نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعۀ بین‌المللی تنیس روی میز ایران بود. این پژوهش به لحاظ پارادایم از نوع پژوهش‌های تفسیری، از نظر ماهیت، اکتشافی، از حیث رویکرد، کیفی، از لحاظ استراتژی، گرندد ­تئوری، به لحاظ تاکتیک، تحلیل محتوای پنهان و از نظر هدف، کاربردی بود. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش، خبرگان حوزۀ تنیس روی میز ازجمله مربیان تیم­ های ملی تنیس روی میز ایران، مدیران ارشد در وزارت ورزش و جوانان و فدراسیون تنیس روی میز و همچنین اعضای هیئت­ علمی در حوزۀ مدیریت ورزشی بودند که 16 نفر از آنان به‌عنوان نمونۀ پژوهش به شیوۀ غیراحتمالی، هدفمند و گلوله‌برفی در نظر گرفته شدند. شیوۀ جمع­ آوری داده‌ها به‌صورت مصاحبۀ عمیق با این افراد بود. 226 کد اولیه از مصاحبه­ های انجام­ شده دربارۀ عوامل مؤثر بر توسعۀ بین ­المللی تنیس روی میز ایران استخراج شد که فراوانی این کدها درمجموع برابر با 460 بود. 13 مقولۀ اصلی و 37 مقولۀ محوری دربارۀ عوامل مؤثر بر توسعۀ بین­ المللی تنیس روی میز ایران احصاء شد. عوامل مدیریتی و عامل تخصصی و فنی به‌ترتیب با ضریب اهمیت 104 و 80 بیشترین ضرایب و مقولۀ دولت و حاکمیت، ماهیت رشته و عامل رسانه به‌ترتیب با ضریب اهمیت 7، 12 و 13 کمترین ضرایب اهمیت را داشتند. مدیران فدارسیون تنیس­ روی ­میز ایران می­باید به نقش شرایط علّی (عوامل اقتصادی، اجتماعی، توسعۀ زیرساخت‌ها و عوامل فنی و تخصصی)، شرایط مداخله­ گر (عوامل انگیزشی، عامل رسانه، ماهیت رشتۀ تنیس ­روی ­میز) و شرایط زمینه ­ای (استعدادیابی، عامل مدیریتی، دولت و حاکمیت، نهادهای آموزشی و توسعۀ ورزش همگانی) به‌عنوان عوامل اثرگذار بر توسعۀ بین ­المللی تنیس ­روی میز اهتمام ورزند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Analyzing the Factors Affecting the International Development of Table Tennis in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • mehran ahadi 1
  • Mohammad Hami 2
  • vahid shojaee 2

1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

2 Department of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Sari, Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study is to identify the factors affecting the international development of table tennis in Iran. From the paradigm perspective, this research is an interpretive research, a qualitative approach, a grounded theory strategy, and a hidden content analysis tactic. The present study is of exploratory nature. The statistical population of this research included the table tennis experts, , the coaches of the Iranian national table tennis teams, senior managers in the Ministry of Sports and Youth and the Table Tennis Federation, were members of the scientific board in the field of sports management. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with these individuals. 226 Preliminary codes were extracted from the initial interviews regarding the factors influencing the improvement of Iranian international table tennis, with the frequency of 460. 13 main categories and 37 pivotal categories were considered regarding the factors affecting the international development of table tennis in Iran. The highest coefficient of importance belonged to managerial factors and specialized and technical factor that were calculated with the coefficient of importance 104 and 80, respectively. Also, the lowest coefficient of importance was related to the category of government and governance, the nature of the field and the media factor that were as 7, 12 and 13, respectively. Managers of the Iranian Table Tennis Federation should consider the role of causal conditions (economic, social factors, infrastructure development and technical and professional factors), intervening conditions (motivational factors, media factor, nature of table tennis) and background conditions (talent identification, managerial factor, government and governance, educational institutions and the development of public sports) as factors influencing the international development of table tennis.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • International Development
  • Table Tennis
  • Educational Institutions
  • Government and Governance
  • Human Resources
  1. Baker, J., Wattie, N., & Schorer, J. (2019). A proposed conceptualization of talent in sport: The first step in a long and winding road. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 43, 27-33.‏
  2. Bairner, A. (2008). Sport, nationalism and globalization: Relevance, impact, consequences. Hitotsubashi Journal of Arts and Sciences, 49(1), 43-53.
  3. Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education.Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 53-66.
  4. Caton, S., Chadwick, D., Chapman, M., Turnbull, S., Mitchell, D., & Stansfield, J. (2012). Healthy lifestyles for adults with intellectual disability: Knowledge, barriers, and facilitators. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 37(3), 248-259.
  5. Chen, Y. W., Tan, T. C., & Lee, P. C. (2015). The Chinese government and the globalization of table tennis: A case study in local responses to the globalization of sport. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32(10), 1336-1348.
  6. Cleland, C. L., Tully, M. A., Kee, F., & Couples, M. E. (2012). The effectiveness of physical activity interventions in socio-economically disadvantaged communities: a systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 54(6), 371-380.
