نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار مدیریت، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان

2 دکتری مدیریت بازاریابی بین‌الملل، دانشگاه سمنان

3 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه سمنان

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، مطالعه و بررسی نقش‌پذیرش فناوری بر تمایل به استفاده از تبلیغات پیامکی، با درنظرگرفتن نقش میانجی نگرش نسبت به پذیرش این تبلیغات بود. مطالعة حاضر براساس هدف، پژوهشی کاربردی و براساس چگونگی به‌دست‌آوردن دادههای موردنیاز، از نوع پژوهش‌های توصیفی و همبستگی بود. مشتریان زن و مرد کالای ورزشی بالای 30 سال در شهر تهران، جامعة آماری این پژوهش بودند و برای به‌دست‌آوردن حجم نمونه از روش نمونهگیری در دسترس و فرمول کوکران استفاده شد. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسش‌نامة استاندارد بود. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل دادههای پرسش‌نامه، از مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. یافتهها نشان داد که سودمندی ادراکشده و تأثیر اجتماعی بر نگرش نسبت به پذیرش تبلیغات پیامکی تأثیر معناداری داشت. همچنین، نگرش، بر تمایل به استفاده از تبلیغات پیامکی تأثیر معناداری داشت. در مدل پذیرش فناوری نیز کاربرد آسان ادراک‌شده بر سودمندی ادراکشده تأثیر معناداری داشت؛ اما، کاربرد آسان ادراکشده بر نگرش نسبت به پذیرش تبلیغات پیامکی تأثیر معناداری نداشت. سودمندی ادراک‌شده، سازة مهمی در نگرش مشتریان کالاهای ورزشی نسبت به پذیرش تبلیغات پیامکی بود؛ بنابراین، این پژوهش بینشی درزمینة به‌کارگیری فناوری سرویس پیام‌کوتاه به‌عنوان یک رسانة تبلیغاتی، دراختیار بازاریابان لوازم ورزشی ازطریق تلفن‌همراه قرار میدهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Technology Acceptance on the Willingness to Use SMS Advertising in Consumers of Sport Goods (Case Study Tehran City)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Forghani 1
  • Mahdi Dehghani Soltani 2
  • Hossein Farsizadeh 2
  • Ali Baghani 3

