نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
3 کارشناسی‌ارشد روان‌شناسی ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج، کرج، ایران
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی شاخص‌های انتخاب رؤسای فدراسیون‌های ورزشی ایران با ارائة مدل بود. نوع پژوهش، کاربردی و به شیوۀ آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) بود. در مرحلة کیفی، جامعة آماری شامل 20 نفر از رؤسا و نایب‌رؤسای فدراسیون‌های ورزشی، داوران، مربیان، بازیکنان و اساتید دانشگاه بود. در این پژوهش، از روش نمونه‌گیری گلوله‌‌برفی استفاده شد. در مرحلة کمی، با استفاده از نرمافزار اس.پی.اس.اس سمپل پاور ، جامعة آماری به تعداد 250 نفر برآورد گردید. جمع‌آوری داده‌ها ازطریق مصاحبة نیمه‌ساختاریافته و درقالبپرسش‌نامةمحقق‌ساختهبود. ازتحلیلعاملی اکتشافی برایتأییدساختار عاملیاستفاده شد. برای تحلیل داده‌های کیفی حاصل از مصاحبه، از نرمافزار ان.وی.وو. نسخة 10 بهره گرفته شد. همچنین، از نرمافزار اسمارت پی.ال.اس. نسخة 0/2 و از نرمافزار اس.پی.اس.اس. نسخة 23 برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های کمی استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها نشان داد که شش عامل و 21 سؤال برای انتخاب شاخص‌های رؤسای فدراسیون‌های ورزشی اعتبار لازم را دارند. همچنین، نتایج آزمون فریدمن نشان داد که شاخص اجتماعی با میانگین 87/6، بیشترین میانگین را دارد و در رتبة اول است و همچنین، شاخص هماهنگی با میانگین 06/5، کمترین میانگین را دارد و در رتبة آخر است. در پایان، علاوه‌بر ارائة مدل پژوهش و تأیید برازش آن مشخص شد که بیشترین میزان سازنده‌بودن متعلق به عامل ارتباطات با بتای استاندارد 310/0 بود و کمترین آن نیز به شاخص شغلی با بتای استاندارد 035/0 تعلق داشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identify and Prioritize the Selection Criteria Heads of Sports Federations Iran Model
نویسندگان [English]
- Kaveh Mirani 1
- Seyed Salahodin Naghshbandi 2
- Aliakbar Hosein Nezhad 3
1 Ph.D. Student of Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Sports Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 M.Sc. in Sports Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study is to identify and prioritize the selection criteria for the heads of sports federations of Iran by presenting the model. The type of research was applied in a mixed (qualitative-quantitative) way. The statistical population of this research was qualitative stage, including 20 chairmen and vice-chairmen of sports federations, referees, coaches, players and university professors. In this research, snowball sampling method was used. The statistical population in the quantitative stage was 250 people using SPSS Sample Power software. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and researcher-made questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis was used to verify the factor structure. To analyze the qualitative data obtained from the interview, Nvivo version 10 was used. Also, the SmartPls 2.0 software version 2.0 and SPSS version 23 software were used to analyze quantitative data. The results of the data analysis showed that 6 factors and 21 questions are needed to select the indices of the heads of federations. Also, the results of Friedman test showed that the social index with the mean (6.87) was the highest and the first and also the index of coordination with the mean (5.6) was the lowest and the last rank. In the end, in addition to providing a research model and confirming its fit, it was found that the highest level of constructivist belonged to the factor of communication with the standard beta of 0.310 and the lowest of it was to the job index with the standard beta of 0.05.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Identification
- Prioritization
- indices
- chairman
- vice-chairman
- Federation
2. Boh, W. F., & Wong, S. S. (2015). Managers versus co-workers as referents: Comparing social influence effects on within-and outside-subsidiary knowledge sharing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 1-17.
3. Bordbar, G., & Shakeri, F. (2011). Analysis of the quality of HR managers performance worthy of Yazd university. Production and Operations Management, 2(2), 101-19. (Persian)
4. Caers, R., Cindy, D., Bois, M., Jegers, S., Gieter, R., and Roland, P. (2007). A micro-economic perspective on manager selection in nonprofit organizations. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(12), 18-32.
5. Faridfathi, A., Marefat, D., & Talaee, R. (2015). Neglect and prioritization of indicators of athletic organizational choices by AHP. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 2(6), 49-55. (Persian)
6. Foster, M. D., Sloto, L., & Ruby, R. (2006). Responding to discrimination as a function of meritocracy beliefs and personal experiences: Testing the model of shattered assumptions. London: Psychology Faculty Publications.
7. Pyuan, Y., & James, J. (2010). Attiude toward advertising through sport: A theoretical framework. Sport Management Review, 14, 33–41.
8. Jeou-Shyan, H., Hsuan, H., Chih-Hsing, L., Lin, L., & Chang-Yen, T. (2011). Competency analysis of top managers in the Taiwanese hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 1044-54.
9. Kazemipour, A., Mehdipour, A. A., & Azamshahi, T. (2015). Design and compilation of the selection criteria for the coach of the national football team of Iran. Sport Management Studies, 7(32), 33-56. (Persian)
10. Koenigsfeld, J. P., Kim, S., Cha, J., Perdue, J., & Cichy, R. F. (2012). Developing a competency model for private club managers. International journal of hospitality management, 31(3), 633-41.
12. Mohammadzadeh, Y., & Kavousi, M. (2016). Identify and determine the competency indicators of middle managers in sports and youth departments of Fars province. National Conference on New Research in Sport Sciences. Tehran. (Persian)
13. Moradi, M. (2013). The model is based on the managers' skills in using multi-criteria approach not take decisions. Journal of Research in Human Resource Management University of Imam Hussein (AS), 2, 1-30. (Persian)
14. Musavizadeh, Z., & Adeli, M. (2007). Site selection criteria approach worthy of selection in Nahjolbalagheh. Andysheh Third Middle East, 12, 103-32. (Persian)
15. Naderi, A. R., & Gholamhoseini, M. (2008). Designing a model of human resource management research by University of Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 3, 91-113. (Persian)
16. Nadrian, M., & Soltan Hosseini, M. (2011). Skills and technical abilities for sports managers (indicators and criteria from the point of view of managers). Research on Sport Management and Motor Science, 1(2), 13-8. (Persian).
17. Rezaeian, A. (2008) Principles of organization and management. Tehran: Organization of Study and Textbooks in the Humanities. (Persian)
18. Sajadi, N. A. (2011). Management of sports organizations. Tehran: Organization of Study and Textbooks in the Humanities. (Persian).
19. Smith, A. C., & Stewart, B. (2010). The special features of sport: A critical revisit. Sport Management Review, 13(1), 1-13.
20. Smith, B. L., & Hughey, A. W. (2006). Leadership in higher education–its evolution and potential: a unique role facing critical challenges. Industry and Higher Education, 20(3), 157-63.
21. Trad, A., & Kalpić, D. (2014). The selection and training framework (STF) for managers in business innovation transformation projects-business enterprise architecture integration. Procedia Technology, 16, 755-67.
22. Wolsey, C., Minten, S., & Abrams, J. (2011). Human resource management in the sport and leisure industry. Routledge, London.
23. Zarghami, M. (2011). Soft computing of the borda count by fuzzy linguistic quantifiers. Applied Soft Computing, 11(1), 1067-73.
)