نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود
2 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود
چکیده
انتخاب استراتژی‌های یک سازمان به‌دلیل آن‌که قضاوت تصمیم‌گیرندگان در میزان اهمیت و ارجحیت هریک از گزینه‌ها و یا معیارها در شرایط عدم قطعیت می‌باشد، یک مسألۀ تصمیم‌گیری چند‌معیاره است. دراین‌راستا، هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر به‌کارگیری یکی از روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چند‌معیاره در شرایط عدم قطعیت (روش تصمیم‌گیری خاکستری) جهت ارزیابی و رتبه‌بندی استراتژی‌های توسعۀ ورزش هندبال استان سمنان بود. روش این پژوهش، توصیفی ـ تحلیلی بوده و در دو بخش کیفی و کمی به‌شکل میدانی انجام گرفته است. نمونۀ آماری پژوهش را 41 نفر از خبرگان ورزش هندبال استان سمنان در بخش تحلیل SWOT و گروهی خبره متشکل از هشت نفر در بخش تدوین استراتژی‌ها و تصمیم‌گیری چند‌معیاره تشکیل دادند. در این پژوهش بر پایۀ تئوری سیستم‌های خاکستری، ابتدا وزن هریک از معیارهای استراتژیک‌محور برای تمامی گزینه‌ها مشخص شد و سپس، با استفاده از روش درجۀ امکان خاکستری، رتبه‌بندی استراتژی‌ها انجام گرفت. براساس نتایج، نه استراتژی تدوین‌شده با استفاده از نه معیار مورد‌ارزیابی قرار گرفت و در‌نهایت، استراتژی‌های توسعۀ ورزش هندبال استان براساس شاخص‌های مربوطه رتبه‌بندی گردید. به‌طورکلی، می‌توان گفت ازآن‌جایی‌که برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک در شرایط عدم قطعیت انجام می‌شود، استفاده از روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چند‌معیاره در شرایط عدم قطعیت می‌تواند منجر به بهبود تصمیم‌گیری گردد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Prioritizing the Strategies of Handball Development by Grey System Theory
نویسندگان [English]
- Ali Akbar Aghaei 1
- Hassan Bahrololoum 2
1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Shahrood University of Tecchonology
2 Associate Professor of Sport Management, Shahrood University of Tecchonology
چکیده [English]
The selection of strategies of an organization is a multi criteria decision making method. Therefore, the main propose of this study was using one of the methods of multi criteria decision making under uncertainty (Grey System Theory) to evaluate and rank the Strategies of handball development in Semnan province. The research method is analytical – descriptive. The Statistical sample of this study were experts of Handball in Semnan province (n =41 for SWOT Analysis and n=8 for experts group). In this study, based on gray systems theory the weight of each criteria determined for all the options, and then using the Grey Possibility Degree, ranking strategies were performed. Based on the results, 9 strategies were evaluated using nine criteria. Finally, Handball development Strategies of Semnan province were ranked on the basis of relevant criteria. Since strategic planning is done in conditions of uncertainty, using multiple criteria decision making under uncertainty can improve decision making.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Multi Criteria Decision Making
- Strategy
- Grey Possibility Degree
- SWOT Analysis
2. Ali Ahmadi, A., Mahdi, F., & Taj al-Din, I. (2003). Holistic approach in strategic management. Tehran: Knowledge Production Publications. First Edition.11. (Persian).
3. Anand Raj, P., & Nagesh Kumar, D. (2006). Ranking of river basin alternatives using Electre. Hydrological Science Journal, 41, 132-47.
4. Asgharpour, M. J. (2015). Group decision making and game theory with the attitude of operations research. Publication of Tehran University. 14th Edition. 64-5. (Persian).
5. Augestad, P., Bergsgard, N. A., & Hansen, A. (2006). The institutionalization of an elite sport organization in Norway: The case of Olympiatoppen. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 293–313.
6. Bylaws of USA Team handball. [Web log comment]. Retrieved 2009, Dec. 15, from www.usateamhandball.org/
7. Chen, M. F., & Tzeng, Gh. (2004). Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 1473-90.
8. Dabbaghi, A., & Malek, A. M. (2010). Proposing a procedure to evaluate and rank corporate vision statements using a mixed methodology. Industrial Management, 4, 57-74. (Persian).
