Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Soccer referees’ decisions are susceptible to major environmental factors, and in contrast this process can be influences based on observable angles of operation level from perspective of stackeholders. Present study has been designed and codified semi-experimentally in order to comparation of soccer referees, players and fans’ perspectives about effect of observe angle and calling fouls. Hence, number of 38 people (12 international referees, 12 top players, and 14 more-involved fans in Iranian premier soccer league) participated. Exactly 268 photos from English northern league (134 leftward and 134 rightward photos) have used. In other words, observe angles as predicted variables and calling fouls as criterion variables have been studied. Paired sample t-test analyses showed no significant differences among players, but the referees approximately more fouls called than players and fans for attacker team (left-moving oriented), but fans unlike referees and players tend to more fouls called when they saw right-moving oriented. Rm anova analyses illustrated that totally degree of calling foul was high in right hand compared to left hand. Based on experiment, factor of observe angle plays an important role in inconsistent and conflict among referees, fans and players, and soccer protests except social and cultural indexes and differentiations in these groups. Also, it seems that left diagonal system of running will be better than line system running for soccer referees. 

Keywords

  1. Ahmadi, M., Mohammadzadeh, H. (2009). Stress resources among Iranian professional soccer referees. Olympic, 17, 45, 47-55. (Persian)
  2. Anderson, M., Wolfson, S., Neave, N., & Moss, M. (2012). Perspectives on the home advantage: A comparison of football players' fans and referees. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13: 311-­16.
  3. Dobel, C., Diesendruck, G., & Bölte, J. (2007). How writing system and age influence spatial representations of actions: A d­evleopmental, cross-linguisitc study. PsycholSci, ­ 18: 486–­91.
  4. Elmiri, M., Naderian Jahromi, M., Hosseini, M., & Talebpour, M. (2009). Investigation of burnout result of officiating among international and national soccer referees and its relation with stress. Journal of Sport Management, 1, 141-157. (Persian)
  5. FIFA. (2013). the official laws of the game. Zurich: Federation Internationale De Football Asociation. 123-­8.
  6. Foer, F. (2004). How soccer explains the world: An unlikely theory of globalization. New York: Harper Collins. 272-­81. 
  7. Gershgoren, L., Tenenbaum, G., Gershgoren, A., & Eklund, R. C. (2011). The effect of parental feedback on young athletes’ perceived motivational climate, goal involvement, goal orientation, and performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12: 481–­9.
  8. Gholamian, J., Golzar, S., SoltanHosseini, M., Isfahani, A., & Rahimi, M. (2009). Investigation of peresence factors of soccer spectators in stadumes. Journal of Sport Management, 3, 61-73. (Persian)
  9. Hagemann­, N., Strauss, B., & Leiβing, J. (2004). When the referee sees? Red Psychol Sci, 19: 769–­71. 
  10. Hoseini, S. H., Aslankhani, M. A., Abdoli, B., & Mohammadi, F. (2011). The relationship between the number of crowds with anxiety and the function of the soccer premier leagues referees. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30: 2374 – ­78.   (Persian).
  11. Jahanfar, M., Bagherzadeh, F., Sheykh, M., & Gholamalizadeh, R. (2003). Analysis of crowd’s factors from point of officials. Journal of Harkat, 20, 87-112. (Persian)
  12. Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/ MST by static images with implied motion. J Cognitive Neurosci, 12: 48–55.
  13. Kranjec, A., Lehet, M., Bromberger, B., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). A sinister bias for calling fouls in soccer. 5­ (7): 61-­67.
  14. Lidbom, P., & Priks, M. (2010). Behavior under social pressure: Empty Italian stadiums and referee bias. Economics Letters, 108: 212–­4.
  15. MesbahiPour, J. (2002). Why Football? Journal of Social Sciences Letter, 19, 155-65.
  16. Mirjamali, E., Ramzaninezhad, R., Rahmaninia, F., & Reihani, M. (2012). A study of sources of stress in international and national referees of soccer, volleyball, basketball and handball in Iran. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 6­ (4): 347-­54. (Persian).
  17. MohammadKazemi, R., Sheykh, M., Shahbazi, M., & Rasekh, N. (2007). Investigation of spectators’ crowds after Iranian huge football match (from point of spectators). Journal of Research on Sport Sciences, 17, 101-14. (Persian)
  18. Rahmati M. M., Mohseni, A. (2003). Exploring the sociology factors related to crowds in soccer spectators. Olympic, 3, 4, (24), 77-91. (Persian)
  19. Ramzaninezhad, R., Loghmani, M., & Poursoltani, H. (2013). An empirical study of job characteristics model in sport settings: evidence from soccer referees. Journal of Sport Management, 6 (3), 559-74. (Persian)
  20. Taylor, F. W. (2004). The principles of scientific management. New York: Norton.

Winawer, J., Hukm, A., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). A motion aftereffect from still photographs depicting motion. PsycholSci, 19: 276–­83.