نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

در هر سازمان، یکی از وظایف اصلی مدیران ارزیابی عملکرد است که اجرای بهینة آن می‌تواند موجب رفع نقاط ضعف سازمان و رشد و توسعة آن شود؛ بنابراین، امروزه پژوهشگران سعی می‌کنند با ارائة روش‌های مختلف، نتایج ارزیابی‌های عملکرد را به شرایط واقعی و حاکم بر سازمان‌ها نزدیک‌تر کنند؛ براین‌اساس، هدف از پژوهش حاضر ارائة مدل جدیدی درزمینة ارزیابی عملکرد و رتبه‌بندی اداره‌های ورزش‌وجوانان با استفاده از ترکیب دو روش کارت امتیازی متوازن و تحلیل خوشه‌بندی خاکستری بود. این پژوهش مبتنی بر ترکیب دو بخش کلی بود: بخش اول شامل تعیین شاخص‌های مرتبط با هریک از منظرهای چهارگانة کارت امتیازی متوازن بود و بخش دوم شامل رتبه‌بندی سازمان‌های موردمطالعه براساس روش تحلیل خوشه‌بندی خاکستری بود. برای تعیین ساختار نهایی مناظر چهارگانة کارت امتیازی متوازن، از نظرهای 297 تن از مدیران ارشد اداره‌های ورزش‌و‌جوانان کشور به‌عنوان نمونة آماری و نیز از روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده شد و برای پیاده‌سازی روش تحلیل خوشهبندی خاکستری در رتبه‌بندی، مجموعة اداره‌های ورزش‌وجوانان استان اصفهان به‌عنوان نمونة مطالعاتی درنظر گرفته شدند. نتایج نشان داد که ازمیان 26 ادارة ورزش‌وجوانان موردمطالعه، ادارة شهرستان نجف‌آباد در رتبة اول، ادارة شهرستان اصفهان در رتبة دوم و ادارة شهرستان شاهین‌شهر در رتبة سوم قرار گرفتند. درنهایت و براساس مراحل انجام‌شده، مدل ارزیابی عملکرد و رتبه‌بندی سازمان‌ها با استفاده از ترکیب دو روش کارت امتیازی متوازن و تحلیل خوشه‌بندی خاکستری ارائه شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Presentation and Implementation of BSC-GCA Model for Performance Appraisal and Ranking in Youth and Sport Offices

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Salimi 1
  • Mahboubeh Khodaparast 2

