The Role of New Technologies in People's Engagement in Leisure Time Physical Activity

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Sports Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 M.S. Student of Sport Management, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract
Extended Abstract
Background and Purpose
Today, technology is becoming seamlessly integrated into people’s daily lives, affecting many aspects of their routines. This trend has turned new technologies into a double-edged sword, creating both opportunities and challenges for leisure time. However, the full impact of these changes remains largely unclear. Technological and entertainment industry advancements have transformed how people spend their leisure time. Shifts in technology usage patterns have significantly impacted lifestyles and leisure activities in both developed and emerging economies. The proliferation of technology—from smartphones and laptops to gaming consoles and smartwatches—has profoundly influenced various aspects of daily life, including routines, professional tasks, and recreational pursuits. Within the realm of leisure, the relationship between free time and technology has become increasingly intertwined. Technology has reshaped traditional concepts of leisure, creating opportunities for people to engage in new recreational activities. Modern technologies not only facilitate leisure pursuits through enhanced communication and coordination but also enrich personal leisure experiences by providing greater access to information. The lack of sufficient research on how new technologies influence people’s participation in physical activity—particularly leisure-time physical activity—has created significant challenges for planning and developing active leisure programs. At the same time, efforts to promote and expand active physical leisure must take into account these ongoing changes. Therefore, this study aims to explore the role of new technologies in individuals’ engagement with leisure physical activity. By doing so, it seeks to provide valuable insights for the field of leisure studies, clarify the importance of technology in leisure-time physical activity, and offer information that can inform policy-making to better support active lifestyles in society.
 
Methods
This exploratory qualitative study employed an applied research framework. Participants included experts drawn from sports science, educational science, social science, and computer science disciplines. Purposive sampling, supplemented by snowball sampling, identified 13 experts, with sample size guided by the concept of information power. Data collection encompassed document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Validity was ensured using established criteria of credibility, transferability, and confirmability. Data were analyzed following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) content analysis model.
 
Results
Analysis yielded 148 open codes, culminating in the identification of three central roles that new technologies assume regarding leisure physical activity participation: facilitator, reducer, and inhibitor. The facilitator role encapsulates how technologies promote or ease engagement in physical activity. The reducer role reflects technology’s capacity to decrease activity levels, often fostering sedentary lifestyles. The inhibitor role addresses technology-related barriers that indirectly impede leisure-time physical activity by influencing individual attitudes, preferences, and lifestyle choices.
 
Conclusion
The study demonstrates the multifaceted impact of new technologies on leisure-time physical activity. Technologies act as facilitators by expanding access and opportunities for engagement, yet simultaneously contribute to reductions in activity through fostering sedentary behaviors. Moreover, their inhibitory effects manifest via subtle psychosocial influences that discourage participation. This complex interplay underscores the necessity for nuanced, holistic approaches in promoting physical activity amidst technological advances. Strategies that mitigate technological barriers while leveraging facilitative potentials are vital for enhancing physical activity and improving public health in the digital era.
Article Message
New technologies exert diverse influences on leisure physical activity participation. This article utilizes qualitative expert perspectives to explicate these varied roles.
Ethical Considerations
The study was conducted in compliance with all relevant ethical standards in sports management research.
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: Ahmad Ali Asefi
Data Collection: Arezo Yazdi
Data Analysis: Ahmad Ali Asefi, Arezo Yazdi
Manuscript Writing: Ahmad Ali Asefi, Arezo Yazdi
Review and Editing: Ahmad Ali Asefi
Literature Review: Ahmad Ali Asefi, Arezo Yazdi
Project Management: Ahmad Ali Asefi
Additional Contributions: Qualitative Analysis Department Collaborators

 
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.
 
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank all interviewees for generously contributing their time and valuable perspectives, greatly enriching this research.

