نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکترای مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی تربیت‌بدنی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران
2 استاد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران
3 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش طراحی مدل روابط تبادل اجتماعی بین مربیان و دانشجویان ورزشکار در مناطق منتخب دانشگاه‌های آزاد اسلامی بود. روش پژوهش، توصیفی- همبستگی وازنوعمطالعات کاربردیبود. دانشجویان ورزشکار دانشگاه‌های آزاد اسلامی مناطق 1، 4، 16، 26 و 30 (2072 نفر) جامعةآماری پژوهش را تشکیل دادند.تعداد نمونه مطابق با جدول مورگان، 327 نفر تعیین شد که به روش دردسترس، متناسب با حجم نمونه انتخاب شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسش‌نامة نقش تعاملات مربی- ورزشکار در افزایش عملکرد دانشجویان ورزشکار استفاده شد. ضریب آلفای کرونباخ این پرسش‌نامه 947/0 به‌دست آمد. از روش‌های آمار توصیفی برای توصیف داده‌ها، از آزمون کلموگروف-اسمیرنوف برای طبیعی‌بودن داده‌ها و برای آزمون مدل از مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که مدل پژوهش از برازش لازم برخوردار بود. درک از عدالت بر اعتماد اثر معنا‌داری داشت. همچنین، اثر اعتماد بر تبادل رهبر- عضو معنا‌دار بود و مشخص شد که تبادل رهبر- عضو به‌طور مستقیم و غیرمستقیم با میانجی‌گری تعهد، بر عملکرد فردی آزمودنی‌ها اثر دارد؛ بنابراین، طبق نظریة تبادل اجتماعی، مربیان با جلب اعتماد دانشجویان ورزشکار می‌توانند روابط تبادلی بین خود و دانشجویان ورزشکار را استمرار دهند تا زمینة بهبود عملکرد فردی دانشجویان ورزشکار فراهم شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing Social Exchange Communication Model among Coaches and Athlete Students Selected Areas of Islamic Azad Universities
نویسندگان [English]
- Haleh Fazel 1
- Seyed Amir Ahmad Mozafari 2
- Ali Zarei 3
1 Ph.D. of Physical Education Planning and Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
2 Professor of Sport Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
3 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University
چکیده [English]
The aim of this study was to design social exchange communication model among coaches and athlete students selected areas of Islamic Azad Universities. The study was conducted by an applicable descriptive correlation method. The population included the athlete students from 1, 4, 16, 26, and 30 areas of Islamic Azad Universities (2072 persons). The sample size was 327 people based on Morgan schedule by using convenience method. Data were selected by the role of coach-athlete interactions questionnaire in athlete students’ performance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.947. Descriptive statistics, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov regarding normality, and structural equation model for testing were utilized. The model correlation was confirmed. Understanding of justice had a significant effect on trust. Also, leader- member exchange had a significant effect on trust, and it was found that leader-member exchange had a direct and indirect effect on the individual performance through the mediation of commitment. Therefore, according to the social exchange theory, coaches after athlete students trust going could establish continued interactive relationship among themselves and athlete students which could promote individual athlete students’ performance.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Justice
- Trust
- Leader-Member Exchange
- Commitment
- Individual Performance
2. Blanc, P. L., & Romá, V. (2012). A team level investigation of the relationship between LMX differentiation, and commitment and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 534-44.
3. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange & power is social life. New York: Wiley.
4. Case, R. (1998). Leader member exchange theory and sport: Possible applications. Journal of Sport Behavior, 21(4), 387–95.
5. Cheng, C., Jiang, D., Cheng, B., Riley, J., & Jen, C. (2015). When do subordinates commit to their supervisors? Different effects of perceived supervisor integrity and support on Chinese and American employees. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 81-97.
6. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386 – 400.
7. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
8. Czekanski, W. A. (2012). Social exchange in intercollegiate athletics: An exploration of exchange ideologies in the coach-student-athlete dyad. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, United States.
9. Czekanski, W. A., & Turner, B, A. (2014). Social exchange and performance in intercollegiate athletics. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 7, 367-89.
10. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 45-51.
11. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-62.
12. Garg, S. H., & Dhar, R. L. (2014). Effect of stress, LMX and perceived organizational support on service quality: Mediating effects of organizational commitment. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 21, 64-75.
13. Ghasemi, V. (2010). In this social structural equation modeling using AMOS. Tehran: Jamehshenasat Publications. (Persian).
14. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
15. Jordan, J. S., Gillentine, J. A., & Hunt, B. P. (2004). The influence of fairness: The application of organizational justice in a team sport setting. International Sports Journal, 8, 139–49.
16. Jordan, J. S., Turner, B. A., & Pack, S. M. (2009). The influence of organizational justice on perceived organizational support in a university recreational sports setting. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 6(1), 106–23.
17. Jowett, S. (2003). When the honeymoon is over: A case study of a coach-athlete dyad in crisis. The Sport Psychologist, 17, 444-60.
18. Kent, A., & Chelladurai, P. (2001). Perceived transformational leadership, organizational commitment, and citizenship behavior: A case study of intercollegiate athletics. Journal of Sport Management, 15, 135–59.
19. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-69.
21. Lawler, E. J., (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321-52.
22. Liao, C., Wayne, S., Liden, R., & Meuser, J. (2017). Idiosyncratic deals and individual effectiveness: The moderating role of leader-member exchange differentiation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 438-50.
23. Mahony, D. F., Hums, M. A., Andrew, D. P., & Dittmore, S. W. (2010). Organizational justice in sport. Sport Management Review, 13, 91–105.
24. Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: an experimental test of a classical proposition. The American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 1396-427.
25. Murphy, S. M., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56(1), 61-84.
26. Naderian Jahromy, M. (2012). Introduction of sociology in sport. Tehran: Bamdadketab Publications. (Persian).
27. Naseer, S., Raja, U., Syed, F., Donia, M., & Darr, W. (2016). Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment: Exploring the combined effects of despotic leadership, leader member exchange, and perceived organizational politics on behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 14-33.
28. Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader-member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvment. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456-65.
29. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W., & Tetrick, L. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 590-8.
30. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111.
31. Whisenant, W. (2005). Organizational justice and commitment in interscholastic sports. Sport, Education, and Society, 10, 343–57.
32. Whisenant, W., & Jordan, J. S. (2006). Organizational justice and team performance in interscholastic athletics. Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics Annual, 21, 55–82.
33. Zhang, Z., & Chelladurai, P. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of athletic's trust in the coach. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2(2), 115-21.
)