نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
2 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
3 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی ، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران
چکیده
هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر، تعیین میزان بهره‌وری فدراسیون‌های المپیکی ایران در بعد حرفه‌ای بود که ازطریق طرح پژوهشی زمینه‌یابی تحت‌تأثیر دامنة زمانی محدود، به‌عنوان طرح زمینه‌یابی روندپژوهی معرفی شده است. این پژوهش با بهره‌گیری از پرسش‌نامة پژوهشگرساخته انجام شد. روایی‌های محتوایی، صوری، ظاهری و ملاکی پرسش‌نامه بررسی و تأیید شدند. همچنین، پایایی ابزار با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ آزمون شد و با ضریب 96/0 ضریب اعتبار مطلوبی به‌دست آمد. جامعة آماری پژوهش، مدیران ارشد فدراسیون‌های المپیکی ایران بودند که با توجه به تعداد محدود، مدیران تمام فدراسیون‌ها (تعداد = 26) به‌صورت کل‌شمار به‌عنوان نمونة آماری درنظر گرفته شدند. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از آزمونتیدو گروه همبسته (برای مقایسة شاخص‌های بهره‌وری در مؤلفه‌های مالی، مادی و انسانی با تأکید بر بعد حرفه‌ای در وضعیت موجود و مطلوب و شناسایی شکاف موجود) و شدت اثر (برای بررسی میزان بهره‌وری) استفاده شد. با نگاهی به نتایج در مؤلفه مالی، با رجوع به میانگین‌ها مشخص شد که در شاخص‌های تجلیل از قهرمانان و پیشکسوتان، برگزاری اردوهای داخلی، توسعة زیرساخت‌ها و ارتقای سطح مسابقات داخلی، میانگین وضعیت مطلوب بالاتر از میانگین وضعیت موجود بود؛ ولی باوجود معناداربودنتیو شدت اثر بالا، شاخص‌های بودجة اعزام‌ها و بودجه برای استفاده از دانش، شدت اثر کمتر از 50/0 داشتند و فاصلة میانگین موجود و مطلوب به نسبت شاخص‌های دیگر مؤلفة مالی در بُعد حرفه‌ای کمتر بود. درنهایت، مشخص شد که بهره‌وری فدراسیون‌های المپیکی ایران در بعد حرفه‌ای پایین‌تر از سطح استاندارد است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
A Survey on the Productivity of Sports Federations in Professional Dimension
نویسندگان [English]
- Edgar Shamounian 1
- Fariba Mohamadian 2
- Zahra Nobakht Ramazani 3
1 Ph.D. in Sport Management, Department of Physical Education, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Department of Physical Education, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Department of Physical Education, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
چکیده [English]
The present study aimed to determine the productivity of Iranian Olympic federations in the professional dimension and it was a process research conducted as a survey under the influence of limited time domain. The research was conducted using a researcher-made questionnaire. The content, face, and criterion validity of questionnaire was examined and confirmed; and the tool reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha leading to the desirable coefficient of 0.96. The statistical population consisted of senior managers of Iranian Olympic federations; and managers of all federations (26) were considered as statistical samples by the full enumeration due to the limited number of managers. Data was analyzed using the Paired-Samples T-Test (to compare the productivity indicators in financial, material and human components with an emphasis on the professional dimension in desired status, and identify gaps) and the effect severity (to evaluate the productivity). According to results of financial component and mean values, the mean desired status was higher than the current status in indexes namely the commemoration of heroes and pioneers; setting up local camps; development of infrastructures; and promoting local championship levels, but due to the significant t and high effect severity, the indices namely budgets for dispatch the knowledge application had the effect severity of less than 0.05; and the mean difference of desired and current status was lower than other indices of financial components in the professional dimension. Finally, it was found that the productivity of Iranian Olympic federations was lower than the standard level in this dimension.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Effectiveness
- Productivity
- Olympic Federations
- Professional dimension
- Sports Organizations
- Productivity of Federations
- Ahmadi, A., Yousefi, B., Eydi, H., & Zardoshtian, Sh. (2017). Impact of strategic planning on organizational effectiveness with mediating role of organizational flexibility. Journal of Human Resource Management in Sport, 4(2), 147-62. (Persian).
- Amini, A., & Ali Nezhad, A. (2015). The EFQM model for finding improvement opportunities of organization. Journal of Decision Engineering. 1(2), 33-60. (Persian).
- Amir Khani, T., & Alikhani, F. (2016). Key indicators of organization performance and productivity improvement: Balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 20, 101-18. (Persian).
- Arraya, M., Pellissier, R. Preto, I. (2015). Team goal-setting involves more than only goal-setting. Sport Business and Management: An International Journal, 5(2), 157-74.