  7. De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., Shibli, S., & Bingham, J. (2009). Explaining international sporting success: An international comparison of elite sport systems and policies in six countries. Sport Management Review, 12(3), 113-136.
  8. Ghaedy, A., Ghafouri, F., & Karegar, Gh. (2014). A study and comparison of the perspective of sport professionals and managers on the role of sport for all and championship sport in social development indicators, New Trends in Sport management, 1(3), 53-64. (in Persian).
  9. Gram, M., Dahl, R., & Dela, F. (2014). Physical inactivity and muscle oxidative capacity in humans. European Journal of Sport Science, 14(4), 376-383.
  10. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (163-194). New bury Park..
  11. Hayhurst, L. M. (2011). Corporatizing sport, gender and development: Postcolonial IR feminisms, transnational private governance and global corporate social engagement. Third World Quarterly, 32(3), 531-549.
  12. Henry, I. P., Amara, M., & Al-Tauqi, M. (2003). Sport, Arab nationalism and the Pan-Arab games. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 38(3), 295-310.
  13. Zia-ul-Islam, S., Jamil, A., Khan, A., & Khan. (2017).  I. Study of governmental barriers/hurdles affecting sports in Secondary schools of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  14. Kavousy, E., & Ahmadi, F. (2010). Globalization, training and development of human resources (Adaptive comparison of 62 countries of world). Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 1(1), 79-108. (in Persian).
  15. Kidd, B. (2008). A new social movement: Sport for development and peace. Sport in Society, 11(4), 370-380.
  16. Kim, J. (2019). Why we cheer for Viktor Ahn: Changing characteristics of sporting nationalism and citizenship in South Korea in the Era of Neoliberal globalization. Communication & Sport, 7(4), 488-509.
  17. Kobayashi, T., Nicholson, M., & Hoye, R. (2013). Football ‘wantok’: Sport and social capital in Vanuatu. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48(1), 38-53.
  18. Kruk, J. (2007). Physical activity in the prevention of the most frequent chronic diseases: an analysis of the recent evidence. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 8(3), 325-338.
  19. Kyröläinen, H., Santtila, M., Nindl, B. C., & Vasankari, T. (2010). Physical fitness profiles of young men. Sports Medicine, 40(11), 907-920.
  20. Levermore, R. (2008). Sport: A new engine of development? Progress in Development Studies, 8(2), 183-190.
  21. Ma, Y., He, J., & Yu, Q. (2019). Modeling on social popularity and achievement: A case study on table tennis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 524, 235-245.
  22. Meier, M., & Saavedra, M. (2009). Esther Phiri and the Moutawakel effect in Zambia: An analysis of the use of female role models in sport-for-development. Sport in Society, 12(9), 1158-1176.
  23. Moradi, M., Honari, H., Naghshbandi, S., & Jabari, N. (2012). The association between informing, social participation, educational, and culture making roles of sport media with development of championship sport. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5356-5360. (in Persian).
  24. (2017). Social factors for the development of uniformity: political science, sociological and economic, 4(6), 11-15.
  25. Pereverzieva, A. (2018). Analysis of globalization determinants impact on human resources development. University Economic Bulletin, (38), 104-112.
  26. Porter-Smith, R., Harris, P. T., Andersen, O. B., Coleman, R., Greenslade, D., & Jenkins, C. J. (2004). Classification of the Australian continental shelf based on predicted sediment threshold exceedance from tidal currents and swell waves. Marine Geology, 211(1-2), 1-20.
  27. Saberi, A., Kalateh Seifari, M., Dosti, M., Razavi, S. M. H., & Farzan, F. (2018). Designing a sport development model in iran’s free trade industrial zones. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 6(4), 49-58. (in Persian).
  28. Seippel, Ø. (2017). Sports and nationalism in a globalized world. International Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 43-61.
  29. Setiawan, A., Saputra, Y. M., Ma’mun, A., & Fattah, N. (2019, September). Sports Development in West Java: Sports policy review. In 3rd International Conference on Sport Science, Health, and Physical Education (ICSSHPE 2018) .( pp. 262-265). Atlantis Press.
  30. Strauss, A., & Korbin, J. (1990). Basic of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and techniques.(B. Mohammadi, Trans.). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (in Persian)
  31. Silk, M. L., Andrews, D. L., & Cole, C. L. (Eds.). (2005). Sport and corporate nationalisms. Oxford: Berg.
  32. Skinner, J., Zakus, D. H., & Cowell, J. (2008). Development through sport: Building social capital in disadvantaged communities. Sport Management Review, 11(3), 253-275.
  33. Sotiriadou, K. (2009). The Australian sport system and its stakeholders: Development of cooperative relationships. Sport in Society, 12(7), 842-860.
  34. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137-146.
  35. Tondnevis, F., & Ghasemi, M. H. (2008). The comparative study of gymnastics championship progressive approach in Iran from athletes, coaches and expert’s point of view. Olympic, 15(4), 17-29. (in Persian).
  36. Zhang, N., & Shu, X. (2020). Research on the Synergetic Sports Development Path of “Healthy Shanghai”. Advances in Physical Sciences, 8(1), 7-11.