Sport Management Studies

Presenting the Development Paradigmatic Model of Sport for All in Islamic Azad University

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Javad Taherzadeh Nooshabadi 1
Rasool Nazari 2
Jamshid Hemmati 3

1 Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch

2 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch

3 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Behbahan Branch

https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2019.6991.2466
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to present a sport for all development model in Islamic Azad University that was carried out using systematic theory of foundation data theory. The participants in the present study were experts and clear-sighted persons in the field of sport for all, working in physical education and sports sciences faculties. Twenty of them were selected as theoretical sampling for deep and exploratory interviews and interviews continued until theoretical saturation stage. The credibility of the findings was determined by the members matching methods, peer reviews and trial interviews. For data analysis, open, axial and selective coding was used. The results indicate that 450 initial conceptual propositions with 14 categories and 38 meanings in the form of six dimensions of the paradigmatic model including: causal factors (1 categories); the main phenomenon (increase participation of students, staffs and faculty members); strategy (2 category); the underlying features (5 categories); environmental conditions (4 categories); outcomes (1 category) were identified. The results of the research model showed improvement in attitude and awareness, increasing motivation and interest and increasing vitality and happiness can attract the participation of students, staff and faculty members in university sport for all activities. Therefore, it is essential for the development of sport for all and increasing the participation of individuals, sport for all development policies based on the model in the Islamic Azad University.

