نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
امروزه تولید، توزیع و مصرف کالاهای مقلد و جعلی در ورزش یکی از روندهای جهانی است که به‌صورت هشداردهندهای درحال‌افزایش است و به صنعتی درآمدزا تبدیل شده است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی الگوهای ذهنی خبرگان دربارة مصرف کنندگان برندهای مقلد و جعلی محصولات ورزشی انجام شد. روش پژوهش از نظر پارادایم، تفسیری و از حیث روش‌شناسی، کیو بود و همچنین به‌لحاظ قطعیت داده ها، آمیختة اکتشافی (کیفی-کمی) بود. متخصصان بازاریابی ورزشی، اساتید دانشگاهی رشتة مدیریت و بازاریابی ورزشی و فروشندگان کالاهای ورزشی به تعداد 25 نفر، جامعة آماری این پژوهش را تشکیل دادند که به روش هدفمند انتخاب شدند. از بین مصاحبه های عمیق با خبرگان و پیشینة پژوهش، مجموعة عبارات کیو در 29 عبارت شناسایی و تأیید شد. روایی صوری و محتوایی عبارات و نمودار کیو به تأیید خبرگان رسید. با تحلیل عوامل کیو شش الگوی ذهنی خبرگان شامل قیمت گرایان، خدمات گرایان، ظاهرگرایان، ارزش گرایان، تجربه گرایان و چالش گرایان، شناسایی، اولویت بندی و تفسیر شد. درنهایت، دربارة الگوهای شناسایی‌شده بحث شد و تولید محصولات اصلی با کیفیت و قیمت مناسب و همچنین طراحی حرفه ای در سایة حمایت دستگاه های اجرایی، به‌عنوان پیشنهادهای کاربردی برای برون‌رفت از آسیب هایی که برندهای مقلد و جعلی بر بازار داخلی وارد میکنند، ارائه شدند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identify the Mental Patterns of Experts about Consumers of Mimicry and Fake Brands of Sports Products
نویسندگان [English]
- Mohammad Kashtidar 1
- Mahdi Talebpour 1
- Masoud Darabi 2
- Ahmad Nazari Torshizi 2
1 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده [English]
Today, the production, distribution, and consumption of mimicry and fake goods in sport are one of the global trends that are growing alarmingly and have become an income-generating industry. The purpose of the present study was to identify the mental patterns of experts about consumers of mimicry and fake brands of sports products. The research method was an interpretative paradigm, and in terms of data certainty, it is a combination of exploratory (qualitative-quantitative) approach and also it’s Q-methodology.The statistical population of this study consisted of sports marketing specialists, university professors of sports management and marketing, and sport goods retailers, who were selected by the purposeful method. Among the deep interviews with the experts and the research project, the set of Q's phrases was identified and endorsed in 29 phrases. Visual and conceptual narrative Q phrases and charts confirmed by the experts. By analyzing the factors, six mental patterns: price-orientation, service-oriented, figurative, value-oriented, empiricist, and challenges from experts were identified and interpreted. Finally, around the identified patterns discussed and the production of the main products with good quality and reasonable prices, as well as professional design in the shadow of the support of the operating system, as suggestions for the removal of the damages that mimicry and fake brands on the domestic market Are being introduced.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Mental Patterns
- Experts
- Mimicry and Fake Brands
- Sports Products
- Q-Methodology
2. Angkouw, P. J. P., & Rumokoy, F. S. (2016). Analysis of Consumer Behavior on Purchase Intention of Counterfeit Shoes in Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 4(1), 29-84.
3. Abdolmaleki, H., Mirzazadeh, Z. S., & Alidost-Ghahfarokhi, E. (2017). Ranking of factors affecting the behavior of sport products by AHP. Journal of Sport Management University of Tehran, 9(3), 471-88. (in Persian).
4. Albers-Miller, N. D. (1999). Consumer misbehavior: Why people buy illicit goods. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(3), 273-87.
5. Bloch, P. H., Bush, R. F., & Campbell, L. (1993). Consumer “accomplices” in product Ccounterfeiting: A demand side investigation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(4), 27-36.
6. Chaudhry, P. E., & Zimmerman, A. (2009). The economics of counterfeit trade: Governments, consumers, pirates and intellectual property rights. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
7. Chaudhry, P. E., & Zimmerman, A. (2012). Protecting your intellectual property rights: Understanding the role of management, governments, consumers and pirates. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
8. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
9. Chaudary, M. W. T., Ahmed, F., Gill, M. S., & Rizwan, M. (2014). The determinants of purchase intention of consumers towards counterfeit shoes in Pakistan. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 4(3), 20-38.
10. D’Astous, A., & Gargouri, E. (2001). Consumer evaluations of brand imitations. European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 153–67.
11. Dehghani-Soltani, M., Mohammadi, E., Por-Ashraf, Y., & Saye-Miri, K. (2013). (Effective factors on assessing the attitude of consumers on brand development). Journal of Business Management, 5 (1), 85-104. (in Persian).
12. Ebrahimi, S. B., Ketabian, H., & Rahimi, H. (2015). Identification of effective measures on the choice of brand in consumer products. Journal of Business Management, 7(2), 273-94. (in Persian).
