نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه گیلان
2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه گیلان
چکیده
هدف این پژوهشطراحی الگوی شناسایی مؤلفه‌های فساد در فوتبال ایران بود. پژوهش ازنوع توصیفی و کاربردی بود که به‌صورت آمیخته، به روش‌های کیفی و کمی انجام شد. ابتدا با روش کتابخانه‌ای، مرور پیشینه و اسناد مرتبط و نیز مصاحبۀ نیمه‌ساختاریافته با نخبگان، پرسش‌نامۀ محقق‌ساخته‌ای با 46 سؤال طراحی شد که سه سطح را، سطح کلان با پنج متغیر، سطح میانی با چهار متغیر و سطح خرد با چهار متغیر، بررسی می‌کرد. جامعة آماری صاحب‌نفعان فوتبال بودند و نمونه‌ها به‌صورت غیرتصادفی و دردسترس انتخاب شدند که تعداد 109 پرسش‌نامه جمع‌آوری شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای اس.پی.اس.اس نسخة 19 و اسمارت پی.ال.اس تجزیه‌وتحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که متغیرهای مدیریتی– اداری و آموزشی– تربیتی بیشترین تأثیر را در همة ابعاد داشتند. همچنین، بالاترین رتبۀ شکل‌های فساد از دیدگاه بازیکنان، مربیان، داوران، کادر فنی و مدیریتی و اصحاب رسانه، تبانی و از دیدگاه اعضای آکادمی فوتبال تحصیل مال ازطریق نامشروع بود. با توجه به برازش مطلوب مدل مفهومی فساد، اثرگذاری متغیرهای کلان بر فساد، زیاد و تأثیر ابعاد میانی و خرد باوجود بعد کلان بسیار ضعیف گزارش شد. با توجه به زیادبودن شدت ضرایب اثر عوامل کلان در پژوهش، می‌توان گفت این بعد نقش زیادی در بروز فساد یا به‌عکس در پیشگیری از آن دارد و می‌تواند مقدم بر سایر ابعاد در کانون توجه مبارزه با فساد در فوتبال قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identifying and Determining the Factors Affecting the Incidence of Corruption in Iran`S Football
نویسندگان [English]
- Shahram Shafiee 1
- Hakimeh Afrouzeh 2
1 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, University of Guilan
2 PhD. Student of Sport Management, University of Guilan
چکیده [English]
The aim of this study is designing the pattern to Identify and determine the factors of incidence of corruption in Iran football. This research is descriptive and used qualitative and quantitative methods in the mixed manner. At first, by library research we review the related literature and documents and design an initial questionnaire with 46 questions by a semi-structured interview with geniuses. By this questionnaire we try to investigate 3 levels, macro levels with 5 variables, meso level with 4 variables and micro level by 4 variables. The statistical population is football beneficiaries we collected data from 109 questionnaire and analyzed with using SPSS19 and SmartPLS2 software. The findings show that managerial-administrative variables and training-educational variables have the most effectiveness at all of dimensions. In addition, from the perspective of the players, coaches, technical and management staff, referees, the media and football academy members the highest rank in forms of corruption is making money illegally. Considering good fitness of the conceptual model of corruption, the effect of macro variables on corruption is most and it is reported that micro and meso variables have less effect on this subject. Due to the high impact of the coefficients of macro factors in research, it can be said that this dimension plays an effective role in leading to corruption or vise versa in preventing it. Football Federation and Olympic Committee should focus their attention on this dimension before considering others.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Corruption
- Iran Football
- Macro Level
- Meso Level
- Micro Level
2. Boniface, P., Lacarriere, S., Verschuuern, P., Tuaillon, A., Forrest, D., Jean-Michel, L. Wang, X. (2012). Sports betting and corruption: How to preserve the integrity of sport. Available at: http://www.sportaccord.com/multimedia/docs/2012/02/2012_-IRIS_Etude_ Paris_ sportifs_et_corruption_-_ENG (Accessed 8 May 2016).
3. Cheung, H. Y., & Chan, A. W. H. (2008). Corruption across countries: Impacts from education and cultural dimensions. The Social Science Journal, 661, 1-17.
4. De Sanctis, F. M. (2016). Football: A call for transparency to curb corruption. Social Crimonol, 4(1), 2 – 10.
5. Dimant, E., & Deutscher, C. (2015). The economics of corruption in sports: The special case of doping. Available at: Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/60566/ (Accessed, 12 July 2016).
6. Forrest, D. (2012). The threat to football from betting-related corruption. International Journal of Sport Finance, 7(2), 99-116.
7. Ghasemi, V., Zohfaghari, V., & Alivand, A. N. (2008). Sociology sport. Sociologists. 47-65. (Persian)
8. Gorse, S., & Chadwick, S. (2010). Conceptualizing corruption in sport: Implications for sponsorship programmers. The European Business Review, July/August, 40-5.
9. Hallak, J., & Poisson, M. (2007). Corrupt schools, corrupt universities: What can be done? International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001502/150259e.pdf (Accessed, 10 December 2015).
10. Henne, K. (2015). Reforming global sport: Hybridity and the challenges of pursuing transparency. Law & Policy, 37(4), 324-49.
11. Holland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
12. Ibrahim, M., Kumi, E., & Yeboah, T. (2015). Greasing or sanding the wheels? Effect of corruption on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, 4(2), 157-73.
14. Kimuyu, P. (2007). Corruption, firm growth and export propensity in Kenya. International Journal of Social Economics, 34(3), 197-206.
15. Maennig, W. (2005). Corruption in international sports and sport management: Forms, tendencies, extent and countermeasures. European Sport Management Quarterly, 5(2), 187-225.
16. Maennig, W. (2008). Corruption in international sports and how it may be combate. Working Papers0813, International Association of Sports Economists. North American Association of Sports Economists. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/spe/wpaper/0813.html (Accessed 27 February 2016).
17. Mason, D., Sthibault, B., & Misener, L. (2006). An agency theory perspective on corruption in sport: The case of the international Olympic Committee. Journal of Sport Management, 20, 52-73.
18. Masters, A. (2015). Corruption in sport: From the playing field to the field of policy. Policy and Society, 34(2), 111-23.
19. Najafi Kaloni, M., Goudarzi, M., Farahani, A., & Bidhendi Ismaili, H. (2012). Factors affecting the incidence of corruption in sport organizations (study of corruption in the Islamic Republic of Iran football federation). The Journal of Sport Management, 14, 109-22. (Persian).
20. Nwosu, O. C., & Ugwuerua, E. (2016). Nigerian football federation, corruption and development of football in Nigeria. International Journal of Physical Education: Sports and Health, 3(1), 376-82.
21. Razm Ara, T., Yktayar, M., Nzarvysy, H., & Abdi, S. (2015). Corruption in sport organizations: The factors influencing the emergence, spread ways of control. The First National Conference on Advances in Physical Education and Sports Science. International University of Chabahar, Iran. (Persian).
22. Razzaghi, M. E., Ramezaninejad, R., & Mehrabi, G. (2015). A study of factors affecting administrative corruption in soccer. New Trends in Sport Management, 2(7), 41-52. (Persian).
23. Teague, K. A. (2016). A critical insight into fraud and corruption, and its facilitators, in global sporting organizations in a Western European and North American context. Internet Journal of Criminology, 4(8), 10 – 48.
24. Warf, B. (2016). Geographically uneven landscapes of Asian corruption. Asian Geographer, 33(1), 57-76.
25. Warren, Ian. (2015). Crime, deviance and doping: Fallen sports stars, autobiography and the management of stigma. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 27(2), 27-52.
)