Sport Management Studies

Assess Factors Relating the Use of Information Technology in Sport Organizations

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Sport Management, University of Kurdistan

2 Ph.D. in Sport Management, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch

3 Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, Isalmic Azad university, Sannadag

Abstract
In order to assess factors relating the use of information technology in sport organizations, 176 experts of sport organizations were randomly selected as sample of the study and responded to the self-made questioner. To measure the face and content validity (panel of expert), construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis), and reliability (Alphacronbax) was used. Descriptive and inferential statistical (ANOVA-MANOVA- multiple regressions) were used also using (LISREL) software (Version 8/52) and SPSS (Version 18). The results revealed that age, job experience, computer and internet skills, English language knowledge, technical, environmental, economic factors and attitude, had a significant relation with the level of using information technology. The result of MANOVA showed significant difference between micro scales indented in this study in the sport organizations. Multiple regression analysis revealed that all micro scales taken into consideration in this study, were significant forecasts of utilization of information technology. And finally, it should be said that information technology is considered as one of the most important criteria of assessment of organization development and therefore it should be one of the first priorities of organizations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Al-Ammari, J. A. (2004). Benefits and barriers to implementing computer use in Qatari elementary schools as perceived by female teachers, an exploratory study (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University).
  2. Asadi, A., & Karimi, A. (2007). An investigation of effective factors on the application of information technology by teachers of academic-applied scientific centers. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(38), 277-89. (Persian).
  3. Atashkhah, M., & Mozzadeh, P. (2010). Identifying and ranking the barriers affecting teachers' non-use of information and communication technology. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 115-22. (Persian).
  4. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1998). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
  5. Ezziane, Z. (2008). Information technology literacy: Implications’ on teaching and learning. Educational technology and society, 10(3),       175-91.
  6. Fallah, M., Shaaban Ali Fami, H., Iravani, H., & Movahed Mohammadi, H. (2006). Analysis of the effective factors on the application of information technology by experts in the agricultural promotion system of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Sciences of Iran, 2(2), 185-97. (Persian).
  7. Hajj Sales, A., & Orange, A. H. (2004). Study of the results of application of information and communication technology in high school personnel in Tehran. Journal of Educational Innovation, 3(9), 11-31. (Persian).
  8. Holecombe, M. (2000). Factors influencing teacher acceptance of the internet as a teaching tools: A study of Texas schools receaving a TIF or TIF grant. Texas: The University of Baylor.
  9. Hughes, M., & Franks, I. M. (Eds.). (2004). Notational analysis of sport London. New York: Capital press.
  10. Hyesung, P. (2004). Factors that affect information technology adoption by teachers. vhttp. digitalcommons. unl. edu/dissertations/AAI3126960.)
  11. Kerani, Z., Fami, H., Razavanfar, A., & Ghasemi, J. (2009). Studying the attitudes of campus students of agriculture and natural resources of Tehran University about the use of information technology in agriculture. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 2(3), 167-77. (Persian).
  12. Knezek, G., & CHristanson, R. (2002). Impact of new information technologies on teachers and student education. Education and information technologies, 7(4), 369-76.
  13. Liebermann, D. G., Katz, L., & Sorrentino, R. M. (2006). Experienced coaches’ attitudes towards science and technology. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 4(1), 21-8.
  14. Lorin, M., & Erik, B. (1997). Information technology and internet firm organization: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Management Information System, 4(2), 81-4.
  15. Maningas, R. V., & Mancebo, S. T. (2002). Utilization of IT-based Services and communication Technology Media by End-Users of Agricultural Research and Extension Network in the Philippines. In AFITA/WCCA joint Congress on IT Agriculture.
  16. Mashhadi, M., Ravvanfar, A., & Yaghobi, J. (2007). Effective factors on information technology use by faculty members of pardis of agricultural and natural resources of Tehran University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 13(2), 151 -71. (Persian).
  17. Matthews, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
  18. Mohammadi, S. (2011). Investigate the attitude of elite coaches of the team and individual sports towards the role and importance of information technology in sport. Sport Management International Journal, 7(2), 19 – 26. (Persian).
  19. Mohammadi, S., & Esmaeili, N. (2010). A survey of familiarity and computer importance in Iranian sports organizations. International Conference on Physical Fitness and Aerobics, Tehran. (Persian).
  20. Movahed Mohammadi, H. (2002). Internet usage pattern by students of agricultural colleges of Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(4), 717-27. (Persian).
  21. Nassiri Aliabadi, R., & Taghipour Zahir, A. (2009). Examining barriers to using information and communication technology in education and providing an optimal model in this regard. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 31(54), (Persian).
  22. O’Brien, G. J., & Wilde, W. D. (1996). Australian managers’ perceptions, attitudes and use of information technology. Information and Software Technology, 38(5), 783-9.
  23. Rasouli azar, S., & Sadeghi, H. (2006). Technical expert’s perception toward information technology. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 37-2(2), 168-73. (Persian).
  24. Rezaei, R. (2004). Investigating the factors affecting the use of experts on information and communication technologies by agricultural promotion experts. (Master's thesis). Tehran University, Iran. (Persian).
  25. Salmani, B., & Motab, A. (2010). Information technology and physical fitness coaches. International Conference on Physical Fitness and Aerobics, Tehran. (Persian).
  26. Sarrafizadeh, A. (2007). Information technology in organization (concepts and applications). Tehran: Amir Publishing. (Persian).
  27. Shahi Beyk, A., & Hashemi, L. (2005). Human resources reengineering via information technology. Tadbir Journal, 163(2), (Persian).
  28. Sheikh Shojaee, F., & Alavi, T. (2007). Investigating the factors affecting information technology acceptance by librarians of technical schools of Tehran State Universities. Journal of Library and Information Science, 19(3), 9-34. (Persian).
  29. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186- 204.
  30. Yaghoobi, N. M., & Shaqueri, R. (2008). Comparison of analysis of acceptance models of information technology with emphasis on internet banking acceptance. Journal of Management Science of Iran, 3(11), 21-4. (Persian).
Sport Management Studies
Volume 9, Issue 44
November and December 2018
Pages 225-242

  • Receive Date 28 July 2012
  • Revise Date 14 November 2012
  • Accept Date 23 January 2013

Home

Publication Ethics

Submit Manuscript

News

Journal Metrics

Contact Us