Designing the Assessment Framework of Knowledge-Based Economy in Iranian Sports System and Analysis of the Development Gap Based on It

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, University of Guilan

2 Professor of Sport Management, University of Guilan

3 Professor of Sport Management, University of kurdistan

Abstract
Background and Purpose
In the field of national championship sports, numerous studies have been conducted using various methods, each with its own strengths and limitations. However, when it comes to championship sports within the armed forces, particularly the army, there is a noticeable lack of comprehensive research that effectively guides successful performance in this specialized context (Abbasi et al., 2022). The limited research that does exist generally addresses sports within the armed forces broadly, without focusing specifically on championship sports in the Islamic Republic of Iran Army (AJA). One of the significant weaknesses of existing studies on armed forces sports is the presence of diverse stakeholders with sometimes conflicting interests across different military branches such as the Pasdar Guards, Police Force, and Army. Additionally, the environments in which championship sports operate within these branches vary considerably, which complicates the development of unified strategies (Manochehri, Baran Cheshme & Manochehri, 2019).
This lack of comprehensive research in the area of AJA championship sports has led to a decision-making process overly reliant on the opinions of senior managers, often excluding the perspectives of other key stakeholders involved in championship sports. This approach has two major drawbacks. First, it results in insufficient attention to the various processes that contribute to success in championship sports. Second, it overlooks the fact that success in championship sports is influenced by the performance of many stakeholders, each playing a crucial role in the overall outcome (Isazadeh, Mohammadi, & Emami, 2021). Given these considerations, the present study was undertaken to fill the research gap in the field of army championship sports and to address the weaknesses of previous studies. The study aims to identify and prioritize the beneficiaries of championship sports in the AJA and to determine the factors influencing the success of these sports.
Materials and Methods
This study employed a mixed-methods research design, conducted in two distinct parts. The first part focused on identifying and prioritizing the beneficiaries of championship sports within the AJA using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Initially, beneficiaries were identified qualitatively through library studies and consultations with AJA sports experts. Subsequently, these beneficiaries were prioritized quantitatively using a structured questionnaire based on expert opinions.
The population for the first part consisted of sports experts familiar with AJA championship sports. Due to the absence of an exact population size, snowball sampling was used to conduct interviews with thirteen individuals to identify the beneficiaries. To classify and prioritize these beneficiaries, a benefit-power matrix was constructed based on data collected via a structured questionnaire distributed among the same group of experts.
The second part of the study involved identifying the factors affecting the success of army championship sports, drawing on the opinions of the key stakeholders identified in the first part. These key stakeholders formed the population for qualitative interviews, where twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was achieved. Following this, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on data collected through questionnaires distributed randomly to a sample of 384 beneficiaries involved in army championship sports, as determined by Morgan’s table given the large population size.
 
Findings
The first phase of the research identified twenty beneficiaries of army championship sports, which were then mapped onto the power-benefit matrix. The main beneficiaries with both high benefit and high power included the Army Physical Training Organization, Armed Forces Sports and Physical Fitness Department, Army Ground Force Physical Training, Army Air Force Physical Training, Army Navy Physical Training, Khatam Al Anbia Air Defense Force Physical Training, and Sports Federations. Primary stakeholders with high power but low interest included the Ministry of Sports and the National Olympic Committee. Secondary beneficiaries, characterized by high benefit but low power, encompassed athlete duty staff, athlete support staff, armed forces trainers and supervisors, families of armed forces personnel, financial sponsors, athlete mobilization organizations, athletes' families, experts, and veterans. The least important stakeholders, with low benefit and low power, were identified as society and media.
By identifying and classifying these beneficiaries, the study was able to pinpoint the key stakeholders with significant influence and interest in army championship sports. In the next phase, twelve individuals from this group of key stakeholders were interviewed to identify the factors influencing the success of army championship sports. The qualitative analysis revealed thirty-nine specific factors grouped into nine main categories: supportive, organizational, sports-related, humanitarian, environmental, media-related, motivational, economic, and facilities-related factors.
In the quantitative phase, exploratory factor analysis of the survey data collected from the broader beneficiary population validated these categories and provided a comprehensive understanding of the multidimensional factors affecting success in army championship sports.
 