Keywords

Participation
Foundation Data Theory
Sport for All

Subjects

  1. Asefi, A. A., & Asadi Dastjerdi. H. (2017). An investigating of evelopmental barriers of sport for all in State Universities of Tehran city and presenting developing strategies. Journal of Sport Management. 6(8): 823-44. (Persian).
  2. Asefi, A. A., Khabiri, M., Asadi Dastjerdi, H., & Goudarzi, M. (2014). Identification and Modeling of Effective Factors in the Institutionalization of Public Sports in Iran. Journal of Sport Mnagement and Motor Behavior. 10(20): 63-73. (Persian).
  3. Azizi, B., Jalali, M., & Khabiri, M. (2011). Survey of the attitudes of students living in University of Tehran dormitories towards sport for all. Journal of Sport Management. 3(8): 75-91. (Persian).
  4. Brochado, A. O., Brito, P. Q., & Brochado, F. O. (2017). Corelate of adult’s participation in sport and frequency in sport. Science & Sport. 32(6): 355-63.
  5. Cheng, S., (1998). A Comparative Study on Recreational Sports Participation Among the University Students, Available on: http://www.isdy.net/pdf/eng/2007_22.pd
  6. Cortes, A. S., Correa-Diazb, A. M., Benjumea-Ariasc, M. L., Valencia-Ariasa, A., & Bran-Piedrahita, L. (2017). Motivational factors and effects associated with physical-sport practice in undergraduate students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 237: 811-815.
  7. Ebrahimipour, T, & Ramezaninezhad. S. (2018). Explaining of commitment model of Sport for All to women participation of Mazandaran province. Research on University Sport. 13(5): 93-110. (Persian).
  8. El-Gilany, A.H., Badawi, K., El-Khawaga, G., & Awadalla, N. (2011). Physical activity profile of students in Mansoura University, Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 694-702.
  9. Emami, S., Heidarinezhad, S., & Shafinya. P. (2014). Motivational factor analysis of student participation in University’s intramural activities. Research on University Sport. 5(2): 65-80. (Persian).
  10. Gallegos, A. G., & Exteremera, A. B, (2010). Perceived barriers by university students in the practice of physical activities. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 9: 374-81.
  11. Garn, A. C., Simonton, K., Dasingert, T., & Simonton, A. (2017). Predicting changes in student engagement in university physical education: Application of control-value theory of achievement emotion. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 29: 93-102.
  12. Ghahraman Tabrizi, K., & Razavi, M. J. (2015). Identification and prioritization of barriers to participation of staff of public offices in Kerman province with a coherent approach of multi-criteria analysis and kopland. Journal of Sport Management. 7(1): 83-98. (Persian).
  13. Goudarzi, M., Eslami, A., & Alidoust. E. (2016). Identifying factors affecting the development of Sport for all via the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Applied Research of Sport Management. 4(15): 11-27. (Persian).
  14. Hefzollesan. M., (2017). Designing and explaining the development model of Sport for All in Iranian state universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. (Persian).
  15. Hee Lee, K., Dvorak, R., Schuett, M. A., & Van Riper, C. J. (2017). Understanding spatial variation of physical inactivity across the continental United States. Landscape and Urban Planning. 168: 61-71.
  16. Hugo, S., Teresa, A., & PereiraDuarte, A. (2018). Talent Identification and Development in Male Football: A Systematic Review, Sports Medicine. 48(4):     907–31.
  17. Hume, P.A., & Stewart, A.D. (2018). Physique assessment in youth sports for talent identification and developmen. In: Hume P., Kerr D., Ackland T. (EDS), Best practice protocols for physique assessment in aport. (3-10), Singapore: Springer.
  18. Janston, K., Mage, M., & Shap, R. (2018). Talent identification in sport: A systematic review. Sports Medicine. 48(1): 97–109.
  19. Javadipour, M., & Rahbari, S. (2018). Pathology of the Policy-Making Process in Sport for All in Iran. Annals of Applied Sport Science. 6(3): 61-72. )Persian(.
  20. Majidi, C., Kashef, S. M., Ahadi, B., & Rasoolazar, G. (2016). The factors related to beautification and joyfulness of university sport places on dorm student's tendency in physical activity. Applied Research of Sport Management. 4(15): 29-39. (Persian).
  21. Manafi, F., Ramezaninezhad, R., GoharRostami, H., & Dastoom, S. (2017). Analyzing the development trend of Iranian collegiate athletics from the first to fifth macro development programs. Sport Management and Development. 6(1): 67-86. (Persian).
  22. Mehdizadeh, R, & Andam, R. (2014). Developing strategies of sport for all in Iran Universities. Sport Management Studies. 6(22): 15-38. (Persian).
  23. Popeska, B., Barbareev, K., & Ivanovska, E.J. (2015). Organization and Realization of University Sport Activities in Goce Delcev University – Stip, Social and Bihavioral Sciences. 197: 2293-303.
  24. Pruna, R., Tribaldos, L. M., & Bahdur, K. (2018). Player talent identification and development in football identificación de talento en el jugador y su desarrollo en el fútbo, Apunts. Medicina de l'Esport. 53(198): 43-6.
  25. Rahimi, A. H., Khayamian, Z., Ghahreman Tabrizi, K., & Sharifian, E. (2018) The comparison of influential factors on promoting sport for all in the dormitories. Research on University Sport. 5(13): 175-92. (Persian).
  26. Sadatemami, S., Heidarinezhad, S., & Shafinya, P. (2014). Motivational factor analysis of student participation in University’s intramural activities. Research on University Sport. 5(2): 65-80. (Persian).
  27. Safari, M., & Ghareh, M. A. (2016). Identification and classification of effective environmental factors in popularity of recreational sports in Iran. Journal of Sport Management. 8(1): 51-68. (Persian).
  28. sameenia, M., paymanizad, H., javadipour, M. (2013). The Pathology of Strategic of Sport for All in Iran and provide development solutions based on SWOT model. Sport Management Studies. 5(20): 221-8. (Persian).
  29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2016). Qualitative research principles, texts and production steps for Underlying Theory (E. Afshar, Trans). Tehran: Nayan Rey. (Persian).
  30. Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Luchetti, M., Atese, A., Oshio, A., & Terracciano, A. (2016). The five-factor model of personality and physical inactivity: A meta-analysis of 16 samples. Journal of Research in Personality. 63: 22-38.
  31. The Framework for Sport in England. (2004). Making England an Active and Successful Sporting Nation: A Vision for 2020. Available at: http:// www.sportengland.org
  32. Vafaei Moqadam, A. (2017). Designing of the Sport for All Policy Model in Iran. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mazandaran University, Mazandaran, Iran. (Persian).
Sport Management Studies
Volume 12, Issue 61
July and August 2020
Pages 85-108

  • Receive Date 10 February 2019
  • Revise Date 30 June 2019
  • Accept Date 14 July 2019

Home

Publication Ethics

Submit Manuscript

News

Journal Metrics

Contact Us