Sport Management Studies

Study of Factors Affecting the Capacity Building of Organizations in Response to Social Responsibility of Three-Branch Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Hadi Vatan Khah 1
Ali Fahimi Nezhad 2
Seyed Mostafa Tayebi Sani 2

1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood Branch, Shahrood, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Shahroud Branch, Shahrood, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2019.7803.2701
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to study the factors affecting the improvement of sports organizations' capacity to respond to social responsibility using the tricyclic theory. This research is a descriptive-analytical research that was conducted in the field. The statistical population of the present study included managers of Khorasan Razavi sport organizations including managers of the Department of Education, Physical Education and Health of the Education Organization, managers of the Sports and Youth Organization of the Khorasan Razavi Province, as well as some experts in the field of social responsibility in the province. They were Khorasan Razavi. According to snowball method, 19 individuals were identified as the sample. The research tool was a researcher-made questionnaire with 15 questions. The validity of this questionnaire was confirmed by eight university professors. The reliability of this questionnaire was also 0.86. The TOPSIS method was used to select the ranking of these factors. All data analysis was performed using BT TopSis SoLver software. The results showed that creating an index for evaluating organizations in the field of social responsibility with a coefficient of closeness of 0.9847 was identified as the most important factor affecting the improvement of the capacity of sports organizations to respond to social responsibility. Generally formulating and setting standards and benchmarks in sports organizations for evaluating and evaluating their programs and activities regarding social responsibility is understood as an important issue.

Keywords

Social Responsibility
Sports Organizations
Capacity Building
Evaluation

Subjects

  1. Afrozeh, M., Mozafari, S., Aghae, N., & Safari, M. (2017). Identifying the areas and factors affecting the social responsibility of Iranian professional societies. Journal of Management and Development of Sport, 5(2), 89-69. (Persian).
  2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2017). On corporate social responsibility, sense making, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057-86.
  3. Ardalan, M., Ghanbari, S., Beheshti Raad, R., & Navidi, P. (2016). The impact of social capital and social responsibility on organizational commitment. Quarterly Journal of Measuring and Educational Evaluation Studies, 5(10), 109-32. (Persian).
  4. Athanasopoulou, P., Douvis, J., & Kyriakis, V. (2011). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in sports: Antecedents and consequences. Paper presented at the 4th Annual EuroMed Conference of the EuroMed academy of Business, Crete, Greece.
  5. Bradish, C., & Cronin, J. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in sport. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 691-7.
  6. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporation social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-19.
  7. Breitbarth, T., Walzel, S., Anagnostopoulos, C., & van Eekeren, F. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and governance in sport: “Oh, the things you can find, if you don’t stay behind!”. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 254-73.‏
  8. Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223-52.
  9. Chuang, S. P., & Huang, S. J. (2018). The effect of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental performance and business competitiveness: The mediation of green information technology capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 991-1009.‏
  10.  Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.
  11.  Engler, A., Rodriguez, M. F., & Cofr, G. (2018). The role of farmer's innovative behavior and social responsibility practices in technology adoption in apple and blueberry farmers in the central region of Chile.‏ International Association of Agricultural Economists, 28 (2), 1-12.
  12.  François, A., Bayle, E., & Gond, J. P. (2019). A multilevel analysis of implicit and explicit CSR in French and UK professional sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(1), 15-37.
  13.  Godfrey, P. C. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in sport: An overview and key issues. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 698-716.‏
  14.  Hsu, F. J., & Chen, Y. C. (2017). Human behavior analysis under financial information science: Evidence from corporate social responsibility. Library Hi Tech, 36(4), 685-704.
  15. Ihlen, Ø., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Boston: Wiley.
  16.  Khalili, S., Noraye, T., & Sharifian, E. (2014). The effect of social responsibility of sporting companies on distribution factors. Applied Research in Sport Management,   3(10), 101-14. (Persian).
  17.  Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853-910.‏
  18.  Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, (72)4, 1785-824.
  19.  Lo, C. Wh., Egri C. P., & Ralston D. A. (2008). Commitment to corporate, social, and environmental responsibilities: an insight into contrasting perspectives in China and the US. Organization Management, 5, 83–98.
  20.  Mayer, R. C., & Shoorman, D. F. (2000). Differentiating antecedents of organizational commitment, a test of March & Simon model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(1), 47-9.
  21.  Mory, L., Wirtz, B. W., & Göttel, V. (2016). Factors of internal corporate social responsibility and the effect on organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(13), 1393-425.
  22.  Rowe, K., Karg, A., & Sherry, E. (2018). Community-oriented practice: Examining corporate social responsibility and development activities in professional sport. Sport Management Review, 22(3), 363-78.
  23.  Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–120.
  24.  Sharifain, E., & Khalil, S. (2016). Comparison of social responsibility components of sporting firms from the perspective of physical education students. Sport Management Research Report and Motor Behavior, 11(22), 29-48. (Persian).
  25.  Shojaian, F. (2017). Social responsibility of the organization in the oil industry. Paper presented at the Conference of the Company-Social Responsibility of the Oil Industry, Research Institute for Energy Management and Energy Planning, University of Tehran. (Persian).
  26.  Smith, A. C., & Westerbeek, H. M. (2007). Sport as a vehicle for deploying corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25(1), 43-54.‏
  27.  Walker, M., Heere, B., Parent, M. M., & Drane, D. (2010). Social responsibility and the Olympic Games: The mediating role of consumer attributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 659-80.‏
  28.  Walters, G. (2009). Corporate social responsibility through sport: The community sports trust model as a CSR delivery agency. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (35), 81-94.
  29.  Zuo, W., Schwartz, M. S., & Wu, Y. (2017). Institutional forces affecting corporate social responsibility behavior of the Chinese food industry. Business & Society, 56(5), 705-37.‏
Sport Management Studies
Volume 11, Issue 58
January & February 2020
January and February 2020
Pages 201-218

  • Receive Date 26 August 2019
  • Revise Date 24 November 2019
  • Accept Date 22 December 2019

Home

Publication Ethics

Submit Manuscript

News

Journal Metrics

Contact Us