Sport Management Studies

The Reasons, Obstacles and Consequences of Professionalization in Selection of Sport Federations of Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Guilan

2 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Guialn

3 Professor of Sport Management, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Guialn

Abstract
When discussing the concept of professionalization in sports, the payments to the athletes may be of the most immediate pictures which may appear in people’s minds, but the actual and deeper meaning of the concept of professionalization differs than that of its everyday perception. The present study aims at identifying the reasons, obstacles and consequences of professionalization in selection of sport federations of Iran. The data presented here has been collected applying two-step Delphi method from semi-structured interviews with experts on professionalization of sports and subsequently analyzed applying hermeneutic-circle approach. Based on the results of the study, five themes, 120 primary codes, 38 sub-stratums and 15 stratums were recognized for the reasons, obstacles and consequences of professionalization of sports organizations. Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that identifying the reasons, obstacles and consequences of professionalization can pay a great contribution to the sports federations of Iran in order to make money, also the analysis of the exterior and interior of sports federations and identifying the potentials of professionalization in their context can expedite the process of professionalization and improvement of sports federations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Abbas Zadeh, M. (2012). Reflection on the reliability and validity of qualitative researches. Applied Sociology, 23(1), 19-34. (In Persian).
  2. Abbott, A. (1988). The order of professionalization: An empirical analysis. Work and Occupations, 18(4), 355-84.
  3. Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Values and organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(4), 436-65.
  4. Auld, C. (1997). Professionalization of Australian sport administration: The effects on organizational decision-making. European Journal for Sport Management, 4(2), 17–39.
  5. Bayle, E., & Robinson, L. (2007). A framework for understanding the performance of national governing bodies of sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(3), 249-68.
  6. Clausen, J., Bayle, E., Giauque, D., Ruoranen, K., Lang, G., Nagel, S., Klenk, Ch., & Schlesinger, T. (2018). Drivers of and barriers to professionalization in international sport federations. Journal of Global Sport Management, 3(1), 37-60.
  7. Cuskelly, G., & Hoye, R. (2003). Board-executive relationships with voluntary sport organizations. Sport Management Review, 6(1), 53-73.
  8. Dowling, M., Edwards, J., & Washington, M. (2014). Understanding the concept of professionalization in sport management research. Sport Management Review, 17(4), 520-9.
  9. Edwards, J. R., Mason, D. S., & Washington, M. (2009). Institutional pressures, government funding and provincial sport organizations. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 6(2), 128-49.
  10. Ehsani, M., Amiri, M., & Ghare khani, H. (2013). Designing and developing a comprehensive system of professional sports in the country. Sport Management Studies, 5(17), 125-36. (in Persian).
  11. Eydi, H., Ramezani Nejad, R., Yousefi, B., & Sajadi, N. (2012). Study of organizational effectiveness in selective sporting federations. Bi-Annual Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 2(4), 119-34. (in Persian).
  12. Ferkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2010). Developing board strategic capability in sport organizations: The national-regional governing relationship. Sport Management Review, 13(3), 235 -54.
  13. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-12.
  14. Horch, H. D., & Sch€utte, N. (2009). Pressures and obstacles to the employment of paid managers in voluntary sports clubs and federations in Germany. European Journal for Sport and Society, 6(2), 101-20.
  15. Kikulis, L. M., Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1995). Toward an understanding of the role of agency and choice in the changing structure of Canada’s national sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 9(2), 135-52.
  16. Lang, M., Schlesinger, T., Lamprecht, M., Ruoranen, K., Klenk, Ch., Bayle, E., & Nagel, S. (2017). Types of professionalization: Understanding contemporary organizational designs of Swiss national sport federations. Sport, Business and Management, 8(3), 298-16.
  17. Nagel, S., Schlesinger, T., Bayle, E., & Giauque, D. (2015). Professionalization of sport federations: A multi-level framework for analyzing forms, causes and consequences. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(4), 407-33.
  18. Nichols, G., Padmore, J., Taylor, P., & Barrett, D. (2012). The relationship between types of sports club and English government policy to grow participation. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4(2), 187-200.
  19. Orr, L. (1991). A dictionary of critical theory. New York: Greenwood Press.
  20. Robinson, L., & Minikin, B. (2011). Developing strategic capacity in Olympic sport organizations. Sport, Business and Management, 1(3), 219-33.
  21. Ruoranen, K., Clausen, J., Nagel, S., Lang, G., Klenk, C., Giauque, D., & Schlesinger, T. (2018). Causes for professionalization in national sport federations in Switzerland: a multiple-case study. Current Issues in Sport Science,3(3), 1- 19.
  22. Ruoranen, K., Klenk, Ch., Schlesinger, T., Bayle, E., Clausen, J., Giauque, D & Nagel, S. (2016). Developing a conceptual framework to analyses professionalization in sport federations. European Journal for Sport and Society, 13(1), 55-74.
  23. Sharpe, S., Beaton, A., & Scott, O. (2018). Considering ongoing professionalization in sport organizations: A case study of the ACT Brumbies Super Rugby Club. Journal of Global Sport Management, 3(3), 215-36.
  24. Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2011). Professionalization, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing Leisure, 16(2), 108-27.
  25. Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13.
  26. Stenling, C., & Fahlén, J. (2009). The order of logics in Swedish sport: Feeding the hungry beast of result orientation and commercialization. European Journal for Sport and Society, 6(2), 121-34.
  27. Taylor, T., & McGraw, P. (2006). Exploring human resource management practices in non-profit sport organizations. Sport Management Review, 9(3), 229 -51.
  28. Vos, S., Breesch, D., Késenne, S., Van Hoecke, J., Vanreusel, B., & Scheerder, J. (2011). Governmental subsidies and coercive pressures: Evidence from sport clubs and their resource dependencies. European Journal for Sport and Society, 8(4), 257-80.
Sport Management Studies
Volume 12, Issue 63
November and December 2020
Pages 43-68

  • Receive Date 16 December 2019
  • Revise Date 09 March 2020
  • Accept Date 19 April 2020

Home

Publication Ethics

Submit Manuscript

News

Journal Metrics

Contact Us