9. David, F. R. (2009). Strategic management. (A. Parsayan, & M. Aarabi, Trans). Tehran: Cultural Research Publications. 13th Edition.542. (Persian).
10. Deng, J. L. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems and Control Letters, 1, 288–94.
11. Gholamian, M. R., & Dolatkhah, S. (2014). Strategy development for customer satisfaction of airline flights based on grey systems (case study: Iranian Airline Industries). Industerial Engeneering & Management, 30, 63-79. (Persian).
12. Goudarzi, M., Nasirzadeh, M., Farahani, A., & Vatan doust, M. (2013). The design and codification of development strategy of sport for all in Kerman Province. Journal of Sport Management, 2(5), 149-72. (Persian).
13. Harrison, J. S., Caron, H., & John, S. T. (2001). Foundations in strategic management. Chicinnati, Chio: South-Western. 6th Edition. 234.
14. Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy: Text and cases. Prentice Hall: Hemel Hempstead. First Edition. 112.
15. Leyva, J & Fernandez, E. (2005). A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III Methodology. From www.sciencedirect.com.
16. Li, Q. X., & Liu, S. F. (2008). The foundation of the grey matrix and the grey input–output analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 32, 267–91.
17. Liu, S., Lin, Y. (2006). Grey information: theory and practical applications. Springer-Verlag London Limited. First Edition. 217.
18. Malek, A. M., & Dabbaghi, A. (2011). Proposing a procedure to evaluate and rank corporate vision statements using a mixed methodology. Journal of Industrial Management, 2(4), 57-74. (Persian)
19. Masoumi, H., Ghrayaq, H., & Kia Kojoor, D. (2015). Identify and prioritize the barriers of strategic management in the Ministry of Youth and Sports Federations make decisions using entropy-fuzzy. Journal of Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 23, 295-317. (Persian)
20. Mirkazemi, O., Gholizadeh, M. H., & Soheili Pishkenari, S. (2015). Ranking fitness clubs of Rasht in terms of safety employing MCDM. Sport Management and Development, 4 (2), 35-48. (Persian)
21. Mohammadi, A., Mohammadi, K., & Jahanbani, M. (2012). Improvement of efficiency measurement in DEA model by applying GRA technique. Management Researches, 17, 135-52. (Persian)
22. Nazari, V., Razavi, M. H., & Hoseini, E. (2015). The design and codification of the strategic plan beach volleyball in IRAN. Sport Management Studies, 27, 63-86. (Persian)
23. Rahmanseresht, H. (2005). Management approaches. Published by Technology and art. Tehran. First Edition, 27. (Persian)
24. Rasekh, N., Sajjadi, N., Hamidi, M., & Khabiri, M. (2015). The design of a strategic plan for Iran female championships. Journal of Sport Management, 3(7), 309-34. (Persian)
25. Rashid Lamir, A., Dehghan Ghahfarrokhi, A., & Rashid Lamir, A. (2014). The development of the strategic plan of sport and youth organization of Khorasan Razavi in sport and physical education section. Journal of Sport Management, 4(5), 179-98. (Persian)
26. Salimi, M., Soltan Hosseini, M., & Naderian Jahromi, M. (2015). The evaluation of Iran’s sport marketing development obstacles. Sport Management Studies, 29, 13-36. (Persian)
27. Taghavi Fard, M., & Malek, A. (2011). The using of method of decision-gray to rank key performance indicators and increase the effectiveness of strategic plans. Industrial Management Studies, 22, 135-65. (Persian)
28. Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and Applications. By Chapman and Hall/CRC. First Edition. 55-7.
29. Vancil, R. F., Lorange, P. (2007). Strategic planning systems. Cambridge Blackwell. 3th Edition. 327.
30. Wang, W; Zhi, L. (2007). Contractors selection based on the Grey Decision Model. Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Electronic science journal, 43(3), 5501-4
31. Wang, Q; Wu, Q. (2005). Application of Grey numerical model to groundwater resource evaluation, Environmental Geology, 47: 991–9.
32. Zhang, J. J., Wu, D. S., Olson, D. L. (2005). The method of grey related analysis to multiple attribute decision making problems with interval numbers. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 42 (9-10), 991-8.
)