1 Associate Professor of Management, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

2 Ph.D. of International Marketing Management, Semnan University*

3 M.Sc. of Business Management, Semnan University

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research is to study the impact of technology acceptance on the willingness to use SMS advertising considering the mediating role of attitude towards accepting the ads. This research is practical and on the basis of how to obtain the required data, the type of this study is descriptive and correlational. Population of this study was male and female customers of sports goods over 30 years in Tehran and available sample and the Cochran formula are used to obtain sample size. The standard questionnaire was used as the Data collection tool. Structural equation modeling has been used for data analysis. Results show that perceived usefulness and social impact has a significant impact on attitude towards acceptance of SMS advertising. Attitude also has a significant impact on acceptance of SMS advertising. Also, in the technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use has a significant impact on perceived usefulness, while it had no significant effect on attitude towards acceptance of SMS advertising. Perceived ease of use is important structures for sport in customers' attitudes towards the acceptance of SMS messages advertising. So, this study provides insight into the use of IT Sweeris SMS as an advertising medium available to marketers sporting goods through mobile phone with this.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Technology Acceptance
  • Willingness
  • Attitude
  • SMS Advertising
  • Consumers of Sport Goods
  1. Al-Ajam, A. S., & Nor, K. (2013). Internet banking adoption: Integrating technology acceptance model and trust. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(3), 207-15.
  2. Bamba, F., & Barnes, S. J. (2007). SMS Advertising, premission and the consumer: A study. Journal of Business Process Management, 13(6), 815-29.
  3. Barwise, P., & Strong, C. (2002). Permission-based mobile advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(1), 14–24.
  4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 2(6), 318–39.
  5. De Mooij, M. (2010). Globalmarketing and advertising: Cultural paradoxes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  6. Dickinger, A., & Kleijnen, M. (2008). Coupons going wireless: Determinants of consumer intentions to redeem mobile coupons. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(3), 23–39.
  7. EMarketer. (2012). US on tract to become top mobile admarket. Available at: http://www.emarketer.com/Atricle.aspx?R=1009232 (Aceessed 2 August 2012).
  8. Esmaili, M., Ehsani, M., Kuzechian, H., & Honari, H. (2016). Designing a model of market orientation to affect customer ehavior and service quality in Water recreational sport centers. Sport Management and Development, 5(1), 137-52. (Persian).
  9. Fathima, Y. A., & Muthumani, S. (2015). User acceptance of banking technology with special reference to internet banking. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 73(1), 12-9.
  10. Grant, I., & O'Donohoe, S. (2007). Why young consumers are not open to mobile communications. International Journal of Advertising, 26(2), 223–46.
  11. Green, T. (2015). A methodological review of structural equation modeling in higher education research. Studies in Higher Education, 41(12), 2125-55.
  12. Grewal, D., Bart, Y., Spann, M., & Zubcsek, P. P. (2016). Mobile advertising: A framework and research. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 34(1), 3-14.
  13. Hong, S., & Tam, K. (2006). Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 162–79.
  14. Hosseini, M. H., Hajizadeh, S., & Hassanpur, B. (2011). The effect of demographic characteristics on attracting donations via short message service ads.Journal of New Marketing Research, 1(1), 23-42. (Persian).
  15. Kim, G. S., Park, S. B., & Oh, J. S. (2008). An examination of factors influencing consumer adoption of short message service (SMS). Psychology and Marketing, 25(8), 769–86.
  16. Kim, J. (2016). An extended technology acceptance model in behavioral intention toward hotel tablet apps with moderating effects of gender and age. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(8), 1535–53.
  17. Lee, H. H., & Hill, J. T. (2013). Utilitarian and hedonic perceptions of short message service mobile marketing. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 11(6), 597–616.
  18. Leppäniemi, M., & Karjaluoto, H. (2005). Factors influencing consumers’ willingness to accept mobile advertising: A conceptual model. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 3(3), 197-213.
  19. Li, J., Liu, J. L., & Ji, H. Y. (2014). Empirical study of influence factors of adaption intention of mobile payment based on TAM model in China. International Journal of U-& E-Service, Science & Technology, 7(1), 12-27.
  20. Lu, Y., Deng, Z., & Wang, B. (2010). Exploring factors affecting Chinese consumers' usage of short message service for personal communication. Journal of Business Research, 20(2), 183–208.
  21. Motameni, A., Moradi, H., Hemmati, A., & Ahghaghi, M. (2012). The impact of incentives on attitudes toward advertising using short message service. Journal of Business Research, 1(10), 95-115. (Persian).
  22. Muk, A., & Chung, C. (2015). Applying the technology acceptance model in a two-country study of SMS advertising. Journal of Business Research, 68(1),    1-6.
  23. Nwagwu, W. E., & Famiyesin, B. (2016). Acceptance of mobile advertising by consumers in public service institutions in Lagos, Nigeria. The Electronic Library, 34 (2), 265-88.
  24. Okazaki, S., & Taylor, C. (2008). What is SMS advertising and why so multinationals adopt it? Answers from an empirical study in European markets. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 4–12.
  25. Ooi, K. B., & Tan, G. W. (2016). Mobile technology acceptance model: An investigation using mobile users to explore smartphone credit card. Expert Systems with Application, 59(1), 33-46.
  26. Peters, C., Amato, C. H., & Hollenbeck, C. R. (2007). An exploratory investigation of consumers' perceptions of wireless advertising. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 129–45.
  27. Reedy, S. (2009). Mobile coupon go mainstream. London: Telephony.
  28. Safar, Y., Azimzadeh, S. M., & Kafashpour, A. (2016). Analyzing the factors to affect the formation of the professional athlete’s brand image. Sport Management and Development, 5(1), 85-102. (Persian).
  29. Santouridis, I., & Kyritsi, M. (2014). Investigating the determinants of internet banking adoption in Greece. Procedia Economics and Finance, 9(1), 501-10.
  30. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, A. (2015). Methodologies in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Agah Publications. (Persian).
  31. Shen, W., Xiao, W., & Wang, X. (2016). Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for Urban rail transit: A structural equation modeling based on partial least squares. Transport Policy, 46(1), 20-31.
  32. Soroa-Koury, S., & Yang, K. C. (2010). Factors affecting consumers’ responses to mobile advertising from a social norm theoretical perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 27(1), 103-13.
  33. Sultan, F., & Rohm, A. (2008). How to market to generation Mobile. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(4), 35-41.
  34. Tabarsa, G., Yadolahifarsi, J., & Naiji, M. J. (2014). The model of strategic entrepreneurship with human resource management approach: the mediating role of knowledge exchange. Journal of Business Research, 12(15), 165-80. (Persian).
  35. Tabatabaie Nasab, M., Seeda Ardekani, S., & Nikzad, F. (2014). Analytical comparison of technology acceptance model and theory of reasoned action about mobile advertising acceptance. Journal of New Marketing Research, (4), 181-96. (Persian).
  36. Trappey, R. J., & Woodside, A. G. (2005). Consumer responses to interactive advertising campaigns coupling short-message-service direct marketing and TV commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(4), 382–401.
  37. Wortham, J. (2009). Coupons you don't clip, sent to your cellphone. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/ technology/29coupon.html (Accessed 29 August 2009).
  38. Zhang, J., & Mao, E. (2008). Understanding the acceptance of mobile SMS advertising among young Chinese consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 25(8), 787–805.