Sport Management Studies

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Journal Metrics

Reviewers

Article Processing Charges (APC)

Peer Review Process

manuscript submission

Modeling the Factors Influencing the Intent of Use and Practical Use of Smart Phones in the Field of Sports Services

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, Department of Physical Education, Collage of Humanities, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Department of physical Education, Collage of Humanities, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre-Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

4 Associate Professor of Sport Psychology, Department of Physical Education, Collage of Humanities, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was modeling the factors affecting the intention to use and practical use of smart phones for accessing to sports services. The research method was descriptive-analytical. The statistical sample was selected amongst the country’s Sport management professors and BA Students in the field of physical education and sport sciences of Azad Universities of Khuzestan Province that included 1000 persons. Statistical sample in the first part (n = 24) was selected by a purposeful and snowball method and in the second part was selected by random method (n = 660). A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data. Reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed by construct validity method and its validity was confirmed by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. This coefficient was obtained in all dimensions above 0.7 According to the findings, 65.7 percent of the variance of intention to use, by independent variables for perceptual, technological, demographic, social and sports aspects was determined. Technological and perceptual dimensions showed the highest and social dimension showed the lowest coefficient of effect in the model. Generally, accepting smart phone in the field of sport is a multi-dimensional phenomenon that paying attention to it can help providers of sport services in satisfying of customers and their loyalty.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
  1. Beldad, A. D., & Hegner, S. M. (2017). Expanding the technology acceptance model with the inclusion of trust, social influence, and health valuation to determine the predictors of German users’ willingness to continue using a fitness app: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 33(5), 1-13.
  2. Belkhamza, Z., Faris, N., & Mohd, A. (2017). The effect of privacy concerns on smartphone app purchase in Malaysia: Extending the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 11(5), 178-94.
  3. Boontarig, W, Chutimaskul, W., Chongsuphajaisiddhi, V., & Papasratorn, B. (2012). Factors influencing the Thai elderly intention to use smartphone for e-Health services. Paper presented at the Humanities, Science and Engineering Research (SHUSER).  2012 IEEE Symposium on, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  4. Chen, K., Chen, J. V., & Yen, D. C. (2011). Dimensions of self-efficacy in the study of smart phone acceptance. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 33(4), 422-31.
  5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319‐39.
  6. Gao, Sh., Krogstie, J., & Siau, K. (2014). Adoption of mobile information services: An empirical study. Mobile Information Systems, 10(2), 147–71.
  7. Ghasemi, V. (2010) .Structural equation modeling in social researches using amos graphics. Tehran: Jammeeshenasan Press. (Persian).
  8. Ha, J. P., Kang S. J., & Ha, J. (2015). A conceptual framework for the adoption of smartphones in a sports context. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 16(3), 2-19.
  9. Ha, J. P., Kim, Y., Kang, S. J., & Park, S. H. (2014). Sport consumers in a ‘smart sport’ (SS) age: Smartphone and sport. Paper presentesd at the North American Society for Sport Management Conference (NASSM 2014), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United Stated.
  10. Habibi, A. (2012). Practical training of LISREL software, structural equation modeling and factor analysis. Available at: https://www.parsmodir.com (Accessed 26 February 2017) (Persian).
  11. Habibi, A. (2013). Practical training of SPSS software. Available at: https://www.parsmodir.com (Accessed 18 February 2017). (Persian).
  12. Hasangholipour, T., Amiri, M., Fahim, F., & Ghaderi A. A. H. (2013). Investigating the impact of customers characteristics on their tendency to accept online purchase (A survey study on Management Faculty of Tehran University). Information Technology Management, 5(4), 67-84. (Persian).
  13. Hooman, H. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling using laser software. Tehran: SAMT Publication. (Persian).
  14. Hur, Y., Ko, Y. J., & Claussen, C. L. (2011). Acceptance of sports websites: A conceptual model. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 12(3), 13–27.
  15. Hur, Y., Ko, Y. J., & Claussen, C. L. (2012). Determinants of using sports web portals: An empirical examination of the sport website acceptance model. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 13(3), 6-25.
  16. Jaberi, A., Khabiri, M., Khazaee Poul, J., & Moradi M. (2013). Analysis of factors affecting acceptance of online purchase of tickets of sport events (Case study: football fans in Isfahan city). Journel of Sport Management, 9(1), 19-26. (Persian).
  17. Janssen, M., Scheerder, J., Thibaut, E., Brombacher, A., & Vos, S. (2017). Who uses running apps and sports watches? Determinants and consumer profiles of event runners’ usage of running-related smartphone applications and sports watches. PLoS ONE, 12(7), 0181167.
  18. Kang, S. J. (2015). Exploring motivations, constraints, and perceptions toward sport consumers' smartphone usage (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, United States of America.
  19. Kwak, J. Y. (2014). Determinants of Users Intention to Adopt Mobile Fitness Applications: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
  20. Miri, A., Eslami, M., & Marjani, S. A. (2016). Personalization of service provision in public libraries from the viewpoint of librarians of public libraries of Mashhad. Journal of Librarianship and Informing Research, 6(2), 227-43. (Persian).
  21. Moon, B. C., & Chang, H. (2014). Technology acceptance and adoption of innovative smartphone uses among hospital employees. Health Information Research, 20(4), 304–12.  
  22. Nisi, A., & Ghanavati, M. (2011). Attractiveness of personalized services for users of mobile phone and its impact on the behavioral change of service providers by customer. Journal of Marketing Management, 6(10), pp: 145- 166, (Persian).
  23. NiLsson C., & Earl A. (2015). The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior: Examining the reasoned action approach to prediction and change of health behaviors. Available at: http://hailab.psych.lsa.umich.edu/wp (Accessed 1 April 2017).
  24. Otieno, O. C., Liyala, S., Odongo B. C., & Abeka, S. (2016). Theory of reasoned action as an underpinning to technological innovation adoption studies. World Journal of Computer Application and Technology, 4(1), 1-7.
  25. Pheeraphuttharangkoon, S. (2015). The adoption, use and diffusion of smartphones among adults over fifty in the UK (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hertfordshire, Hertford, United Kingdom.  
  26. Robinson, L. (2009). A summary of diffusion of innovations. Available at: https://www.enablingchange.com.au/Summary_Diffusion_Theory.pdf. (Accessed 4 May 2017).
  27. Silva, H. D., Ratnadiwakara, D., & Zainudeen, A. (2011). Social influence in mobile phone adoption: Evidence from the bottom of the pyramid in emerging Asia. Information Technologies & International Development, 7(3), 1–18.
  28. Surendran, P. (2012). Technology acceptance model: A survey of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), 2(4), 175-8.
  29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis Gordon B., & Davis F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view1. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-78.
  30. Verkasalo, H., López, N. C., Molina, C. F. J., & Bouwman, H. (2010). Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications. Telematics and Informatics. 27(3), 242-55.
  31. Wu, L. Kang, M. & Yang, S. B. (2015). What makes users buy paid smartphone applications? Examining app, personal, and social influences. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 20(1), 1-22.
Sport Management Studies
Volume 12, Issue 59
March and April 2020
Pages 91-112
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 22 August 2018
  • Revise Date: 16 November 2018
  • Accept Date: 03 December 2018
Share
How to cite
Statistics