مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی

راهبردها و پیامدهای ارتباط دانشکده های علوم ورزشی با مراکز رشد و پارک های علم و فناوری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

3 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

4 استادیار مدیریت بازرگانی بین الملل، دانشگاه آی‌شو، کوشینگ، تایوان

5 استادیار تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه سویلا، سویلا، اسپانیا

چکیده
هدف از این تحقیق ارائه راهبردهایی جهت ارتباط دانشکده‌های علوم ورزشی با مراکز رشد و پارک‌های علم و فناوری و پیامدهایِ حاصل از آن است. روش تحقیق، کیفی و گردآوری داده‌ها با مصاحبه و بررسی ادبیات انجام شد.جامعه تحقیق شامل:روسا و اعضای هیئت علمی علوم ورزشی کشور،مراکز رشد و کارآفرینی، پارک‌های علم و فناوری و دیگر مسئولان مرتبط بودند. نمونه‌گیری تحقیق به‌صورت هدفمند و با رویکرد گلوله برفی بوده است و پس از انجام 14 مصاحبه راهبردهای ارتباط بین دانشکده های علوم ورزشی با مراکز رشد و پارک‌های علم و فناوری شناسایی گردید. تحلیل داده‌ها با سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام گردید.طبق نتایج 205 کد باز بدست آمده در این تحقیق به دوبخش راهبردها و پیامدها تقسیم شد. راهبردها شامل 5 مقوله اصلی و 15 مقوله فرعی تقیسم بود. 5 مقوله اصلی راهبردها شامل؛تخصص‌گرایی، حمایت و پشتیبانی از ایده‌های ورزشی، ایجاد و تقویت روحیه کارآفرینی، نوآوری و ایده‌پردازی، ارتقاء تعامل بین دانشکده، مراکز رشد و جامعه و ایجاد کافه کارآفرینی در دانشکده بود. پیامدها شامل 4 مقوله اصلی و 9 مقوله فرعی بود. مقوله اصلی پیامدها شامل؛ خلق و توسعه فرصت‌های شغلی ورزشی، برخورداری از حمایت‌های مراکز رشد و پارک‌های علم و فناوری، درآمدزایی ایمن، بهبود کیفیت زندگی در جامعه بود. لذا می‌توان پیشنهاد کرد به‌منظور برقراری ارتباط دانشکده‌های علوم ورزشی با این مراکز باید به آموزش نوآوری، حمایت از ایده‌ها و ایجاد جوکارآفرینانه در دانشکده پرداخت. همچنین شناسایی نیازهای ورزشی صنعت و جامعه می‌تواند منجر به تعریف پروژه‌های نوآورانه و تحریک دانشجویان به ایده پردازی شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Strategies and consequences of sports science faculties' connection with incubators and science and technology parks

نویسندگان English

  • Samaneh Almasi 1
  • Hossein Eydi 2
  • Homayoun Abbasi 3
  • Behzad Foroughi 4
  • Jerónimo García Fernández 5
1 PhD student in Sports Management, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Sports Management, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Sports Management, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
4 Assistant Professor of International Business Management, Aishu University, Cushing, Taiwan
5 Assistant Professor of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
چکیده English

