نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه پیام نور
2 استاد گروه تربیتبدنی دانشگاه پیام نور
3 استادیار گروه مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه پیام نور
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین مدل ارتباطی خودکارآمدی شغلی و سرمایة اجتماعی در وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران انجام شد. جامعة آماری پژوهش همة مدیران عالی، میانی و پایه، کارشناسان مسئول، کارشناسان و کمککارشناسان شاغل در وزارت ورزش و جوانان بودند (تعداد = 850) که 265 نفر بهطور تصادفی طبقهای برای نمونة پژوهش انتخاب شدند. برای دستیابی به اهداف پژوهش از پرسشنامههای خودکارآمدی شرر (1982) و سرمایة اجتماعی پاتنام (1993) استفاده شد. روایی هر دو پرسشنامه به تأیید 15 نفر از متخصصان رسید و پایایی آنها در یک مطالعة مقدماتی با 30 آزمودنی و با آلفای کرونباخ بهترتیب 8/0 و 73/0 محاسبه شد. بهمنظور تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات جمعآوریشده از روشهای آماری توصیفی و استنباطی از جمله کولموگروف-اسمیرنوف، تی استودنت تکنمونهای، تحلیل مسیر و برای تعیین ارتباط علّی بین متغیرها از روش مدل معادلات ساختاری به کمک دو نرمافزار آموس و اسپیاساس استفاده شد. یافته های پژوهش نشان داد در بین منابع انسانی وزارت ورزش و جوانان خودکارآمدی شغلی در حد نامطلوب و سرمایة اجتماعی در حد مطلوب قرار داشت. همچنین بین خودکارآمدی شغلی و سرمایة اجتماعی ارتباط مستقیم معناداری وجود داشت. در ارتباط بین خودکارآمدی شغلی و سرمایة اجتماعی وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران بعد شناختی با بار عاملی 80/0، بعد ساختاری با بار عاملی 74/0 و بعد ارتباطی با بار عاملی 71/0 بیشترین تأثیر را داشتند.نتایج تحقیق ضرورت و لزوم ارتقا سرمایه اجتماعی و اعتماد متقابل در سازمان را به منظور بالا بردن سطح خودکارآمدی و در نتیجه افزایش قدرت رقابتی سازمان را تبیین می کند.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing Relationship Model of Career Self-efficacy and Social Capital at the Ministry of Youth and Sports of Iran
نویسندگان [English]
- Loghman Keshavarz 1
- Abolfazl Farahani 2
- Zahra Asghari 3
1 Professor of Sport Management at Payame Noor University
2 Professor of Sport Management at Payame Noor University
3 Assistant Professor of Sport Management at Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this research was to design relationship model of career self-efficacy and social capital at the Ministry of Youth and Sports of Iran. Statistical population of this study included 850 employees that working at the all levels (the managerial and operational levels) of Ministry of Youth and Sports in Iran. On the basis of Morgan table, 265 persons were selected through cluster-sampling. To achieve the research goals, the questionnaires of Scherer Public Self-efficacy and Putnam Social Capital were used. Validity of two questionnaires was confirmed by 15 experts, and their reliability were studied in preliminary study with 30 subjects and calculated as 0.8 and 0.73, respectively. For data analysis, the descriptive statistics and inferential statistics methods, including Kolmogorov-Smirnov Single sample student test, and path analysis were used. In addition, for determination of the causal relationship between variables, the method of structural equations model by application of Amos V.18 software and SPSSV.16 were used. Research findings showed that career self-efficacy is not desirable, and social capital is desirable at the ministry of youth and sports of Iran. There is a significant relationship between career self- efficacies with social capital. Their relationship model has desirable goodness. Also, at their relationship model the cognitive factors with coefficient of 0.8, the structural factors with coefficient of 0.74, and the communicational factors with coefficient of 0.71, have the most roles.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Career Self-efficacy
- Social Capital
- The Ministry of Youth and Sports
- Ahmadi, S., & Faizabadi, H. (2011). The effects of the social capital on the improvement of organization performance in the municipality. Government Management Quarterly, (6), 35-54. (in Persian).
- Alvani, S., & Shirvani, A. (2008). Social capital as central principle in development. Tadbir Monthly, 147, 16-22. (in Persian).
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, (84), 191-213.
- Bandura, A. (2003). Social cognitive theory an agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
- Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206.
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
- Deft, R. (1999). Organization theory and design. USA: South-Western College Publishing.
- Elmi, Z. (2005). Social capital and its effect on economy. Tehran University Economical Research, 17, 239-296. (in Persian).
- Fukuyama, F. (1999). Social capital and civil society. The Institute of Public Policy George Mason University.
- Gordon, I. (2005). Integrating cities. In Changing cities: Rethinking urban competitiveness, cohesion and governance (pp. 78-93). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Graycar, A. (1999). Crime and social capital. Paper presented at the Australian Crime Prevention Council 19th Biennial International Conference Preventing Crime, Melbourne.
- Honari, H. (2012). Designing structural equations of the social capital and knowledge management in the sports organizations. Sports Management and Dynamic Sciences, 1(1), 85-105. (in Persian).
- Imami, M., & Darabi, M. (2012). Relationship between the social capital and organizational entrepreneurship at Kermanshah government organizations attached to the ministry of economy and finance. Paper presented at the National Conference of Entrepreneurship and Management of Business and Knowledge-Based Jobs, Babolsar. (in Persian).
- Joann, M. (2007). Self-monitoring of physical activity effects on self-efficacy and behavior in people with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 33, 962-988.
- Keshavarz, L., & Bararzadeh, H. (2012). Study of the relationship between Self-Efficacy and demographic characteristics of Iran sport boards managers. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Management and Innovation, Qom. (in Persian).
- Keshavarz, L., & Farahani, A. (2013). Management of Sports Organizations (6th). Tehran: Legal Thoughts Publication. (in Persian).
- Khorshid, S. (2012). Relationship between self-efficacy and social capital of the entrepreneurs considering the role of the intermediary social efficiency. A case study of entrepreneurs at Babolsar Industrial Towns. Paper presented at the National Conference of Entrepreneurship and Management of Business and Knowledge-Based Jobs, Babolsar. (in Persian).
- Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538-555.
- Mohammad Davoodi, A., & Soroush, S. (2010). Relationship of social capital with the social entrepreneurship at Aluminum Pars Kaveh Co. Paper presented at the First International Conference of Management & Creativity, Khuzestan. (in Persian).
- Mau, W. C. (2000). Cultural differences in career decision-making and self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 365-378.
- Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13, 35-42.
- Salimi, L. (2011). Self-efficacy professional profile of the senior managers in the sports federations (Unpublished master´s thesis). Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch. (in Persian).
- Sarraf, V. (2013). Organizational investment in social capital (OISC) and employee job performance. European Journal of Management Science, 11, 2668-3121. (in Persian).
- Shafi’ei-Pour, V., Husseini, H., & Roosta’ei, Z. (2011). Relationship of social capital with the social entrepreneurship and the inter-organizational entrepreneurship. Presented at National Conference of Entrepreneurship and Cooperation & Economic Jihad, Tehran. (in Persian).
- Sherer, M. (1982) General self-efficacy (GSE). Psychological Report, 51(2), 663-671.
- Whetten, D. (1998). Developing management skills. New York: Addison–Wesley, Wheelan.
- Zhao, Y. (2005). Measuring the social capital of laid-off Chinese workers. Current Sociology, 50(4), 555–571.