1 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, University of Isfahan

2 Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

Performance appraisal is one of the main responsibilities of managers in every organization, the optimal implementation of which eliminates weak points of the organization and causes its development. Thus, nowadays researchers try to make results from performance appraisal closer to real condition of organizations. So, the main purpose of present study was to present a new model for performance appraisal and ranking Youth and Sport offices using combination of GCA and BSC methods. This study consists of two general sections, the first section is determining alternatives related to every four perspectives of balanced scorecard and the second section is ranking organizations based on gray cluster analysis method. In order to determine final construction of four perspectives of BSC comments of 297 chief managers in Youth and Sport offices in Iran as subjects were used and confirmatory factor analysis method was utilized. For implementing GCA method in ranking organizations, Esfahan Youth and Sport offices were considered as subjects. Results showed that among 26 studied Youth and Sport offices, Najaf Abad branch was in the first place followed by Esfahan and Shahin Shahr branches. Finally based on different stages, the model for performance appraisal and ranking organizations using combination of BSC and GCA methods was presented.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Performance Appraisal
  • Ranking Organizations
  • BSC
  • GCA
  • Youth and Sport Offices
1. Abtahinia, A., Mirkazemi, O., & Keshtidar, M. (2014). Implementing BSC approach foe performance appraisal in youth and sport offices of Iran Universities. Research in Sport Management and Movement Behavior, 7, 149-64. (Persian).
2. Ardekani, S. S., Morovati Sharifabadi, A., Jalaly, M., & Eghbalizarch, M. (2013). Comprehensive performance evaluation using FAHP-FVIKOR approach based on balanced scorecard (BSC): A case of Yazd's ceramic and tile industry. Iranian Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 6(2), 81-104.
3. Awadallah, E., & Allam, A. (2015). A critique of the balanced scorecard as a performance measurement tool. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(7), 91-9.
4. Azar, A., & Rajabzadeh, A. (2010). Applicable decision making (MADM approach) (3rd Edition). Tehran: Ghalam Publication. (Persian).
5. Chang, W Y. (2009). Application of grey clustering approach and genetic algorithm to partial discharge pattern recognition. Wseas Transactions on Systems, 12(8), 1273-83.
6. Daneshfard, K., Vahdani K., & Aghaz A. (2010). Studying the role of balanced scorecard implementation in performance improvement of organization. Leadership and Education Management Magazine, 12, 55-72. (Persian).
7. Faraji Sabokbar, H., Ashornejad, G., Rahimi, S., & Farhadipor, A. (2012). Studying the capacity of ATM in banks and financial institutes and case study: Field range (GCA) and (ANP) credit using Enghelab to Ferdousi streets of Tehran. Urban and Regional Researches, 14, 23-42. (Persian).
8. Faraji Sabokbar, H., Hasanpour, S., Azizi, A., Malekian, A., & Alavipanah, K. (2013). Studying and comparing efficacy of FAHP and GCA methods for navigation of flood comportment in GIS environment. Natural Geographic Researches, 45(2), 55-76. (Persian).
9. Faraji Sabokbar, H. A., Mahmoudi Meimand, H., Rahimi, S., & Shadman Roodposhti, M. (2013). The evaluation of land eco-capability for water planting using grey clustering analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(1), 142-51.
10. Feizi, A., & Solookdar, A. (2014). Performance appraisal of banking industry by integrated balanced scorecard fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS-BSC) approach. Financial Engineering Magazine, 20, 57-78. (Persian).
11. Fekete, M., & Rozenberg, I. (2014). The practical model of employee performance evaluation. International Conference Human Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life, Portoroz, Sloveia.
12. Fooladvand, M., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Shahtalebi, S. (2015). The application strategic planning and balance scorecard modelling in enhance of higher education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 950-4.
13. Ghanbari Shahraji, M., Rashidipanah, M., Soltaninasanb, R., Pournorouz Golroudbari, M., Tavakoli, A., Khorshidifard, S., …, & Ghahramanpour, A. (2012). Approaches of performance evaluation in organizations. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(8), 620-5.
14. Haghighi, M., Hassangholipour, T., & Yousefi, H. (2013). An analysis of role of dry ports on development of container transit from the Iranian South ports by balanced scorecard method. International Journal of Maritime Technology, 1(1), 73-8.
15. Hakkak, M., & Ghodsi, M. (2015). Development of a sustainable competitive advantage model based on balanced scorecard. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 5(5), 298-308.
16. Kadarova, J., Durkacova, M., Teplicka, K., & Kadar, G. (2015). The proposal of an innovative integrated BSC – DEA model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1503-8.
17. Kairu, E. W., Wafula, M. O., Okaka, O., Odera, O., & Akerele E. K. (2013). Effects of balanced scorecard on performance of firms in the service sector. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(9), 81-9.
18. Kamfiroozi, M. H., & Bonyadi Naieni, A. (2013). A hybrid grey-game-MCDM method for ERP selecting based on BSC. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 3(1), 13-20.
19. Karimi Shirazi, H., & Modiri, M. (2013). Selecting the best dynamic integrated performance system based on BSC by FMADM approach. Industrial Management of Human Science College of Sanandaj Azad University, 24, 23-38. (Persian).
20. Ke, L., Xiaoliu, S., Zhongfu, T., & Wenyan, G. (2012). Grey clustering analysis method for overseas energy project investment risk decision. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 55-62.
21. Lehmann, D. R., Zahay, D., & Peltier, J. W. (2013). Surveys analyze customer relationship management using balanced scorecard. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27, 1-16.
22. Li, G. D., Yamaguchi, D., & Nagai, M. (2007). A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 46, 573-81.
23. Mirfakhredini, H., Peimanfar, M., Khatibiaghda, A., & Alimohammadi, H. (2013). Performance appraisal of sport organizations using BSC-TOPSIS model (Case study: Yazd physical training office). Sport management, 16, 77-96. (Persian).
24. Mohammadi, A., & Molaie, N. (2010). Application of gray multi-factorial decision making in performance appraisal of companies. Industrial Management, 4, 125-42. (Persian).
25. Momeni, M., & Faal Ghayomi, A. (2011). Statistical analysis by SPSS. Tehran: Tehran University Press. (Persian).
26. Patrick, E A., Blessing, I. N., & Gloria, E. C. (2015). The use of activity-based costing and balance score card for strategic performance measurement: Perception of chartered accountants in Anambra State, Nigeria. American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 1(3), 211-22.
27. Rahimi, Z., Payamani, A., & Anbari, K. (2015). Performance appraisal of Shahid Rahimi Khoramabadi Hospital based on EFQM model. Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, 3, 87-94. (Persian).
28. Rezaie, F., & Ahmadi, Z. (2012). Performance appraisal of Novin insurance branches using BSC model and TOPSIS method. Revolution and Development Management, 10, 31-9. (Persian).
29. Shahin, A., Rezaei Dolatabadi, H., & Kouchekian, M. (2012). Proposing an integrated model of BSC and EFQM and analyzing its influence on organizational strategies and performance: The case of Isfahan Municipality Complex. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 1(3), 41-57.
30. Shaout, A., & Yousif, M. K. (2014). Performance evaluation: Methods and techniques survey. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 3(5), 966-79.
31. Soleimani, F. (2012). Employee involvement is the prime organizational culture trait influencing balanced scorecard effectiveness in the hospitals: Evidence from a correlation study. International Journal of Hospital Research, 1(2), 117-20.
32. Song, Y., Wei, L., & Ge, M. (2014). Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness and wearing comfort of radiation protection fabrics based on gray clustering analysis. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 45, 1-6.
33. Sorooshian, S, (2014). Study on unbalances of the balanced scorecard. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 8(84), 4163-9.
34. Stas, D., Lenort, R., Wicher, P., & Holman, D. (2015). Green transport balanced scorecard model with analytic network process support. Sustainability, 7, 15243-61.
35. Wu, B. (2015). Research on the evaluation index system and the grey clustering analysis model of teaching quality of physical education in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(8), 59-62.
36. Wu, W. H., Lin, C. T., Peng, K. H., & Huang, C. C. (2012). Applying hierarchical grey relation clustering analysis to geographical information systems: A case study of the hospitals in Taipei city. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 7247-54.
37. Yarmohammadian, M., Shahtalebi, S., Fooladvand, M., & Shahtalebi, B. (2015). Proposing a model for performance appraisal of universities, Case: Khorasgan Azad University. A Novel Approach in Educational Management, 2, 19-37. (Persian).
38. Zhang, T., Cheng, L., Guo, M., & Xue, W. (2015). Evaluation of electromagnetic shielding and wear ability of metal wire composite fabric based on grey clustering analysis. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 106, 1-8.