Conclusion
The findings of this research align with previous studies but also highlight unique aspects specific to the military environment. A critical insight is that many challenges facing AJA championship sports stem from insufficient prioritization by decision-makers within the armed forces. The study suggests that sports managers within the AJA should focus on raising awareness among senior managers and policymakers regarding the importance of championship sports. Emphasizing the ancillary benefits of success in championship sports—such as fostering pride among armed forces families, promoting physical fitness and health among personnel, enhancing the armed forces’ international reputation during peacetime, and stimulating public interest in sports—can help elevate the status of championship sports within the military.
If these efforts succeed and championship sports within the AJA receive the attention they deserve, significant progress toward achieving the goals outlined in this research will be possible. This includes addressing the identified success factors and overcoming existing challenges through coordinated management, resource allocation, and stakeholder engagement.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abedi, H., Babalhavaeji, F., Hassanzadeh, M. (2017). Measuring and model-ing the syn-ergy of knowledge-based economy at pro-vincial and national levels in Iran: A Triple Helix approach. Journal of Scientometrics, 3(6), 147-172. (Persian)
  2. Ahmadi, M. (2016). Modeling and prioritizing knowledge-based economic indicators affecting economic growth using genetic algorithms (Master's thesis). Urmia University of Technology. (Persian)
  3. Raftar Aliabadi, S. (2018). Investigating the effect of knowledge-based economic components on tourism in selected developing countries (M.Sc. thesis). Attar Institute of Higher Education, Department of Economics, Tehran. (Persian)
  4. Alizadeh Golrizi, A. (2017). Development of a commercialization model for sports science research (PhD dissertation). Payame Noor University. (Persian)
  5. Amini, M. (2017). Designing a knowledge-based economy model in sports (Master's thesis). Al-Zahra University, Tehran. (Persian)
  6. Azizi, F., & Moradi, F. (2018). Calculating the Index and Sub-Indices of Knowledge-Based Economy for Iran. Quarterly. Journal of Economic Research and Policy, 26(85), 243-270. (Persian)
  7. Bamir, M., & Setayesh, A. (2019). Measuring the impact of scientific advancements on sports development (Case study: The thematic area of sports championship Olympics). Sport Management Studies, 11(55), 59-70. (Persian)
  8. Branca, A. B. (2013). Sergio Ricardo Cortines Campos, and Mariza Almeida. Interaction among Universities, government and spin-off companies in a Brazilian context to generate sports innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(2), 93-106.
  9. Centobelli, , Roberto, C., Emilio, E., & Mario, R. (2016). The revolution of crowdfunding in social knowledge economy: Literature review and identification of business models. Advanced Science Letters, 22(6), 1666-1669.
  10. Cortsen, K., & Rascher, D. (2018). The application of sports technology and sports data for commercial purposes. In The use of technology in sport-emerging challenges. London: IntechOpen.
  11. Dadgar, Y., Yazdani, M., & Khoeini, P. (2019). Investigating and identifying variables affecting the realization of the economics of students in Iran and selected countries on the horizon of 2050. Comparative Economics, 6(1), 101-120. (Persian)
  12. Dastoom, S., Ramezani Nezhad, R., Benar, N., & Rasouli, R. (2013). Survey of interactions administrative departments and industry sport in Iran Based on the Analysis Documents and structural. Applied Research in Sport Management, 2(2), 91-109. (Persian)
  13. Eliassy, M, Mohammadi, M., Jafari, H., & Karami, P. (2018). Global experiences of sports and physical health startups, vice president for science and technology project. Tehran: Danesh Bonyan Technology Publishing. (Persian)
  14. Fallah, E., & Salami, R. (2016). A comparative study of the foundations of Iranian economics with selected Asian countries and a roadmap for improving Iran's situation. Economic Development Policy, 4(4), 42-61. (Persian)
