Sport Management Studies

Presenting the Model of a Teaching Organization for Faculties of Sport Sciences Based on Foundation Data Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

R. Nazari 1
M. Dehghan Manshadi 2

1 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch

2 Ph.D. in Educational Management, Farhangian University

https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2018.5079.1989
Abstract
Learning and learning together among all members is a key pillar of teaching organizations. The purpose of this study was to present a teaching organization model for physical education and sports sciences faculties that was carried out using systematic theory of foundation data theory. The participants in the present study were experts and clear-sighted persons in the field of teaching organization, working in physical education and sports sciences faculties. Twenty-two of them were selected as theoretical sampling for deep and exploratory interviews and interviews continued until theoretical saturation stage. The credibility of the findings was determined by the members' matching methods, peer reviews and trial interviews. For data analysis, open, axial and selective coding was used. The results indicate that 467 initial conceptual propositions with 15 main categories and 48 sub categories in the form of six dimensions of the paradigmatic model including: causal factors (3 categories); the main phenomenon (mutual teaching and learning between members); strategy (2 categories); the underlying features (3 categories); environmental conditions (5 categories); outcomes (2 categories) were identified. The integration of the categories based on the existing relationships between them around the mutual teaching and learning forms a paradigmatic model that reflects the pattern of the teaching organization for physical education and sports sciences faculties.

Keywords

Teaching Organization
Sports Sciences
Paradigmatic Model
Foundation
Data Theory

Subjects

  1. Aragon, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349-59.
  2. Bakhshe Chenari, A. R., Abdi, H., & Abbassi, H. (2015). Analysis of relationship between organizational forgetting and organizational agility with organizational performance (Case study: Ministry of Sports and Youth). Organizational Behavior Management Studies in Sport, 2(5), 11-9. (Persian).
  3. Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management, management team social networks and firm performance: The role of human resource in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academic Management Journal, 46(1), 40 –1.
  4. Dehghan Manshadi, M., Saeedian Khorasgani, N., & Nazari, R. (2017). A conceptual model of teaching organization according to data-based theory for Farhangian University. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 1(4), 73-84.
  5. De Pietro, O., De Rose, M., & Valenti, A. (2017). Methodologies and technologies to support didactics for competencies. Realization of an active and participatory teaching activity in a university context. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1), 127-33.
  6. Gabriel, G., Alina, l. (2015). Research on the management of sport organization. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 667-70.
  7. Jeanquart, M., Sandra, C., & Mark, V. (2017). Strategic fit: Key to growing enterprise value through organizational capital. Business Horizons, 60(1), 55-65.
  8. Keikha, A., Hoveyda, R., & Yaghoubi, N. (2017). Investigating the effect of smart leadership on educational performance of faculty members of state universities of Zahedan City with the role of mediator of critical thinking. Public Management Researches, 10(35), 61-83. (Persian).
  9. Mirghafouri, S. H., Sayyadi Toranloo, H., & Kariminia, M. (2013). Ranking of effective factors on innovation promotion in affiliated companies to growth centers using fuzzy topsis technique, a case study of Yazd Science and Technology Park. Technology Development Journal, 9(36), 19-28. (Persian).
  10. Mohammad Kazemi, R., & Omidi, Y. (2011). Sport entrepreneurship: An emerging approach to entrepreneurship and sport management. Two Quarterly Journal of Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 9(2), 69-86.
  11. Nazari, R., Ehsani, M., Ashraf Ganjavi, F., & Ghasemi, H. (2013). Structural equation modeling of the effect of communication skills on interpersonal communications and its role on organizational effectiveness of Iranian sport managers. Sports Management Journal, 5(4), 67-82. (Persian).
  12. Nazari, R., Ehsani, M., Hamidi, M., & Salari, M. (2014). Compilation and introduction of strategic visions of the general office of sports and youth of Isfahan Province through the David model. Sports Management Magazine, 6(1), 157-72. (Persian).
  13. Nazari, R., Tabatabai, M., & Karimian, J. (2017). Analysis of the operational obstacles of the sports strategic program of Isfahan Province based on Fortune model. Sports Management Magazine, 9(1), 99-112. (Persian).
  14. Nazari, R., Yaghmaei, L., & Sohrabi, Z. (2016). Strategic document of territorial development of Isfahan Province sport sector. Sports Management Magazine, 8(5), 665-80. (Persian).
  15. Pilat, M. (2016). How organizational culture influences on building a learning organization. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 4(1), 83-92.
  16. Pourhassan, S., & Sheikhalyzadeh, M. (2015). The effect of leadership styles on organizational entrepreneurship in the general department of physical education of Tehran Province. Sport Management Studies, 1(28), 219-31.
  17. Pourshafi, M., Hosseini, E., Dosti, M., & Alizadeh, F. (2016). Assessment of the marketing mix premier league football in Mazandaran. Study Sports Management and Motor Behavior, 23, 251-68.
  18. Rosenbusch, E. D., Roth, A. V., & Dean, J. W. (2011). The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 437-56.
  19. Salimi, M., Sultan Hussein, M., & Naderian Jahromy, M. (2015). Assessment of obstacles to the development of sports marketing. Journal of Sport Management, 29, 13-36.
  20. Strauss, Anselm and Carbin, Juliet (2016). Qualitative Research Principles, Texts and Production Steps for Underlying Theory. Translated by Ibrahim Afshar, Tehran: Nayan Rey, p: 230. (Persian).
  21. Thomas, M., Madden, M., & Qazi, W. (2016). Learning organization orientation in gender-based categories of schools. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 10(1), 51-68.
  22. Tichy, N. M., Cardwell, N. (2002). The cycle of leadership. Newyork: Harper Collins Publisher, Inc.
  23. Zare Mohammadabadi, H., Rajaeepour, S., Moulavi, H., & Jamshidian, M. (2010). Review the application of the components of teaching organization in the state universities. Applied Sociology, 21, 40(4), 57-72. (Persian).
Sport Management Studies
Volume 10, Issue 50
Oct & Nov 2018
September and October 2018
Pages 145-164

  • Receive Date 19 November 2017
  • Revise Date 11 April 2018
  • Accept Date 05 May 2018

Home

Publication Ethics

Submit Manuscript

News

Journal Metrics

Contact Us