نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام رضا (ع)، مشهد
2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
در این پژوهش، رابطة عناصر پایه‌ای سیستم مدیریت دانش با به‌اشتراک‌گذاری دانش، از دیدگاه مدیران ادارة کل تربیت‌بدنی دانشگاه‌های سراسر کشور بررسی شد. روش پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی ازنوع پیمایشی بود که به روش میدانی اجرا شد. همة مدیران تربیت‌بدنی دانشگاه‌های سراسر کشور جامعة آماری پژوهش را تشکیل دادند که حجم نمونه تمام‌شمار و برابر با حجم جامعه بود. ابزار اصلی این پژوهش، پرسش‌نامة اصلاح‌شده و تغییریافتة اندام (1387)، درمجموع با 19 سوأل برای عناصر پایه‌ای دانش و شش سوأل برای به‌اشتراک‌گذاری دانش بود که درقالب مقیاس پنج‌‌رتبه‌ای لیکرت طراحی شده بود. نتایج نشان داد که میانگین عناصر پایه‌ای دانش و به‌اشتراک‌گذاری دانش بیش‌ازحد متوسط است و بیشترین میانگین مربوط به شاخص سازمانی و کمترین میانگین مربوط به شاخص یادگیری مدیران است. بین عناصر پایه‌ای مدیریت دانش و به‌اشتراک‌گذاری دانش از دیدگاه مدیران در اداره‌های تربیت‌بدنی دانشگاه‌ها، رابطة مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد. همچنین، درمجموع متغیرهای عناصر پایه‌ای مدیریت دانش 504/0 از به‌اشتراک‌گذاری دانش در اداره‌های تربیت‌بدنی دانشگاه‌ها را تبیین می‌کنند و متغیر سازمان بیشترین اهمیت را در پیش‌بینی به‌اشتراک‌گذاری دانش دارد. براساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده مشخص شد که راهبرد مدیریت دانش خاص یا اقدامات مدیریتی مشخص، به یک اندازه برای سازمان‌های مختلف کارساز نخواهند بود؛ بنابراین، اهداف و راهبرد‌های مدیریت دانش با توجه به برنامه‌ریزی و تفکر راهبردی یک سازمان با سازمان دیگر بسیار متفاوت خواهد بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Relationship between the Basic Elements of the Stankosky's Model Knowledge Management and Knowledge Sharing from the Managers' View Point of Administrations of Physical Education University Across the Iran
نویسندگان [English]
- Vahid Saatchian 1
- Alireza Khademlo 2
- Bahador Azizi 2
1 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad
2 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Ferdowsi university of Mashhad
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study was to investigating the relationship between basic elements of the Stankosky's model knowledge management and knowledge sharing from the managers' view point of administrations of Physical Education University across the Iran. The method of this research was descriptive – surveying and sample size was 54 individuals. The main tool of this research was the modified and of questionnaire (Andam, 2008), with 19 questions for basic knowledge elements and 6 questions for knowledge sharing, which was designed in a 5-point Likert scale. The results showed that there was significant relationship between the basic elements of knowledge management and knowledge sharing in the administrations; the multivariate regression results showed the 0.504 % of the variance in knowledge sharing is related to knowledge management and organization has the greatest importance impact in prediction of knowledge sharing. Based on the results, it was found that a specific KM strategy, or specific managerial actions, would not work to the same extent for different organizations. Therefore, the goals and strategies of knowledge management will vary greatly according to the planning and strategic thinking of an organization with another organization.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Basic Elements of the Knowledge Management
- Stankosky's Model
- Knowledge Sharing
- Managers' Physical Education University
2. Bagherzadeh Hooshmandi, K., & Pour Abbas, L. (2017). Investigating knowledge managemen's patterns and knowledge strategy in organizations. Presented at 1st International Conference on Modern Developments in Management, Economics and Accounting, Tehran. (In Persian).
3. Booth, S. E. (2011). Cultivating knowledge sharing and trust in online communities for educators: A multiple-case study. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Curriculum and Instruction. Raleigh, North Carolina.
4. Carmeli, A., Atwater, L., & Levi, A. (2011). How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing: The intervening roles of relational and organizational identification. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 3(3), 257-74.
5. Cranfield, D. J. & Taylor, J. (2008). Knowledge management and higher education: A UK case study. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 85-100.
6. Dobrai, K., Farkas, F., Karoliny, Z., & Poór, J. (2012). Knowledge transfer in multinational companies – Evidence from Hungary. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9(3), 149-62.
7. Fu, E., Yang, S., & Huang J. (2012). A snapshot of students’ blogging profiles in Taiwan: From the viewpoint of knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An international Journal, 4(1), 7-16.
8. Golden, T. D., & Raghuram, S. (2010). Teleworker knowledge sharing and the role of altered relational and technological interactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1061–85.
9. Hassan Ibrahim, N., & Allen, D. (2012). Information sharing and trust during major incidents: Findings from the oil industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1916–28.
10. Ko, S., & Tan, B. S. (2012). Knowledge transfer, perceived environmental turbulence and innovation in China. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 104 – 16.
11. Kumar, N., & Che Rose, R. (2012). The impact of knowledge sharing and Islamic work ethic on innovation capability. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 142 – 65.
12. Lee, P., Gillespie, N., Mann, L., & Wearing, A. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management learning, 41(4), 473-91.
13. Lin, Y, H. (2012). The influence of transformational leadership to knowledge sharing and organizational innovation: The cross-level analysis by using coaching, communication and organizational learning as mediating variables (Unpublished master's thesis).
14. Mahamed Ismail, N, A. (2012). Key determinants of research-knowledge sharing in UK higher education institutions. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Portsmouth. Portsmouth.
15. McNeil, R. (2011). Application of knowledge management for sustainable development in institutions of higher education. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 7, 1-13.
16. Mills, M. A., & Smith, T. A. (2011). Knowledge management and organizational performance: A decomposed view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 156-71.
17. Ming, P. S., Liao, H. L., Liu, S. H., & Peng, S. Y. (2011). Using knowledge management systems to cooperative Learning. Advanced Materials Research. 187, 416-21.
18. Naresh Kumar, R. R. (2012). The impact of knowledge sharing and Islamic work ethic on innovation capability. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 142 – 65.
19. Raeisi, M. (2012). The relationship between knowledge management and organizational effectiveness from the view point of administrator's managers of selected sports organizations. (Unpublished masterʼs thesis). Shomal University. (In Persian).
20. Ramakrishnan, K., & Yasin, N. M. (2012). Knowledge management system and higher education institutions. Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Network Technology (ICINT 2012) IPCSIT, 37, 67-73.
21. Sulisworo, D. (2012). Enabling ICT and knowledge management to enhance competitiveness of higher education institutions. International Journal of Education 4(1), 112-20.
22. Ullah Khan, S., & Ullah Alam, A. (2012). Knowledge sharing management model (KSMM) for software development outsourcing vendors. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 45, 135-45.
23. Wen Fan, Y. (2011). The role of social capital in knowledge sharing: A meta-analytic review. Presented at System Sciences (HICSS). Presented at 44th Hawaii International Conference, 4-7 Jan, Hawaii.
24. Wickramasinghe, V., & Widyaratne, R. (2012). Effects of interpersonal trust, team leader support, rewards, and knowledge sharing mechanisms on knowledge sharing in project teams. VINE, 42(2), 214 – 236.
)