Keywords

Subjects


1.       Albrechtsen, S. J. (2001). Technology and lifestyles: Challenges for leisure education in the new millenium. World Leisure Journal, 43(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2001. 9674215
2.       Almaqhawi, A., & Albarqi, M. (2022). The effects of technology use on children's physical activity: a cross-sectional study in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Medicine and Life, 15(10), 1240. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0148
3.       Alotaibi, T., Almuhanna, R., Alhassan, J., Alqadhib, E., Mortada, E., & Alwhaibi, R. (2020). The relationship between technology use and physical activity among typically-developing children. In Healthcare, 8(4), 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040488
4.       Asadi, S. A., Farzan, F., & Tabesh, S. (2022). A systematic review of digital leisure in Iran. Journal of New Studies in Sport Management, 3(4), 602-625. https://doi.org/10.22103/JNSSM.2022.19941.1111  [In Persian].
5.       Ascione, A., Di Palma, D., & Napolitano, S. (2018). Social inclusion and education through sport and technology. Sport Science, 11(1), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.35662/2018-0238
6.       Black, A. M., Meeuwisse, D. W., Eliason, P. H., Hagel, B. E., & Emery, C. A. (2021). Sport participation and injury rates in high school students: A Canadian survey of 2029 adolescents. Journal of Safety Research, 78, 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.008
7.       Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
8.       Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Weate, P. (2016). Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise
research. In B. Smith & A. C. Sparkes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative
research in sport and exercise (pp. 191-205). New York, NY: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762012.ch15
9.       Büchi, M. (2024). Digital well-being theory and research. New Media & Society, 26(1), 172-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211056851
10.     Ciochetto, L. (2015). The impact of new technologies on leisure in developed and emerging economies. RIMCIS: Revista Internacional y Multidisciplinar en Ciencias Sociales, 4(2), 194-214. http://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2015.1565
11.    Deranek, K., Hewitt, B., Gudi, A., & McLeod, A. (2021). The impact of exercise motives on adolescents’ sustained use of wearable technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(7), 691-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1720295
12.    Eskiler, E., Yildiz, Y., & Ayhan, C. (2019). The effect of leisure benefits on leisure satisfaction: Extreme sports. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 21(1), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.522984
13.    Gao, Z., & Lee, J. E. (2019). Emerging technology in promoting physical activity and health: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(11), 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111830
14.    Litman, L., Rosen, Z., Spierer, D., Weinberger-Litman, S., Goldschein, A., & Robinson, J. (2015). Mobile exercise apps and increased leisure time exercise activity: a moderated mediation analysis of the role of self-efficacy and barriers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(8), e4142. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4142
15.    Greco, G., Poli, L., Clemente, F. M., Francesco, F., & Cataldi, S. (2023). The effectiveness of new digital technologies in increasing physical activity levels and promoting active and healthy ageing: A narrative review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2023,
1-11.
 https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2803620
16.    Gumus, H., & Isik, O. (2018). The relationship of physical activity level, leisure motivation and quality of life in candidate teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(5), 22-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.157.3
17.    Hurling, R., Catt, M., De Boni, M., Fairley, B., Hurst, T., Murray, P. & Sodhi, J. (2007). Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(2), e633. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.2.e7
18.    Ibabe, I., Albertos, A., & Lopez-del Burgo, C. (2023). Leisure time activities in adolescents predict problematic technology use. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-02152-5
19.    Jong, S. T., & Drummond, M. J. (2020). Exploring online fitness culture and young females Re-thinking Leisure in a Digital Age (pp. 50-62): London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780 429450402-4
20.    Karwani, A., & Atashafrooz, S. (2014). Investigating and understanding the relationship between virtual social networks and leisure time (case study: students of Kashan University). Journal of Cultural Management, 9(29). [In Persian].
21.    Kaur, B. (2022). Role of technology in sports. International Journal of Physical Education Sports Health, 9(2), 268-270. https://doi.org/10.4144/9550 43452342-3
22.    Kim, A. C. H., Ryu, J., Lee, C., Kim, K. M., & Heo, J. (2021). Sport participation and happiness among older adults: A mediating role of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(4), 1623-1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00288-8
23.    Kretschmann, R. (2010). Physical Education 2.0. In M. Ebner & M. Schiefner (Eds.), Looking toward the future of technology enhanced education: Ubiquitous learning and the digital native (pp. 432‐454). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-678-0