  15. Farahmandmehr, A. (2017). Designing and explaining the framework of entrepreneurial ecosystem in sports (PhD dissertation). South Tehran Azad University, Tehatn. (Persian)
  16. Gerke, A. (2016). Towards a network model of innovation in sport–the case of product innovation in nautical sport clusters. Innovation, 18(3), 270-288.
  17. Ghasemi, M., Faghihi, M., & Alizadeh, P. (2018). Requirements to achieve a knowledge-based economy at macro level: Analysis of legal framework in Iran and some policy recommendations. Economics Research, 18(68), 99-152. (Persian)
  18. Hayduk, T., & Walker, M. (2018). mapping the strategic factor market for sport entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(3), 705-724.
  19. Jalili, N. (2016). Investigate the impact of knowledge-based economy On Iran's economic growth (M.Sc. thesis). Payame Noor University, Tehran. (Persian)
  20. Mirzapour, M. (2017). Investigating the effect of higher education evaluation and validation components on the realization of knowledge-based economy (Master's thesis). Tehran University of Science and Culture, Tehran. (Persian)
  21. Mohsenpour, A. (2014). The relationship between knowledge-based economics and scientific research in the world based on the world bank indicators (Master's thesis). Tehran. (Persian)
  22. Nam, B. H., Shin, Y. H., Jung, K. S., Kim, J., & Nam, S. (2019). Promoting knowledge economy, human capital, and dual careers of athletes: a critical approach to the Global Sports Talent Development Project in South Korea. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(4), 607-624.
  23. Nazari Ghanbari, M., & Sabounchi, R. (2014). Analysis of role of Education and human capital in economic competitiveness of sport in west provinces of Iran. Scientific Journal of Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 1(2), 93-97. (Persian)
  24. Nazarian, A. (2019). Pathology of the process of production to consumption of Iranian sports products and providing a strategic framework (PhD dissertation). University of Guilan, Rasht. (Persian)
  25. Peachey, W., & Cohen, A. (2016). Research partnerships in sport for development and peace: Challenges, barriers, and strategies. Journal of Sport Management, 30(3), 282-297.
  26. Ratten, V. (2019). Sport entrepreneurial ecosystems and knowledge spillovers. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(6), 1-10.
  27. M. (2015), Statistical and mathematical aspects of ranking: Lessons from Poland. Higher Education in Europe, 17(3), 173-181.
  28. Salem, A. (2018), The effects of knowledge-based economy on economic growth. Economics Research, 18(68), 187-218. (Persian)
  29. shamsi, M., & Nourmohammadi, H. (2018). Identifying the most important indicators and models in evaluation of science and technology in knowledge-based companies in Iran. Journal of Scientometrics, 4(8), 1-16. (Persian)
  30. Spathis, C. J., & Ananiadis, J. (2014). The accountability system and resource allocation reform in a public university International. Journal of Educational Management, 18(3), 196-204.
  31. Terra, B., de Oliveira, A. R., Almeida, M., Batista, L. A., dos Santos, J. A. N., Nogueira, J. A., & Martins, L. L. A. (2020). Sport innovation: An opportunity for technology-based companies stimulated by the Brazil Olympics. Sport Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 13, 41-68.
  32. Yousefi, M. (2015). Investigating the effect of the role of components of knowledge-based economy on economic growth; (In selected countries) (Master's thesis). Islamic Azad University, Tehran. (Persian)
  33. Zaharia, , & Kaburakis, A. (2016). Bridging the gap: US sport managers on barriers to industry–academia research collaboration. Journal of Sport Management, 30(3), 248-264.
  34. Zheng, J., & Mason, D. S. (2018). Sport, information, and the attention economy. Brand Platform in the Professional Sport Industry, 7(1), 1-18.
Volume 16, Issue 87
May and June 2024
Pages 47-70

  • Receive Date 23 June 2020
  • Revise Date 03 September 2020
  • Accept Date 13 September 2020