- Barnett, H. (1996). Operations Management. Macmillian Education, UK Benton, W.C.Jr. 2014. Supply Chain Focused Manufacturing Planning and Control. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
- Brosed Lázaro, M., Espitia-Escuer, M., García, C, L, I. (2014). Productivity in professional Spanish basketball. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 4(3), 196-211.
- Collier, T. A., Johnson, L., & Ruggiero, J. (2011). Measuring Technical Efficiency in Sports. Journal of Sports Economics, 12 (6), 579-98
- Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. New Jersey, publicaions Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall
- Eydi, H., Ramzaninezhad, R., Yousefi, B., & Sajjadi, S. N. (2013). Study of Organizational Effectiveness in Selective Sporting Federations. JRSM.; 2 (4) :119-34
- Eydi, H., Ramzaninezgad, R., Yosefi, B., & Malekakhlagh, E. (2014). Introducing questionnaire of effectiveness in sporting federations according to competing value framework. Sport Management Studies, 6(22), 63-84. (Persian).
- Faghihi, A., & Mousavi Kasha, Z. (2010). A model for the measurement of productivity in the public sector of Iran. Journal of Public Administration (JPA), 2(4), 107-26. (Persian).
- Gabus, A. & Fontela, E. (1972). World Problems an Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL. Switzerland Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre
- Habibi, A., Izadiar, S., & Sarafzari, A. (2014). Decision making and information management. Tehran: Simaye Danesh Publishing. (Persian).
- Hersey, H., & Goldsmith, M. (1980). A situational approach to performance planning. Training and Development Journal, Madison. 34(11), 38.
- Hershauer, J. C., & Ruch, W. A. (1978). A Worker Productivity Model and Its Use at Lincoln Electric, 8(3), 80-90.
- Jamshidi Koohsari, H. (2016). Designing a leadership competency development model in Tehran municipality. Paper presented at the 12th Human Resources Development Conference, Tehran. (Persian).
- Khaki, Gh. R. (2008). Productivity management-with an analytical approach to it in the organization. Tehran: Kuhsar Publications. (Persian).
- Khoshalhan, F. (2004). Fund productivity. Tehran, Ahar Publications.
- M. Poty, Jozef. (1992). Productivity management and methods improving that. Interpreter by AlaEinaldoleh.
- Mahdavi Anari, S. A.A., Saadat, M., Esmaeili, M. R., & Aphronesh. A. (2016). Meta analyses of general sports development, championship, professional, educational and prediction of its future course. Paper presented at the First National Conference on Physical Education and Sport Sciences. Institute of Technical and Vocational Education, Varamin, Sama. (Persian).
- Manzoor, A. (2015). Impact of employees motivation on organizational effectiveness. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(3), 1-12.
- National Productivity Organization of Iran. (2000). Glossary of national productivity organization. Tehran: Publication of National Productivity Organization of Iran.
- Niroumand, P., Bamdad Soofy, J., Aerabi, S. M., & Amiri, M. (2012). A conceptual framework for competencies of CEOs engaged in technology- based firms CEOs: Dimensions, factors and indies. Journal of Career and Organization Consulting, 4(12), 145-61. (Persian).
- Palizban, A., Norouzian, M., Madani, A., & Azadan, M. (2012). Guide to compiling productivity indicators and performance appraisal. Center for Planning and Information Technology. Office of Statistics and Planning of Performance Management Group. 10-2. (Persian).
- Pritchard, R. D., Harrell, M. M., Diaz Granados, D., & Guzman, M. J. (2008). The productivity measurement and enhancement system: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology Association, 93(3), 540–67.
- Haleem, R. M., Salem, M. Y., Fatahallah, F. A., & Abdelfattah, L. E. (2015). Quality in the pharmaceutical industry –A literature review. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 23, 463–9.
- Daft, R. L. (1957). Organization Theory & Design,
- Saatchi, M. (2000). The Psychology of Productivity. Tehran: Editing Publications
- Sedaqhati, S. (2012). Effective factors in increasing the productivity of human resources selected sport federation and model presented. PhD thesis, Islamic Azad university, Central branch, Tehran. (Persian).
- Soltani, I. (2008). Human resource efficiency. Isfahan: Arkan Publications. (Persian).
- Sutermeister, A. R. (1976). People and Productivity. McGraw-Hill.
- Taheri, Sh. (2008). Productivity and analysis in organizations: Integrated productivity management. Tehran: Hastan Publications. (Persian).
- Tofighi, Sh., Chaghary, M., Amerioun, A., & Karimi Zarchi, A. (2011). Effect of organizational changes on organizational health indicators and its relationship with organizational effectiveness. Iranian Journal of Military Medicine, 13(3), 173-9. (Persian).
)