The purpose of this research is to provide strategies to connect sports science faculties with science and technology incubators and parks and its consequences. The research method was qualitative and data collection was performed by interviewing and reviewing the literature. The research sample was determined theoretically and after conducting 14 interviews, the communication strategies between the faculties of sports sciences with incubators and science and technology parks were identified. According to the results, the 205 open codes obtained in this research were divided into two parts: strategies and consequences. The strategies included 5 main categories and 15 sub-categories. 5 main categories of strategies including; Specialization, supporting sports ideas, creating and strengthening the spirit of entrepreneurship, innovation and ideation, promoting interaction between the faculty, incubator centers and the community and creating an entrepreneurial cafe in the faculty. The results included 4 main categories and 9 subcategories. The main categories of outcomes include; Creation and development of sports job opportunities, having the support of incubator centers and science and technology parks, secure income generation, improving the quality of life in the society. Therefore, it can be suggested in order to establish a relationship between the Faculties of Sports Sciences and these centers, it is necessary to teach innovation, support ideas and create a creative atmosphere in the faculties. It can also turn the needs of sports and the community into ideas as new projects and motivating students.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Sports Science
  • Incubators
  • Science and Technology Parks
  • Business
  • Self-Employment
  1. Al-Kfairy, M., Khaddaj, S., & Mellor, R. B. (2020). Evaluating the effect of organizational architecture in developing science and technology parks under differing innovation environments. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 100, 102036.
  2. Albahari, A., Barge‐Gil, A., Pérez‐Canto, S., & Modrego, A. (2018). The influence of science and technology park characteristics on firms' innovation results. Papers in regional science, 97(2), 253-279.
  3. Almasi, S., Eydi, H., Abbasi, H. (2021). Identifying Barriers of communication Between Faculty of Sport Sciences with Incubator Centers and Science & Technology Parks in Iran. Sport Physiology & Management Investigations, 13(2), 41-57.
  4. Azimi Delarestaghi, A. (2014). Designing Strategic Entrepreneurship Model in Sports Business. North University.
  5. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business venturing, 20(2), 183-216.
  6. Corrocher, N., Lamperti, F., & Mavilia, R. (2019). Do science parks sustain or trigger innovation? Empirical evidence from Italy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 140-151.
  7. Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., & Blois, G. V. (2018). Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 99-111.
  8. Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Niesten, E. M. (2017). How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 676-713.
  9. Farahmandmehr, A., Sharififar, F., & Nikbakhsh, R. (2019). Designing and explaining the framework of entrepreneurship ecosystem in sports. sports management and development, 17(1), 63-83.
  10. Ghaffari, H., Shahiki, A., & TASH, M. (2020). The Impact of Information Technology Capabilities on Identifying Entrepreneurial Opportunities in Growing Companies Zahedan Science and Technology Park. Journal of Technology Growth, 16(6), 12-22.
  11. González-Serrano, M. H., Moreno, F. C., & Hervás, J. C. (2018). Sport management education through an entrepreneurial perspective: Analysing its impact on Spanish sports science students. The International Journal of Management Education, 100271,1-15.
  12. Gümüsay, A. A., & Bohné, T. M. (2018). Individual and organizational inhibitors to the development of entrepreneurial competencies in universities. Research Policy, 47(2), 363-378.
  13. Habibi, R., Asghari, Z., & Jafari, K. (2019). Identifying and Prioritizing the Factors Affecting the Development of University Technology Units Growth Centers (Case Study: Guilan University Technology Units Growth Center). Journal of Technology Growth, 14, 1-9.
  14. Hemme, F., Morais, D. G., Bowers, M. T., & Todd, J. S. (2017). Extending sport-based entrepreneurship theory through phenomenological inquiry. Sport management review, 20(1), 92-104.
  15. Klofsten, M., Lundmark, E., Wennberg, K., & Bank, N. (2020). Incubator specialization and size: Divergent paths towards operational scale. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119821.
  16. Lecluyse, L., Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2019). The contribution of science parks: A literature review and future research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 559-595.
  17. Lindsey, I., & Darby, P. (2019). Sport and the Sustainable Development Goals: Where is the policy coherence? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 54(7), 793-812.
  18. Mirghfouri , H., Sayadi Turanl , H., & Kariminia , H. (2013). Ranking of effective factors on promoting innovation in companies affiliated with growth centers using fuzzy TOPSIS technique; Case study of Yazd Science and Technology Park. Quarterly Journal of Parks and Growth Centers, 9(3), 19-29.
  19. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook: sage.
  20. Naia, A., Baptista, R., Biscaia, R., Januário, C., & Trigo, V. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions of sport sciences students and theory of planned behavior. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 23, 14-21.
  21. Pierce, D. (2019). Analysis of sport sales courses in the sport management curriculum. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 24, 17-29.
  22. Popp, N., Simmons, J., & McEvoy, C. D. (2017). Sport ticket sales training: Perceived effectiveness and impact on ticket sales results. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(2), 99.
  23. Ratten, V., & Jones, P. (2018). Future research directions for sport education: Toward an entrepreneurial learning approach. Education+ Training.
  24. Revest, V., & Sapio, A. (2012). Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know? Small Business Economics, 39(1), 179-205.
  25. Salvador, D. S., Toboso-Chavero, S., Nadal, A., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall, J., & da Silva, R. S. (2019). Potential of technology parks to implement Roof Mosaic in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 166-177.
  26. Schulenkorf, N. (2017). Managing sport-for-development: Reflections and outlook. Sport management review, 20(3), 243-251.
  27. Sidrat, S., & Frikha, M. A. (2018). Impact of the qualities of the manager and type of university on the development of the entrepreneurial university. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 27-34.
  28. Soetanto, D., & van Geenhuizen, M. (2019). Life after incubation: The impact of entrepreneurial universities on the long-term performance of their spin-offs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 263-276.
  29. Stal, E., Andreassi, T., & Fujino, A. (2016). The role of university incubators in stimulating academic entrepreneurship. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(2), 89-98.
  30. Sun, S. L., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Dong, J., & Cantwell, J. (2019). Enriching innovation ecosystems: The role of government in a university science park. Global Transitions, 1, 104-119.
  31. Svensson, P. G., Andersson, F. O., Mahoney, T. Q., & Ha, J.-P. (2020). Antecedents and outcomes of social innovation: A global study of sport for development and peace organizations. Sport management review, 23(4), 657-670.
  32. Svensson, P. G., & Hambrick, M. E. (2019). Exploring how external stakeholders shape social innovation in sport for development and peace. Sport management review, 22(4), 540-552.
  33. Vaghefi Nazari, R., farahani, A., Asad, M., khodadadi, M. (2015). Job Expectations of Physical Education Students of Their Job and Job Prospect in Tehran Azad Universities. Journal of Sport Management, 7(2), 175-189.
  34. Taslimi, Z. (2015). Presenting the financing framework of sports federations with the focus on self-sufficiency studied: athletics, swimming, gymnastics federations, doctoral thesis, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Gilan University.
  35. van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2020). Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 49(1), 103884.
  36. Vanessa, R. (2012). Sport entrepreneurship: challenges and directions for future research. International journal of entrepreneurial venturing, 4(1), 65-76.
  37. Vatan Khah, N., & Rezai Moghadam, K. (2015). Components and Barriers of the College of Entrepreneurship Establishment from the Perspective of Cooperative Member and Non-member Students of Shiraz University. Co-Operation and Agriculture, 4(15), 17-40.

 

 

مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی
دوره 16، شماره 83
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1403
صفحه 101-130

  • تاریخ دریافت 01 تیر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 28 تیر 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 29 تیر 1401

صفحه اصلی

اصول اخلاقی

ارسال مقاله

اخبار و اعلانات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

تماس با ما