داده‌ها از سه فرایند همپوش کدگذاری باز، کدگذاری محوری و کدگذاری گزینشی استفاده شد. یافته‌ها تحت تأثیر شرایط علی، زمینه‌‌ساز و مداخله‌گر پاسخگویی از دو جنبه اداری و غیراداری قابل پیگیری است. همچنین در تقابل با این وضعیت راهبردهای سطح کلان و سطح خرد درنظر گرفته می‌شود که نتیجه آن در قالب شفاف‌سازی و رفع ابهام، بهبود عملکرد، افزایش ضریب اعتماد، اقناع‌سازی، ممانعت از سوء استفاده و اتلاف منابع، افزایش همدلی، توانمندسازی مدیران و اثربخشی اقدمات پدیدار می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Understanding the consequences of managers' accountability in sports organizations grounded theory
نویسندگان [English]
- Zeinab Masoumi jaid 1
- ali mohammad safanai 2
- reza nikbakhsh 3
- mohsen baghrian 4
1 Ph.D. Student in Strategic Management in Sports Organizations, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of Management and Planning in Physical Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Sport Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Management and Planning in Physical Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Often, organizations, managers and employees tend to be accountable only in cases where they have problems, this has added to the problems of the organization, especially sports organizations, so the purpose of this study is to understand the consequences of managers' accountability in Sports organizations use grounded theory. The method of this qualitative research is the data theory of the foundation and the approach was the systematic approach of Strauss and Corbin. The participants in the research were scientific and executive experts of sports in the country, and 12 of them were interviewed in depth through snowball sampling method based on theoretical saturation. Three overlapping processes of open coding, axial coding and selective coding were used to analyze the data. Findings can be followed under the influence of causal, contextual and interventionist conditions of accountability from both administrative and non-administrative aspects. In contrast, macro-level and micro-level strategies are considered, which result in transparency and ambiguity, performance improvement, increased trust, persuasion, prevention of misuse and waste of resources, increased empathy. , Empowering managers and the effectiveness of actions emerge.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Principles of Management
- Accountability
- Transparency
- Accountability System
- Sports Managers
- Abbaspour, A., Shakeri, M., Rahimian, H., & Faraskhah, M. (2019). Effective accountability model of public universities: A mixed study. Quarterly Journal of Research in the Educational System, 13(44), 7-22. (in Persian).
- Alwani, S. M., & Ahmadi, K. (2013). The concept of organizational social accountability and the need to explain its components in Iranian government organizations. Quarterly Journal of Management of Government Organizations, 3, 7-16. (In Persian).
- Bovens, M. (2005). Public accountability: A framework for the analysis and assessment of accountability arrangements in the public domain. Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Bovens%2C+M.+%282005%29.+Public+accountability%3A+A+framework+for+the+analysis+and+assessment+of+accountability+arrangements+in+the+public+domain.+Unpublished+paper&btnG=.
- Brandsma, G. J., & Schillemans, T. (2013). The accountability cube: Measuring accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 953-975.
- de Silva, K., Yapa, P. W. S., & Vesty, G. (2020). The impact of accountability mechanisms on public sector environmental sustainability performance: A case study of Sri Lanka. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 14(3), 38-55.
- Dubnick, M. J., & Frederickson, H. G. (Eds.). (2014). Accountable governance: Problems and promises. London: Routledge.
- Hall, A. T., Zinko, R., Perryman, A. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior and reputation: Mediators in the relationships between accountability and job performance and satisfaction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(4), 381-392.
- Han, Y. (2020). The impact of accountability deficit on agency performance: performance-accountability regime. Public Management Review, 22(6), 927-948.
- Han, Y., & Hong, S. (2019). The impact of accountability on organizational performance in the US federal government: The moderating role of autonomy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(1), 3-23.
- Hassani, M., & Shahin Mehr, B. (2015). Modeling the relationship between professional ethics and social responsibility with organizational accountability. Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 10(1), 29-39. (in Persian).
- Hemati Afifi, A., & Kolahi, M. (2021). Assessing the effectiveness of strategic management process and its impact on organizational accountability. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 19(50), 117-130.
- Hoye, R., Smith, A. C., Nicholson, M., & Stewart, B. (2015). Sport management: Principles and applications. London: Routledge.
- Kearns, K. P. (1998). Institutional accountability in higher education: A strategic approach. Public Productivity & Management Review, 1, 140-156.
- Koppell, J. G. (2008). Accountability in global governance. Paper presented at the Kettering Symposium on Accountability, Dayton, OH.
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Nathuralistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publication.
- Mac Donald, K., Rezania, D., & Baker, R. (2020). A grounded theory examination of project managers' accountability. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1), 27-35.
- Mizrahi, S., & Minchuk, Y. (2019). Accountability and performance management: Citizens’ willingness to monitor public officials. Public Management Review, 21(3), 334-353.
- Morgan, N. A., Jayachandran, S., Hulland, J., Kumar, B., Katsikeas, C., & Somosi, A. (2021). Marketing performance assessment and accountability: Process and outcomes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1, 1-20.
- Olfati, A., Yousefi, B., Bahrami, Sh., & Eydi, H. (2022). Identification and prioritization of accountability barriers in sport organizations. Sport management, 13(1), 141-160. (in Persian).
- Panannangan, J. A. (2017). Accountability of administrative operation of secondary vocational education in the South Minahasa, North Sulawesi province (Doctoral dissertation). Universitas Negeri Makassar.
- Rafi'Zadeh Baqarabad, A., & Manurian, A. (2009). Investigating the factors affecting stakeholder responsiveness. Tadbir, 21, 64-68. (in Persian).
- Rezania, D., Baker, R., & Nixon, A. (2019). Exploring project managers’ accountability. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12, 919-937.
- Sepahvand, R., Akbari Pashm, F., & Faramarzi, Alma. (2018). Designing a response model for compensating the services of senior government managers. Strategic Management Studies, 35, 139-162. (in Persian).
- Tenbrink, A. P., & Speer, A. B. (2022). Accountability during performance appraisals: The Development and Validation of the Rater Accountability Scale. Human Performance, 1, 1-23.
- Urdaneta, R., Guevara-Pérez, J. C., Llena-Macarulla, F., & Moneva, J. M. (2021). Transparency and accountability in sports: Measuring the social and financial performance of Spanish professional football. Sustainability, 13(15), 1-16.
- Wikhamn, W., & Hall, A. T. (2014). Accountability and satisfaction: Organizational support as a moderator. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(9), 458-471.
)