13. Ebrahimi, A. A., Jafarzadeh-Kenari, M., & Bozorgi-Makrani, S. (2012). Factors affecting attitudes and intention of buying customers to purchase fake products of luxury brands in the apparel industry (Case study: Sari city). Journal of New Marketing Research, 2(3), 1-34. (in Persian).
14. Estes, Z. (2003). A tale of two similarities: Comparison and integration in conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 27(6), 911-21.
15. Foxman, E. R., Berger, P. W., & Cote, J. A. (1992). Consumer brand confusion: A conceptual framework. Psychology & Marketing, 9(2), 123-41.
16. Huang, J. H., Lee, B. C., & Hsun Ho, S. (2004). Consumer attitude toward gray market goods. International Marketing Review, 21(6), 598-614.
17. Hoseini, M. H., & Rezaei, M. (2011). Factors affecting brand loyalty in the dairy market. Journal of Business Management Perspective, 5(38), 57-79. (in Persian).
18. Jiang, L., & Shan, J. (2018). Genuine brands or high-quality counterfeits: An investigation of luxury consumption in China. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 35(2), 183-97.
19. Kapferer, J. N. (1995). Brand confusion: Empirical study of a legal concept. Psychology & Marketing, 12(6), 551-69.
20. Khanofar, H., & Moslemi, N. (2018). Principles and foundations of qualitative research methods New and functional wallpaper. Tehran: Neghah-e Danesh Publication. (in Persian).
21. Khodadad-Hoseini, S. H., Nejat, S., & Hashemi, M. (2017). Discussing the mental patterns of buyers of fake luxury products based on Qi's methodology. Journal Scientific Research Brand Management, 4(1), 13-40. (in Persian).
22. Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building measuring and managing brand equity (2th ed). New York: Prentice Hall.
23. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2011). Principles of marketing (14th ed.). London: Pearson.
24. Lai, K. K. Y., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1999). Brand imitation: Do the Chinese have different views? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 16(2), 179-92.
25. Lysonski, S., & Durvasula, S. (2008). Digital piracy of MP3s: Consumer and ethical predispositions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(3), 167-78.
26. Mansouri, H., Sadeghi-Broujerdi, S, & Izadi, B. (2017). Identification and prioritization of foreigners prefer to buy second-hand sporting goods AHP Approach. Sport Management Studies, 44, 73-92. (in Persian).
27. Mccracken, J. C., & Macklin, M. C. (1998). The role of brand names and visual cues in enhancing memory for consumer-packaged goods. Marketing Letters, 9(2), 209-26.
28. Nalchi kasha, A., Rasolian, M., & Bojari, H. (2012). The survey of Consumers purchasing behavior toward foreign brands vs domestic brands, Journal of development and evolution Management, 8, 47-56. (in Persian).
29. Norum, P. S., & Cuno, A. (2011). Analysis of the demand for counterfeit goods. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 15(1), 27-40.
30. Pieters, R. (2010). Looking more or less alike: Determinants of perceived visual similarity between copycat and leading brands. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1121-8.
31. Riso, J. (2014). Friend or faux: The trademark counterfeiting act's inability to stop the sale of counterfeit sporting goods. Journal of Business and Intellectual Property. Law., 15(2), 233-61.
32. Sano, N., Tamura, S., Yada, K., & Suzuki, T. (2014). Evaluation of price elasticity and brand loyalty in milk products. Procedia Computer Science, 35, 1482-7.
33. Seyed-Javadin, S. R., & Esfandiani, M. R. (2012). Consumer behavior. Tehran: University of Tehran Publication. (in Persian).
34. Stumpf, S. A., Chaudhry, P. E., & Perretta, L. (2011). Fake: Can business stanch the flow of counterfeit products? Journal of Business Strategy, 32(2), 4-12.
35. West. J. (2014). 5 key factors that affect your employees’ productivity. National Business Research Institute. Available at: http://blog.doostang.com (28 Junuary 2019).
36. Wisniewski, E. J., & Bassok, M. (1999). What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3-4), 208-38.
37. Wilke, R. & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1999). Brand imitation and its effects on innovation, competition, and brand equity. Business Horizons, 42(6), 9-18.
38. Wilcock, A. E., & Boys, K. A. (2014). Reduce product counterfeiting: An integrated approach. Business Horizons, 57(2), 279-88.
39. Yasini, A., Rezaekhah, H., Taban, M., & Zeinabadi, H. R. (2016). Identifying mental models of Ilam University students on job promotion using Q-method (Q). Journal of Management of Government Agencies. 9(28), 13-40 (Persian).
40. Zakerian, A., Ghods Mir-Heydari, S. F., & Takli, H. (2017). Investigating factors affecting the attitude and intention of buying counterfeit shoes. Journal of Sport Management, 9(4), 741-62. (Persian).
41. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1995). Defending your brand against imitation book. 1th ed., London: Quorum book.
42. Zaichkowsky, J. L., & Simpson, R. N. (1996). The effect of experience with a brand imitator on the original brand. Marketing Letters, 7(1), 31-9.
)