24.    Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Xu, R. (2023). The impact of technology on promoting physical activities and mental health: a gender-based study. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01348-3
25.   Longhini, J., Marzaro, C., Bargeri, S., Palese, A., Dell’Isola, A., Turolla, A., ..., & Rossettini, G. (2024). Wearable devices to improve physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour: An umbrella review. Sports Medicine-Open, 10(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00678-9
26.    López-Sintas, J., Rojas-DeFrancisco, L., & García-Álvarez, E. (2017). Home-based digital leisure: Doing the same leisure activities, but digital. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1309741. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1309741
27.    Luo, W., & He, Y. (2021). Influence of sports applications on college students' exercise behaviors and habits: A thematic analysis. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60(6), 5095-5104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.059
28.    Malizia, V., Ferrante, G., Fasola, S., Montalbano, L., Cilluffo, G., & La Grutta, S. (2021). New technologies for promoting physical activity in healthy children and in children with chronic respiratory diseases: A narrative review. Sustainability, 13(21), 11661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111661
29.    Malterud, K., Siersma, V., & Guassora, A. D. (2021). Information power: Sample content and size in qualitative studies. In P. M. Camic (Ed.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 67–81). American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0000252-004
30.    Martin, K. R., Cooper, R., Harris, T. B., Brage, S., Hardy, R., Kuh, D., & NSHD Scientific and Data Collection Team. (2014). Patterns of leisure-time physical activity participation in a British birth cohort at early old age. PLoS One, 9(6), e98901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0098901
31.    Mohammadi, S., & Quaidi, A. (2019). Presenting a model of influencing factors in the decision to use smartphones in the context of sports: an application of the technology acceptance and pleasant experience model, Sports Management Studies, 12(60), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2019.6410.2314  [In Persian].
32.    Nimrod, G., & Adoni, H. (2012). Conceptualizing e-leisure. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 35(1), 31-56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2012.10707834
33.   Pedersen, H., Söderström, S., & Kermit, P. S. (2021). The fact that I can be in front of others, I am used to being a bit behind: how assistive activity technology affects participation in everyday life. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1642391
34.    Pitney, W. A., & Parker, J. (2009). Qualitative research in physical activity and the health professions (pp. 63-65). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
35.    Rachel, L. (2021). Leisure-enhancing technological change. Job market paper, London School of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12456-024-11239-8
36.   Santos, I. K. D., Medeiros, R. C. D. S. C. D., Medeiros, J. A. D., Almeida-Neto, P. F. D., Sena, D. C. S. D., Cobucci, R. N., ... & Dantas, P. M. S. (2021). Active video games for improving mental health and physical fitness—an alternative for children and adolescents during social isolation: An Overview. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(4), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041641
37.    Sezer Efe, Y., Döner, S., Erdem, E., & Elmalı, F. (2023). The effect of technology addiction on eating behaviors and physical activity of adolescents. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-023-01205-9
38.    Tamizifare, R., & Azizimehr, K. (2017). The relationship between leisure and social happiness in the city of Isfahan. Social Work Journal, 6, 209-221.  https://doi.org/10.22054/rjsw.2017.7898  [In Persian].
39.    Thianthai, C., & Tamdee, P. (2024). Understanding digital well-being and insights from technological impacts on university students’ everyday lives in Bangkok. Journal of Health Research, 38(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940X.1069
40.    Tutar, Ö. F., & Turhan, F. H. (2023). Digital leisure: Transformation of leisure activities. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 11, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11iS1-Oct.6365  
41.    Wac, K., & Wulfovich, S. (2022). Quantifying quality of life: Incorporating daily life into medicine (p. 602). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94212-0
42.    Widdop, P., King, N., Parnell, D., Cutts, D., & Millward, P. (2018). Austerity, policy and sport participation in England. International journal of sport policy and politics, 10(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2017.1348964
43.    Woessner, M. N., Tacey, A., Levinger-Limor, A., Parker, A. G., Levinger, P., & Levinger, I. (2021). The Evolution of Technology and Physical Inactivity: The Good, the Bad, and the Way Forward. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.655491
44.    Zhong, H. M., Xu, H. B., Guo, E. K., Li, J., & Wang, Z. H. (2022). Can internet use change sport participation behavior among residents? Evidence from the 2017 Chinese General Social Survey. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 837911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.837911
Volume 17, Issue 90
September and October 2025
Pages 63-90

  • Receive Date 18 November 2023
  • Revise Date 04 November 2024
  • Accept Date 26 February 2025